scholarly journals Comparison of a Cancer Family History Collection and Risk Assessment Tool – ItRunsInMyFamily – with Risk Assessment by Health-Care Professionals

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jordon B. Ritchie ◽  
Brandon M. Welch ◽  
Caitlin G. Allen ◽  
Lewis J. Frey ◽  
Heath Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Family Health ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Increased Risk

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Primary care providers (PCPs) and oncologists lack time and training to appropriately identify patients at increased risk for hereditary cancer using family health history (FHx) and clinical practice guideline (CPG) criteria. We built a tool, “ItRunsInMyFamily” (ItRuns) that automates FHx collection and risk assessment using CPGs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ItRuns by measuring the level of concordance in referral patterns for genetic counseling/testing (GC/GT) between the CPGs as applied by the tool and genetic counselors (GCs), in comparison to oncologists and PCPs. The extent to which non-GCs are discordant with CPGs is a gap that health information technology, such as ItRuns, can help close to facilitate the identification of individuals at risk for hereditary cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We curated 18 FHx cases and surveyed GCs and non-GCs (oncologists and PCPs) to assess concordance with ItRuns CPG criteria for referring patients for GC/GT. Percent agreement was used to describe concordance, and logistic regression to compare providers and the tool’s concordance with CPG criteria. <b><i>Results:</i></b> GCs had the best overall concordance with the CPGs used in ItRuns at 82.2%, followed by oncologists with 66.0% and PCPs with 60.6%. GCs were significantly more likely to concur with CPGs (OR = 4.04, 95% CI = 3.35–4.89) than non-GCs. All providers had higher concordance with CPGs for FHx cases that met the criteria for genetic counseling/testing than for cases that did not. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The risk assessment provided by ItRuns was highly concordant with that of GC’s, particularly for at-risk individuals. The use of such technology-based tools improves efficiency and can lead to greater numbers of at-risk individuals accessing genetic counseling, testing, and mutation-based interventions to improve health.

scholarly journals The Use of a Family History Risk Assessment Tool within a Community Health Care System: Views of Primary Care Providers

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Christianson ◽  
◽  
Karen Potter Powell ◽  
Susan Estabrooks Hahn ◽  
Susan H. Blanton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Family History ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Community Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Community Health Care System

scholarly journals Challenging the status quo: results of an acceptability and feasibility study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) management pathways in Indonesian primary care

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati ◽  
Ova Emilia ◽  
Jane Gunn ◽  
Sharon Licqurish ◽  
Phyllis Lau
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders Of Pregnancy ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders

Abstract Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the leading cause of maternal mortality in Indonesia. Focused HDP management pathways for Indonesian primary care practice have been developed from a consensus development process. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the pathways in practice have not been explored. This study reports on the implementation process of the pathways to determine their acceptability and feasibility in Indonesian practice. Methods The pathways were implemented in three public primary care clinics (Puskesmas) in Yogyakarta province for a month, guided by implementation science frameworks of Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). The participating providers (general practitioners (GPs), midwives, and nurses) were asked to use recommendations in the pathways for a month. The pathway implementation evaluations were then conducted using clinical audits and a triangulation of observations, focus groups (FGs), and interviews with all of the participants. Clinical audit data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using a mix of the inductive-deductive approach of thematic analysis. Results A total of 50 primary care providers, four obstetricians, a maternal division officer in the local health office and 61 patients agreed to participate, and 48 of the recruited participants participated in evaluation FGs or interviews. All of the providers in the Puskesmas attempted to apply recommendations from the pathways to various degrees, mainly adopting preeclampsia risk factor screenings and HDP monitoring. The participants expressed that the recommendations empowered their practice when it came to HDP management. However, their practices were challenged by professional boundaries and hierarchical barriers among health care professionals, limited clinical resources, and regulations from the local health office. Suggestions for future scale-up studies were also mentioned, such as involving champion obstetricians and providing more patient education toolkits. Conclusion The HDP management pathways are acceptable and feasible in Indonesian primary care. A further scale-up study is desired and can be initiated with investigations to minimise the implementation challenges and enhance the pathways’ value in primary care practice.

scholarly journals Are antiretrovirals prescribed according to the recommended prescribed daily doses in the private healthcare sector in South Africa

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norah L. Katende-Kyenda ◽  
Martie Lubbe ◽  
Juan H.P. Serfontein ◽  
Ilse Truter
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Health Care Sector ◽  
Hiv And Aids ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Private Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Increased Risk

Current antiretroviral treatment (ART) guidelines recommend different combinations that have led to major improvements in the management of HIV and AIDS in the developed and developing world. With the rapid approval of many agents, health care providers may not be able to familiarise themselves with them all. This lack of knowledge leads to increased risk of dose- prescribing errors, especially by non-HIV and AIDS specialists. The purpose of this retrospective non-experimental, quantitative drug utilisation study was to evaluate if antiretrovirals (ARVs) are prescribed according to the recommended prescribed daily doses (PDDs) in a section of the private health care sector in South Africa (SA). Analysed ARV prescriptions (49995, 81096 and 88988) for HIV and AIDS patients were claimed from a national medicine claims database for the period 1 January 2005 through to 31 December 2007. ARV prescriptions prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) with PDDs not according to the recommended ARV dosing increased dramatically, from 12.33% in 2005 to 24.26% in 2007. Those prescribed by specialists (SPs) increased from 15.46% in 2005 to 35.20% in 2006 and decreased to 33.16% in 2007. The highest percentage of ARV prescriptions with PDDs not according to recommended ARV dosing guidelines was identified in ARV regimens with lopinavir−ritonavir at a PDD of 1066.4/264 mg and efavirenz at a PDD of 600 mg prescribed to patients in the age group of Group 3 (19 years > age ≤ 45 years). These regimens were mostly prescribed by GPs rather than SPs. There is a need for more education for all health care professionals and/or providers in the private health care sector in SA on recommended ARV doses, to avoid treatment failures, development of resistance, drug-related adverse effects and drug interactions.OpsommingHuidige riglyne vir behandeling met antiretrovirale middels beveel verskillende kombinasies aan wat tot groot verbetering in die beheer van MIV en VIGS in die ontwikkelde en ontwikkelende wêreld gelei het. Met die vinnige goedkeuring van talle nuwe middels kan dit gebeur dat verskaffers van gesondheidsorg nie kan bybly om hulle hiermee op hoogte te hou nie. Hierdie gebrek aan kennis lei tot ‘n hoër risiko vir foute in die voorgeskrewe dosis en veral deur persone wat nie spesialiste in MIV en VIGS is nie. Die doel van hierdie nie-eksperimentele, retrospektiewe, kwantitatiewe studie van die gebruik van geneesmiddels was om te bepaal of antiretrovirale middels in ‘n deel van die privaat gesondheidsorgsektor in Suid-Afrika (SA) volgens die aanbevole voorgeskrewe daaglikse dosisse (VDD) voorgeskryf word. Voorskrifte van antiretrovirale middels (49995, 81096 en 88988) aan pasiënte met MIV en VIGS wat in die periode van 1 Januarie 2005 tot 31 Desember 2007 van ‘n nasionale medisyne databasis geëis is, is ontleed. Voorskrifte van antiretrovirale middels deur algemene praktisyns (APs) met VDDs wat nie volgens die aanbevole dosisse vir antiretrovirale middels was nie, het dramaties van 12.33% in 2005 tot 24.26% in 2007 toegeneem. Die wat deur spesialiste (SPs) voorgeskryf is, het van 15.46% in 2005 tot 35.20% in 2006 toegeneem en in 2007 tot 33.16% gedaal. Die hoogste persentasie van voorskrifte vir antiretrovirale middels met VDDs wat nie volgens die riglyne was nie, was in die regimens met lopinavir−ritonavir met ‘n VDD van 1066.4/264 mg en efavirens met ‘n VDD van 600 mg wat aan pasiënte in die ouderdomsgroep van ouer as 19 tot en met 45 jaar voorgeskryf is. Hierdie regimens is meer deur APs as deur SPs voorgeskryf. Daar is ‘n behoefte aan nog opleiding van alle gesondheidsprofessies en/of voersieners in die privaat gesondheidsorgsektor in SA oor die aanbevole antiretrovirale middel-dosisse om mislukking van behandeling, ontwikkeling van weerstand, nadelige effekte vanweë geneesmiddels en geneesmiddel interaksies te voorkom.

scholarly journals Evolving Toward Shared HIV Care Using the Champlain BASE eConsult Service

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 238146831986821
Author(s):  
Claire E. Kendall ◽  
Janessa E. Porter ◽  
Esther S. Shoemaker ◽  
Rachel Seoyeon Kang ◽  
Michael Fitzgerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Question Type ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Survey Responses ◽  
Living With Hiv

Background. Electronic consultation (eConsultation) is a potential strategy to improve access to specialist expertise and facilitate collaborative care models. The Champlain BASE eConsult service allows for asynchronous communication between primary care providers (PCP) and specialists on a secure, web-based system. HIV experts accessible include HIV physician specialists, HIV pharmacists, and social workers with expertise in HIV. Objective. This study aims to describe the use, value, and utility of this eConsultation service in the care of people living with HIV and to characterize the common question types and clinical topics asked by PCPs. Methods. We analyzed the data from eConsults sent to the HIV specialty group in Ontario’s Champlain Local Health Integration Network between February 2015 and December 2017. Usage data and close-out survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, eConsults were classified using a predefined list of validated taxonomy, and a thematic analysis was performed on the consultation logs to identify common clinical themes. Results. Among the 46 eConsults, the most common question type related to drug treatment (58.7%, n = 27) and management (19.6%, n = 9). The main clinical themes involved the care of significant complexities in people living with HIV, such as comorbidities and drug interactions, and suggestions of coordinated patient care. As well, eConsult was used for advice regarding pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative patients at risk of HIV infection. PCPs highly valued the eConsult service (average rating 4.8/5). Conclusion. Overall, this study demonstrates that eConsult provides an efficient and valuable service to PCPs caring for patients living with or at risk for HIV by improving access to HIV specialists and facilitating the delivery of team-based comprehensive care.

scholarly journals 221 Delirium Detection in the ED Utilizing the 4AT Delirium Screening Tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii1-iii16
Author(s):  
Louise Kelly ◽  
Caitriona Whelan ◽  
Maeve Ryan ◽  
Ruth Wade ◽  
Orla Boyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Routine Screening ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Acute Setting ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Delirium is a medical emergency and is associated with increased risk of mortality, in-hospital complications, length of stay and institutionalisation. Delirium screening is recommended for patients at risk on admission. Despite this, delirium screening is frequently not undertaken in the acute setting leading to undiagnosed delirium and sub-optimal clinical care. We aim to investigate the prevalence of delirium in patients aged ≥75 years attending the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary referral centre. Methods Patients aged ≥75yrs presenting to the ED between 08.30 and 18.30, Monday- Friday were assessed by an interdisplinary gerontological service using a standardised assessment tool including the 4AT to screen for delirium. Data was collected and analysed via Excel. Results Of 163 patients screened over a 4 week period 47.9% (78/163) were male with a mean age of 81.8 years (SD 2.7). Twenty three percent (34/148) scored ≥4 indicating a possible delirium. Patients with delirium were older (85 yrs vs. 80 yrs, P<0.001), were more likely to score ≥4 on Clinical Frailty Scale (97% vs. 56%, P<0.001), and at risk of, or have malnutrition (MNA SF score <12) (86% vs. 40%, P<0.001). Conclusion Routine screening of patients in the acute setting detected a high rate of delirium at a level which is consistent with previous studies. Patients with delirium were older, more frequently frail and at risk of malnutrition. Our results support the evidence for routine screening for delirium in the acute setting.

scholarly journals 323. Fragility Fracture Risk in HIV: Awareness Among Primary Care Providers

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S171-S171
Author(s):  
Anne Abbate ◽  
Lisa Chirch ◽  
Michael Christopher. Thompson ◽  
Dorothy Wakefield ◽  
Faryal Mirza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Patients

Abstract Background Recommendations on screening HIV-infected (+) patients for bone disease exist. We sought to characterize awareness of and adherence to HIV-specific recommendations and assess risk factors for fracture in this population. Methods Primary care provider (PCP) and ID specialist awareness of screening recommendations was assessed using an anonymous electronic survey. We conducted interviews of 45 HIV+ patients and chart review. We calculated risk using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Email notifications were sent if an indication dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans was identified. Chart review was repeated 12 months later to assess response. Statistical methods included chi-square and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous data. A multivariate logistic regression examined the relationship between adult fragility fractures and covariates. Results No immunologic or virologic factors or exposure to specific antiretroviral therapies (ART) were associated with FFX (Table 1). FRAX score (hip, major osteoporotic fracture) successfully predicted FFX history (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, respectively). Overall, 35 (78%) patients qualified for DXA; 23 (66%) were men, only 8 (23%) had a previous DXA. Following provider notification, an additional 5 patients had DXA ordered. DXA was recommended for all patients with FFX, compared with 68% without a fracture (P = 0.02). In logistic regression modeling, increasing age, male sex, and months of ART therapy were associated with FFX (Table 2). Twenty-seven providers responded to the pre-intervention survey, of whom only 35% were aware of screening recommendations for HIV+ patients. Of the 18 providers who responded post-intervention, 63% were aware of these recommendations (Table 3). Conclusion A brief educational intervention resulted in increased awareness of HIV-specific screening recommendations, but this translated into adherence to a lesser extent. HIV+ men were more likely to have a history of fragility fracture compared with females. No specific ART or immunologic marker predicted fracture risk or history. Fostering a greater understanding of unique characteristics and risks in this population is crucial to ensure appropriate preventive care. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals What can we do to reduce the burden of avoidable deaths in those with serious mental illness?

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Crompton ◽  
Aaron Groves ◽  
John McGrath
Keyword(s):  
Service Providers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Differential Mortality ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Avoidable Deaths ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Wide Range

AbstractIndividuals with schizophrenia have higher mortality rates compared to the general community. Apart from an increased risk of suicide, people with schizophrenia have an increased risk of death related to a wide range of comorbid physical conditions. There is evidence to suggest that much of this mortality is avoidable. The provision of assertive management of comorbid physical disorders has the potential to help close the differential mortality gap. While the primary data are robust, there is less empirical evidence to guide policy makers and service providers when dealing with these problems. Focused clinical programs aimed at reducing risk factors (e.g. smoking, obesity) and shared care between mental health teams and primary care providers can help reduce the burden of avoidable deaths. In light of recent evidence suggesting that the mortality gap has widened in recent decades, there is an urgent need to address the burden of avoidable deaths in those with serious mental illnesses.

Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Rachel Webster ◽  
Sarah A. Bannon ◽  
Samuel M. Hyde ◽  
Ashley H. Woodson ◽  
Nancy Yi‐Qian You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

scholarly journals ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (06) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian M. Gralnek ◽  
Cesare Hassan ◽  
Ulrike Beilenhoff ◽  
Giulio Antonelli ◽  
Alanna Ebigbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
European Society ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractWe are currently living in the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic that imposes a significant stress on health care providers and facilities. Europe is severely affected with an exponential increase in incident infections and deaths. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 can be subtle, encompassing a broad spectrum from asymptomatic mild disease to severe respiratory illness. Health care professionals in endoscopy units are at increased risk of infection from COVID-19. Infection prevention and control has been shown to be dramatically effective in assuring the safety of both health care professionals and patients. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (www.esge.com) and the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (www.esgena.org) are joining forces to provide guidance during this pandemic to help assure the highest level of endoscopy care and protection against COVID-19 for both patients and endoscopy unit personnel. This guidance is based upon the best available evidence regarding assessment of risk during the current status of the pandemic and a consensus on which procedures to perform and the priorities on resumption. We appreciate the gaps in knowledge and evidence, especially on the proper strategy(ies) for the resumption of normal endoscopy practice during the upcoming phases and end of the pandemic and therefore a list of potential research questions is presented. New evidence may result in an updated statement.

The enduring importance of family health history in the era of genomic medicine and risk assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne B Haga ◽  
Lori A Orlando
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Traditional Approach ◽  
Genomic Medicine ◽  
Family Health ◽  
Family Health History ◽  
Environmental Data ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Health History

Improving disease risk prediction and tailoring preventive interventions to patient risk factors is one of the primary goals of precision medicine. Family health history is the traditional approach to quickly gather genetic and environmental data relevant to the patient. While the utility of family health history is well-documented, its utilization is variable, in part due to lack of patient and provider knowledge and incomplete or inaccurate data. With the advances and reduced costs of sequencing technologies, comprehensive sequencing tests can be performed as a risk assessment tool. We provide an overview of each of these risk assessment approaches, the benefits and limitations and implementation challenges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document