scholarly journals Radiographic Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars and Their Association with Pathological Conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Zahra Haddad ◽  
Mansour Khorasani ◽  
Mahin Bakhshi ◽  
Maryam Tofangchiha ◽  
Zeynab shalli
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Pathological Lesions ◽  
Pathological Conditions ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Objectives. This study aimed to assess the radiographic position of impacted mandibular third molars (IMTMs) and their association with pathological conditions. Materials and Methods. The impaction depth, relationship with ramus, and angulation of 1600 IMTMs and their association with 2nd molar distal caries and root resorption, pathological conditions, and proximity to the mandibular canal were evaluated on panoramic radiographs. The IMTM position was determined based on the depth of impaction according to the Pell and Gregory classification, relationship with ramus according to the Pell and Gregory classification, and angulation according to the Winter’s classification. The classical and Bayesian logistic regressions were applied to analyze the effect of IMTM position on the associated complications using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (credible interval for Bayesian models). Two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. Of 1600 IMTMs evaluated in this study, 195 (12.2%), 252 (15.8%), and 119 (7.4%) had caused second molar distal caries, second molar root resorption, and pathological lesions, respectively, and 872 (54.5%) had contact with the mandibular canal. Impaction angulation was a risk factor for second molar distal caries (maximum OR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.12–8.18). Changed angulation and greater impaction depth were the risk factors for second molar root resorption (minimum OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 0.58–4.02). Decreased distance between the ramus and distal side of the second molar was a risk factor for associated pathological lesions (minimum OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.79–4.25). Mesioangular and horizontal angulations and greater impaction depth were the risk factors for contact with the mandibular canal (maximum OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 2.6–4.57 and minimum OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 094–1.8). Conclusions. The frequency of complications associated with IMTMs was low, but considerable. The occurrence of these conditions might be affected by the impaction position. Thus, regular follow-ups are recommended in order to be able to surgically intervene when the first signs of pathologies arise.

scholarly journals Assessment of Lingual Nerve Paresthesia after Removal of Mandibular Third Molar

2021 ◽  
pp. 253-259
Author(s):  
V. Usha ◽  
G. Rajabackiyam ◽  
K. Prabhu Sankar ◽  
Varun Muthuraman ◽  
Aravind Christo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Resorption ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Lingual Nerve ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
The Common ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars are the most commonly performed minor surgical procedures by maxillofacial surgeon. If not treated can lead to few complications like pericoronitis, root resorption of second molar, caries of second molar, cyst and tumours can arise from them. The common complications include swelling, hematoma, trismus and lingual nerve injuries. In this article 1000 cases of various types impactions were surgically operated and assessment of lingual nerve injury was done.

scholarly journals Flap vs flapless technique for impacted third molar removal: A split mouth prospective randomized control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-171
Author(s):  
Neeraj ◽  
Banshilal Beniwal ◽  
Padmanidhi Agarwal ◽  
Vikas Berwal ◽  
Richa Malik
Keyword(s):  
Healing Process ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Pocket Depth ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Group I ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative sequelae of removal of impacted third molars in participants treated with conventional flap elevation technique or with a minimally invasive flapless technique. Participants with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included. They were divided into two sites constituting 2 groups. One group was operated by using conventional flap design and elevation and other with flapless technique. Objective clinical parameters were recorded and compared in the post-operative period like mouth opening, swelling, surgical time, and pocket depth. Subjective parameters including pain were also assessed and statistically analyzed. The sites operated in Group II (Flapless technique) had better results (p≤0.05) in terms of pain, swelling, trismus, and pocket depth distal to second molar when compared to Group I (Flap). The flapless technique gives better surgical results and improved healing process after third molar removal and so should be recommended in routine clinical practice.

scholarly journals Radiographic assessment of impacted mandibular third molars

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
Pankaj Kukreja ◽  
Fahd Nasser Al Qahtani ◽  
Ahad Fahd Al Qahtani ◽  
Modi Fahd Al Qahtani ◽  
Majedah Fahd Al Qahtani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Lingual Nerve ◽  
Structural Systems ◽  
Imaging Method ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Radiographic Assessment ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Crown Roots

The surgical remedy of problems related to lower jaw 3 molars is related to common surgical risks like contamination, haemorrhage, pain and swelling. Certain unique risks are related with such surgery, specifically inferior alveolar and lingual nerve harm as these are adjacent vital structures. Risk assessment calls for an entire understanding of dental factors that can impact the care of these characteristic structures. Preoperative radiographic assessment warrants to provide data about the tooth itself, its encompassing bone, the neighbouring dentition, and related anatomical structural systems. Parameters that ought to be assessed are level of impaction, root formulations, angulation of the enamel, number of roots, root morphology, related pathology and, most importantly, the relation some of the crown/roots and the mandibular canal. An appropriate imaging method for 3 molars ought to display the complete 3rd molar and the mandibular canal below it. In this mini review, we elaborate on the generally used radiographic assessment methods of mandibular 3rd molars.

scholarly journals Factors associated with spontaneous mesialization of impacted mandibular third molars after second molar protraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186
Author(s):  
Un-Bong Baik ◽  
Jin Hye Kang ◽  
Ui-Lyong Lee ◽  
Nikhilesh R Vaid ◽  
Yoon-Ji Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
The Third ◽  
Mandibular Second Molar ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular First Molar

ABSTRACT Objectives: To investigate factors associated with spontaneous mesialization of impacted third molars after second molar protraction to close the space caused by a missing mandibular first molar (L-6) or retained deciduous mandibular second molars with a missing succedaneous premolar (L-E). Materials and Methods: Panoramic radiographs of patients treated with mandibular second molar protraction to close the space due to missing L-6 or L-E (14 males, 36 females, mean age = 18.6 ± 4.4 years) were analyzed before treatment (T1) and after second molar protraction (T2). Factors associated with the amount of third molar mesialization were investigated using regression analyses. Results: Mandibular second molars were protracted by 5.1 ± 2.1 mm and 5.8 ± 2.7 mm, measured at the crown and root furcation, respectively. After second molar protraction, third molars showed spontaneous mesialization by 4.3 ± 1.6 mm and 3.8 ± 2.6 mm, measured at the crown and root furcation, respectively. Nolla's stage of the third molar at T1 (B = 0.20, P = .026) and second molar protraction time (B = 0.04, P = .042) were significantly associated with the amount of third molar mesialization. Conclusions: Greater third molar mesialization was observed when Nolla's stage of the third molar was higher before treatment and when the second molar protraction time was longer.

scholarly journals Vertical eruption patterns of impacted mandibular third molars after the mesialization of second molars using miniscrews

2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Un-Bong Baik ◽  
Yoon-Ah Kook ◽  
Mohamed Bayome ◽  
Je-Uk Park ◽  
Jae Hyun Park
Keyword(s):  
Third Molar ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Space Closure ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Objective:  To investigate (1) whether vertical eruption of impacted third molars improves after mesialization of second molars and (2) what factors affect the vertical eruption of impacted third molars when space caused by missing molars is successfully closed by mesialization of the second molar using miniscrews. Materials and Methods:  The treatment group (Group 1) included 52 patients who had (1) missing mandibular first molars (ML-6) or missing deciduous mandibular second molars (ML-E), (2) initially impacted mandibular third molars, and (3) successful space closure of the edentulous area with orthodontics. Panoramic radiographs at start of treatment (T1) and at time of space closure (T2) were collected. The control group (Group 2) included 46 nonedentulous patients with impacted mandibular third molars without molar protraction treatment. Panoramic radiographs with similar T1/T2 treatment times were selected. Nine measurements were obtained regarding horizontal available space, vertical eruption, and third molar angulation. Results:  Third molars erupted vertically an average of 2.54 mm in Group 1 compared with 0.41 mm in Group 2. Age, gender, Nolla stage, and angle of the third molars did not show significant correlations with the vertical change of the impacted third molars, whereas the depth of third molar impaction and available space showed significant correlations. Conclusions:  Impacted mandibular third molars vertically erupt as a result of uprighting with mesialization of the second molar, and vertical eruption is affected by the initial vertical location of impacted third molars and available space.

scholarly journals Autotransplantation of Two Immature Third Molars with the Use of L-PRF

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Manon Rey Lescure ◽  
Nicola Alberto Valente ◽  
Sibylle Chatelain ◽  
Chiara Cinquini ◽  
Antonio Barone
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Impacted Tooth ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Successful Case ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Good Treatment Option ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Root Apices

Tooth autotransplantation is a procedure which provides the extraction of an erupted or impacted tooth and its repositioning to another site in the oral cavity. This Case Report describes a successful case of two autotransplantations of open-apex mandibular third molars in place of the hopeless first mandibular molars with the use of L-PRF in a growing patient. A 15-year-old male patient was referred to the Dental Clinic for the extractions of the two hopeless mandibular first molars. Autotransplantation was considered the best treatment option for both sites 36 and 46, because the presence of two impacted mandibular third molars (38 and 48) with an incomplete root formation. Teeth 36 and 46 were extracted and replaced with teeth 38 and 48. The patient had an uneventful healing. At follow-up visits, the two autotransplanted teeth showed physiologic mobility, absence of inflammation and discomfort, and absence of infection; probing depth values were within normal range, and the vitality tests were positive. After 2 years, the teeth in position 36 and 46 showed absence of infection and mobility, and positive pulp vitality tests and the radiographic examinations exhibited closure of the root apices as well as absence of any periapical radiolucency or root resorption. Tooth autotransplantation is a good treatment option in case of tooth loss offering an alternative to traditional or implant-supported prosthesis especially for growing patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document