scholarly journals Imaging Review of Subscapularis Tendon and Rotator Interval Pathology

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zohaib Y. Ahmad ◽  
Luis E. Diaz ◽  
Frank W. Roemer ◽  
Ajay Goud ◽  
Ali Guermazi

As the largest rotator cuff muscle, the subscapularis plays a major role in stabilizing the glenohumeral joint, in conjunction with surrounding rotator cuff structures. Injury to the subscapularis tendon can be isolated, but more commonly is seen in conjunction with supraspinatus tendon pathology. Injury can be associated with biceps pulley instability, superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears, humeral head subluxation, and anterosuperior and coracoid impingements. The involvement of the rotator interval can lead to what is called “the hidden lesion,” due to its difficulty to diagnose during arthroscopy. Understanding the anatomical relations of the subscapularis tendon with the rest of the rotator cuff and rotator interval, as well as common patterns of injury that involve the subscapularis tendon, can aid in proper diagnosis of these injuries leading to prompt surgical repair. This review describes the anatomy of the subscapularis muscle and tendon, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of subscapularis tendon injury.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Muto ◽  
Hiroki Ninomiya ◽  
Hiroaki Inui ◽  
Masahiko Komai ◽  
Katsuya Nobuhara

In 2013, a 16-year-old baseball pitcher visited Nobuhara Hospital complaining of shoulder pain and limited range of motion in his throwing shoulder. High signal intensity in the rotator interval (RI) area (ball sign), injured subscapularis tendon, and damage to both the superior and middle glenohumeral ligaments were identified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Repair of the RI lesion and partially damaged subscapularis tendon was performed in this pitcher. During surgery, an opened RI and dropping of the subscapularis tendon were observed. The RI was closed in a 90° externally rotated and abducted position. To reconfirm the exact repaired state of the patient, arthroscopic examination was performed from behind. However, suture points were not visible in the >30° externally rotated position, which indicates that the RI could not be correctly repaired with the arthroscopic procedure. One year after surgery, the patient obtained full function of the shoulder and returned to play at a national convention. Surgical repair of the RI lesion should be performed in exactly the correct position of the upper extremity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0046
Author(s):  
Troydimas Panjaitan

The shoulder is one of the most complex joints of the human body. Consequently, they are susceptible to injury and degeneration. Mechanical shoulder pathology typically results when overuse, extremes of motion, or excessive forces overwhelm intrinsic material properties of the shoulder complex resulting in tears of the rotator cuff, capsule, and labrum. The fundamental central component of the shoulder complex is the glenohumeral joint. It has a ball-and-socket configuration with a surface area ratio of the humeral head to glenoid fossa of about 3:1 with an appearance similar to a golf ball on a tee. Overall, there is minimal bony covering and limited contact areas that allow extensive translational and rotational ability in all three planes. The glenohumeral joint has 2 groups of stabilizers, which are static (passive) and dynamic (active) restrains. Static stabilizers include the concavity of the glenoid fossa, glenoid fossa retroversion and superior angulation, glenoid labrum, the joint capsule, and glenohumeral ligaments, and a vacuum effect from negative intra-articular pressure. Dynamic stabilization is merely the coordinated contraction of the rotator cuff muscles that create forces that compress the articular surfaces of the humeral head into the concave surface of the glenoid fossa. During upper extremity movement, the effects of static stabilizers are minimized and dynamic or active stabilizers become the dominant forces responsible for glenohumeral stability The simple act of arm elevation is a complex task that occurs via the combination of glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion, together known as scapulohumeral rhythm. In the first 1200, glenohumeral arm abduction, the supraspinatus and deltoid work together and create a force couple that promotes stability, while raising the arm (deltoid contraction). In addition, the humerus must undergo 450 external rotation to not only clear the greater tuberosity posteriorly but also loosen the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) to allow maximum elevation. There are several anatomical updates regarding the rotator cuff and capsular footprint. The footprint of the supraspinatus on the greater tuberosity is much smaller than previously believed, and this area of the greater tuberosity is actually occupied by a substantial amount of the infraspinatus. The superior-most insertion of the subscapularis tendon extends a thin tendinous slip, which attaches to the fovea capitis of the humerus. The teres minor muscle inserts to the lowest impression of the greater tuberosity of the humerus and additionally inserts to the posterior side of the surgical neck of the humerus.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596711986459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Leschinger ◽  
Katharina Besch ◽  
Cansu Aydin ◽  
Manfred Staat ◽  
Martin Scaal ◽  
...  

Background: Irreparable rotator cuff tears lead to superior translation of the humeral head. Numerous surgical management options are available to treat the condition. Purpose: To compare superior capsule stability among different types of patch grafting in irreparable rotator cuff tears. Methods: Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom-designed shoulder testing system. Superior translation of the humerus and subacromial contact pressure were quantified in an intact condition (condition 1), after cutting the supraspinatus tendon (condition 2), and after additionally cutting the superior capsuloligamentous complex (condition 3). The results were compared among 3 types of patch grafting, in which capsule reconstruction was achieved by glenoidal 3-point (condition 4) or 2-point (condition 5) fixation or by affixing a graft below the acromion (condition 6). Results: No significant difference in subacromial pressure was measured by reconstruction with 2 or 3 anchors compared with conditions 1 and 2 ( P > .05). However, with 3-point fixation, lower levels of pressure were measured than with 2-point fixation. Moreover, superior translation values were lower with 3-point fixation; the same applied for values of the preserved capsule as compared with the torn capsule. In condition 6, a significant increase in pressure in the neutral position was documented ( P < .05). Conclusion: The superior capsuloligamentous complex plays an important role in stabilizing the glenohumeral joint. The results suggest that with additional medial anchoring at the coracoid base, the depressing and centering effect of the superior complex can probably be regained in a more physiological way compared with a reconstructed capsule with 2 glenoid attachments or with an interpositional graft below the acromion.


Author(s):  
Ashok Srikar Chowdhary ◽  
Naresh Babu Lakshmipathi Nikhil ◽  
Nidhi Hemendra Chandrakar ◽  
Nidhi Raj Buddaraju

Introduction: Shoulder joint is a highly mobile joint but is prone for rotator cuff injuries and dislocations. It is necessary to accurately diagnose rotator cuff and labral injuries so that appropriate plan of action for treatment can be taken. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can be used to diagnose and describe the extent of rotator cuff tendon and labral injuries and any secondary rotator cuff muscle abnormalities. Aim: To study the demographic profile of patients presenting with shoulder pain and instability, identify the various rotator cuff injuries causing shoulder pain, identify the rotator cuff interval lesions causing microinstability, identify the various labral and bony pathologies in instability, describe the MRI features of the rotator cuff, rotator cuff interval, labral and bony injuries. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of patients with symptoms of either shoulder pain or instability who underwent MRI evaluation of the shoulder in the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, from July 2018 to December 2020. The study population consisted of 54 patients with either shoulder pain or instability who underwent MRI of shoulder. All the MRI scans of the shoulder in this study were performed using 1.5 Tesla Siemens Magnetom Avanto (Tim 76x18) MR machine using a flex coil. Results: The study population consisted of 54 patients comprising of 38 males and 16 females. The age of the patients ranged from 20-77 years. Majority of the patients were older than 50 years constituting about 33.33% of the total study population. Rotator cuff injury was the commonest cause of pain. Tendinosis was the commonest type of rotator cuff injury followed by partial-thickness and full-thickness tendon tears. The commonest grade of tendinosis was mild or grade 1. Supraspinatus tendon was the most commonly affected tendon followed by subscapularis and infraspinatus tendons. Teres minor tendon was normal in all the cases. Anterior instability was the commonest type of instability with equal prevalence of soft tissue Bankart, bony Bankart and Perthes lesions. Biceps pulley lesions resulted in long head of biceps tendon instability, microinstability and internal impingement. Conclusion: Rotator cuff injuries are the commonest cause of shoulder pain and are seen more frequently after the fifth decade. Shoulder instability is most commonly seen in young male adults. Tendinosis is the commonest type of rotator cuff injury. Supraspinatus tendon is the most commonly injured tendon. Anterior instability is the commonest type of shoulder instability. Biceps pulley lesions result in long head of biceps tendon instability, microinstability and internal impingement. MRI can diagnose interstitial or intrasubstance tendon tears which are not visualised on arthroscopy. MRI description of tendon and labral tears, tendon retraction and muscle atrophy can guide the orthopaedician during arthroscopy and in treatmentplanning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1661-1667
Author(s):  
Hyoung Seop Kim ◽  
Seung Ho Joo ◽  
Hyun Sun Lim ◽  
Hye Won Kim

Background The acromion index (AI) is the acromial lateral extension above the head of the humerus. Some researchers have advocated that the AI indicates the severity of the tear size of the full-thickness supraspinatus tendon. Purpose To validate the reproducibility of the AI between shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and standard X-ray and to verify whether the AI is a useful index for stratifying the severity of supraspinatus tendon injuries, as well as full-thickness tears. Material and Methods We enrolled 200 patients with impingement syndrome who were subsequently evaluated with standard X-ray of the shoulder in the anteroposterior view, as well as an MRI. We performed a pilot study to validate the reproducibility of the AI using standard X-ray and MRI, and to compare the AI between these imaging modalities. The severity of supraspinatus tendon injury was classified into four groups (0 = no evidence of injury, 1 = partial tear, 2 = full-thickness tear, and 3 = complete rupture) based on an official reading of the shoulder MRI. We compared the AIs of both modalities between the groups. Results Intraclass correlation coefficients of the AIs between the two examiners were 0.819 for MRI and 0.808 for plain X-ray. The mean AI from standard X-ray was greater than that from MRI ( P<0.0001). There was no statistical correlation between the AI and the severity of supraspinatus tendon injury. Conclusion Our findings indicate that the AI cannot be generally used as a predictive reference for the stratified severities of supraspinatus tendon injury.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1102-1109
Author(s):  
Seonji Jeong ◽  
Ja-Young Choi ◽  
Yu Suhn Kang ◽  
Hye Jin Yoo ◽  
Sae Hoon Kim ◽  
...  

Background Deep, high-grade bursal-sided supraspinatus tendon tears are sometimes preoperatively misinterpreted as full-thickness tears on shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Purpose To determine the usefulness of disproportionate fluid sign for differentiating high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears from full-thickness tears on conventional MRI. Material and Methods Preoperative MRIs of 198 patients with arthroscopically confirmed high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears and full-thickness tears were independently reviewed by two readers on two occasions. The presence of high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tears with a confidence level using a five-point grading scale was assessed based on tear depth alone and also in combination with disproportionate fluid sign, defined as a prominent subdeltoid or subacromial-subdeltoid bursal fluid distension with a relative paucity of effusion in the glenohumeral joint. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated, as well as inter-observer reliability. Results The disproportionate fluid sign was identified in 60/74 (81.2%) bursal-sided partial-thickness tears and 9/124 (7.5%) full-thickness tears. The sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnosis of bursal-sided tear were higher when disproportionate fluid sign was used in conjunction with the tear depth, compared with tear depth alone ( P < 0.001). There was excellent inter-observer agreement for disproportionate fluid sign and deep bursal-sided tear. The AUCs were significantly higher in combination with disproportionate fluid sign. Conclusion The disproportionate fluid sign indicates the presence of a deep, high-grade bursal-sided partial-thickness tear, which can be misinterpreted as a full-thickness tear. Thus, it can provide greater diagnostic assistance to less-experienced radiologists and clinicians.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712110098
Author(s):  
Matthew Y. Siow ◽  
Brendon C. Mitchell ◽  
Michael Hachadorian ◽  
Wilbur Wang ◽  
Tracey Bastrom ◽  
...  

Background: Superior humeral migration has been established as a component of rotator cuff disease, as it disrupts normal glenohumeral kinematics. Decreased acromiohumeral interval (AHI) as measured on radiographs has been used to indicate rotator cuff tendinopathy. Currently, the data are mixed regarding the specific rotator cuff pathology that contributes the most to humeral head migration. Purpose: To determine the relationship between severity of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and AHI via a large sample of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shoulder examinations. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A search was performed for 3-T shoulder MRI performed in adults for any indication between January 2010 and June 2019 at a single institution. Three orthopaedic surgeons and 1 musculoskeletal radiologist measured AHI on 2 separate occasions for patients who met the inclusion criteria. Rotator cuff pathologies were recorded from imaging reports made by fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Results: A total of 257 patients (mean age, 52 years) met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 199 (77%) had at least 1 RCT, involving the supraspinatus in 174 (67.7%), infraspinatus in 119 (46.3%), subscapularis in 80 (31.1%), and teres minor in 3 (0.1%). Full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, or subscapularis tendon were associated with significantly decreased AHI (7.1, 5.3, and 6.8 mm, respectively) compared with other tear severities ( P < .001). Having a larger number of RCTs was also associated with decreased AHI (ρ = –0.157; P = .012). Isolated infraspinatus tears had the lowest AHI (7.7 mm), which was significantly lower than isolated supraspinatus tears (8.9 mm; P = .047). Conclusion: Although various types of RCTs have been associated with superior humeral head migration, this study demonstrated a significant correlation between a complete RCT and superior humeral migration. Tears of the infraspinatus tendon seemed to have the greatest effect on maintaining the native position of the humeral head. Further studies are needed to determine whether early repair of these tears can slow the progression of rotator cuff disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryu Yoshida ◽  
Farhang Alaee ◽  
Felix Dyrna ◽  
Mark S. Kronenberg ◽  
Peter Maye ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel J. Wheeler ◽  
Tigran Garabekyan ◽  
Roberto Lugo ◽  
Jenni M. Buckley ◽  
Marielena Lotz ◽  
...  

There has been interest in improving arthroscopic subscapularis repairs due to their popularity and efficacy when compared to open subscapularis repairs. However, previous biomechanical analyses of rotator cuff repairs have typically focused on the supraspinatus tendon [1–5]. Testing repair techniques in the subscapularis tendon requires the modification of previously established biomechanical testing methods. Most rotator cuff tendon tests have utilized axial loading on supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons [1–4]. Most subscapularis tendons are torn with forced external rotation of the shoulder. Axial loading of the subscapularis tendon would not be representative of the injury mechanism. Additionally, past rotator cuff studies have employed a variety of techniques for clamping tendons, including freezing clamps and soft tissue grips. Such methods offer insufficient fixation for tendons that have high muscle content, such as the subscapularis. Several studies have focused on the repair’s ability to restore the appropriate healing environment at insertion footprint. These investigations have used either digitizers or pressure-sensitive film to measure contact area [5–7]. However, there are questions concerning the repeatability and accuracy of the results provided by these techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of open, transosseous fixation with that of the arthroscopic, suture anchor technique for subscapularis repair, while making three specific improvements to current testing methods. It sought to: 1) apply physiologically accurate loads to the subscapularis using cyclic, external rotation, 2) identify an effective method of clamping tendons with high muscle content, such as the subscapularis, and 3) introduce a novel, tactile pressure measurement system that measures contact pressure and area in real-time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097535
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Veenstra ◽  
Andrew G. Geeslin ◽  
Christopher W. Uggen

Background: Biceps tendon pathology is commonly associated with rotator cuff tears. A multitude of different biceps tenodesis techniques have been studied, with limited clinical data on arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques incorporated into rotator cuff repairs. Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into a supraspinatus tendon repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears with concomitant biceps tendon pathology were prospectively enrolled from 2014 to 2015. A total of 32 patients underwent combined biceps tenodesis and rotator cuff repair; of these, 19 patients were evaluated for a mean of 2.0 years. The primary outcome measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES; patient self-report and physician assessment sections), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, responses to specific biceps-related assessments, and biceps specific physical exam findings. Results: Patient-reported ASES scores improved from 45.9 preoperatively to 91.6 at the 2-year follow-up ( P < .001). Pain VAS scores improved from 5.2 preoperatively to 0.7 at the 2-year follow-up ( P < .001). Preoperatively, 18 patients had a positive Speed test; all were negative at 5 months postoperatively, and 21 patients had bicipital groove tenderness preoperatively, which resolved in all 21 patients at 5 months postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, 2 patients had cramping arm pain and 4 patients noticed a change in arm contour. There were no reoperations. No complications occurred in the study group. Conclusion: Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into a supraspinatus tendon repair was a safe and reliable option for biceps pathology with a concomitant rotator cuff tear.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document