scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiovascular surgery

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Allyson M. Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker

Abstract Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (06) ◽  
pp. 1141-1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothée Leroux ◽  
Jérome Rollin ◽  
Jean Amiral ◽  
Marc-Antoine May ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
...  

SummaryA new ELISA (Zymutest HIA®), based on incubation of diluted plasma with protamine/heparin (PRT/H) complexes without and with platelet factor 4 (PF4) provided by a platelet lysate, was used to detect heparindependent antibodies in a cohort of 232 cardiac surgery (CS) patients and in 47 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Significant binding of IgG/A/M to PRT/H complexes was demonstrated in 59 CS patients (25.4%), with similar absorbances whether platelet lysate was added to the plasma or not, and significant reactivity to PF4/H in 29 of them. Antibodies to PRT or heparin alone were present in 15 and two of these patients, respectively. Importantly, antibodies to PRT/H were detected in only three of the 47 HIT patients, who had also undergone recent CS. The Zymutest HIA® was positive in another 41 CS patients (17%), but only or mainly when their plasma was tested with platelet lysate, with significant levels of antibodies to PF4/H in 40 of them without detectable reactivity to PRT or heparin alone. Slight antibody binding to PRT/H complexes was also measured in six of these 41 patients. Therefore, a total of 35 CS patients exhibited dual antibody reactivity towards PRT/H and PF4/H complexes. Serotonin release assay performed with PRT alone was positive in 17 CS patients with antibodies to PRT/H, but all had normal platelet count evolution without thrombosis postoperatively. In conclusion, antibodies to PRT/H are frequently present in CS patients postoperatively (25.4%), and can activate platelets in vitro, but their clinical impact remains questionable.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystin Krauel ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
Birgitt Fürll ◽  
Andreas Greinacher

Abstract Heparin is a widely used anticoagulant. Because of its negative charge, it forms complexes with positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). This can induce anti-PF4/heparin IgG Abs. Resulting immune complexes activate platelets, leading to the prothrombotic adverse drug reaction heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT requires treatment with alternative anticoagulants. Approved for HIT are 2 direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI; lepirudin, argatroban) and danaparoid. They are niche products with limitations. We assessed the effects of the DTI dabigatran, the direct factor Xa-inhibitor rivaroxaban, and of 2-O, 3-O desulfated heparin (ODSH; a partially desulfated heparin with minimal anticoagulant effects) on PF4/heparin complexes and the interaction of anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban had any effect on the interaction of PF4 or anti-PF4/heparin Abs with platelets. In contrast, ODSH inhibited PF4 binding to gel-filtered platelets, displaced PF4 from a PF4-transfected cell line, displaced PF4/heparin complexes from platelet surfaces, and inhibited anti-PF4/heparin Ab binding to PF4/heparin complexes and subsequent platelet activation. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban seem to be options for alternative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT. ODSH prevents formation of immunogenic PF4/heparin complexes, and, when given together with heparin, may have the potential to reduce the risk for HIT during treatment with heparin.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (07) ◽  
pp. 691-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyson Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker

AbstractHeparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Because nearly all patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are exposed to heparin and experience a postoperative platelet count fall, it is not surprising that HIT is commonly suspected in this population. However, the incidence of HIT in cardiac surgery patients who receive intraoperative and postoperative unfractionated heparin is much lower than the incidence of suspected HIT, being approximately 1 to 2%. Clinical diagnosis may therefore be particularly challenging because of the need to distinguish the common platelet count fall associated with CPB and surgery from the much less common platelet count fall associated with HIT. A biphasic platelet count pattern is characteristic of HIT in this setting. Laboratory diagnosis is also difficult because of the high frequency of anti-PF4/heparin antibody seropositivity after cardiac surgery in patients without HIT. A unique aspect of management in the cardiac surgery setting is selecting an anticoagulant for intraoperative use in patients with a history of HIT who require cardiac surgery. In this article, we review the epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, and laboratory diagnosis of HIT in cardiac surgery patients and present a conceptual framework for selecting intraoperative anticoagulation in patients with a history of HIT.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (04) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Eichler ◽  
U. Budde ◽  
S. Haas ◽  
H. Kroll ◽  
R. M. Loreth ◽  
...  

Summary Background. No data exist regarding the inter-laboratory reproducibility of the heparin-induced-platelet-activation (HIPA) test, the most widely used functional assay in Germany for the detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. Methods. Nine laboratories used an identical protocol to test eight different sera with the HIPA test. Five laboratories also tested the sera with a platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin-complex ELISA. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium was assessed using 0.2 aFXa units instead of heparin in the HIPA test. Results. Two of nine laboratories had no discrepant HIPA test results. Four laboratories differed in one sample, one reported two discrepant results, and two laboratories reported more than two discrepant results. Cross-reactivity with danaparoid-sodium test results differed among laboratories. PF4/heparin ELISA results were identical in all five laboratories. Conclusion. The HIPA test requires strict quality control measures. Using both a sensitive functional assay (HIPA test) and a PF4/heparin ELISA will allow detection of antibodies directed to antigens other than PF4/heparin complexes as well as detection of IgM and IgA antibodies with PF4/heparin specificity.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2217-2217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
Dorothee Leroux ◽  
Jerôme Rollin ◽  
Amiral Jean ◽  
May Marc Antoine ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2217 Introduction, aims of the study: Cardiac surgery (CS) is associated with high risk of antibodies (Abs) to platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, CS patients can also synthesize Abs specific to protein/H complexes other than PF4/H. In this regard, it has been outlined that some CS patients might also synthesize Abs to protamine/H complexes (PRT/H), but the ability of these Abs to induce adverse events is questionable. Recently a new assay (Zymutest HIA® IgG/A/M, Hyphen Biomed, France) has been developed for the diagnosis of HIT, but its principle is different from those of other ELISA since unfractionated heparin (UFH) is immobilized by protamine sulphate in wells and PF4 is provided by a platelet lysate (Plt L) added in the reaction mixture. Therefore, we used this assay to detect Abs to PRT/H complexes in CS patients, by testing plasma samples without addition of Plt L. We also looked whether Abs to PRT/H, or to PRT alone could be associated with platelet activation and clinical events or not. Patients and methods: 232 consecutive CS patients without HIT (normal Plt count evolution while treated by enoxaparin (n=231) or UFH (n=1) post-operatively were sampled on day 7–8 after cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). Each plasma was studied with the Zymutest HIA IgG/A/M® and absorbance values (A450) were measured without and with addition of Plt L. Two groups of CS patients with heparin-dependent Abs were thus identified: one included patients with Abs that bind equally on PRT/H with or without Plt L (group named “Plt L-ind”), and therefore the A450 values obtained were similar. The second group (named “Plt L-dep”) comprised patients with Abs that bind to PRT/H only or mostly in the presence of Plt L. Therefore, the A450 recorded when the patient plasma was tested with Plt L was above the cut-off value (0.5) and at least two-fold higher than those measured without Plt L. Levels of Abs to either PF4/H (Asserachrom HPIA®, Stago, France), PRT alone (“in house” ELISA), or heparin alone (“in house” ELISA) were also assayed in these 2 groups of patients. Serotonin release assay (SRA) was also performed with UFH alone in all CS patients with heparin-dependent Abs and with PRT alone and PRT/UFH in 45 representative cases. In addition, results obtained in these CS patients were compared to those of 47 other patients with definite HIT diagnosed on clinical history and positive PF4-specific ELISA and SRA (including 21 cases after recent CS with CPB). Results: Heparin-dependent Abs were detected in 100 of 232 CS patients with the Zymutest HIA® assay, but A450 values were similar whether platelet lysate was added to the plasma tested or not in 59 cases (“Plt L-ind” group). No significant levels of Abs to PF4/H were detected in 30 of these 59 CS patients. 41 other CS patients were identified as “Plt L-dep” since A450 values were at least 2-fold higher when their plasma was tested with Plt L. Abs to PF4/H were detected in 40 of these 41 “Plt L-dep” samples without Abs to PRT or heparin alone. In contrast, Abs to PRT were present in 15 of the 59 “Plt L-ind” patients (including 9 with Abs to PF4/H) and 2 also had Abs to heparin alone. On the other hand, Abs to PRT were detected in only 3 of the 47 definite HIT who had also underwent recent CS, and 2 of them had “Plt L-ind” heparin-dependent Abs. SRA was positive with UFH in only 4 of the 232 CS patients (including 2 with “Plt L-ind” Abs), who were asymptomatic despite high levels of Abs to PF4/H (A450> 2.5). SRA was also positive with PRT alone almost exclusively with “Plt L-ind” plasmas (7/30 vs. 1/15 with “Plt L-dep” plasmas). This platelet release was evidenced whether samples contained Abs to PRT alone (4/15) or not (3/15). It was always inhibited by IV.3 (neutralizing monoclonal Ab to FcgRIIa) and when heparin was co-incubated with PRT. In addition, SRA with PRT alone was positive with the 3 HIT plasmas with Abs to PRT. Post-operative platelet count evolution was similar in CS patients until day 8, without clinical thrombosis, whether they had developed Abs to H/PF4, Abs to PRT alone, Abs to PRT/H, or not. Conclusion: Abs that predominantly bind to protamine/heparin complexes are frequently present in CS patients post-operatively (25.4%), sometimes without Abs to PF4/H (12.9%). Despite these Abs to PRT/H can activate platelets in vitro in the presence of PRT (positive SRA), their capability to induce clinical adverse events is doubtful, unless patients are exposed again to protamine without heparin. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glosser LD ◽  
◽  
Knauss HM ◽  
Jodeh W ◽  
Craig D ◽  
...  

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic and potentially fatal immune complication of heparin therapy. HIT is challenging to diagnose, particularly in critically ill patients where multiple causes of thrombocytopenia must be considered. Diagnostic algorithms for HIT begin with a clinical assessment, followed by laboratory testing when indicated. If Platelet Factor-4 (PF4)/heparin immunoassay and Serotonin Release Assays (SRA) are negative, HIT is deemed unlikely and heparin therapy may be resumed. Current recommendations have excluded the next step in work up for thrombocytopenia after immunoassay and functional assays result negative despite worsening thrombocytopenia following heparin re-initiation. We present the case of an 85-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, found to have a clinical course consistent with HIT despite negative serologic and functional assay results. Our case highlights the challenge in diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a medically complex patient and demonstrates the need for standardized recommendations following negative laboratory results despite high clinical suspicion.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Motohashi ◽  
Takefumi Matsuo ◽  
Hidenori Inoue ◽  
Makoto Kaneko ◽  
Shunya Shindo

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the serious complications in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. However, there remains a major problem in diagnosing HIT because the current immunological assays for detection of HIT antibody have limitations. Furthermore, the clinical course of thrombocytopenia in this surgery makes it increasingly difficult to diagnose HIT. We investigated the relationship between platelet count and HIT antibody in 59 patients who underwent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The number of postoperative HIT antibody-positive patients evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (polyanion IgG/IgA/IgM complex antibodies/antiplatelet factor 4 enhanced) was 37 (62.7%). In contrast, platelet activation by HIT antibody was evaluated using the serotonin release assay (SRA). More than 20% and 50% release of serotonin was obtained from 12 patients (20.3%) and 8 patients (13.6%), respectively. The levels of d-dimer were significantly different on postoperative day 14 between SRA-positive and SRA-negative groups; however, postoperative thrombus complication was not detected using sonography in the patients with positive serotonin release at all. After being decreased by the operation, their platelet count recovered within 2 weeks in both groups equally. In our study, although the patients were positive in the platelet activating HIT antibody assay, they remained free from thrombosis and their platelet count recovered after early postoperative platelet decrease. Therefore, in addition to the SRA, monitoring of platelet count might be still considered an indispensable factor to facilitate the prediction of HIT thrombosis prior to manifestation in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB.


Perfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J DeBois ◽  
Junli Liu ◽  
Leonard Y Lee ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Charles Mack ◽  
...  

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document