Abstract 1664: Impact of Ischemic Burden and Revascularization on Outcomes among Patients Receiving Drug Therapy Versus an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in MUSTT: Evidence for Ischemia Induced Proarrhythmia

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A Crandall ◽  
Thomas J Bunch ◽  
Thomas M Munger ◽  
Gail Hafley ◽  
Kerry L Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy ◽  
Long Term Effect ◽  
Background Therapy ◽  
Thallium Imaging ◽  
The Relationship

Background. ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction is well established. However debate exists between the relationship between ischemia and the proarrhythmic state. Persistent ischemia may counter antiarrhythmic (AA) drug and/or device efficacy. Furthermore, the extent to which revascularization mitigates this influence of ischemia on efficacy is unknown. Methods . 704 patients enrolled in the MUSTT trial were studied. Ischemia was determined by the presence of angina within 6 weeks of enrollment and ≥ 2 reversible thallium defects. Revascularization was characterized as CABG or PTCA within 1 year of enrollment or the use of thrombolytics with the sentinal myocardial infarction (MI). We compared groups who were randomized to background medical treatment (BG Rx) verses those who were randomized to AA drug therapy in addition to EP testing (EP AARx). Results . 507 (81%) patients had ≤2 vessel CAD, whereas the remaining 19% had 3 vessel disease. 268 patients reported angina within 6 weeks of study enrollment. Thallium imaging revealed 0–1 defects in 458 (65%) and ≥2 in another 246 (35%). Those with ≥ 2 defects on Thallium and angina within 6 weeks of device implant had a significantly lower 5-year freedom from mortality in the EP AARx and BG Rx cohorts (Table ). Patients with EP AARx had an 8% lower mortality than those with BG Rx therapy alone if they received thrombolytics. However, if they did not receive thrombolytics, their mortality rate was 5% higher than the BG Rx group. Conclusion . Outcomes are worse in patients on antiarrhythmic therapy with ischemic factors compared to those on background therapy alone, particularly in the setting of recent angina. A proarrhythmic effect from antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with ischemia may underlie the higher mortality. ICD therapy mitigates the negative long-term effect of ischemia on mortality in those treated with AA therapy. Five Year Freedom from Mortality

Antiarrhythmische Pharmakotherapie

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 826-829
Author(s):  
A. Goette ◽  
P. Kirchhof ◽  
A. Treszl ◽  
K. Wegscheider ◽  
T. Meinertz
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation Trial

ZusammenfassungEs werden die Ergebnisse von Studien sowie die Protokolle laufender „Megastudien“ mit Bezug zum Vorhofflimmer-Netzwerk dargestellt. Bei den abgeschlossenen Studien handelt es sich um die Flecainide Short-Long trial (Flec-SL) und die Angiotensin-II-Rezeptorblocker in Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationStudie (ANTIPAF). Bei den „Megastudien“ um Studien mit den Kürzeln EAST (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial), CABANA (Catheter Ablation Versus Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial) und CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation versus Standard conventional Treatment in patients with LEft ventricular dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation). Die Ergebnisse der Studien: Eine präventive Kurzzeittherapie nach Kardio-version ist sinnvoller als der Verzicht auf jegliche Antiarrhythmika-Nachbehandlung. Noch effektiver scheint eine antiarrhythmische Langzeit-Nachbehandlung über sechs Monate zu sein. In der ANTIPAF-Studie zeigte sich, dass bei Patienten mit paroxysmalem Vorhofflimmern (VHF) ohne strukturelle Herzkrankheit der Angiotensinrezeptorblocker Olmesartan nicht in der Lage ist, die Häufigkeit der Anfälle zu reduzieren. Wichtigstes therapeutisches Ziel ist die Verhinderung der Progression von VHF. In der EAST-Studie wird geprüft, ob eine frühzeitig eingeleitete, „aggressive“ Therapie zur Kontrolle des Herzrhythmus eher in der Lage ist, Morbidität und Mortalität von VHF zu senken als die Standardtherapie.

Sex differences in pharmacotherapy and long-term outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Dagan ◽  
D Dinh ◽  
J Stehli ◽  
C Tan ◽  
A Brennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ischaemic Heart Disease ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Background Left ventricular dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease are common amongst women, however, women tend to present later and are less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapy compared to their male counterparts. Purpose To investigate if a sex discrepancy exists for optimal medical therapy (OMT) and long-term mortality in a cohort of patients with known ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and left ventricular dysfunction. Methods We analysed prospectively collected data from a multicentre registry database collected between 2005–2018 on pharmacotherapy 30-days post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 13,015 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. OMT at 30-days was defined as beta-blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) ± mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Long-term mortality was determined by linkage with the National Death Index, with median follow up of 4.7 (IQR 2.0–8.6) years. Results Mean age was 65±12 years; women represented 20.2% (2,634) of the cohort. Women were on average 5 years older, had higher average BMI, higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, prior stroke and rheumatoid arthritis. Men were more likely to have sleep apnoea, be current/ex-smokers and to have had prior myocardial infarction, PCI and bypass surgery. Overall, 72.3% (9,411) of patients were on OMT, which was similar between sexes (72.7% in women vs. 72.2% in men, p=0.58). Rates of BB therapy were similar between sexes (85.2% vs. 84.5%, p=0.38), while women were less likely to be on an ACEi/ARB (80.4% vs. 82.4%, p=0.02) and more likely to be on a MRA (12.1% vs. 10.0%, p=0.003). Amongst those with LVEF ≤35% (n=1,652), BB (88.7% vs. 87.3%, p=0.46), ACEi/ARB (83.3% vs. 82.1%, p=0.59) and MRA use (32.5% vs. 33.3%, p=0.78) was comparable. Aspirin use was similar between sexes (95.3% vs. 95.9%, p=0.12), while women were less likely to be on statin therapy (93.5% vs. 95.3%, p<0.001) and a second antiplatelet agent (94.4% vs. 95.6%, p=0.007). On unadjusted analysis women had significantly higher long-term mortality of 25.4% compared to 19.0% for men (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis out to 14 years demonstrated that men on OMT have the best long-term survival overall and women on sub-OMT have significantly poorer outcomes compared to men on sub-OMT. However, after adjusting for OMT and other comorbidities there was no difference in long-term mortality between sexes (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.14, p=0.94). Conclusion From this large multicentre registry, we found similar rates of guideline-directed pharmacotherapy for left ventricular dysfunction between sexes, however women were less likely to be on appropriate IHD secondary prevention. The increased unadjusted long-term mortality amongst women is likely due to differing baseline risk, given that adjusted mortality was similar between sexes. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document