Primary Tumor Resection Is Associated with a Better Outcome among Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving EGFR-TKI Treatment

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40
Author(s):  
Jeng-Sen Tseng ◽  
Kuo-Hsuan Hsu ◽  
Zhe-Rong Zheng ◽  
Tsung-Ying Yang ◽  
Kun-Chieh Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Metastatic Burden ◽  
Egfr Tki

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The characteristics and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with primary tumor resection (PTR) is not yet clear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We enrolled advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy to access the impact of PTR on the outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 466 patients were enrolled with 76 patients (16.3%) undergoing PTR; 59 patients recurred after curative surgery, while 17 patients underwent surgery as diagnostic purposes. PTR patients displayed a better performance status, a lower metastatic burden, and much less measurable diseases (30.3 vs. 97.4%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). PTR patients experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (25.1 [95% CI 16.6–33.7] vs. 9.4 [95% CI 8.4–10.4] months; aHR 0.40 [95% CI 0.30–0.54], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and overall survival (56.8 [95% CI 36.3–77.2] vs. 31.8 [95% CI 28.2–35.4] months; aHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39–0.84], <i>p</i> = 0.004). Survival advantage was still observed while comparing PTR patients with the better performance and lower metastatic burden subgroup found within the non-resection group. Moreover, the progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 patients who were found having pleural metastases during surgery and underwent PTR plus pleural biopsy, were also longer than those with pure N0--1/M1a-malignant pleural effusion disease in the non-resection group (<i>n</i> = 19) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> PTR was associated with significantly better outcomes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the biological role of PTR among these patients.

Metastasiertes nicht kleinzelliges Lungenkarzinom: Operation vor zielgerichteter Therapie mit EGFR-TKI

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Tobias Rachow ◽  
Susanne M. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Kleinzelliges Lungenkarzinom ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Metastatic Burden ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Egfr Tki

<b>Objectives:</b> The characteristics and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with primary tumor resection (PTR) is not yet clear. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy to access the impact of PTR on the outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 466 patients were enrolled with 76 patients (16.3%) undergoing PTR; 59 patients recurred after curative surgery, while 17 patients underwent surgery as diagnostic purposes. PTR patients displayed a better performance status, a lower metastatic burden, and much less measurable diseases (30.3 vs. 97.4%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). PTR patients experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (25.1 [95% CI 16.6–33.7] vs. 9.4 [95% CI 8.4–10.4] months; aHR 0.40 [95% CI 0.30–0.54], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and overall survival (56.8 [95% CI 36.3–77.2] vs. 31.8 [95% CI 28.2–35.4] months; aHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39–0.84], <i>p</i> = 0.004). Survival advantage was still observed while comparing PTR patients with the better performance and lower metastatic burden subgroup found within the non-resection group. Moreover, the progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 patients who were found having pleural metastases during surgery and underwent PTR plus pleural biopsy, were also longer than those with pure N0–1/M1a-malignant pleural effusion disease in the non-resection group (<i>n</i> = 19) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> PTR was associated with significantly better outcomes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the biological role of PTR among these patients.

EGFR-mutiertes Adenokarzinom der Lunge: Wachsender Stellenwert der multimodalen Therapie

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Khosro Hekmat
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Metastatic Burden ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Egfr Tki

<b>Objectives:</b> The characteristics and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with primary tumor resection (PTR) is not yet clear. <b>Methods:</b> We enrolled advanced <i>EGFR</i>-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR-TKI as first-line therapy to access the impact of PTR on the outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 466 patients were enrolled with 76 patients (16.3%) undergoing PTR; 59 patients recurred after curative surgery, while 17 patients underwent surgery as diagnostic purposes. PTR patients displayed a better performance status, a lower metastatic burden, and much less measurable diseases (30.3 vs. 97.4%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). PTR patients experienced a significantly longer progression-free survival (25.1 [95% CI 16.6–33.7] vs. 9.4 [95% CI 8.4–10.4] months; aHR 0.40 [95% CI 0.30–0.54], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and overall survival (56.8 [95% CI 36.3–77.2] vs. 31.8 [95% CI 28.2–35.4] months; aHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.39–0.84], <i>p</i> = 0.004). Survival advantage was still observed while comparing PTR patients with the better performance and lower metastatic burden subgroup found within the non-resection group. Moreover, the progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 patients who were found having pleural metastases during surgery and underwent PTR plus pleural biopsy, were also longer than those with pure N0–1/M1a-malignant pleural effusion disease in the non-resection group (<i>n</i> = 19) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> PTR was associated with significantly better outcomes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the biological role of PTR among these patients.

scholarly journals Could Primary Tumor Resection Improve Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (07) ◽  
pp. 422-428
Author(s):  
Rafaela Aparecida Dias de Oliveira ◽  
Lyvia Aparecida Dias de Oliveira ◽  
Marília Davoli Abella Goulart ◽  
Maria Clara Faustino Linhares
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor Resection ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction: In advanced breast cancer, local treatment is considered palliative. However, although there are some polemic opinions about the surgical treatment, some of the latest studies have emphasized that in advanced cases primary tumor resection (PTR) is related to better outcomes. This review aims to evaluate how resection of the original tumor impacts women with metastatic breast cancer, considering the most recent studies about this subject. Methods: The search was performed in MEDLINE, Scopus, PMC, Current Contents and Wiley Online Library databases; 23 articles - from 2016 to 2019 - were selected and 11 were included in this review. As inclusion criteria were considered: studies presenting outcomes about resection of the primary tumor, comparison between chemotherapy/ hormone therapy/ targeted cancer therapies and surgical intervention, studies published from 2016 to 2019 and available in English, Spanish or Portuguese. We excluded those which did not approach PTR, did not present outcomes of interest (progression-free survival comparison between PTR and systemic therapy) or only discussed systemic therapy, as well as those published before 2016. Results: It was reported in 6 studies that progression-free survival is better on those who underwent surgery. PTR was also related to longer median overall survival in women submitted to surgery, up to 16 months higher when compared to the ones who were not. Enhanced survival even pertained to surgical groups regardless of tumor size.  Conclusion: Based in the analysis, PTR in metastatic breast cancer can be related to higher overall survival.

scholarly journals Surgical Resection of Primary Tumors Provides Survival Benefits for Lung Cancer Patients With Unexpected Pleural Dissemination

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwen Fan ◽  
Haitang Yang ◽  
Ke Han ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Wen Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sublobar Resection ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resection Group ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Background: Surgery is not generally recommended for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural dissemination (PD). However, in some cases, PD is found unexpectedly during surgery. There is no consensus on whether surgical intervention can provide survival benefit for them. We investigated the role of surgery in NSCLC patients with unexpected PD by a cohort study.Methods: Clinical data of consecutive patients who intended to undergo radical surgery for NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2015 at Shanghai Chest Hospital and Huadong Hospital were collected from a lung cancer database. Patients diagnosed with unexpected malignant pleural nodules intraoperatively were enrolled in this retrospective study.Results: A total of 181 NSCLC patients were diagnosed with unexpected malignant PD intraoperatively and confirmed with postoperatively histological examinations. Out of these, 80 (44.2%) patients received pleural nodule biopsies alone, and 101 (55.8%) received primary tumor resection (47 with sublobar resection and 54 with lobectomy). The median progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients were 13 and 41 months respectively. Patients in the resection group had significantly better progression-free survival (19.0 vs. 10.0 months, P &lt; 0.0001) and overall survival (48.0 vs. 33.0 months, P &lt; 0.0001) than patients in the biopsy group. In the resection group, there was no statistical difference between patients with sublobar resection and lobectomy (P = 0.34). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified primary tumor resection, targeted adjuvant therapy, and tumor size (≤ 3 cm) as independent prognostic factors.Conclusions: NSCLC patients with unexpected intraoperative PD potentially benefited from surgical resection of the primary tumor and multidisciplinary targeted therapy, particularly when tumor size did not exceed 3 cm. Our data demonstrated that the resection type was not associated with survival differences, which remains to be defined with a larger sample size.

scholarly journals Low-grade astrocytoma: surgical outcomes in eloquent versus non-eloquent brain areas

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
André de Macedo Bianco ◽  
Flavio Key Miura ◽  
Carlos Clara ◽  
Jose Reynaldo W. Almeida ◽  
Clemar Correa da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Eloquent Areas ◽  
Eloquent Area ◽  
Extent Of Surgical Resection

A retrospective study of 81 patients with low-grade astrocytoma (LGA) comparing the efficacy of aggressive versus less aggressive surgery in eloquent and non-eloquent brain areas was conducted. Extent of surgical resection was analyzed to assess overall survival (OS) and progression- free survival (PFS). Degree of tumor resection was classified as gross total resection (GTR), subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy. GTR, STR and biopsy in patients with tumors in non-eloquent areas were performed in 31, 48 and 21% subjects, whereas in patients with tumors in eloquent areas resections were 22.5, 35 and 42.5%. Overall survival was 4.7 and 1.9 years in patients with tumors in non-eloquent brain areas submitted to GTR/STR and biopsy (p=0.013), whereas overall survival among patients with tumors in eloquent area was 4.5 and 2.1 years (p=0.33). Improved outcome for adult patients with LGA is predicted by more aggressive surgery in both eloquent and non-eloquent brain areas.

A meta-analysis of comparing EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as the second-line treatment of NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19166-e19166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanghui Gao ◽  
Shengxiang Ren ◽  
Aiwu Li ◽  
Yayi He ◽  
Xiaoxia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki

e19166 Background: The efficacy of comparing the EGFR-TKI with standard chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with wide-type EGFR were still controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the two regimens, a meta-analysis was performed. Methods: Medical databases and conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials which compared EGFR-TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib) with standard second-line chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) in patients with NSCLC. Endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival and overall response. Results: Three eligible trials (INTEREST, TITAN and TAILOR) were identified. Lacking for data of overall survival of TAILOR trial, So we only make a preliminary meta-analysis for overall survival. The intention to treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that the patients receiving EGFR-TKI had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients treated with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.31; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.10-1.56; P = 0.002). The overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) were coparable between this two groups (HR = 0.96; 95%CI = 0.77-1.19; P = 0.69; relative risk (RR) = 0.37; 95%CI = 0.09-1.54; P = 0.17). Conclusions: Although chemotherapy had a clear superiority in PFS as second-line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations compared with EGFR-TKI, OS and ORR were equal in this two regimens. The toxicity profiles might play an important role in the decision to choose EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy. These findings still need to be verified in larger confirmatory studies in future.

Low-grade gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres in children: an analysis of 71 cases

1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian F. Pollack ◽  
Diana Claassen ◽  
Qasim Al-Shboul ◽  
Janine E. Janosky ◽  
Melvin Deutsch
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Low Grade Gliomas ◽  
Fine Print

✓ Low-grade gliomas constitute the largest group of cerebral hemispheric tumors in the pediatric population. Although complete tumor resection is generally the goal in the management of these lesions, this can prove difficult to achieve because tumor margins may blend into the surrounding brain. This raises several important questions on the long-term behavior of the residual tumor and the role of adjuvant therapy in the management of these lesions. To examine these issues, the authors reviewed their experience in 71 children with low-grade cerebral hemispheric gliomas who were treated at their institution between 1956 and 1991 and assessed the relationship between clinical, radiographic, pathological, and treatment-related factors and outcome. Only seven patients in the series died, one from perioperative complications, five from progressive disease, and one (a child with neurofibromatosis) from a second neoplasm. For the 70 patients who survived the perioperative period, overall actuarial survivals at 5, 10, and 20 years were 95%, 93%, and 85%, respectively; progression-free status was maintained in 88%, 79%, and 76%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the factor that was most strongly associated with both overall and progression-free survival was the extent of tumor resection (p = 0.013 and p = 0.015, respectively). A relationship between extent of resection and progression-free survival was present both in patients with pilocytic astrocytomas (p = 0.041) and those with nonpilocytic tumors (p = 0.037). Histopathological diagnosis was also associated with overall survival on univariate analysis; poorer results were seen in the patients with nonpilocytic astrocytoma compared to those with other low-grade gliomas, such as pilocytic astrocytoma, mixed glioma, and oligodendroglioma (p = 0.021). The use of radiotherapy was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (p = 0.6). All three patients who ultimately developed histologically confirmed anaplastic changes in the vicinity of the original tumor had received prior radiotherapy, 20, 46, and 137 months, respectively, before the detection of malignant progression. In addition, children who received radiotherapy had a significantly higher incidence of late cognitive and endocrine dysfunction than the nonirradiated patients (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). The authors conclude that children with low-grade gliomas of the cerebral hemispheres have an excellent overall prognosis. Complete tumor resection provides the best opportunity for long-term progression-free survival. However, even with incomplete tumor excision, long-term progression-free survival is common. The findings in this study do not support the routine use of postoperative radiotherapy after an initial incomplete tumor resection: although irradiation appears to increase the likelihood of long-term progression-free survival, overall survival is not improved significantly, and long-term morbidity may be increased.

scholarly journals Efficacy of EGFR-TKI Plus Chemotherapy or Monotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients With Co-Mutations

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengyu Yang ◽  
Ya Chen ◽  
Yanan Wang ◽  
Shuyuan Wang ◽  
Minjuan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Egfr Tkis

BackgroundCo-mutations was associated with poor response to EGFR-TKIs. First-generation EGFR-TKIs combined with chemotherapy was reported to be more effective than TKIs alone in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients.ObjectiveThis retrospective study aimed to explore whether EGFR-mutant patients with co-mutations can benefit from EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively collected data of 137 EGFR-mutant patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who underwent next-generation sequencing in our hospital in 2018. Among them, 96 were treated with EGFR–TKIs alone and 41 received EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy. We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with co-mutations using different treatments.ResultsConcurrent TP53 mutations, especially exon 4 and 6, were associated with a markedly shorter time to progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy (11.4 months vs. 16.6 months, P=0.003), while EGFR–TKIs plus chemotherapy would benefit those patients more (with TP53: 11.4 months vs. 19.1 months, P=0.001, HR=0.407; without TP53: 16.6 months vs. 18.9 months, P=0.379, HR=0.706). The incidence of T790M after resistance was equal in patients treated with different treatments (53% vs. 53%, P=0.985).ConclusionsIn our study, concurrent TP53 mutations were found to be risk factors for EGFR-TKI monotherapy, but TKI combined with chemotherapy could eliminate this heterogeneity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document