scholarly journals Ongoing Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias and All-cause Mortality at Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Generator Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Yuyun ◽  
Sebhat A. Erqou ◽  
Adelqui O. Peralta ◽  
Peter S. Hoffmeister ◽  
Hirad Yarmohammadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background - Uncertainty still surrounds implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) generator change at time of elective replacement indicator (ERI), in primary prevention patients with improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) beyond guideline recommendations or without prior appropriate ICD therapies. Methods - We conducted a meta-analysis of studies assessing the risk of appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause mortality after generator change in patients with improved LVEF > 35% versus unimproved LVEF ≤ 35% or patients without versus with prior appropriate ICD therapies during the life of their first ICD generator. A systematic electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until December 31 st , 2019 was performed. Estimates were combined using random-effects model meta-analyses. Results - In 15 studies that included 29730 patients, 25.3% had LVEF improvement >35% at time of generator change. The pooled annual incidence of appropriate ICD therapies was significantly lower in those with improved LVEF, compared to patients with unimproved LVEF: 4.6% versus 10.7%; risk ratio (RR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.36-0.68), p <0.0001. The pooled rate of all-cause mortality was 6.6% versus 10.9% per year, RR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.62-0.69), p < 0.0001. Risk of inappropriate shock was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.750). In 8 studies (N = 27209), the pooled incidence of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) was significantly lower in patients without prior ICD therapies (3.9% per annum), compared to those with prior ICD therapies (12.5 % per annum), RR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.33-0.41), P<0.001. Conclusions - There was significant reduction in risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients with improved versus unimproved LVEF or those who received versus those who did not receive appropriate ICD therapies during the life of their first ICD generator. However, we found a substantial residual outcome risk in these groups of patients.

scholarly journals Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias and 1‐Year Predictors of Mortality in Patients Treated With Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Undergoing Generator Replacement

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Demarchi ◽  
Stefano Cornara ◽  
Antonio Sanzo ◽  
Simone Savastano ◽  
Barbara Petracci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Generator Replacement

Background When implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) battery is depleted most patients undergo generator replacement (GR) even in the absence of persistent ICD indication. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and the overall prognosis of patients with and without persistent ICD indication undergoing GR. Predictors of 1‐year mortality were also analyzed. Methods and Results Patients with structural heart disease implanted with primary prevention ICD undergoing GR were included. Patients were stratified based on the presence/absence of persistent ICD indication (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% at the time of GR and/or history of appropriate ICD therapies during the first generator's life). The study included 371 patients (82% male, 40% with ischemic heart disease). One third of patients (n=121) no longer met ICD indication at the time of GR. During a median follow‐up of 34 months after GR patients without persistent ICD indication showed a significantly lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (1.9% versus 16.2%, P <0.001) and ICD therapies. 1‐year mortality was also significantly lower in patients without persistent ICD indication (1% versus 8.3%, P =0.009). At multivariable analysis permanent atrial fibrillation, chronic advanced renal impairment, age >80, and persistent ICD indication were found to be significant predictors of 1‐year mortality. Conclusions Patients without persistent ICD indication at the time of GR show a low incidence of appropriate ICD therapies after GR. Persistent ICD indication, atrial fibrillation, advanced chronic renal disease, and age >80 are significant predictors of 1‐year mortality. Our findings enlighten the need of performing a comprehensive clinical reevaluation of ICD patients at the time of GR.

scholarly journals Association of statin use and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa ◽  
Ibadete Bytyçi ◽  
Stephan Von Haehling ◽  
Stefan Anker ◽  
Jacek Jozwiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Statin Use

Abstract Background The role of statins in patients with heart failure (HF) of different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains unclear especially in the light of the absence of prospective data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in non-ischemic HF, and taking into account potential statins’ prosarcopenic effects. We assessed the association of statin use with clinical outcomes in patients with HF. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central until August 2018 for RCTs and prospective cohorts comparing clinical outcomes with statin vs non-statin use in patients with HF at different LVEF levels. We followed the guidelines of the 2009 PRISMA statement for reporting and applied independent extraction by multiple observers. Meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) of effects of statins on clinical outcomes used generic inverse variance method and random model effects. Clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and CV hospitalization. Results Finally we included 17 studies (n = 88,100; 2 RCTs and 15 cohorts) comparing statin vs non-statin users (mean follow-up 36 months). Compared with non-statin use, statin use was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–0.83, P < 0.0001, I2 = 63%), CV mortality (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76–0.88, P < 0.0001, I2 = 63%), and CV hospitalization (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69–0.89, P = 0.0003, I2 = 36%). All-cause mortality was reduced on statin therapy in HF with both EF < 40% and ≥ 40% (HR: 0.77, 95% Cl: 0.68–0.86, P < 0.00001, and HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69–0.82, P < 0.00001, respectively). Similarly, CV mortality (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79–0.93, P = 0.0003, and HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77–0.90, P < 0.00001, respectively), and CV hospitalizations (HR 0.80 95% CI: 0.64–0.99, P = 0.04 and HR 0.76 95% CI: 0.61–0.93, P = 0.009, respectively) were reduced in these EF subgroups. Significant effects on all clinical outcomes were also found in cohort studies’ analyses; the effect was also larger and significant for lipophilic than hydrophilic statins. Conclusions In conclusion, statins may have a beneficial effect on CV outcomes irrespective of HF etiology and LVEF level. Lipophilic statins seem to be much more favorable for patients with heart failure.

scholarly journals Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator oversensing due to electric shock

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 236-239
Author(s):  
Ruzica Jurcevic ◽  
Lazar Angelkov ◽  
Dejan Vukajlovic ◽  
Velibor Ristic ◽  
Milosav Tomovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Electric Shock ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Circumflex Artery ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
First Case

Introduction. We described the first case of oversensing due to electric shock in Serbia, in a 54-year-old man who had implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Case Outline. In July 2002, the patient had acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation (VF) which was terminated with six defibrillation shocks of 360 J. Coronary angiography revealed 30% stenosis of circumflex artery, the left anterior descending coronary artery was recanalized and the right coronary artery was without stenosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%. In December 2003, an electrophysiology study was performed and ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced and terminated with 200 J defibrillation shock. Single chamber ICD Medtronic Gem III VR was implanted in January 2004 and defibrillation threshold was 12 J. The patient was followed up during three years every three months and there were no VT/VF episodes and VT/VF therapies. In December 2007, the patient experienced electric shock through the fork while he was making barbecue on the electric grill. ICD recognized this event in VF zone (oversensing) and delivered defibrillation shock of 18 J. The electrogram of the episode showed ventricular sensing - intrinsic sinus rhythm with electric shock potentials which were misidentified as VF. After charge time of 3.16 seconds, ICD delivered defibrillation shock and sinus rhythm was still present. Conclusion. Oversensing of ICD has different aetiology and the most common cause is supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.

scholarly journals Effects of Exercise on Cardiac Function Outcomes in Women Receiving Anthracycline or Trastuzumab Treatment for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 8336
Author(s):  
Pedro Antunes ◽  
Dulce Esteves ◽  
Célia Nunes ◽  
Anabela Amarelo ◽  
José Fonseca-Moutinho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circulating Biomarkers ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Background: we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy of exercise training on cardiac function and circulating biomarkers outcomes among women with breast cancer (BC) receiving anthracycline or trastuzumab-containing therapy. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus were searched. The primary outcome was change on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcomes included diastolic function, strain imaging and circulating biomarkers. Results: Four RCTs were included, of those three were conducted during anthracycline and one during trastuzumab, involving 161 patients. All trials provided absolute change in LVEF (%) after a short to medium-term of treatment exposure (≤6 months). Pooled data revealed no differences in LVEF in the exercise group versus control [mean difference (MD): 2.07%; 95% CI: −0.17 to 4.34]. Similar results were observed by pooling data from the three RCTs conducted during anthracycline. Data from trials that implemented interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions (n = 3) showed a significant effect in preventing LVEF decline favoring the exercise (MD: 3.25%; 95% CI: 1.20 to 5.31). No significant changes were observed on secondary outcomes. Conclusions: exercise appears to have a beneficial effect in mitigating LVEF decline and this effect was significant for interventions with ≥36 exercise sessions.

scholarly journals P1391 Global longitudinal strain in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D De Campos ◽  
R Teixeira ◽  
A Botelho ◽  
C Saleiro ◽  
J Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Regurgitation ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Symptom Development ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that left ventricle global longitudinal strain (GLS) assessed with 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography, is an independent predictor of outcome in asymptomatic moderate to severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) patients. OBJECTIVES To assess GLS impact on mortality and need for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or symptom development in chronic asymptomatic AR patients and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS A literature search was performed according with these key terms "aortic regurgitation" and "longitudinal strain." The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary end-points were: a composite of all-cause mortality, need for AVR or symptom development; and only AVR plus symptom development. Data was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis models. Pooled Hazard Ratio (HR) was performed using its log transformation and inverse variances as weights were then calculated for each study . RESULTS Six studies were included, with a total of 1,571 asymptomatic patients with at least moderate AR and preserved LVEF. There were 996 events (death, AVR, symptom development) reported during follow-up. Pooled adjusted mortality HR tended to be higher for patients with worse GLS (1.14 [0.96–1.35], P = 0.13, I2 51%). GLS performed better in predicting AVR or symptom development (mean difference -0.72 [-1.29, -0.15], P = 0.01, I2 88%), with an estimated HR of 1.36 ([1.01–1.84], P = 0.04, I2 65%). CONCLUSIONS In asymptomatic chronic moderate to severe AR patients, impaired GLS was associated with adverse cardiac outcomes. Left ventricular GLS may offer incremental value on risk stratification as well as on decision-making. Abstract P1391 Figure 1

1384MitraClip treatment of functional mitral regurgitation - A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Noutsias ◽  
M Matiakis ◽  
M Ali ◽  
E Abate ◽  
B Ahmadzada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with higher rates of hospitalizations and with increased mortality in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Transcatheter mitral valve repair by MitraClip® implantation (TMVrMC) may effectively reduce severe MR, and is associated with symptomatic improvement. However, the long-term clinical effects of this procedure are not well defined. Aims We analyzed outcomes for rehospitalization and survival in heart failure patients with moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) treated by either medical treatment (MT) only TMVrMC+MT by meta-analysis. Methods and results By systematic search of bibliographic databases, we evaluated publications comparing heart failure patients with FMR treated by MT only versus treatment by MT combined with TMVrMC. Studies with a minimum of 25 enrolled patients and a follow/up period of at least 12 months were deemed eligible for this meta-analysis. We identified n=7 studies enrolling 2,884 HFrEF patients, divided into two study arms: TMVrMC+MT (n=1,618), versus FMR patients receiving MT only (n=1,266). At 12 months, there was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality favoring TMVR+MT (OR: 0.67; CI 95% 0.55–0.81), as well as a reduction of unplanned rehospitalizations (OR: 0.69; 95%; CI 0.53–0.89), compared with the MT only patients. At 24 months, there was a significant reduction of all-cause mortality in the TMVrMC+MT patient group (OR: 0.50; CI: 95%: 0.38–0.66; p<0.001). TMVrMC+MT was associated with significantly lower rates of unplanned re-admissions for heart failure compared with MT only at 12 months (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53–0.89; p<0.001) and at 24 months (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39–0.71; p<0.001). In one publication, a survival benefit of TMVrMC+MT over MT alone was shown at 5 years post intervention (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.69–0.94; p=0.012) after weighting for propensity score and controlling for age. Conclusions This meta-analysis on n=2,884 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe FMR reveals that TMVrMC+MT, as compared with MT alone, is associated with a significant reduction of rehospitalizations and improvement of survival. These data imply additional evidence for TMVrMC in eligible heart failure patients with relevant FMR, which might be important for an update of the corresponding guidelines.

Effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and shock application on serum endothelin-1 and big-endothelin levels

2002 ◽  
Vol 103 (s2002) ◽  
pp. 233S-236S ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea SZÜCS ◽  
Katalin KELTAI ◽  
Endre ZIMA ◽  
Hajnalka VÁGÓ ◽  
Pál SOÓS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Shock Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Icd Implantation ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Endothelin 1

The incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the early post-operative period following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is relatively high compared with that in control periods. Since endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been proven to be an endogenous arrhythmogenic substance, we investigated the changes in serum ET-1 and big-ET levels in patients undergoing ICD implantation. Serum concentrations of ET-1 and big-ET were measured in 14 patients with various heart diseases before the operation, as well as 1min and 1h after the last shock therapy. Big-ET levels and the sum of ET-1 and big-ET levels were unchanged immediately after the operation, but had increased significantly by 1h after implantation (before, 1.57±0.61pmol/l; 1min, 1.86±0.87pmol/l; 1h, 4.29±1.65pmol/l for big-ET; before, 3.44±1.07pmol/l; 1min, 3.79±1.29pmol/l; 1h, 6.36±2.03pmol/l for big-ET+ET-1). There was a significant correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction and big-ET level measured 1h after the last shock delivery (r =-0.542, P<0.05). We conclude that the increased big-ET level observed 1h after the last induction and shock therapy of ventricular fibrillation might have a pathophysiological role in the increased incidence of post-operative spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document