Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

Single Center Experience with the Nanoparticle-Based Flow Immunoassay for Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2189-2189
Author(s):  
Susanne Macher ◽  
Nazanin Sareban ◽  
Camilla Drexler ◽  
Gerhard Lanzer ◽  
Katharina Schallmoser
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Score System ◽  
Single Center Experience

Abstract Abstract 2189 Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), caused by antibodies against heparin/platelet factor 4 (HPF4) complex, is a rare but potentially serious side effect of heparin therapy where due to high mortality, rapid diagnosis is crucial. For the detection of HPF4 antibodies we compared the new nanoparticle-based lateral-flow immunoassay (LFI-HIT, Milenia Biotec, Germany) and a particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA, BioRad, Germany) with an IgG-specific-PF4/polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgG-ELISA, GTI Diagnostics, USA). Sera from 121 patients (54/67 f/m, median 73 years, range 14–94) with suspected HIT were prospectively tested. The LFI-HIT and the PaGIA were evaluated visually, the IgG-ELISA was positive at an optical density (OD) cutoff > 0.4. For most of the positive samples, the functional heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) assay was additionally performed to detect false positive serological results and to confirm a clinically relevant HIT by in vitro platelet-activation. Regarding HIT as a clinico-pathological syndrome, characteristics for HIT were evaluated for each patient by the 4Ts scoring system and divided into high, intermediate or low risk. Results of serological analyses and OD values are summarized in the table. Ten of 121 samples were positive in the LFI-HIT, 10/10 positive in the PaGIA and 8/10 positive in the IgG-ELISA. The HIPA was tested in 9/10 samples and was positive in 8/9 samples. Of the 2 samples positive for LFI-HIT and PaGIA but negative in the ELISA, 1 was HIPA positive, 1 HIPA negative, resulting in a specificity of 88.9% for the LFI-HIT assay correlated to the HIPA. From 111/121 LFI-HIT-negative samples, 2 were positive in the PaGIA, the IgG-ELISA (OD 1.318 and 2,019) and in the HIPA. Seven of the 111 LFI-HIT negative samples were positive only in the IgG-ELISA. Due to marginal positive reactions of 5/7 samples in the ELISA with OD values between 0.4 to 0.5, only 2 LIF-HIT negative IgG-ELISA positive samples were tested by HIPA and 1/2 was positive. Based on the ELISA, the sensitivity of the LFI-HIT was 91.9% (102/111 negative samples also negative in the ELISA) in contrast to 93.1% of the PaGIA. The specificity of the LFI-HIT was 80% (LFI-HIT and IgG-ELISA positive), compared to 57.9% of the PaGIA. Notably, the clinical risk estimated by the 4Ts score system (received from 92/121 patients) did not correlate with laboratory diagnosis of HIT, probably due to inadequate evaluation. Concluding our data, a reliable exclusion of HIT by rapid testing with the LFI-HIT only seems possible with additional analysis of HPF4 antibodies by IgG-ELISA and/or HIPA assay. LFI-HIT PaGIA IgG-ELISA OD IgG-ELISA HIPA assay Median (range) Samples n=121 Pos 10 Pos 10 Pos 8 2.366 (0.902-3.000) 7/7 pos Neg 2 0.199 and 0.170 1/2 pos, 1/2 neg Neg 0 - - - - Neg 111 Pos 9 Pos 2 1.318 and 2.019 2/2 pos Neg 7 0.110 (0.054-0.139) 6/6 neg Neg 102 Pos 7 0.436 (0.404-1.463) 1/2 pos, 1/2 neg Neg 95 0.082 (0.013-0.376) Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prevalence of Heparin-Dependent Platelet Antibodies in Children after Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3019-3019
Author(s):  
Rowena C. Punzalan ◽  
Sheila J. Hanson ◽  
Nancy Ghanayem ◽  
Brian R. Curtis ◽  
Kathleen Murkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Bypass ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Platelet Antibodies ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Heparin is used during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery in children. Upon exposure to heparin, heparin-dependent platelet antibodies (HDPA) may form against complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin on platelet surfaces. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HITT) may then ensue. Among adult CPB patients, up to 50% demonstrate HDPA, although only 2% develop HIT and 1% develop HITT. In previous studies done among non-CPB newborns and pediatric intensive care patients, the incidence of HDPA has been zero to minimal. Objective: To determine prevalence of HDPA among children undergoing CPB who are exposed to unfractionated heparin for >120 hours after CPB. Methods: We designed a prospective pilot study. All patients ≤ 12 years old who were to receive heparin during CPB were eligible. The presence of HDPA was assessed by heparin-platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); positive and equivocal results were confirmed by serotonin release assay. Blood samples were obtained at the time of cessation of heparin or after 10 days on heparin, whichever came first. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled: 15 were aged 2–19 days (median 6 days); 15 were aged 1.2 to 50 months (median 4.5 months). One patient had borderline positive and 1 had positive results by heparin-platelet factor 4 ELISA; both had negative results by serotonin release assay; neither developed clots. Eighteen patients developed thrombocytopenia, which is common after CPB, including the 2 with equivocal results by ELISA. Six patients, all with negative ELISAs, developed symptomatic thromboses. Conclusion: There were no HDPA identified among children who received unfractionated heparin for CPB. The specificity of heparin-platelet factor 4 ELISA among children should be assessed.

scholarly journals Challenges in Detecting Clinically Relevant Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibodies

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (04) ◽  
pp. 472-484
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Thrombosis Risk ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Chemiluminescent Immunoassay

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated hypercoagulable state featuring high thrombosis risk and distinct pathogenesis involving immunoglobulin G-mediated platelet activation. The target of the immune response is a cationic “self” protein, platelet factor 4 (PF4), rendered antigenic by heparin. A key problem is that only a minority of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies induced by heparin are pathogenic, i.e., capable of causing platelet activation and thereby clinical HIT. Since thrombocytopenia occurs frequently in hospitalized, heparin-treated patients, testing for “HIT antibodies” is common; thus, the problem of distinguishing between pathogenic and nonpathogenic antibodies is important. The central concept is that those antibodies that have platelet-activating properties demonstrable in vitro correlate well with pathogenicity, as shown by platelet activation tests such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation assay. However, in most circumstances, immunoassays are used for first-line testing, and so it is important for clinicians to appreciate which immunoassay result profiles—in the appropriate clinical context—predict the presence of platelet-activating antibodies (Bayesian analysis). Clinicians with access to rapid, on-demand HIT immunoassays (e.g., particle gel immunoassay, latex immunoturbidimetric assay, chemiluminescent immunoassay) can look beyond simple dichotomous result interpretation (“negative”/“positive”) and incorporate semiquantitative interpretation, where, for example, a strong-positive immunoassay result (or even combination of two immunoassays) points to a greater probability of detecting platelet-activating antibodies, and hence supporting a diagnosis of HIT. Recent recognition of “SRA-negative HIT” has increased the importance of semiquantitative interpretation of immunoassays, given that strong immunoassay reactivity is a potential clue indicating possible HIT despite a (false) negative platelet activation assay.

Incidence of antibodies to protamine sulfate/heparin complexes in cardiac surgery patients and impact on platelet activation and clinical outcome

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (06) ◽  
pp. 1141-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothée Leroux ◽  
Jérome Rollin ◽  
Jean Amiral ◽  
Marc-Antoine May ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Lysate ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Normal Platelet Count ◽  
Normal Platelet ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
Release Assay

SummaryA new ELISA (Zymutest HIA®), based on incubation of diluted plasma with protamine/heparin (PRT/H) complexes without and with platelet factor 4 (PF4) provided by a platelet lysate, was used to detect heparindependent antibodies in a cohort of 232 cardiac surgery (CS) patients and in 47 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Significant binding of IgG/A/M to PRT/H complexes was demonstrated in 59 CS patients (25.4%), with similar absorbances whether platelet lysate was added to the plasma or not, and significant reactivity to PF4/H in 29 of them. Antibodies to PRT or heparin alone were present in 15 and two of these patients, respectively. Importantly, antibodies to PRT/H were detected in only three of the 47 HIT patients, who had also undergone recent CS. The Zymutest HIA® was positive in another 41 CS patients (17%), but only or mainly when their plasma was tested with platelet lysate, with significant levels of antibodies to PF4/H in 40 of them without detectable reactivity to PRT or heparin alone. Slight antibody binding to PRT/H complexes was also measured in six of these 41 patients. Therefore, a total of 35 CS patients exhibited dual antibody reactivity towards PRT/H and PF4/H complexes. Serotonin release assay performed with PRT alone was positive in 17 CS patients with antibodies to PRT/H, but all had normal platelet count evolution without thrombosis postoperatively. In conclusion, antibodies to PRT/H are frequently present in CS patients postoperatively (25.4%), and can activate platelets in vitro, but their clinical impact remains questionable.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of the Serotonin Release Assay and Platelet Count Monitoring After Cardiac Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Motohashi ◽  
Takefumi Matsuo ◽  
Hidenori Inoue ◽  
Makoto Kaneko ◽  
Shunya Shindo
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Immunological Assays ◽  
Platelet Count Monitoring ◽  
The Relationship

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the serious complications in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. However, there remains a major problem in diagnosing HIT because the current immunological assays for detection of HIT antibody have limitations. Furthermore, the clinical course of thrombocytopenia in this surgery makes it increasingly difficult to diagnose HIT. We investigated the relationship between platelet count and HIT antibody in 59 patients who underwent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The number of postoperative HIT antibody-positive patients evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (polyanion IgG/IgA/IgM complex antibodies/antiplatelet factor 4 enhanced) was 37 (62.7%). In contrast, platelet activation by HIT antibody was evaluated using the serotonin release assay (SRA). More than 20% and 50% release of serotonin was obtained from 12 patients (20.3%) and 8 patients (13.6%), respectively. The levels of d-dimer were significantly different on postoperative day 14 between SRA-positive and SRA-negative groups; however, postoperative thrombus complication was not detected using sonography in the patients with positive serotonin release at all. After being decreased by the operation, their platelet count recovered within 2 weeks in both groups equally. In our study, although the patients were positive in the platelet activating HIT antibody assay, they remained free from thrombosis and their platelet count recovered after early postoperative platelet decrease. Therefore, in addition to the SRA, monitoring of platelet count might be still considered an indispensable factor to facilitate the prediction of HIT thrombosis prior to manifestation in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB.

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Perfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J DeBois ◽  
Junli Liu ◽  
Leonard Y Lee ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Charles Mack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Platelet Inhibition ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Heparin Infusion ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cellular Activation ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
New Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

scholarly journals Comparison of an IgG-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Cutoff of 0.4 Versus 0.8 and 1.0 Optical Density Units for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne M. Ritchie ◽  
Jean M. Connors ◽  
Katelyn W. Sylvester
Keyword(s):  
Optical Density ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated optimized diagnostic accuracy in utilizing higher antiheparin–platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density (OD) thresholds for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe the incidence of positive serotonin release assay (SRA) results, as well as performance characteristics, for antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units in the diagnosis of HIT at our institution. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we conducted a single-center retrospective chart review on adult inpatients with a differential diagnosis of HIT evaluated by both antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA from 2012 to 2014. The major endpoints were to assess incidence of positive SRA results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA values ≥0.4 OD units when compared to values ≥0.8 and ≥1.0 OD units. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, laboratory values, clinical and safety outcomes, length of stay, and mortality, were collected. Results: A total of 140 patients with 140 antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA values were evaluated, of which 23 patients were SRA positive (16.4%) and 117 patients were SRA negative (83.6%). We identified a sensitivity of 91.3% versus 82.6% and 73.9%, specificity of 61.5% versus 87.2% and 91.5%, PPV of 31.8% versus 55.9% and 63.0%, NPV of 97.3% versus 96.2% and 94.7%, and accuracy of 66.4% versus 86.4% and 88.6% at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests an increased antiheparin–PF4 ELISA threshold of 0.8 or 1.0 OD units enhances specificity, PPV, and accuracy while maintaining NPV with decreased sensitivity.

scholarly journals Is There an Alternative to Serotonin Release Assay for the Diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)? Evaluation of 5 Other Functional Methods Using 5B9 a Monoclonal IgG That Mimics HIT Human Antibodies

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3742-3742
Author(s):  
Eve-Anne Guéry ◽  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Cloé Derray ◽  
Joévin Besombes ◽  
Wayne Corentin Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Aggregation ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Atp Release ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
The Other ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Functional Methods ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Introduction: Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) is today considered as the "gold standard" to detect pathogenic Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. However, this method is time-consuming, expensive and necessitates the use of 14C-radio-labelled serotonin, this implicating a specific agreement and secured premises, with a non-negligible environmental impact. These limitations explain that the use of SRA is restricted to a few laboratories worldwide. Finding a more accessible method with similar performances is therefore a challenge, and other different functional assays, such as Heparin-Induced Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (HIMEA), Light Transmission Aggregometry (LTA) using platelet rich plasma (PRP) or washed platelet (WP), ATP release, and Flow Cytometry (FC), are available. However, the sensitivity of these assays has never been comparatively evaluated with a standardized reagent. Objectives: The objective of our study was therefore to evaluate the sensitivity of these 5 functional methods for the detection of HIT antibodies in comparison with SRA, using 5B9, a monoclonal chimeric anti-PF4/H IgG recently developed in our laboratory, which fully mimics the effects of human HIT antibodies (Kizlik-Masson et al, J Thromb Haemost, 2017). Material and Methods: Platelet activation induced by 5B9 with heparin was assessed by the 6 following methods with blood samples from 10 consecutive unselected healthy donors:HIMEA performed with whole blood (Multiplate Analyzer® Roche),LTA performed with PRP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),FC based on the assessment of P-selectin expression and performed with PRP (HIT Confirm®, Emosis on AccuriC6 plus®, Becton Dickinson),ATP release performed with WP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),LTA performed with WP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),SRA performed with WP (LSC scintillation counter, Perkin Elmer). For each method, different concentrations of 5B9 (10-20-50 µg/mL) were tested without heparin, and with "therapeutic" or high concentrations of unfractionated heparin (ranging from 0.1 to 1 and from 10 to 200 IU/mL respectively, according to the functional assay performed). The 3 concentrations of 5B9 were previously defined as "low" (10 µg/mL inducing in most cases a serotonin release <50% and no platelet aggregation in PRP), "high" (50 µg/mL always inducing a serotonin release >50% and platelet aggregation in PRP) or "intermediate" (20 µg/mL yielding variable results). Results: With the highest concentration of 5B9 (50 µg/mL), a strong platelet activation was detected with all methods and donors tested. HIMEA exhibited similar sensitivity (Ss 100%) than SRA to detect the activation induced by 20 μg/mL 5B9. FC was also able to detect the effect induced by 20 μg/mL 5B9 with 9/10 donors tested (90%). Alternatively, the measurement of ATP release, and LTA performed with WP or PRP failed to detect the effect of 20 μg/mL 5B9 in 30, 30 and 40 % of donors tested, respectively. SRA was the only method able to detect platelet activation induced by 10 μg/mL 5B9 with all donors tested, and the other methods were less sensitive (table). LTA performed with PRP was always negative (Ss= 0%). Platelet washings increased LTA sensitivity for detecting 10 or 20 μg/mL 5B9 (40% and 70% with WP vs. 0 and 60% with PRP, respectively), and the measurement of ATP release exhibited similar sensitivity. When platelet activation was evaluated in whole blood by HIMEA or in PRP using FC, the sensitivity to detect HIT antibodies was also improved (60% and 50%, respectively). Conclusion: These results confirm that SRA is likely the more sensitive functional assay to detect low concentrations of HIT antibodies. Indeed, apart from SRA, none of the other methods was able to detect the lowest concentration of 5B9 with 100% of donors. Interestingly, FC or HIMEA, which are rapid assays, also exhibit a high sensitivity, close to 100%, for detecting "intermediate" concentrations of HIT antibodies (i.e. corresponding to 20 μg/mL 5B9). We will further study the performances of these functional tests, including their specificity, by assessing patient's samples with confirmed HIT or having developed non-pathogenic antibodies (study in progress). Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document