scholarly journals Does It Matter Who Provides Psychological Interventions for Medically Unexplained Symptoms? A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Gerger ◽  
Michaela Hlavica ◽  
Jens Gaab ◽  
Thomas Munder ◽  
Jürgen Barth
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (681) ◽  
pp. e262-e269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittni Jones ◽  
Amanda C de C Williams

BackgroundStudies have reported that medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) tend to be associated with increased healthcare use, which is demanding of resources and potentially harmful to patients. This association is often used to justify the funding and study of psychological interventions for MUS, yet no systematic review has specifically examined the efficacy of psychological interventions in reducing healthcare use.AimTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapies (CBT) for MUS in reducing healthcare use.Design and settingSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodThe search from a previous systematic review was updated and expanded. Twenty-two randomised controlled trials reported healthcare use, of which 18 provided data for meta-analysis. Outcomes were healthcare contacts, healthcare costs, medication, and medical investigations.ResultsSmall reductions in healthcare contacts and medication use were found for CBT compared with active controls, treatment as usual, and waiting list controls, but not for medical investigations or healthcare costs.ConclusionCognitive behavioural interventions show weak benefits in reducing healthcare use in people with MUS. The imprecise use of MUS as a diagnostic label may impact on the effectiveness of interventions, and it is likely that the diversity and complexity of these difficulties may necessitate a more targeted approach.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. A32.1-A32
Author(s):  
Anne van Gils ◽  
Robert A Schoevers ◽  
Irma J Bonvanie ◽  
Jeannette M Gelauff ◽  
Annelieke M Roest ◽  
...  

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S4-S4
Author(s):  
Zaineb S Y Al-Dahash ◽  
William Loveday ◽  
Naomi Law ◽  
Mutahira Qureshi ◽  
Paul Gallagher ◽  
...  

AimsDescription of a model to improve care for patients with Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS) by small targeted investment and maximisation of existing resources.BackgroundTreatment of MUS presents several challenges including a lack of clarity on the best models of care and limited service provision. Patients typically present with a physical complaint to physical health outlets: here limited confidence in professionals around how to address these often leads to poor patient/doctor experience, inappropriate use of resources and repeated attendance. Evidence shows that integration of care, psychological interventions and upskilling physicians in interventions such as positive communication, can significantly improve outcomes. Psychiatric Liaison Teams (PLT) are positioned at the interface of mental and physical health services and can play a crucial role for these patients, when provided with the right skill-mix.Method1FTE Clinical Psychologist specialising in MUS was integrated into the PLT. Pathways to triage between primary, secondary psychology and the new service were agreed, alongside channels of communication and supervision. The job plan included integrated sessions in Gastroenterology, Rheumatology and PLT. The activities included: assessments, formulations and discharges; brief psychological interventions; group sessions for patients; one-day long courses to GP trainees and physicians, and input in specialities MDTs. Clinical outcomes, numbers of patients seen and signposted, teaching sessions and simulation training delivered were collected.ResultOver 20 months the service was able to process 237 referrals, 35 were managed over the phone. Referral sources: Gastroenterology 32%, Rheumatology 37%, Psychiatric liaison 28%.116 patients attended 315 face to face appointments and 21 phone contacts were made. Core-10 data show reduction from moderately severe to mild psychological distress in a sample of patients. 58% of patients were referred on for continuing care. The service ran 8 patient groups including sessions on pain management and joint sessions with Rheumatology. It ran 9 one-day long courses for GP and physician trainees, training a total of 120 doctors: feedback showed increased confidence in managing and recognising MUS. Attendances to Emergency Departments covered by Barking Havering and Redbridge and Bart's Health Trusts combined (5 sites) reduced by 22%, saving an estimated £19,200, while ambulance usage in the cohort dropped by 29%, saving an estimated £9072.ConclusionThe integration of a specialist psychologist with a mix of educational, advisory and clinical role to a PLT can provide an effective and efficient stepped-up model to increase the provision of care for patients with MUS


Author(s):  
Orla McDevitt-Petrovic ◽  
Karen Kirby

This chapter presents a systematic review of the literature to assess the effectiveness of brief psychological interventions for medically unexplained symptoms (MUS)/somatic symptom disorder, non-cardiac chest pain, and illness anxiety disorder or health anxiety (HA). Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched as data sources. Reference lists were subsequently examined for other relevant articles. Studies were assessed according to specified inclusion criteria and extracted according to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 23 studies were included in the final synthesis. Significant effects for intervention groups relative to control groups were reported in 19 studies, whilst 4 studies did not determine any significant benefits of interventions compared with controls. All of the brief interventions (CBT, psychosocial, psychophysiological, psychosomatic, relaxation and group therapy), with the exception of metaphor therapy, showed significant effects relative to controls in at least one study. The evidence suggests that brief psychological interventions, more specifically time limited CBT based interventions may be effective in treating HA and MUS with psychological distress. Findings are comparable with other reviews. Future research may facilitate the piloting of an intervention, and there remains a need to provide more robust evidence of cost effectiveness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. McAndrew ◽  
Marcus Crede ◽  
Kieran Maestro ◽  
Sarah Slotkin ◽  
Justin Kimber ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-34
Author(s):  
Ruel Billones ◽  
Nada Lukkahatai ◽  
Leorey Saligan

Background/Purpose: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been used in medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). This systematic review describes the literature investigating the general effect of MBIs on MUS and identifies the effects of specific MBIs on specific MUS conditions. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Guidelines (PRISMA) and the modified Oxford Quality Scoring System (Jadad score) were applied to the review, yielding an initial 1,556 articles. The search engines included PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsychINFO using the search terms: mindfulness, or mediations, or mindful or MBCT or MBSR and medically unexplained symptoms or MUS or Fibromyalgia or FMS. A total of 24 articles were included in the final systematic review. Results/Conclusions: MBIs showed large effects on: symptom severity (d = 0.82), pain intensity (d =0.79), depression (d = 0.62), and anxiety (d = 0.67). A manualized MBI that applies the four fundamental elements present in all types of interventions were critical to efficacy. These elements were psycho-education sessions specific to better understand the medical symptoms, the practice of awareness, the nonjudgmental observance of the experience in the moment, and the compassion to ones’ self. The effectiveness of different mindfulness interventions necessitates giving attention to improve the gaps that were identified related to home-based practice monitoring, competency training of mindfulness teachers, and sound psychometric properties to measure the mindfulness practice.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e027922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferozkhan Jadhakhan ◽  
Oana C Lindner ◽  
Amy Blakemore ◽  
Elspeth Guthrie

IntroductionMedically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are common in primary-care and secondary-care settings. Persistent symptoms of MUS are associated with a variety of poor outcomes including increased disability, poor quality of life and high healthcare costs. The aim of this systematic review is to review the relevant literature to determine the prevalence of MUS in patients who are high users of healthcare and/or who accrue high healthcare costs.Methods and analysisThis review will include studies with cases that are either high users of general healthcare or are patients who accrue high healthcare costs, aged ≥18 years and where a recognised measure of MUS, either a standardised clinical interview or questionnaire, was employed. The following citation databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, PROSPERO and the Cochrane library will be systematically searched from inception to 30 June 2018. The Cochrane library was included because of the significant proportion of non-observational studies currently published in the database. The prevalence of MUS and associated disorders along with the costs or use of healthcare associated with the presence of MUS will be estimated with 95% CI. If possible, study results will be pooled into a meta-analysis. However, if heterogeneity is high, data analysis will be presented descriptively.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this systematic review since only data from existing studies will be used. Results of this review will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and at national and international conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018100388


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document