Effect of Double Screw on Abutment Screw Loosening in Single-Implant Prostheses

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-447
Author(s):  
Young-Gun Shin ◽  
So-Yun Kim ◽  
Chang-Mo Jeong ◽  
So-Hyoun Lee ◽  
Jung-Bo Huh
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Behnaz Ebadian ◽  
Amirhossein Fathi ◽  
Saba Khodadad

Background. The complications of implant-supported prostheses can be classified into mechanical and biological ones, one part of which is associated with screw loosening. This study was aimed to compare the effect of four different abutment screw torque techniques on screw loosening in single implant-supported prostheses following the application of mechanical loading. Materials and Methods. In this experimental study, a total of 40 implants in acrylic blocks (6 × 10 × 20 mm) were mounted perpendicular to the surface. They were then randomly divided into four groups: (1) torquing once with 30 Ncm, (2) torquing three times with 30 Ncm and 5-minute intervals, (3) torquing once with 30 Ncm, opening the screw, and retorquing with 30 Ncm, and (4) torquing once with 35 Ncm. The torque values were confirmed by using a digital torque meter. Then, the samples underwent a force (2 cps, 0.453–11.793 kg) for three hours before the measurement of detorque values. The screw loosening force (torque) was then measured and recorded. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS (version 22) software using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test at a 5% error level. Results. The maximum mean detorque values of the abutment screws in single implant-supported prostheses were reported for groups 4 (27.8 ± 1.3), 1 (26.8 ± 1.3), and 3 (25.1 ± 1.3), and the minimum mean detorque value was found in group 2 (24.9 ± 1.2). Moreover, no significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3 ( p > 0.05 ), but a significant difference was found between groups 1 and 3 and other groups ( p < 0.05 ). Conclusion. The increase in the torque value increased the torque loss. However, the detorque value in group 4 showed the least difference with the value recommended by the manufacturer (30 Ncm).


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Hasan Kocaağaoğlu ◽  
Haydar Albayrak ◽  
Zekeriya Taşdemir ◽  
Sezgi Cinel Sahin ◽  
Mustafa Zortuk

Crown fractures, framework fractures, and abutment screw loosening or screw fracture are examples of mechanical implant failures. Abutment screw loosening is a serious problem that can result in abutment screw fractures. This clinical report describes the production method of a custom-made abutment screwdriver piece for a patient with abutment screw loosening.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
D.R. Prithviraj ◽  
Ninad Muley ◽  
Vikas Gupta

A study of the implant–abutment connection is of great importance because it is the primary determinant of the strength and stability of an implant-supported restoration, which, in turn, determines the restoration’s prosthetic stability. Traditionally, Brånemark’s external hexagon has been used, but significant complications, such as abutment screw loosening, rotational misfit at the implant–abutment interface, and microbial penetration have led to modification of the external hexagon and the development of internal implant–abutment connections. In this review, we describe various implant–abutment connections that have evolved over time from the traditional external hexagon.  How to cite this article: Alharissy M, Dayoub S. The Evolution of External and Internal Implant–Abutment Connections: A Review. Int Dent Res 2012;2:37-42. Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Dincer Kose ◽  
Burcin Karataslı ◽  
Sabit Demircan ◽  
Taha Emre Kose ◽  
Erhan Cene ◽  
...  

Preload is applied to screws manually or using a torque wrench in dental implant systems, and the preload applied must be appropriate for the purpose. The aim of this study was to assess screw loosening and bending/torsional moments applied by clinicians of various specialties following application of manual tightening torque to combinations of implants and abutments. Ten-millimeter implants of 3.7 and 4.1 mm diameters and standard or solid abutments were used. Each group contained five implant-abutment combinations. The control and experimental groups comprised 20 and 160 specimens, respectively. Implants in the experimental group were tightened by dentists of different specialties. Torsional and bending moments during tightening were measured using a strain gauge. Control group and implants with preload values close to the ideal preload were subjected to a dynamic loading test at 150 N, 15 Hz, and 85,000 cycles. The implants that deformed in this test were examined using an optical microscope to assess deformities. Manual tightening did not yield the manufacturer-recommended preload values. Dynamic loading testing suggested early screw loosening/fracture in samples with insufficient preload.


10.1563/805.1 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeev Ormianer ◽  
Guido Schiroli

Abstract This study reports on the first longitudinal results of an alumina (70%)-zirconia (30%) ceramic restorative system for implant-supported, single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxillary jaw. Eighteen patients (9 men, 9 women, mean age = 42.4 years) were treated with 22 implants placed into 19 extraction sockets and 3 residual ridges. Eight implants were immediately loaded with nonoccluding provisional prostheses. All implants were definitively loaded with fully occluding ceramic restorations after osseointegration and soft tissue maturation. Patients were monitored from 7 to 30 months (mean = 18.1 months) after loading. All implants osseointegrated and were successfully restored. One case of abutment screw loosening occurred because of patient parafunction (bruxing), and another patient reported chewing pain attributed to malocclusion. Both problems were successfully resolved without further incidence. Within the context of this study, single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxillary jaw was successfully achieved with alumina-zirconia ceramic single-tooth restorations with up to 30 months of clinical function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document