Dual Therapy with Vonoprazan and Amoxicillin Is as Effective as Triple Therapy with Vonoprazan, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Digestion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahisa Furuta ◽  
Mihoko Yamade ◽  
Takuma Kagami ◽  
Takahiro Uotani ◽  
Takahiro Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Urea Breath Test ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Treat Analysis

<b><i>Backgrounds/Aims:</i></b> Vonoprazan (VPZ) is the first clinically available potassium competitive acid blocker. This class of agents provides faster and more potent acid inhibition than proton pump inhibitors. Most strains of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> are sensitive to amoxicillin. We hypothesized that dual therapy with VPZ and amoxicillin would provide the sufficient eradication rate for <i>H. pylori</i> infection. To evaluate this, we compared the eradication rate by the dual VPZ/amoxicillin therapy with that by the standard triple VPZ/amoxicillin/clarithromycin therapy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Non-inferiority of the eradication rate of <i>H. pylori</i> by the dual therapy with VPZ 20 mg twice daily (bid) and amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily (tid) for 1 week to that by the triple therapy with VPZ 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 750 mg bid and clarithromycin 200 mg bid for 1 week was retrospectively studied. Propensity score matching was performed to improve comparability between 2 regimen groups. Successful eradication was diagnosed using the [<sup>13</sup>C]-urea breath test at 1–2 months after the end of eradication therapy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated that the eradication rate by the dual therapy (92.9%; 95% CI 82.7–98.0%, 52/56) was not inferior to that of the triple therapy (91.9%; 95% CI 80.4–97.0%, 51/56; OR 1.275, 95% CI 0.324–5.017%, <i>p</i> = 0.728). There were no statistically significant differences in incidences of adverse events between 2 regimens. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> VPZ-based dual therapy (VPZ 20 mg bid and amoxicillin 500 mg tid for 1 week) provides an acceptable eradication rate of <i>H. pylori</i> infection without the need for second antimicrobial agents, such as clarithromycin.

scholarly journals A 14-Day Course of Triple Therapy is Superior to a 10-Day Course for the Eradication ofHelicobacter pylori: A Canadian Study Conducted in a ‘Real World’ Setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. e7-e10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-I Chen ◽  
Carlo A Fallone
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
First Line ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Gastric Biopsies ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Treat Analysis

BACKGROUND: SuccessfulHelicobacter pylorieradication with the traditional seven-day course of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapy is declining. Prolonging therapy to either 10 or 14 days is associated with better eradications rates.OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 14-day course of triple therapy versus a 10-day course in the treatment ofH pyloriin Canada.METHODS: Consecutive treatment-naive patients with clinical indications forH pylorieradication underwent either a 10-day course or a 14-day course of traditional PPI triple therapy depending on the date of the office visit (an odd date received the 10-day course, whereas an even date received the 14-day treatment).H pylorieradication was ascertained via urea breath test or gastric biopsies performed ≥4 weeks after completion of therapy. Analyses were by both intention to treat and per-protocol.RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were included in the study (31 in the 10-day group and 52 in the 14-day group). In the intention-to-treat analysis, eradication rates were 82.7% (95% CI 70% to 92%) versus 45.2% (95% CI 27% to 64%), favouring the 14-day treatment (P<0.001). Similarly, in the per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 91.5% (95% CI 80% to 98%) versus 63.6% (95% CI 41% to 83%), favouring the 14-day arm (P=0.01). Adverse events and compliance were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION: A 14-day course of standard PPI triple therapy was superior to a shorter-duration therapy and should be included as a first-line regimen forH pylorieradication in Canada. The 10-day course of treatment did not achieve an acceptable eradication rate and should no longer be used in this country.

scholarly journals Helicobacter pyloriEradication with Either Seven-Day or 10-Day Triple Therapies, and with a 10-Day Sequential Regimen

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Scaccianoce ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Alba Panarese ◽  
Donato Piglionica ◽  
Sergio Morini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Breath Test ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Urea Breath Test ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sequential Regimen ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Very High

BACKGROUND:Helicobacter pylorieradication rates achieved by standard seven-day triple therapies are decreasing in several countries, while a novel 10-day sequential regimen has achieved a very high success rate. A longer 10-day triple therapy, similar to the sequential regimen, was tested to see whether it could achieve a better infection cure rate.METHODS: Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia andH pyloriinfection were randomly assigned to one of the following three therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g for seven days or 10 days, or a 10-day sequential regimen including esomeprazole 20 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g for five days and esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining five days. All drugs were given twice daily.H pylorieradication was checked four to six weeks after treatment by using a13C-urea breath test.RESULTS: Overall, 213 patients were enrolled.H pylorieradication was achieved in 75.7% and 77.9%, in 81.7% and 84.1%, and in 94.4% and 97.1% of patients following seven-day or 10-day triple therapy and the 10-day sequential regimen, at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The eradication rate following the sequential regimen was higher than either seven-day (P=0.002) or 10-day triple therapy (P=0.02), while no significant difference emerged between the latter two regimens (P=0.6).CONCLUSIONS: The 10-day sequential regimen was significantly more effective than both triple regimens, while 10-day triple therapy failed to significantly increase theH pylorieradication rate achieved by the standard seven-day regimen.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Levofloxacin Based Triple and High-Dose PPI-Amoxicillin Dual Eradication Therapy for Helicobacter pylori after Failures of First- and Second-Line Therapies

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Okimoto ◽  
Makoto Arai ◽  
Keiko Saito ◽  
Shoko Minemura ◽  
Daisuke Maruoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
The Third ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Third Line

Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori as the third-line triple therapy with rabeprazole (RPZ) + amoxicillin (AMPC) + levofloxacin (LVFX) and high-dose RPZ + AMPC. Methods. 51 patients who failed Japanese first-line (proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + AMPC + clarithromycin) and second-line (PPI + AMPC + metronidazole) eradication therapy were randomly assigned at a 1 : 1 ratio to one of the following third-line eradication groups: (1) RAL group: RPZ 10 mg (b.i.d.), AMPC 750 mg (b.i.d.), and LVFX 500 mg (o.d.) for 10 days; (2) RA group: RPZ 10 mg (q.i.d.) and AMPC 500 mg (q.i.d.) for 14 days. Patients who failed to respond to third-line eradication therapy received salvage therapy. Results. The rates of eradication success, based on intention to treat (ITT) analysis, were 45.8% in the RAL group and 40.7% in the RA group. The overall eradication rates were 73.9% in the RAL group and 64.0% in the RA group. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions. The third-line triple therapy with RPZ, AMPC, and LVFX was as effective as that with high-dose RPZ and AMPC.

scholarly journals Efficacy of dexlansoprazole-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175628481987096
Author(s):  
Chia-Jung Kuo ◽  
Chun-Wei Chen ◽  
Puo-Hsien Le ◽  
Jun-Te Hsu ◽  
Cheng-Yu Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Breath Test ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Urea Breath Test ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Eradication ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Group A ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Group B

Background: Dexlansoprazole has been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, there is a paucity of data about its efficacy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexlansoprazole for H. pylori eradication as triple therapy in real-world practice. Methods: Adult patients with endoscopically proven H. pylori related peptic ulcer diseases or gastritis were recruited for this study. The eradication status was assessed based on the results of the 13C-urea breath test performed 4 weeks after treatment. According to the different treatment regimens, the patients were allocated to group A: Esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 days; group B: Esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 days, or group C: Dexlansoprazole 60 mg q.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 days. Results: A total of 215 patients (49% males) were enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 55 years. The eradication rates in group A, B, and C were 94.7% (71/75), 89.6% (69/77), and 93.7% (59/63) ( p = 0.457), respectively. The adverse events were similar between the three groups ( p = 0.068). Conclusions: This study suggests that dexlansoprazole-based triple therapy has an acceptable eradication rate for H. pylori infection.

scholarly journals Helicobacter pylori treatment results in Slovenia in the period 2013-2015 as a part of European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojan Tepes ◽  
Marko Kastelic ◽  
Miroslav Vujasinovic ◽  
Polona Lampic ◽  
Maja Seruga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Medical Institutions ◽  
High Dropout Rate ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Treatment ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
European Registry

Abstract Background Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the most common chronic bacterial infection in the world affecting over 50% of the world’s population. H. pylori is a grade I carcinogen, responsible for the development of 89 % of noncardia gastric cancers. In the present study we analyzed the data for H. pylori eradication treatments in Slovenia. Patients and methods Slovenia is a part of the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management from the beginning. In seven medical institutions data for H. pylori eradication treatments was collected for 1774 patients from April 16th 2013 to May 15th 2016. For further modified intention to treat (mITT) analysis 1519 patients were eligible and for per protocol (PP) analysis 1346 patients. Results Patients’ dropout was 11.4%. Eradication rate for 7 day triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + Clarithromycin (C) + Amoxicillin (A) was 88.7% PP and 72.0% mITT; for PPI + C + Metronidazole (M) 85.2% PP and 84.4% mITT. Second line 14 day therapy PPI + A + Levofloxacin had 92.3% eradication rate PP and 87.1% mITT. Ten to fourteen day Bismuth quadruple therapy was the therapy in difficult to treat patients. At the end all patients that adhered to prescribed regimens were cured of their H. pylori infection. Conclusions High dropout rate deserves further analysis. Slovenia is still a country with < 15% H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin, triple therapy with PPI plus two antibiotics reaches PP eradication rate > 85%, but mITT eradication rates are suboptimal.

scholarly journals Changes in the Eradication Efficacy of Fluoroquinolone-containing Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158
Author(s):  
Jung Won Lee ◽  
Nayoung Kim ◽  
Geun Kim ◽  
Siho Kim ◽  
Hwawon Nam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
National University ◽  
Seoul National University ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Background/Aims: Fluoroquinolone-containing triple eradication therapy could be considered an alternative regimen for the second- line treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection. This study aimed to investigate the changes in the eradication efficacy of fluoroquinolone- containing triple therapy from 2003 to 2018 in Korea.Materials and Methods: Patients with a history of first-line eradication therapy failure were consecutively enrolled at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2018. All patients took moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy as the second-line eradication therapy. The treatment regimen comprised a three-drug combination comprising a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and moxifloxacin. Data on age, sex, endoscopic diagnosis, eradication results, compliance, and adverse outcomes were acquired and analyzed.Results: In total, 824 participants were enrolled during the study period, of whom, 46 were lost to follow-up. Finally, 778 participants were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, of whom, 72.1% received moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy for 14 days. The eradication rate of moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy was 72.1% (594/824) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 76.3% (594/778) in the PP analysis. A decline in eradication efficacy was observed, especially in the PP analysis (<i>P</i>=0.046). Diarrhea was the most commonly observed adverse event, accounting for 19.6% (41/209) of recorded adverse events.Conclusions: Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy has shown suboptimal eradication efficacy as the second-line eradication therapy. In addition, there is a concern that eradication rate will decrease due to increase in antimicrobial resistance.

scholarly journals Comparison between Single-Dose Esomeprazole- and Pantoprazole-Based Triple Therapy on the Effectiveness forHelicobacter pyloriEradication in Taiwanese Population

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hsiang-Yao Shih ◽  
Sophie S. W. Wang ◽  
Chao-Hung Kuo ◽  
Fu-Chen Kuo ◽  
Yi-Yu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Taiwanese Population ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Treat Analysis

Background and Study Aims.To compare the effectiveness of two regimens, single-dose esomeprazole- and pantoprazole-based triple therapy, forHelicobacter pylori(H. pylori) eradication.Patients and Methods.A total of 453 patients were enrolled forH. pylorieradication. They were randomly assigned to either EAC group (Esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, Amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or PAC group (Pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily, Amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, Clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Follow-up endoscopy or urea breath test was scheduled 12–16 weeks after the eradication to evaluate the therapeutic response.Results.Higher eradication rate in EAC group than PAC group was shown by intention-to-treat analysis (EAC 72% versus PAC 55%,P<0.05) and per-protocol analysis (EAC 91% versus PAC 72%,P<0.05). The incidence of adverse effects (EAC 19% versus PAC 17%,P=0.712) and the compliance (EAC 87% versus PAC 91%,P=0.083) were comparable between these 2 groups.Conclusions.Single-dose esomeprazole-based triple therapy is effective forH. pylorieradication.

scholarly journals The Application of High-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitor Induction Treatment before Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: An Open-Label Random Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4352
Author(s):  
Li-Wei Chen ◽  
Liang-Che Chang ◽  
Chung-Ching Hua ◽  
Ching-Jung Liu ◽  
Tien-Shin Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Eradication ◽  
H Pylori

This was a prospective, randomized, open-label trial. Patients without previous Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy were randomly assigned to either a high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) group or a traditional clarithromycin/amoxicillin triple therapy (CATT) group. In the HDDT group, patients took rabeprazole, 20 mg, four times per day for three days and then dual therapy with rabeprazole, 20 mg, and amoxicillin, 500 mg, four times per day during the patient’s breakfast, lunch, dinner, and bedtime for 14 days. In the CATT group, patients received conventional triple therapy for 14 days (rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice per day). In the HDDT group, the success rates of H. pylori eradication were 91.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.97) by intention-to-treat (ITT) and 94.3% (95% CI: 0.79–0.99) by per-protocol (PP) analysis. In the CATT group, the eradication rates were 77.1% (95% CI: 0.61–0.87) by ITT and 84.3% (95% CI: 0.66–0.94) by PP analysis. The study completion rates were 97.2% (35/36) in the HDDT group. Three-day high-dose rabeprazole induction treatment before dual therapy and a schedule of taking the drug at meal and bed times could achieve an acceptable H. pylori eradication rate (>90%) and good drug compliance.

scholarly journals 7-Day Nonbismuth-Containing Concomitant Therapy Achieves a High Eradication Rate forHelicobacter pyloriin Taiwan

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Shuo Kao ◽  
Wen-Chi Chen ◽  
Ping-I Hsu ◽  
Kwok-Hung Lai ◽  
Hsien-Chung Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Urea Breath Test ◽  
Concomitant Therapy ◽  
Drug Compliance ◽  
Clinical Factor ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Very High

Background.Ten-day concomitant therapy achieves a high eradication rate in Taiwan. Whether shortening the duration of concomitant therapy can still keep a high eradication rate remains unclear.Aim.To assess the eradication rate of 7-day pantoprazole-containing concomitant therapy in Taiwan and to investigate factors influencing the eradication outcome.Methods.From March 2008 to March 2012, 319H. pylori-infected patients receiving a 7-day pantoprazole-containing concomitant regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 days) were included. Patients were asked to return at the second week to assess drug compliance and adverse effects. Repeated endoscopy or urea breath test was performed at 8 weeks after the end of eradication therapy.Results.The eradication rates according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were 93.7% (299/319) and 96.4% (297/308), respectively. Adverse events occurred in 13.2% (42/319) of the patients. The compliance rate was 98.4% (314/319). Multivariate analysis disclosed that poor compliance was the only independent factor influencing the efficacy of anti-H. pyloritherapy with an odds ratio of 0.073 (95% confidence interval, 0.011–0.483).Conclusion.7-day concomitant therapy achieved a very high eradication rate forH. pyloriinfection in Taiwan. Drug compliance was the only clinical factor influencing treatment efficacy.

scholarly journals Vonoprazan-Based Third-Line Therapy Has a Higher Eradication Rate against Sitafloxacin-Resistant Helicobacter pylori

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Saito ◽  
Kaho Konno ◽  
Moeka Sato ◽  
Masaru Nakano ◽  
Yukako Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
H Pylori

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is an effective strategy for preventing various gastrointestinal diseases such as gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, the eradication success rate is decreasing because of a recent increase in drug-resistant strains of H. pylori. Here, we evaluated the success rate of eradication therapy with vonoprazan (VPZ), a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, against drug-resistant H. pylori. In total, 793 patients who received H. pylori eradication therapy were investigated retrospectively. All underwent esomeprazole (EPZ)-based triple therapy (n = 386) or VPZ-based triple therapy (n = 407) for first-, second- and third-line H. pylori eradication for 7 days. The overall success rates of first- and third-line H. pylori eradication were significantly higher for VPZ-based triple therapy (88.4% and 93.0%, respectively, per protocol (PP)) than for EPZ-based triple therapy (69.5% and 56.5%, respectively, PP). Moreover, the success rates of first- and third-line eradication of clarithromycin (CLR)- and sitafloxacin (STFX)-resistant H. pylori were significantly higher for VPZ-based triple therapy (72.0% and 91.7%, PP) than for EPZ-based triple therapy (38.5% and 20.0%, PP). In addition, patient age did not affect the eradication rate of VPZ-based first-line therapy, whereas the success rate of EPZ-based therapy was lower in patients under 65 years of age. Our results clearly demonstrated that VPZ-based therapy achieved a higher eradication rate even against CLR- and STFX-resistant H. pylori, and that patient age did not affect the eradication rate of VPZ-based therapy. These findings suggest that dual therapy using VPZ and amoxicillin may be sufficient for standard H. pylori eradication, and may thus also be beneficial for avoiding antibiotic misuse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document