Abstract P014: Impact of Antihypertensive Class on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey J McGaughey ◽  
Emily A Fletcher ◽  
Sachin A Shah
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Central Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Funnel Plots ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: New evidence suggests central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) is a superior predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes as compared to peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP). Additionally, augmentation index (AI) provides a surrogate assessment of vascular stiffness. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of antihypertensive drug classes on cSBP and AI. METHODS: Search terms related to blood pressure and AI were used to identify relevant articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library and CINAHL limited to randomized trials in humans and publications in English. Appropriate data on cSBP, pSBP and AI were extracted along with other study characteristics. Weighted mean differences (WMD) between the pSBP and cSBP with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects methodology. For AI, the WMD from baseline was determined. Further, the data was sorted by antihypertensive class (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics) to determine their impact on cSBP and AI. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess robustness of results by limiting to the fixed-effects model, a primary diagnosis of hypertension, and excluding studies with JADAD scores < 3. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger’s statistic and visual inspection of funnel plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Fifty-one and 58 studies incorporating 4381 and 3716 unique subjects were included for cSBP and AI respectively. Overall, antihypertensives reduced pSBP more than cSBP (2.52mmHg, 95%CI 1.35 to 3.69; I2 =21.9%). ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs and diuretics reduced cSBP and pSBP in a similar manner (-2.40mmHg, 95%CI -4.89 to 0.08; 1.12mmHg, 95%CI -2.25 to 4.49; 1.01mmHg, 95%CI -2.17 to 4.19; 0.65mmHg, 95%CI -2.47 to 3.77 respectively). BBs posed a significantly greater reduction in pSBP as compared to cSBP (5.19mmHg, 95%CI 3.21 to 7.18). The change in AI from baseline was (-3.09, 95%CI -3.90 to -2.28; I2 =84.5%). A significant reduction in AI was seen with ACE-Is, ARBs, CCB and diuretics (-5.61, 95%CI -6.95 to -4.27; -5.28, 95%CI -8.61 to -1.95; -5.36, 95%CI -6.95 to -3.77; -3.24, 95%CI -5.45 to -1.03 respectively). BBs reduced AI non-significantly (-0.32, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.84). While the Egger’s statistic showed a lack of publication bias (p>0.125), it cannot be ruled out based on visual inspection of funnel plots. CONCLUSIONS: BBs are not as beneficial in reducing cSBP as opposed to ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs and diuretics. In contrast, ACE-Is, ARBs, CCBs and diuretics significantly reduce AI, which is not evident with BB therapy. The views expressed in this material are those of the author(s), and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense, or the Department of the Air Force.

scholarly journals Influence of Mindfulness and Relaxation on Treatment of Essential Hypertension: Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Fushun Zhang ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Qiao Zhai ◽  
Juanjuan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Effect Model

Background. Some studies published previously have shown a strong correlation between hypertension and psychological nature including impulsion emotion or mindfulness and relaxation temperament, among which mindfulness and relaxation temperament might have a benign influence on blood pressure, ameliorating the hypertension. However, the conclusion was not confirmed. Objective. The meta-analysis was performed to investigate the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on essential hypertension interventions and confirm the effects. Methods. Systematic searches were conducted in common English and Chinese electronic databases (i.e., PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) from 1980 to 2020. A meta-analysis including 5 studies was performed using Rev Man 5.4.1 software to estimate the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on blood pressure, ameliorating the hypertension. Publication bias and heterogeneity of samples were tested using a funnel plot. Studies were analyzed using either a random-effect model or a fixed-effect model. Results. All the 5 studies investigated the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on diastolic and systolic blood pressure, with total 205 participants in the control group and 204 in the intervention group. The random-effects model (REM) was used to calculate the pooled effect for mindfulness and relaxation on diastolic blood pressure (I2 = 0%, t2 = 0.000, P = 0.41 ). The random pooled effect size (MD) was 0.30 (95% CI = −0.81–1.42, P = 0.59 ). REM was used to calculate the pooled effect for mindfulness and relaxation on systolic blood pressure (I2 = 49%, t2 = 3.05, P = 0.10 ). The random pooled effect size (MD) was −1.05 (95% CI = −3.29–1.18, P = 0.36 ). The results of this meta-analysis were influenced by publication bias to some degree. Conclusion. All the results showed less influence of mindfulness and relaxation might act on diastolic or systolic blood pressure, when mindfulness and relaxation are used to intervene in treating CVD and hypertension.

scholarly journals The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2824
Author(s):  
Su-Kiat Chua ◽  
Wei-Ting Lai ◽  
Lung-Ching Chen ◽  
Huei-Fong Hung
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background: The management of hypertension remains suboptimal throughout the world. Methods: We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) for the treatment of high arterial pressure. Relevant published articles from PubMed, Cochrane base, and Medline were examined, and the last search date was December 2020. Only published randomized controlled trials and double-blind studies were selected for further analysis. The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) in the sitting position, as well as the mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP), were assumed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were considered as safety outcomes. Results: Ten studies with a total of 5931patients were included for analysis. Compared with placebo, LCZ696 had a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference (WMD) = −6.52 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −8.57 to −4.47; p < 0.001), msDBP (WMD = −3.32 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.57 to −2.07; p < 0.001), maSBP (WMD = −7.08 mmHg, 95% CI: −10.48 to −3.68; p < 0.001), maDBP (WMD = −3.28 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.55 to −2.02, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, only 200 mg and 400 mg LCZ696 showed a significant BP reduction. There was no difference in the AE rate between the LCZ696 and placebo groups (WMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.27, p = 0.54). Egger’s test revealed a potential publication bias for msSBP (p = 0.025), but no publication bias for other outcomes. Conclusion: LCZ696 may reduce blood pressure more efficaciously than traditional therapy in hypertensive patients without increasing adverse effects.

The effect of 0.01% atropine on ocular axial elongation for myopia children: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Yu ◽  
Jiasu Liu
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Axial Elongation ◽  
Funnel Plots ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Q Statistic ◽  
Regression Tests ◽  
Review Manager

Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to identify the therapeutic effect of 0.01% atropine with on ocular axial elongation for myopia children. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases from inception to July 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 14.0 and Review Manager version 5.3 softwares. We calculated the weighted mean differences(WMD) to analyze the change of ocular axial length (AL) between orthokeratology combined with 0.01% atropine (OKA) and orthokeratology (OA) alone. The Cochran's Q-statistic and I2 test were used to evaluate potential heterogeneity between studies. To evaluate the influence of single studies on the overall estimate, a sensitivity analysis was performed. We also performed sub group and meta-regression analyses to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. We conducted Begger's funnel plots and Egger's linear regression tests to investigate publication bias. Results: Nine studies that met all inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 191 children in OKA group and 196 children in OK group were assessed. The pooled summary WMD of AL change was -0.90(95%CI=-1.25~-0.55) with statistical significance(t=-5.03, p<0.01), which indicated there was obvious difference between OKA and OK in myopic children. Subgroup analysis also showed that OKA treatment resulted in significantly less axial elongation compared to OK treatment alone according to SER. We found no evidence for publication bias. Conclusions:  Our meta-analysis indicates 0.01% atropine atropine is effective in slowing axial elongation in myopia children with orthokeratology.

Abstract P369: Impact of Enhanced External Counterpulsation on Exercise Duration in Patients With Chronic Stable Angina: A Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin A Shah ◽  
Bradley R Williams ◽  
Atiera Andrews-Pestana
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Visual Inspection ◽  
Chronic Stable Angina ◽  
Exercise Duration ◽  
External Counterpulsation ◽  
Bruce Protocol ◽  
Funnel Plots ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Enhanced External Counterpulsation

Introduction: Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive Food and Drug Administration approved treatment for patients with chronic stable angina and heart failure. Typical treatment regimen comprises of 35, 1-hour sessions of synchronized compressions of the calf, thigh, and sacral muscles over a seven-week period. Exercise duration measured using an exercise tolerance test is a commonly utilized marker of worsening ischemic disease and is predictive of cardiovascular mortality. Several studies have evaluated the impact of EECP on exercise duration with conflicting results. We sought to determine the magnitude of benefit of EECP on exercise duration. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane database along with hand searching of relevant articles limited to those published in the English language. Studies were included for analyses if assessing patients with stable angina and reporting exercise duration data using either the Bruce or modified Bruce exercise treadmill test. Appropriate data were extracted at baseline and after completion of the full course of EECP. Studies were excluded if presenting duplicate data or using a non-Bruce protocol. A weighted mean difference from baseline along with 95% confidence interval was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Sub-group analyses, the Cochran Q statistic, and JADAD scores were utilized to assess for heterogeneity, non-combinability, and quality of published studies respectively. Publication bias was assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the Egger bias statistic. Results: Our search strategy identified 1117 independent studies of which 15 were included for analyses. A total of 484 individual subjects were incorporated in the primary analysis. Exercise duration improved by 55.5 seconds (95%CI 36.1 to 74.9; Cochran Q, p=0.246) from baseline. The benefits were maintained when using a fixed-effects model, excluding small studies and limiting to studies using the Bruce protocol only. While the Egger statistic showed a lack of publication bias (p=0.121), it cannot be ruled out based on visual inspection of funnel plots. Conclusion: EECP significantly increases exercise duration by 56 seconds in patients with chronic stable angina. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of EECP on long-term outcomes. The views expressed in this material are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense or the Department of the Air Force.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Resveratrol Supplementation on Markers of Renal Function and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Hypoglycemic Therapy

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (23) ◽  
pp. 5645
Author(s):  
Tawanda M. Nyambuya ◽  
Bongani B. Nkambule ◽  
Sithandiwe E. Mazibuko-Mbeje ◽  
Vuyolwethu Mxinwa ◽  
Kabelo Mokgalaboni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Total Protein Content ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Hypoglycemic Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Evidence on the beneficial effects of resveratrol supplementation on cardiovascular disease-related profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is conflicting, while its impact on renal function and blood pressure measurements remains to be established in these patients. The current meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the impact of resveratrol supplementation on markers of renal function and blood pressure in patients with T2D on hypoglycemic medication. Electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched for eligible studies from inception up to June 2020. The random and fixed effects model was used in the meta-analysis. A total of five RCTs met the inclusion criteria and involved 388 participants with T2D. Notably, most of the participants were on metformin therapy, or metformin in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs such as insulin and glibenclamide. Pooled estimates showed that resveratrol supplementation in patients with T2D lowered the levels of fasting glucose (SMD: −0.06 [95% CI: −0.24, 0.12]; I2 = 4%, p = 0.39) and insulin (SMD: −0.08 [95% CI: −0.50, 0.34], I2 = 73%, p = 0.002) when compared to those on placebo. In addition, supplementation significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (SMD: −5.77 [95% CI: −8.61, −2.93], I2 = 66%, p = 0.02) in these patients. Although resveratrol supplementation did not affect creatinine or urea levels, it reduced the total protein content (SMD: −0.19 [95% CI: −0.36, −0.02]; I2 = 91%, p = 0.001). In all, resveratrol supplementation in hypoglycemic therapy improves glucose control and lowers blood pressure; however, additional evidence is necessary to confirm its effect on renal function in patients with T2D.

P1691Impact of dose and duration of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Huang ◽  
K Trieu ◽  
S Yoshimura ◽  
M Woodward ◽  
N Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Sodium Excretion ◽  
Salt Intake ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Salt ◽  
Baseline Blood Pressure ◽  
Salt Reduction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Authoritative medical and public health agencies in most countries advise to reduce population dietary salt intake to under 5–6 g/day as a strategy for preventing high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. However, there is still dispute about whether salt reduction should be adopted by all populations. In addition, the effect of duration of dietary salt reduction has not been sufficiently investigated. Purpose To understand the effect of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure and the impact of intervention duration. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Randomized controlled trials that allocated participants to low and high salt intake, without confounding from unequal concomitant interventions, were included. We excluded studies done in individuals younger than 18 years, pregnant women, individuals with renal disease or heart failure, and studies with sodium excretion estimated from spot urine. Random effect meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of the effect on 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Multivariate meta-regression was used to quantify the dose response effect of dietary salt on blood pressure change and to understand the impact of the intervention duration. Results 125 studies were included with 162 data points extracted. Ninety-nine data points (61%) had interventions under 4 weeks. Overall, 24-hour urinary sodium excretion changed by −141 mmol (95% CI: −156; −126), systolic blood pressure changed by −4.4 mm Hg (95% CI: −5.2; −3.7) and diastolic blood pressure changed by −2.4 mm Hg (95% CI: −2.9; −1.9). Sodium reduction resulted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure in all subgroups except in participants with low baseline sodium intake (<109 mmol) (Figure 1). Each 100 mmol reduction of sodium was associated with 2.7 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.0; 4.4; p=0.002) reduction of systolic blood pressure and 1.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.0; 2.4; p=0.046) reduction of diastolic blood pressure after adjusting for intervention duration, age, sex, race, baseline blood pressure, baseline sodium intake and interaction between age and baseline blood pressure. For the same amount of salt reduction, a 10 mm Hg higher baseline systolic blood pressure would result in 2.5 mm Hg greater reduction of systolic blood pressure. There is not enough evidence to show the impact of intervention duration. Figure 1 Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that sodium reduction could reduce blood pressure in all adult populations regardless of age, sex and race. The effect of salt reduction on systolic blood pressure increases with higher baseline blood pressure. Further studies, designed to investigate the impact of intervention duration, are needed to understand the significance of the duration. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals Association between Serum Vitamin C and the Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ran ◽  
Wenli Zhao ◽  
Xiaodong Tan ◽  
Hongwu Wang ◽  
Kaito Mizuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
English Articles

Background. Hypertension is regarded as a major and independent risk factor of cardiovascular diseases, and numerous studies observed an inverse correlation between vitamin C intake and blood pressure. Aim. Our aim is to investigate the relationship between serum vitamin C and blood pressure, including the concentration differences and the correlation strength. Method. Two independent researchers searched and screened articles from the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP databases, and WANFANG databases. A total of 18 eligible studies were analyzed in the Reviewer Manager 5.3 software, including 14 English articles and 4 Chinese articles. Results. In the evaluation of serum vitamin C levels, the concentration in hypertensive subjects is 15.13 μmol/L lower than the normotensive ones (mean difference=−15.13, 95% CI [-24.19, -6.06], and P=0.001). Serum vitamin C has a significant inverse relation with both systolic blood pressure (Fisher’s Z=−0.17, 95% CI [-0.20, -0.15], P<0.00001) and diastolic blood pressure (Fisher’s Z=−0.15, 95% CI [-0.20, -0.10], P<0.00001). Conclusions. People with hypertension have a relatively low serum vitamin C, and vitamin C is inversely associated with both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.

scholarly journals Comparison of Survival Benefits of Combined Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone for Uterine Serous Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanying Lin ◽  
Jingyi Zhou ◽  
Yuan Cheng ◽  
Lijun Zhao ◽  
Yuan Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Uterine Serous Carcinoma ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveTo date, there is no convincing evidence comparing the impact of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy with chemotherapy alone in postoperative uterine serous carcinoma (USC), which remains an unclear issue. We conducted a meta-analysis assessing the impact of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone on overall survival in postoperative USC.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed in the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2016. Studies comparing survival among patients who underwent combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone after surgery for USC were included. Quality assessments were carried out by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Publication bias was assessed using both funnel plot and the Egger regression test. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 13.0 software.ResultNine retrospective studies with relatively high quality containing 9354 patients were included for the final meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death (HR, 0.72; P < 0.0001) compared to chemotherapy alone with a low heterogeneity (I2 = 21.0%, P = 0.256). Subgroup analyses indicated that calculating HR by unadjusted method may cause the heterogeneity among studies. Exploratory analyses showed that either patients with early stage disease (HR, 0.73; P = 0.011) or advanced stage disease (HR, 0.80; P < 0.0001) have survival benefits from combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. No significant evidence of publication bias was found.ConclusionsThis is the first meta-analysis examining the role of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in USC. Our results suggest the potential survival benefits of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Further studies, preferably randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm our results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document