Incidence of antibodies to protamine sulfate/heparin complexes in cardiac surgery patients and impact on platelet activation and clinical outcome

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (06) ◽  
pp. 1141-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothée Leroux ◽  
Jérome Rollin ◽  
Jean Amiral ◽  
Marc-Antoine May ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
...  

SummaryA new ELISA (Zymutest HIA®), based on incubation of diluted plasma with protamine/heparin (PRT/H) complexes without and with platelet factor 4 (PF4) provided by a platelet lysate, was used to detect heparindependent antibodies in a cohort of 232 cardiac surgery (CS) patients and in 47 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Significant binding of IgG/A/M to PRT/H complexes was demonstrated in 59 CS patients (25.4%), with similar absorbances whether platelet lysate was added to the plasma or not, and significant reactivity to PF4/H in 29 of them. Antibodies to PRT or heparin alone were present in 15 and two of these patients, respectively. Importantly, antibodies to PRT/H were detected in only three of the 47 HIT patients, who had also undergone recent CS. The Zymutest HIA® was positive in another 41 CS patients (17%), but only or mainly when their plasma was tested with platelet lysate, with significant levels of antibodies to PF4/H in 40 of them without detectable reactivity to PRT or heparin alone. Slight antibody binding to PRT/H complexes was also measured in six of these 41 patients. Therefore, a total of 35 CS patients exhibited dual antibody reactivity towards PRT/H and PF4/H complexes. Serotonin release assay performed with PRT alone was positive in 17 CS patients with antibodies to PRT/H, but all had normal platelet count evolution without thrombosis postoperatively. In conclusion, antibodies to PRT/H are frequently present in CS patients postoperatively (25.4%), and can activate platelets in vitro, but their clinical impact remains questionable.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2217-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
Dorothee Leroux ◽  
Jerôme Rollin ◽  
Amiral Jean ◽  
May Marc Antoine ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2217 Introduction, aims of the study: Cardiac surgery (CS) is associated with high risk of antibodies (Abs) to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, CS patients can also synthesize Abs specific to protein/H complexes other than PF4/H. In this regard, it has been outlined that some CS patients might also synthesize Abs to protamine/H complexes (PRT/H), but the ability of these Abs to induce adverse events is questionable. Recently a new assay (Zymutest HIA® IgG/A/M, Hyphen Biomed, France) has been developed for the diagnosis of HIT, but its principle is different from those of other ELISA since unfractionated heparin (UFH) is immobilized by protamine sulphate in wells and PF4 is provided by a platelet lysate (Plt L) added in the reaction mixture. Therefore, we used this assay to detect Abs to PRT/H complexes in CS patients, by testing plasma samples without addition of Plt L. We also looked whether Abs to PRT/H, or to PRT alone could be associated with platelet activation and clinical events or not. Patients and methods: 232 consecutive CS patients without HIT (normal Plt count evolution while treated by enoxaparin (n=231) or UFH (n=1) post-operatively were sampled on day 7–8 after cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). Each plasma was studied with the Zymutest HIA IgG/A/M® and absorbance values (A450) were measured without and with addition of Plt L. Two groups of CS patients with heparin-dependent Abs were thus identified: one included patients with Abs that bind equally on PRT/H with or without Plt L (group named “Plt L-ind”), and therefore the A450 values obtained were similar. The second group (named “Plt L-dep”) comprised patients with Abs that bind to PRT/H only or mostly in the presence of Plt L. Therefore, the A450 recorded when the patient plasma was tested with Plt L was above the cut-off value (0.5) and at least two-fold higher than those measured without Plt L. Levels of Abs to either PF4/H (Asserachrom HPIA®, Stago, France), PRT alone (“in house” ELISA), or heparin alone (“in house” ELISA) were also assayed in these 2 groups of patients. Serotonin release assay (SRA) was also performed with UFH alone in all CS patients with heparin-dependent Abs and with PRT alone and PRT/UFH in 45 representative cases. In addition, results obtained in these CS patients were compared to those of 47 other patients with definite HIT diagnosed on clinical history and positive PF4-specific ELISA and SRA (including 21 cases after recent CS with CPB). Results: Heparin-dependent Abs were detected in 100 of 232 CS patients with the Zymutest HIA® assay, but A450 values were similar whether platelet lysate was added to the plasma tested or not in 59 cases (“Plt L-ind” group). No significant levels of Abs to PF4/H were detected in 30 of these 59 CS patients. 41 other CS patients were identified as “Plt L-dep” since A450 values were at least 2-fold higher when their plasma was tested with Plt L. Abs to PF4/H were detected in 40 of these 41 “Plt L-dep” samples without Abs to PRT or heparin alone. In contrast, Abs to PRT were present in 15 of the 59 “Plt L-ind” patients (including 9 with Abs to PF4/H) and 2 also had Abs to heparin alone. On the other hand, Abs to PRT were detected in only 3 of the 47 definite HIT who had also underwent recent CS, and 2 of them had “Plt L-ind” heparin-dependent Abs. SRA was positive with UFH in only 4 of the 232 CS patients (including 2 with “Plt L-ind” Abs), who were asymptomatic despite high levels of Abs to PF4/H (A450> 2.5). SRA was also positive with PRT alone almost exclusively with “Plt L-ind” plasmas (7/30 vs. 1/15 with “Plt L-dep” plasmas). This platelet release was evidenced whether samples contained Abs to PRT alone (4/15) or not (3/15). It was always inhibited by IV.3 (neutralizing monoclonal Ab to FcgRIIa) and when heparin was co-incubated with PRT. In addition, SRA with PRT alone was positive with the 3 HIT plasmas with Abs to PRT. Post-operative platelet count evolution was similar in CS patients until day 8, without clinical thrombosis, whether they had developed Abs to H/PF4, Abs to PRT alone, Abs to PRT/H, or not. Conclusion: Abs that predominantly bind to protamine/heparin complexes are frequently present in CS patients post-operatively (25.4%), sometimes without Abs to PF4/H (12.9%). Despite these Abs to PRT/H can activate platelets in vitro in the presence of PRT (positive SRA), their capability to induce clinical adverse events is doubtful, unless patients are exposed again to protamine without heparin. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.


Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Allyson M. Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker

Abstract Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 472-484
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated hypercoagulable state featuring high thrombosis risk and distinct pathogenesis involving immunoglobulin G-mediated platelet activation. The target of the immune response is a cationic “self” protein, platelet factor 4 (PF4), rendered antigenic by heparin. A key problem is that only a minority of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies induced by heparin are pathogenic, i.e., capable of causing platelet activation and thereby clinical HIT. Since thrombocytopenia occurs frequently in hospitalized, heparin-treated patients, testing for “HIT antibodies” is common; thus, the problem of distinguishing between pathogenic and nonpathogenic antibodies is important. The central concept is that those antibodies that have platelet-activating properties demonstrable in vitro correlate well with pathogenicity, as shown by platelet activation tests such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation assay. However, in most circumstances, immunoassays are used for first-line testing, and so it is important for clinicians to appreciate which immunoassay result profiles—in the appropriate clinical context—predict the presence of platelet-activating antibodies (Bayesian analysis). Clinicians with access to rapid, on-demand HIT immunoassays (e.g., particle gel immunoassay, latex immunoturbidimetric assay, chemiluminescent immunoassay) can look beyond simple dichotomous result interpretation (“negative”/“positive”) and incorporate semiquantitative interpretation, where, for example, a strong-positive immunoassay result (or even combination of two immunoassays) points to a greater probability of detecting platelet-activating antibodies, and hence supporting a diagnosis of HIT. Recent recognition of “SRA-negative HIT” has increased the importance of semiquantitative interpretation of immunoassays, given that strong immunoassay reactivity is a potential clue indicating possible HIT despite a (false) negative platelet activation assay.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Motohashi ◽  
Takefumi Matsuo ◽  
Hidenori Inoue ◽  
Makoto Kaneko ◽  
Shunya Shindo

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the serious complications in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. However, there remains a major problem in diagnosing HIT because the current immunological assays for detection of HIT antibody have limitations. Furthermore, the clinical course of thrombocytopenia in this surgery makes it increasingly difficult to diagnose HIT. We investigated the relationship between platelet count and HIT antibody in 59 patients who underwent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The number of postoperative HIT antibody-positive patients evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (polyanion IgG/IgA/IgM complex antibodies/antiplatelet factor 4 enhanced) was 37 (62.7%). In contrast, platelet activation by HIT antibody was evaluated using the serotonin release assay (SRA). More than 20% and 50% release of serotonin was obtained from 12 patients (20.3%) and 8 patients (13.6%), respectively. The levels of d-dimer were significantly different on postoperative day 14 between SRA-positive and SRA-negative groups; however, postoperative thrombus complication was not detected using sonography in the patients with positive serotonin release at all. After being decreased by the operation, their platelet count recovered within 2 weeks in both groups equally. In our study, although the patients were positive in the platelet activating HIT antibody assay, they remained free from thrombosis and their platelet count recovered after early postoperative platelet decrease. Therefore, in addition to the SRA, monitoring of platelet count might be still considered an indispensable factor to facilitate the prediction of HIT thrombosis prior to manifestation in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
Andreas Greinacher

Abstract Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.


2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1370-1378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christian Pötschke ◽  
Claudia Weber ◽  
Wolfram Kessler ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
...  

AbstractA clinically important adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is induced by antibodies specific for complexes of the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) and the polyanion heparin. Even heparin-naive patients can generate anti-PF4/heparin IgG as early as day 4 of heparin treatment, suggesting preimmunization by antigens mimicking PF4/heparin complexes. These antibodies probably result from bacterial infections, as (1) PF4 bound charge-dependently to various bacteria, (2) human heparin-induced anti-PF4/heparin antibodies cross-reacted with PF4-coated Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, and (3) mice developed anti-PF4/heparin antibodies during polymicrobial sepsis without heparin application. Thus, after binding to bacteria, the endogenous protein PF4 induces antibodies with specificity for PF4/polyanion complexes. These can target a large variety of PF4-coated bacteria and enhance bacterial phagocytosis in vitro. The same antigenic epitopes are expressed when pharmacologic heparin binds to platelets augmenting formation of PF4 complexes. Boosting of preformed B cells by PF4/heparin complexes could explain the early occurrence of IgG antibodies in HIT. We also found a continuous, rather than dichotomous, distribution of anti-PF4/heparin IgM and IgG serum concentrations in a cross-sectional population study (n = 4029), indicating frequent preimmunization to modified PF4. PF4 may have a role in bacterial defense, and HIT is probably a misdirected antibacterial host defense mechanism.


Author(s):  
P Malla

Background: This is the first report of Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) presenting as bilateral carotid thrombi and multiple cerebral infarcts. Methods: 54 year old woman presented with sudden onset of right arm numbness and weakness two days after discharge from hospital. During her hospitalization 9 days prior, she underwent colovesicular fistula repair, received heparin subcutaneously for DVT prophylaxis and had normal platelet counts. Results: On this admission, MRI Brain showed scattered multiple acute infarcts within the cortex of bilateral cerebral hemispheres. CT angiography head /neck showed non-occlusive thrombi at the carotid bifurcations bilaterally. Platelet count on admission was 267 K/uL q which decreased to 125 K/uL the next day, after which heparin was started for the carotid thrombi. The platelet count rapidly decreased further to 79 K/uL leading to suspicion for HIT and switching to Argatroban. HIT and serotonin release assay were positive confirming the diagnosis of HIT. CT chest and tranthoracic echocardiogram was normal. Venous Duplex of bilateral upper and lower extremities were negative for DVTs.Hypercoaguable evaluation was negative. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of identifying HIT as a cause of arterial thrombosis and stroke even with normal platelet counts in the clinical setting of recent heparin use.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4896-4896
Author(s):  
Thein H. Oo ◽  
Cristhiam Mauricio Rojas Hernandez

Introduction: Cancer patients appear to have a higher risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) related complications than non-cancer patients; yet data on the performance of conventional diagnostic tools for HIT in cancer is limited. Our aim was to determine among cancer patients with a 4T score ≥ 4, the performance of the conventional cut-off for HIT antibody testing (IgG anti PF4) to discriminate between serotonin release assay (SRA) positive and negative cases. Methods: Retrospective and prospective analysis of cases (2002-2019) was performed of the electronic medical records of adult cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center with suspected HIT. Cases were included in the analysis if the 4T score was ≥ 4 and investigated with IgG anti-PF4 optical density (HIT OD) and SRA. Logistic regression model and the receiver operating characteristic curves were conducted to identify the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off points for the HIT OD to discriminate HIT cases based on the SRA status. Results: Among 50 cases, 18 were SRA positive. Median HIT OD was 1.03. At a cut-off point of 0.4, the HIT OD performed with a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.50 to discriminate the cases of SRA positive HIT. When the cut-off HIT OD was 1.0, the sensitivity was 0.78 with a specificity of 0.66. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in cancer patients the performance of IgG anti-PF4 is similar to that of non-cancer patients for the identification of HIT cases. Disclosures Oo: Janssen and Janssen: Other: Research: site co-investigator ; Medical Education Speakers Network: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document