Abstract 4931: Not all tumors are created equal: Evaluating the impact of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) on clinical outcomes in esophageal/gastroesophageal cancer (GEJ CA)

Author(s):  
Vidya Kollu ◽  
Arun Singhavi ◽  
Paul S. Ritch ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18038-e18038
Author(s):  
Pablo M. Barrios ◽  
Marcio Debiasi ◽  
Carolina Cauduro ◽  
Fábio Herrmann ◽  
Gabriela Marchese ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Tomlins ◽  
Daniel H. Hovelson ◽  
Jennifer M. Suga ◽  
Daniel M. Anderson ◽  
Han A. Koh ◽  
...  

AbstractPurposeTissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly utilized for treatment selection in patients with advanced solid tumors, however real-world tissue availability may limit widespread implementation. Here we established real-world CGP tissue availability and assessed CGP performance on consecutively received samples.Patients and MethodPost-hoc, non-prespecified analysis of 32,048 consecutive tumor tissue samples received for StrataNGS, a multiplex PCR based-CGP (PCR-CGP) test, as part of an ongoing observational trial (NCT03061305). Tumor tissue sample characteristics and PCR-CGP performance were assessed across all tested tumor samples, including exception samples not meeting minimum input requirements (<20% tumor content [TC], <2mm2 tumor surface area [TSA], DNA or RNA yield <1ng/ul, or specimen age >5yrs). Tests reporting at least one prioritized alteration or meeting all sequencing QC metrics (and ≥20% TC) were considered successful. For prostate carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, tests reporting at least one actionable/informative alteration or those meeting all sequencing QC metrics (and ≥20% TC) were considered actionable.ResultsPCR-CGP was attempted in 31,165 of 32,048 (97.2%) consecutively received solid tumor tissue samples. Among the 31,165 tested samples, 10.7% had low (<20%) tumor content (TC) and 58.4% were small (<25mm2 TSA), highlighting the challenging nature of samples received for CGP. Of the 31,101 samples evaluable for input requirements, 8,079 (26.0%) were exceptions not meeting requirements. However, 94.2% of the 31,101 tested samples were successfully reported, including 80.6% of exception samples. Importantly, 80.6% of 1,344 tested prostate carcinomas and 87.8% of 1,144 tested lung adenocarcinomas yielded results informing treatment selection.ConclusionMost real-world tumor tissue samples from patients with advanced cancer desiring CGP are limited, requiring optimized CGP approaches to produce meaningful results. An optimized PCR-CGP test, coupled with an inclusive exception testing policy, delivered reportable results for >94% of samples, potentially expanding the proportion of CGP-testable patients, and thus the impact of biomarker-guided targeted and immunotherapies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9027-9027
Author(s):  
Ray D. Page ◽  
Leylah Drusbosky ◽  
Hiba I. Dada ◽  
Victoria M. Raymond ◽  
Davey B. Daniel ◽  
...  

9027 Background: Somatic genomic testing is recommended by numerous expert guidelines to inform targeted therapy treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (aLUAD). The NILE study was a prospective observational study that demonstrated non-inferiority of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA)-based tumor genotyping compared to tissue-based genotyping to find targetable genomic alterations in patients with newly diagnosed aLUAD. As the cohort has matured, clinical outcomes data can now be reported. Methods: This prospective, multicenter North American study (NCT03615443) enrolled patients with previously untreated aLUAD who had standard of care (SOC) tissue genotyping performed and concurrent comprehensive cfDNA analysis using the commercially available Guardant360 assay (Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA). After 12 months of study enrollment, objective response rates, disease control rate, and time to treatment data were collected for patients with targetable genomic alterations, as defined by NCCN guidelines, who were treated with physician’s choice of therapy. Results: Among 282 patients on the study, 89 (31.6%) had an actionable biomarker detected by tissue (21.3%) and/or cfDNA (27.3%) analysis. Sixty-one (68.5%) of these patients were treated with an FDA-approved targeted therapy guided by somatic genotyping results ( EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Thirty-three patients were eligible for clinical response evaluation and demonstrated an objective response rate of 58% and disease control rate of 94%. Twenty-five (76%) achieved a durable response > 6 months; 17 (52%) achieved a durable response > 12 months. Patients responded to targeted therapy regardless of the variant allele frequency of the target alteration. The time to treatment (TtT) was significantly faster for cfDNA-informed biomarker detection as compared to tissue genotyping (median 18 vs 31 days, respectively; p = 0.0008). Conclusions: This is the first prospective community-based study to find that cfDNA detects guideline-recommended biomarkers at a rate similar to tissue genotyping, and therapeutic outcomes based on plasma-based comprehensive genomic profiling are comparable to published tissue-based targeted therapy clinical outcomes. The NILE study complements and confirms findings in the prospective FLAURA and SLLIP studies, which exclusively enrolled at academic sites. Clinical trial information: NCT03615443.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13646-e13646
Author(s):  
Umut Disel ◽  
Fatih Kose ◽  
Ahmet Bilici ◽  
Mustafa Özgüroğlu ◽  
Sezer Saglam ◽  
...  

e13646 Background: Most of the frequent cancers present a large number of very rare targetable genomic alterations. Moreover, some oncogenic drivers are shared across several diseases, and their targeting could improve outcome. We think that testing a large number of genes across all tumor types could improve outcomes in patients with “hard-to-treat” advanced cancers. The most important factor for the cancer patient to benefit from precision medicine therapy is the detection of the targeted driver mutations. The objective of this study is to determine clinical advantages of hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling over classical diagnostic methods in the treatment strategies of patients with advanced stage diverse solid tumors in Turkey. Methods: This study was designed as a national, multicenter, descriptive, non-drug, retrospective cohort study. Study data were collected from medical files of patients. Besides, a survey was conducted to investigate the impact of CGP results on the treatment decisions of the clinicians. Results: The study included the data of 118 patients (55; %46.6 female, 63; %53.4 male). The mean period between the diagnosis and CGP analysis was 748 days. For either due to progression (97; 75.2%) or intolerance to therapy (12; 9.3%), the treatment of some cases was discontinued after CGP analysis. The results of the electronic survey for the clinicians indicated that the 57;48.3% of the clinicians change their treatment approach based on the results of the CGP analysis, of these 24; 42.1% preferred on-label treatments,3; 5.3% clinical trials and the 30; 52.6% preferred off-label treatments. 59;69.8% of the clinicians declared that their patients can reach to the revised treatment. 48;42.1% of the clinicians expressed that CGP support was very important in the last treatment decision. This is the interim descriptive statistics of the study. Conclusions: This is the preliminary results of the study. Conclusions will be done after the final analysis of the study


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Manning-Geist ◽  
S Gordhandas ◽  
A Da Cruz Paula ◽  
B Weigelt ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document