Abstract 18881: New Oral Anticoagulants for Periprocedural Management of Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: a Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Shokor Parwani ◽  
Daniel Blaschke ◽  
Alexander Wutzler ◽  
Martin Huemer ◽  
Phillip Attanasio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Warfarin Group

Introduction: Thromboembolic events are the most feared complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The traditional periprocedural anticoagulation approach is discontinuation of vitamin K antagonist and bridging with heparin. Newly procedures are done under therapeutic INR 2-3. Recent studies used periprocedural new direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Hypothesis: We evaluated the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of NOACs for periprocedural anticoagulation during RFCA of AF. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central were searched. Retrospective and prospective studies published as peer-reviewed full-size articles were included if they reported embolic events and major and minor bleeding. Results: Fifteen studies were identified (14 observational studies, 1 small randomized trial). A total of 7050 patients were included (NOACs group: 2887 ). A total of 37 thromboembolic complications occurred (0,5%) with 17 events in the NOAC group (0,6%) and 20 in the warfarin group (0,5%) (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 1.99). Major bleeding were numerically higher in the warfarin group compared to the NOACs group. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (odds ratio 0.69, CI 0.43 to 1.10). Subgroup analysis did not reveal any differences in event rates. Conclusions: Our review suggests that dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban are as effective and safe as warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing RFCA of AF. However, it has to be acknowledged that the current evidence is mainly based on observational studies.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and advanced stages of chronic kidney disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Chashkina ◽  
D.A Andreev ◽  
N.L Kozlovskaya ◽  
Z.K Salpagarova ◽  
A.A Bykova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Warfarin Group ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in around 10–15% of patients (pts) with CKD, while 30% of those with AF have CKD. In pts with advanced stages of CKD, safety and efficacy profiles of novel oral anticoagulants, in particular rivaroxaban, have been understudied. Purpose To evaluate safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in pts with stage 4 CKD or a transient reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to 15–29 ml/min/1.73 m2. Materials and methods Data of 3,500 pts with nonvalvular AF in cardiovascular units for the period from 2017 to 2019 were analyzed. Of these, 507 (15%) showed a decrease in GFR to 29–15 ml/min/1.73 m2. 109 (3.1%) pts enrolled in the study (in accordance with inclusion criteria) and were randomized in a 2: 1 fashion to either the 15 mg rivaroxaban (n=74) or warfarin (n=36) group. The pts had either not previously been taking anticoagulants, or TTR was <65% in the case of taking warfarin. The average follow-up period was 18 months. Visits took place every 3 months, when compliance, haemoglobin were checked and GFR calculation was carried out. Primary endpoint: development of major and minor bleeding on the BARC scale. Secondary endpoints: thromboembolic events, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality. Results The pts were of similar clinical and demographic profile. The median age was 77 years with 32 men in the rivaroxaban group and 14 in the warfarin group. The average CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.6 and 4.7 (n/s) in the rivaroxaban and warfarin group, respectively, while the average HAS-BLED score was 3 (n/s) in both. Pts taking warfarin were significantly more likely to develop minor bleedings: 26 (72%) vs 27 (37%) in the rivaroxaban group, p=0.001. There were not detected significant differences in the ratio of major bleedings (warfarin 3 (8.3%) versus rivaroxaban 2 (2.7%) cases, p=0.3). No significant differences at secondary endpoints were observed. In the warfarin group, 1 (2.8%) ischemic stroke and 1 fatal haemorrhagic stroke occurred. In the rivaroxaban group, 1 (1.4%) ischemic stroke occurred during a 5-day break in taking the anticoagulant. 5 (6.9%) pts in the rivaroxaban group developed ACS, vs 1 (2.8%) in the warfarin group (n/s). 2 (2.7%) pts died from myocardial infarction in the rivaroxaban group and 1 (2.8%) - in the warfarin group (n/s). Mortality from all causes was 5 (6.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and 3 (8.3%) in the warfarin group (n/s). In the rivaroxaban group, GFR (CG formula) improved significantly more since the 3rd month of observation (in the 18th month of observation, the median value was 35.0 [29.0; 39.5] ml/min/1.73 m2 vs 27.0 [21.5; 31.5] ml/min/1.73 m2 in the warfarin group, p<0.001). Conclusion Significantly more pts within the warfarin group had minor bleedings. Pts during warfarin and rivaroxaban therapy showed an improvement in glomerular filtration, which was more pronounced in the rivaroxaban group. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 13721: Is Single Dose Interruption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Necessary Before Atrial Fibrillation Ablation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali H Jafry ◽  
Khawaja H Akhtar ◽  
Amna M Chaudhary ◽  
Safi U Khan ◽  
Mohammad S Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Silent Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) and undergoing catheter ablation, it is unclear if interruption of a single dose of DOAC before the procedure is necessary. We assessed the peri-procedural adverse events between uninterrupted vs single-dose interrupted DOACS. Methods: A systematic review of Medline and EMBASE was conducted and all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared uninterrupted versus interrupted DOACS were included. Random effects model was used and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported using Mantel Haenszel method. All studies defined dose interruption as holding a single dose of DOAC before ablation. Separate analyses were conducted for RCTs and observational studies. Results: Eight RCTs with 2656 patients and 4 observational studies with 834 patients were included. In RCT restricted analysis, no significant difference was seen in major bleeding [RR 0.65 (CI 0.30-1.42)], minor bleeding [RR 0.98 (0.68-1.40)], stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism [RR 0.90 (CI 0.27-2.98)] and silent cerebral infarction [RR 0.51 (CI 0.14-1.89)]. In observational study restricted analysis, no significant difference was seen in major bleeding [RR 3.04 (CI 0.13-74.07)], minor bleeding [RR 0.88 (0.46-1.69)], stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism [RR 0.98 (CI 0.12-7.91)] and a statistically significant lower silent cerebral infarction [RR 0.45 (CI 0.31-0.67)]. Conclusion: Uninterrupted DOACS are safe for patients undergoing AF ablation and logistically easier for patients. Figure 1: Forest plot showing outcomes with uninterrupted vs interrupted direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation in randomized controlled trials.

scholarly journals A single institution’s experience with using dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Xin Chan ◽  
Yee May Wong ◽  
Pow-Li Chia ◽  
Zhen Liang Kek
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Warfarin Group ◽  
One Year

Background: Although non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, their use in the local clinical setting has not been well studied. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. A total of 383 patients recruited between June 2011 and December 2014 were studied. Incidents of stroke, systemic embolism and clinically relevant bleeding events were compared between dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin. Results: Stroke rates were 5.47% per year with warfarin, 7.27% per year with dabigatran (HR=1.32; 95% CI 0.48−3.64; p=0.591) and 2.76% per year with rivaroxaban (HR=0.49; 95% CI 0.14−1.69; p=0.261). The warfarin group had significantly higher incidence of minor bleeding (62.4% vs 3.64% for dabigatran vs 13.79% for rivaroxaban; p<0.001), major bleeding (3.91% for warfarin, 0.91% for dabigatran, 0% for rivaroxaban; p=0.028) and other adverse events (51.18% for warfarin, 3.64% for dabigatran, 8.28% for rivaroxaban; p<0.001). Incidence of dyspepsia was higher in both NOAC groups compared to warfarin (0% for warfarin, 7.27% for dabigatran, 5.52% for rivaroxaban; p=0.003). Conclusion: Stroke and venous thromboembolism rates after one year were comparable among dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin. Warfarin was associated with more bleeding and adverse events while both NOACs were associated with higher rates of dyspepsia. Further study is needed to assess the clinical benefit of NOACs in the Singaporean population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document