Evaluation of the Postoperative Analgesic Effect of 2 Different Blocks after Pediatric Circumcision Surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Mehmet Mutlu ◽  
Seray Turkmen

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Circumcision is a painful day-case surgery. Regional anesthesia techniques are used effectively for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia after pediatric circumcision surgery. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> Our prospective observational study aimed to compare postoperative analgesic efficiency of a dorsal penile nerve (DPN) block with a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after male pediatric circumcision surgery and complications related to each block. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> We enrolled 80 male children under the age of 10 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II status scheduled for circumcision in this prospective observational study. A TAP or DPN block was performed after induction of general anesthesia before surgery with ultrasound (US) guidance. Postoperative pain was assessed with Faces Pain Scale-Revised and the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding 30-min pain score levels (<i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). But, the 1st hour, 2nd hour, 6th hour, 12th hour, and 24th-hour pain score levels in the TAP block group were statistically significantly higher than those of the DPN block group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). The 1st rescue analgesic requirement in the TAP block group was at the 6th hour postoperative. There was no need for rescue analgesia in the DPN block group during the postoperative 24-h follow-up. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> A US-guided DPN block provided effective and long-lasting postoperative analgesia for circumcision surgery with statistically significantly lower pain score levels than a US-guided TAP block. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study found that a TAP block alone was insufficient to provide adequate postoperative analgesia for circumcision surgery compared to DPN block.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1

Background and objective: Circumcision is one of the most common operations and can cause postoperative pain, fear, and anxiety for children. This study aims to compare the effects of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and caudal epidural (CE) anesthesia on postoperative analgesia after circumcision in providing postoperative pain control. Methods: Eighty boys aged 1 to 14 years who underwent elective circumcision surgery under general anesthesia either with USG-guided TAP block or with CE block for postoperative analgesia were enrolled consecutively to this prospective observational study equally in each group. Postoperative pain scores and need for rescue analgesia were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in mean age and Aldrete scores (p > 0.05). Body mass index (BMI) of the caudal block group was statistically lower than the TAP group (p < 0.05). While there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in 30th-minute VAS values (p > 0.05), the CE block group's 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 18th, and 24th hour VAS values were statistically lower than the TAP block group's (p < 0.05). Conclusion: USG-guided TAB block under general anesthesia was not associated with lower postoperative pain scores and delayed rescue analgesia need compared with CE block in patients who underwent elective circumcision surgery. CE block provided superior analgesia than the USG-guided TAP block after elective circumcision surgery in this study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 755-758
Author(s):  
Roshan Pradhan ◽  
Seema Kumari Mishra ◽  
Lalit Kumar Rajbanshi ◽  
Kanak Khanal ◽  
Batsalya Arjyal ◽  
...  

Introduction: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthesia that involves the infiltration of local anesthetic in between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle plane. This block provides post-operative analgesia and reduces the requirement of opioids consumption. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of TAP block in providing postoperative analgesia in women undergoing caesarean section. Methodology: This was a hospital based prospective, comparative, cross sectional study conducted in 70 patients from 17th September 2018 to 17th February 2019 undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A patients received TAP block with 0.5% Ropivacaine versus Group B patients received injection paracetamol 1gm intravenous every 8 hourly as a standard and routine analgesic. At the end of the surgery, TAP block was performed by anesthesiologist and assessment of postoperative pain using a visual analogue pain score at every 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour, 12 hour and 24 hour by trained staffs at postoperative ward. Then, depending upon the severity of the pain injection fentanyl 1mcg/kg intravenous was given as rescue analgesia. Short assessment of patient satisfaction (SAPS) score was also assessed 24 hours postoperatively. Results: Compared to control group, in women who received TAP block, there was statistically significant reduction in pain at 3 hr, 6 hr, 24 hrs. However at 12 hrs there was no significant difference in the pain score. The cumulative fentanyl requirement was also significantly less in the TAP block group at all the time points.  Conclusion: The TAP block provided highly effective postoperative analgesia following caesarean section and reduces the fentanyl requirement in the first 24 hour.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Poupak Rahimzadeh ◽  
Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz ◽  
Kaveh Latifi-Naibin ◽  
Mahzad Alimian

AbstractNowadays, there are various methods to manage pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the effectof preemptive versus postoperative use of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (USG-TAP) block on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, the patients who were candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into the two groups (n = 38 per group). In the preemptive group (PG) after the induction of anesthesia and in the postoperative group (POG) after the end of surgery and before the extubation, bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was performed on patients using 20 cc of ropivacaine 0.25%. Both groups received patient controlled IV analgesia (PCIA) containing Acetaminophen (20 mg/ml) plus ketorolac (0.6 mg/ml) as a standard postoperative analgesia and meperidine 20 mg q 4 h PRN for rescue analgesia. Using the numerical rating scales (NSR), the patients’ pain intensity was assessed at time of arrival to the PACU and in 2th, 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th h. Primary outcome of interest is NSR at rest and coughing in the PACU and in 2th, 4th, 8th, 12th, 24th h. Secondary outcomes of interests were the time to first post-surgical rescue analgesic and level of patients’ pain control satisfaction in the first 24 h. The USG-TAP block significantly decreased pain score in the POG compared to the PG, and also the pain was relieved at rest especially in 8 and 12 h (p value ≤ 0.05) after the surgery. Pain score after coughing during recovery at 2, 8 and 12 h after the operation were significantly decreased. (p value ≤ 0.05) The patient satisfaction scores in the POG were significantly higher in all times. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), indicating that patients in the POG had significantly lower incidences of the PONV compared tothe PG. The time to first analgesic request was significantly shorterin the POG, which was statistically significant (p value = 0.089). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of consumption of analgesics. The postoperative TAP block could offer better postoperative analgesia than preepmtive TAP block.


Author(s):  
Sravani Manam ◽  
R. N. V. Swetha ◽  
A. S. Kameswara Rao ◽  
S. G. K. Murthy

Background: The ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block which provides effective analgesia after lower abdominal surgeries including caesarean section. It is a simple and reliable technique. In this prospective, randomized double-blind study, we determined the efficacy of TAP block using 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.9N Saline with respect to VAS for pain, postoperative Tramadol consumption and post-operative ondansetron usage.Methods: This study was conducted on 100 adult patients of ASA physical status I and II in the   age group of 18 to 40 years undergoing elective lower segment cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Study group received TAP block with 0.25% Bupivacaine and control group received 10 ml of 0.9N saline on each side. Patients were analyzed for postoperative pain by pain score (at rest, on movement, on cough) using VAS was recorded at 0, ½, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Need for rescue analgesia was assessed by time to first dose of Tramadol requirement and total dose of Tramadol over 24 hours of postoperative period. Ondansetron (4 mg i.v.) was administered whenever nausea score was more than 2 or the patient vomited. All the data was noted using uniform performs.Results: Patients received TAP block with 0.25% Bupivacaine had better pain scores at first hour of postoperative period during rest, cough and movement which was statistically significant (p<0.0010) in comparison to group B. There was a statistically significant difference (p <0.001) in the requirement of total dose of Tramadol as a rescue analgesia in patients who received transversus abdominis block with 0.25% Bupivacaine (138.77 mg) in comparison with other group(240 mg).The mean time to first request for Tramadol was significantly longer in group A (5.8 hrs)  in comparison to group B (1.93 hrs) with p value <0.001. Patients received TAP block with 0.9N saline needed more dose of Ondansetron, however, the difference was not statistically significant (p >0.001).Conclusions: TAP block using ultrasound provides substantial reduction in Tramadol consumption, time to first dose of rescue tramadol when compared with control group. This study reinforces the recommendation for TAP as a part of multimodal post-operative analgesic regimen.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (07) ◽  
pp. 1073-1077
Author(s):  
Syed Aftab Haider ◽  
Atqua Sultan ◽  
Zaira Salman ◽  
Salman Waris

Objectives: To determine the efficacy of co-administration of magnesiumsulphate (MgSO4) with bupivacaine in enhancing the analgesic efficacy of Transversusabdominus plane block (TAP block) in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.Study Design: Randomized clinical single blinded trial. Setting: Department of Anesthesia,Nishtar Medical University/Hospital Multan. Period: 07 months from March 2017 to October2018. Methods: We included female patients who presented with uterine or ovarian cancer andplanned for total abdominal hysterectomy. In group B patients (n=30) TAP block was givenusing 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml). In group M patients (n=30), 19.4 ml 0.25% bupivacaine plus0.60 ml Mg sulphate. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, VAS pain score and time of1st rescue analgesia and total dose of rescue analgesia was noted in all patients. For dataanalysis we used independent sample t-test (Mann-Whitney U test for skewed data) to comparequantitative variables. Chi-square test we used for comparison of ASA status. P-value < 0.05was taken as significant difference. Results: Mean VAS pain score after 1 hour was 3.27+1.70in group B and 2.23+1.35 in group M (p-value 0.012), after 2 hours mean VAS pain score was4.03+2.10 in group B and 2.47+1.25 in group M (p-value 0.001), after 6 hours mean VAS scorewas 4.53+2.62 in group B and 3.27+1.36 in group M (p-value 0.02). Mean VAS pain score after12 and 24 hour of shifting the patient in recovery room was no significantly different between thegroups (p-value 0.55 & 0.08 resp.). Mean time of 1st rescue analgesia was 7.53+4.92 hours ingroup B versus 13.96+2.25 hours in group M. Conclusion: Administration of 200 mg of MGSO4with bupivacaine for TAP block significantly improves the duration of analgesia and reduces therequirement of rescue analgesics in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.


Author(s):  
Tauqeer Anjum Mir ◽  
Aabid Hussain Mir ◽  
Tantry Tariq Gani ◽  
Abida Yousuf ◽  
Sheikh Irshad Ahmad

Background: Pain is the commonest symptom encountered postoperatively and hence multimodal analgesia is tried to overcome it. In this study, we have compared bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus clonidine in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia.Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients in the age range of 18-60 years undergoing various lower abdominal surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, who were operated after giving spinal block using 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacine and 25ug of fentanyl. At the end of surgical procedure tranversus abdominis plane (TAP) block was given by giving 25 ml of injection bupivacaine 0.25% in group I and 25 ml of 0.25% of bupivacaine with 1 ug.kg-1 of clonidine in group II. Quality of analgesia was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), categorical pain scoring system and frequency of rescue analgesia given and duration was assessed with the time at which first rescue analgesia was given. Side effects of clonidine such as sedation, bradycardia and hypotension were also noted. The hemodynamic parameters like heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were noted for both the groups.Results: Demographic characteristics like age, weight, sex, ASA class and type of surgeries were comparable in both groups. SBP, DBP and HR were less in group II than in group I and was statistically significant (p-value<0.05). The overall mean VAS score in group I was 3.03 ± 1.57 and group II was 1.72 ± 1.02 with p-value of 0.0005 and hence better quality of analgesia in group II. Categorical pain scoring system also showed statistically better scores in group II than group I. The duration of analgesia which was calculated by mean time for first rescue analgesia in group I was 6.38 ± 2.56 hours and group II was 14.23 ± 4.63 hours with a p-value of <0.0001 and the difference was statistically significant. The mean number of doses of rescue analgesia in group I for the first 24 hours was 1.37 ± 0.89 and in group II was 0.60 ± 0.62 with a p-value of 0.0003 and the difference was statistically significant. Group II patients showed more sedation scores than group I patients (p-value <0.05). None of the patients had any episode of bradycardia or hypotension.Conclusions: Addition of clonidine 1 ug.kg-1 to 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine compared to 25 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine alone in tranverse abdominis plane (TAP) block improves quality of analgesia, increases duration of postoperative analgesia and decreases postoperative analgesic requirements with minimal side effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4393
Author(s):  
Summaira Jan ◽  
Tawheed Ahmad ◽  
Saima Rashid

Background: Requirement of postoperative analgesic medication is decreased by the use of regional nerve blocks. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective way to provide postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries. TAP block using ropivacaine alone has not been consistently proven to be effective in alleviating pain after abdominal surgeries. The objective of the study was to compare the combination of dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine to ropivacaine alone in TAP block for abdominoplasty patients. Time to onset of post-operative pain and time interval for need of rescue analgesia were compared.Methods: Sixty ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) grade I or II patients undergoing abdominoplasty were allocated to two groups with thirty patients in each group. In this randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, the test group received TAP block using 20 ml (100 mgs) 0.5 percent of ropivacaine mixed with 50 µg of dexmedetomidine while as Control group received TAP block with 20 ml (100 mgs) of 0.5 percent of ropivacaine alone. Patient demographics, time to initial reporting of post-operative pain, time to need of first rescue analgesia, quality of pain block and side effects were recorded.Results: Time to initial onset of pain and time to need of first rescue analgesia were significantly longer in the test group than control group. The two groups were similar in demographics and quality of pain block, with no significant difference in side effects.Conclusions: Addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for TAP block in abdominoplasty patients prolong the time to initial onset of pain and time to need for first rescue analgesia.


Author(s):  
Usha Shukla ◽  
Pratima Kumari ◽  
Jay Brijesh Singh Yadav ◽  
Atit Kumar

Introduction: Abdominal Hysterectomy (AH) is one of the most common surgeries performed in gynaecology and is associated with a medium to high pain level. Newly discovered peripheral blocks such as Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and Quadratus Lumborum (QL) block have gained immense popularity as an adjunct to regional and general anaesthesia for postoperative pain management and reducing analgesic requirements. Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of QL block with TAP block in patients undergoing total AH. Materials and Methods: This was a double-blinded Randomised Clinical Trial (RCT). The study population comprised of 105 patients posted for elective total AH under spinal anaesthesia. They were randomly allocated into three groups of 35 patients each. Group Q received bilateral QL block with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine divided on either side, Group T received bilateral TAP block with 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine divided on either side and in Group C no block was given. Patients were monitored for Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at 0, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th and 24th hour postoperatively, time for first analgesic requirement, total analgesic requirement in 24 hours and patient satisfaction score after 24 hours and also adverse effects, if any. Data were analysed using Statistical Package For The Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 (Chicago, IL, USA) with independent t-test and Chi-square test as appropriate. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were significantly lower VAS scores in group Q than group T at 2nd and 6th hour with p-value of 0.003 and 0.001, respectively. The time for first analgesic was early in group C with mean value of 1.37±0.74 hours and it was 4.63±0.97 hours in group T and 7.77±1.51 hours in group Q. The total analgesic requirement was lesser in group Q when compared to group C and T. Patient satisfaction score was comparable between group Q and T (p=0.97). No significant difference in complications among the three groups was observed (p=0.51). Conclusion: QL block is a better postoperative analgesic technique than TAP block for postoperative analgesia in hysterectomy patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Meiyu Wei ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Haitao Yang

Aim. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesia between preoperative and postoperative ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for different durations of laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods. A total of 120 patients, ASA I-III, 18–65 years of age, were divided randomly into 2 groups: preoperative TAP group (pre-TAP group) and postoperative TAP group (post-TAP group). Patients in the pre-TAP group (n = 60) and post-TAP group (n = 60) received bilateral TAP blocks of 0.375% ropivacaine, 40 mL, preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively. Duration of surgery, postoperative pain score, consumption of analgesics, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during the first 24 h postoperatively were recorded. Results. For all the patients in the two groups, similar analgesia was obtained with no statistical difference. The same results were found in duration of surgery <180 min. Meanwhile, patients undergoing surgery >180 min in the post-TAP group obtained lower postoperative pain score, lower analgesics consumption, and higher satisfaction score than those in the pre-TAP group. Conclusion. Postoperative TAP block could offer better postoperative analgesia than preoperative TAP block for patients undergoing surgery >180 min. No difference was found in analgesia effect between preoperative TAP block and postoperative TAP block for patients undergoing surgery <180 min.


Author(s):  
Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Ritu Grewal ◽  
Sirisha Anne ◽  
Arpit Garg

Background: Abdominal hysterectomy is the most common surgery performed in Indian Women. Recent advances in Regional Anaesthesia especially ultrasonography-guided truncal blocks for postoperative analgesia are now being used for patient comfort and faster times for discharge of the patients. This study compares the ultrasonographic guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum blocks for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia. Aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum blocks in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy.Methods: A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data was performed. A total of 111 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II and III gradings were enrolled in the study who had received either transversus abdominis plane block or quadratus lumborum blocks. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores and use of rescue analgesia was studied between the two groups. The data obtained were analysed using the students t-test and Mann Whitney U Test.Results: The demographic profile was similar between the 2 groups. The study showed that patients who received the quadratus lumborum block had a greater analgesia after 6 hours and had lower analgesic requirements compared to those who received transversus abdominis block (TAP) block. TAP block was however effective in the initial post-operative period.Conclusions: In patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy quadratus lumborum block may be preferred over TAP block for post-operative analgesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document