scholarly journals Use of Global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines in asthma management among paediatric residents in a Sub Saharan African country: a cross-sectional descriptive study

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adaeze Chikaodinaka Ayuk ◽  
Agozie Ubesie ◽  
Chioma Laura Odimegwu ◽  
Kenechukwu Iloh
Keyword(s):  
African Country ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines

scholarly journals Assessment of Asthma Control and Severity among Children According to Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines in Sulaimani City-Iraq

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Adnan M. H. Hamawandi ◽  
Kosar M Ali ◽  
Ali Z. Naji
Keyword(s):  
Asthma Control ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Persistent Asthma ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asthmatic Children ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Severe Persistent Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines

Background: Asthma is a common and potentially serious chronic disease that imposes a substantial burden on patients, their families and the community. Objective: Assessment of the level of asthma control and severity in asthmatic children in Sulaimani city according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 82 patients who are known cases of asthma, aged 5 – 15 years , from 1st of March 2014 to 1st of August 2014. Results: Out of 82 patients in our study, 20.8%were classified as having intermittent asthma all of them have well controlled asthma, 42.7% of those classified as having mild persistent asthma 65.7% of them have well controlled asthma, 26.8% of those classified as having moderate persistent asthma 54.5% of them have partly controlled asthma, and 9.8%of those classified as having severe persistent asthma the majority of them 87.5% have uncontrolled asthma and none of them reached to the controlled asthma level according to GINA guidelines. Regarding the peak expiratory flow (PFT) we notice that 58.8% of asthmatic children who were classified as having intermittent severity, their PEF measurements ranged between 160- 250 l/min while those with severe persistent asthma 75% of them have readings between 50-150 l/min. Conclusion: Current levels of asthma control in the Sulaimani city fall far short of the goals specified in the GINA guidelines for asthma management. Also there is a strong correlation between PEF measurements and the level of asthma severity,

scholarly journals A comparative analysis of asthma treatment guidelines and Essential Medicine Lists in sub-Saharan Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1294-1298
Author(s):  
W. Siduna ◽  
H. Bradley ◽  
R. Laing
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Essential Medicine ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is a chronic condition affecting between 300 and 400 million people worldwide. Studies have shown that asthma symptoms can be controlled by the daily use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The management of asthma varies in different settings.METHODS: Asthma management in 13 sub-Saharan African countries was compared to the 2018 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines and the 20th WHO model list of essential medicines (2019). A table with predefined criteria extracted from the international guidelines was used to analyse the content and compare the different treatment guidelines using an Excel spreadsheet.RESULTS: There are variations in the way asthma is diagnosed and treated in different countries. Countries with older treatment guidelines do not have a stepwise approach to assessing severity as stipulated by GINA. Of the 13 countries, only 46% have inhaled ICS at the primary level, 38% have ICS at the secondary level and 16% do not specify.CONCLUSION: The management of asthma varies widely between different countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The noticed variations in approach to care can be explored as an opportunity to harness resources to produce similar and updated guidelines, resulting in uniformity of care across different countries.

scholarly journals Comparing LAMA with LABA and LTRA as add-on therapies in primary care asthma management

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Kaplan ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
Roland Buhl ◽  
Christian Vogelberg ◽  
Eckard Hamelmann
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Lung Function ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Control Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends a stepwise approach to adjust asthma treatment to the needs of individual patients; inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain the core pharmacological treatment. However, many patients remain poorly controlled, and evidence-based algorithms to decide on the best order and rationale for add-on therapies are lacking. We explore the challenges of asthma management in primary care and review outcomes from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as add-on to ICS in patients with asthma. In adults, LAMAs and LABAs provide a greater improvement in lung function than LTRAs as add-on to ICS. In children, results were positive and comparable between therapies, but data are scarce. This information could aid decision-making in primary care, supporting the use of add-on therapy to ICS to help improve lung function, control asthma symptoms and prevent exacerbations.

scholarly journals The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): 25 years later

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 1900598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Philippe Boulet ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Søren Pedersen ◽  
J. Mark FitzGerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Asthma Management ◽  
Treatment Guideline ◽  
Global Strategy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Global Initiative For Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1993 under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA, and the World Health Organization to produce a global strategy on asthma management and prevention. Now constituted as a non-profit entity, it continues to produce, on an annual basis, the most widely cited evidence-based report on the optimal management of asthma in both adults and children intended for global use. Although the GINA Report is often viewed and used as an asthma treatment guideline, it is designed to be a clinically oriented strategy document that supports the development of practice guidelines in different countries and regions.Other GINA products, including the report's pocket guides, teaching slide kits and implementation tools, are also offered free of charge for public use. The GINA Scientific Committee comprises recognised international experts from primary, secondary and tertiary centres of care who are actively involved in both the care of patients and research in asthma. The GINA Assembly is a forum for exchange of scientific information and discussions on initiatives to improve asthma care in various countries, focusing on implementation strategies. GINA plays a role in shaping research on the diagnosis and treatment of asthma and informs the development of point of care practice guides and decision support tools. GINA supports the objectives of raising awareness of asthma and improving access to therapy and quality of care for asthmatic patients, in addition to presenting and promoting continuously updated evidence-based treatment approaches for global use.

scholarly journals Assessment of asthma control and lung function in asthmatic children in Sokoto, North Western Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Fatima Abubakar Ishaq ◽  
Bilkisu Ilah Garba ◽  
Nma Mohammad Jiya ◽  
Ahmed Hamidu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Function ◽  
Asthma Control ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asthmatic Children ◽  
Children With Asthma ◽  
Global Initiative ◽  
Gina Guidelines ◽  
Study Participants

Objectives: This study aimed at assessing asthma control using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) asthma assessment, and determining its relationship with lung function parameters among asthmatic children in Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching hospital, Sokoto. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among 60 children with asthma diagnosed based on GINA guidelines. It was conducted over a period of 4 months. The GINA asthma control assessment was administered to assess asthma control. Lung function was done using a portable spirometer. Results: Males accounted for 58.3% of the study population with M: F of 1.4:1 and median age of 9.47 years, with majority from urban domicile (91.7%). Well-controlled asthma accounted for 50.0% while 35.0% had partly controlled asthma and 15.0% had poorly controlled asthma. The median FEV1/FVC among the study participants was 0.856 (IQR: 0.170). There was no relationship between asthma control and LF parameters (FEV1: r = 0.044, P = 0.736, FVC: r = 0.010, P = 0.941, FEV1/FVC: r = 0.122, P = 0.352, and PEFR: r = 0.015, P = 0.911). Conclusion: Majority of the study participants had well-controlled asthma and no relationship was found between asthma control and lung function. Thus, serial monitoring of LF in addition to uniformly agreed standardized assessment of asthma control is required to objectively evaluate asthma control in children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document