scholarly journals Overall Survival Analyses following Adjuvant Chemotherapy or Nonadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage IB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zegui Tu ◽  
Tian Tian ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Caili Li
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Lemeshow Test ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Background. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) can improve prognosis for stages II-IIIA patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its implication in stage I patients is still an intractable puzzle. This study aims to seek ACT candidates for stage IB NSCLC and establish a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of specific patient for clinician’s decision. Method. We performed a retrospective study on 16,765 patients (ACT group: n = 2,187; non-ACT group: n = 14,578) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival was assessed in two groups. We performed propensity-score matching for risk adjustment. The risk factors were identified and used to create nomogram. Concordance index (C-index), Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and calibration were applied to evaluate model performance. To further evaluate the influence of tumor size on the selection of potential ACT candidates for patients with stage IB NSCLC, subgroup analyses were executed. Result. Survival analysis for the entire study cohort showed that ACT had better OS than non-ACT (HR = 0.800, CI: (0.751–0.851), P < 0.0001 ). In matched cohort, ACT also presented better OS than non-ACT (HR = 0.775, CI: (0.704–0.853), P < 0.0001 ). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that eight prognostic factors, including gender, age, grade, pathological subtype, tumor size, visceral pleural invasion, surgical procedure, and the number of removed lymph nodes, were significantly correlated with OS. The nomogram was further constructed based on these prognostic factors. The C-index of nomogram was 0.639 (95%CI: 0.632–0.646). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and calibration presented good congruence between the predictions and actual observations. Subgroup analyses of tumor size group showed that ACT shared similar OS to non-ACT in NSCLC patients with tumor size ≤20 mm ( P > 0.05 ). However, for NSCLC patients with 20 mm < size ≤30 mm (HR = 0.845, 95%CI (0.724–0.986), P = 0.032 ) and 30 mm < size ≤40 mm (HR = 0.912, 95%CI (0.833–1.000), P = 0.049 ), ACT associated with better OS. Conclusion. In this study, we found that ACT had better OS than non-ACT in patients with stage IB NSCLC. The nomogram provided an individual prediction of OS for patients after surgical resection. Patients with tumor size >20 mm and ≤40 mm may be potential candidates for ACT.

scholarly journals A Prediction Rule for Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with a Pathological Tumor Size Less Than 30 mm

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang-Yu Zhu ◽  
Ke-xin Fang ◽  
Jian-ying He ◽  
Ri Cui ◽  
Yong-Kui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Training Set ◽  
Nsclc Patients

We sought to develop and validate a clinical nomogram model for predicting overall survival (OS) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resected tumors that were 30 mm or smaller, using clinical data and molecular marker findings. We retrospectively analyzed 786 NSCLC patients with a pathological tumor size less than 30 mm who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2017 at our institution. We identified and integrated significant prognostic factors to build the nomogram model using the training set, which was subjected to the internal data validation. The prognostic performance was calibrated and evaluated by the concordance index (C-index) and risk group stratification. Multivariable analysis identified the pathological tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and Ki-67 expression as independent prognostic factors, which were entered into the nomogram model. The nomogram-predicted probabilities of OS at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years posttreatment represented optimal concordance with the actual observations. Harrell’s C-index of the constructed nomogram with the training set was 0.856 (95% CI: 0.804-0.908), whereas TNM staging was 0.814 (95% CI: 0.742-0.886, P=5.280221e−13). Survival analysis demonstrated that NSCLC subgroups showed significant differences in the training and validation sets (P<0.001). A nomogram model was established for predicting survival in NSCLC patients with a pathological tumor size less than 30 mm, which would be further validated using demographic and clinicopathological data. In the future, this prognostic model may assist clinicians during treatment planning and clinical studies.

scholarly journals Number of metastatic lymph nodes and zones as prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-314
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Maniwa ◽  
Akiisa Ohmura ◽  
Takashi Hiroshima ◽  
Akihiro Ike ◽  
Toru Kimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract OBJECTIVES Characterizing pathological nodes (pNs) by location alone is sometimes inadequate as patients with pN1 or pN2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) show prognostic heterogeneity. We aimed to assess the relationship of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and zones with prognosis in NSCLC patients. METHODS We analysed 1393 patients who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal LN dissection for NSCLC at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between January 2006 and December 2015. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the number of LNs: n1–3, n4–6 and n7–. We investigated the relationship of prognosis with the number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones. RESULTS In the multivariable analyses, the number of metastatic LNs and zones were not independent factors for overall survival or recurrence-free survival in patients with pN1 disease after adjustment for age, sex, tumour histology and tumour diameter. However, n4–6 (ref. n1–3) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 4.148, P &lt; 0.001] in those with pN2 disease. There were no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between pN1 (HR 0.674, P = 0.175) and pN2n1–3 disease (HR 1.056, P = 0.808). Moreover, patients with pN2 disease with a higher number of metastatic zones had a poor prognosis for recurrence-free survival [3 zones (ref. 1): HR 1.774, P = 0.051, and 4 zones (ref. 1): HR 2.173, P &lt; 0.047]. CONCLUSIONS The number of metastatic LNs and metastatic zones were useful prognostic factors in NSCLC patients. The findings could help in establishing a new pN classification.

scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of afatinib for poor performance status patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiao-En Wu ◽  
Ching-Fu Chang ◽  
Chen-Yang Huang ◽  
Cheng-Ta Yang ◽  
Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. Methods The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy. Results Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control. Conclusion Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Resected Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Yu Chen ◽  
Bing-Ru Wu ◽  
Chia-Hung Chen ◽  
Wen-Chien Cheng ◽  
Wei-Chun Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
Pathologic Stage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Eighth Edition ◽  
Resected Stage

The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for lung cancer was introduced in 2017 and included major revisions, especially of stage III. For the subgroup stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection remains controversial due to heterogeneous disease entity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognostic factors of patients with completely resected stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC. We retrospectively evaluated 77 consecutive patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC (AJCC eighth edition) who underwent surgical resection with curative intent in China Medical University Hospital between 2006 and 2014. Survival analysis was conducted, using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed, using log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Of the 77 patients with pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC examined, 35 (45.5%) were diagnosed before surgery and 42 (54.5%) were diagnosed unexpectedly during surgery. The mean age of patients was 59 years, and the mean length of follow-up was 38.1 months. The overall one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 91.9%, 61.3%, and 33.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size <3 cm (hazards ratio (HR): 0.373, p = 0.003) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach (HR: 0.383, p = 0.014) were significant predictors for improved OS. For patients with surgically treated, pathologic stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC, tumor size <3 cm and the VATS approach seemed to be associated with better prognosis.

scholarly journals Determination of prognostic factors of surgically treated pathological Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-504
Author(s):  
Muhammet Sayan
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Background: This study aims to identify the prognostic factors in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer and to investigate whether there was a significant difference in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival among the subgroups belonging to this disease stage. Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2018, a total of 144 patients (125 males, 19 females; median age 60 years; range, 41 to 80 years) who were operated for non-small cell lung cancer in our clinic and whose pathological stage was reported as IIIA were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, histopathological diagnosis, the standardized uptake value of the mass on positron emission tomography-computed tomography, tumor diameter, type of surgery, lymph node metastasis status, visceral pleural invasion, and overall and disease-free survival rates were recorded. Results: The median survival was 39 (range, 27.8 to 46.1) months and the five-year overall survival rate was 28%. The mean tumor diameter was 4.3±2.7 cm. The median disease-free survival was 37 (range, 28.1 to 48.6) months and the five-year disease-free survival rate was 26.9%. In the multivariate analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival in T2N2M0 subgroup were significantly worse than the other subgroups. The other poor prognostic factors of survival were the standardized uptake value of the tumor, pneumonectomy, and histopathological subtypes other than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Parietal pleural invasion was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival rates. Conclusion: Our results showed that there may be significant survival differences between subgroups created by tumor histopathology, lymph node invasion and the type of surgery in a heterogeneous lung cancer stage.

Correlation between outcomes and tumor size in >7 cm T4 non-small cell lung cancer patients: A tumor size-based comparison study

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 784-791
Author(s):  
Volkan Erdoğu ◽  
Necati Çitak ◽  
Celal B Sezen ◽  
Levent Cansever ◽  
Cemal Aker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free

Background We investigated whether all size-based pathological T4N0–N1 non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumors at any size >7 cm had the same outcomes. Methods We reviewed non-small cell lung cancer patients with tumors >7 cm who underwent anatomical lung resection between 2010 and 2016. A total of 251 size-based T4N0–N1 patients were divided into two groups based on tumor size. Group S ( n = 192) included patients with tumors of 7.1–9.9 cm and Group L ( n = 59) as tumor size ≥10 cm. Results The mean tumor size was 8.83 ± 1.7 cm (Group S: 8.06 ± 0.6 cm, Group L: 11.3 ± 1.6 cm). There were 146 patients with pathological N0 and 105 patients with pathological N1 disease. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 64.2 and 51.4 months, respectively. The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 51.2% and 43.5% (five-year OS; pT4N0:52.7%, pT4N1:47.9%, DFS; pT4N0:44.3%, pT4N1: 42.3%). No significant differences were observed between T4N0 and T4N1 patients in terms of five-year OS or DFS ( p = 0.325, p = 0.505 respectively). The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 52% and 44.6% in Group S, and 48.5% and 38.9% in Group L. No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of five-year overall survival or disease-free survival ( p = 0.699, p = 0.608, respectively). Conclusions Above 7 cm, any further increase in tumor size in non-small cell lung cancer patients had no significant effect on survival, confirming it is not necessary to further discriminate among patients with tumors in that size class.

scholarly journals PIOS (Patras Immunotherapy Score) Score Is Associated with Best Overall Response, Progression-Free Survival, and Post-Immunotherapy Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with Anti-Program Cell Death-1 (PD-1) Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1257
Author(s):  
Foteinos-Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos ◽  
Achilleas Nikolakopoulos ◽  
Anastasia Kottorou ◽  
Fotini Kalofonou ◽  
Elias Liolis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Program Cell Death

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) over the last decade. However, there is an unmet need for clinically useful biomarkers in this patient subgroup. The aim of this study was to combine baseline clinical characteristics of aNSCLC patients, in the form of a scoring system, and to investigate its predictive and prognostic value in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. A total of 112 patients with advanced (stages IIIA to IV) NSCLC, treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, were enrolled in this study. Patras Immunotherapy Score (PIOS) was developed based on four of the studied parameters (performance status (PS), body mass index (BMI), age, and lines of treatment (LOT), which were incorporated into our formula (PS × BMI/ LOT × age). PIOS score was strongly associated with best overall responses (BOR), with those patients having benefit/good response (stable disease (SD) or partial (PR) or complete response (CR), achieving a higher score compared to patients who developed progressive disease (PD) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, PIOS score was associated with progression-free survival (PFS), since high-score patients had longer PFS (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.469). Moreover, PIOS was associated with post-immunotherapy overall survival (OS), with high-score patients having improved OS (log-rank p = 0.019). This study suggests that a combination of baseline parameters, which give rise to PIOS score, may predict the best response of NSCLC patients treated with anti-program cell death -1 (PD-1) monotherapy as well as it may have a potent prognostic value for PFS and post immunotherapy OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document