Abstract P257: Getting to the Golden Hour: Correlating “Door-To” Times with 60-Minute Administration of tPA in an Academic Medical Center
Introduction: The efficacy of intravenous tPA for the treatment of acute stroke diminishes over time. The AHA/ASA and NINDS recommend a goal door to needle time of 60 minutes or less. Objective: Identify potential barriers to tPA administration within 60 minutes of arrival. Methods: Retrospective review of tPA adsinistration using “Get With the Guidelines” (GWTG) and institutional records from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 (n=100). Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated for the NINDS recommended time standards, age and NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. We used a receiver-operator curve (ROC) to identify the door to CT time predictive of tPA administration ≤ 60 minutes. Results: Median door to physician, door to CT, and door to stroke team times were within the recommended goals. Door to CT (ρ=0.53, p<0.0001), and door to stroke team (ρ=0.33, p<0.01) times were positively correlated with door to tPA times. Last known well to arrival (ρ= -0.28, p<0.01) and NIHSS (ρ= -0.32, p<0.01) were negatively correlated with door to tPA times; patients with higher NIHSS and longer last-known-well to arrival times received tPA in a shorter time frame. Age and door to physician time were not correlated with tPA treatment times. After adjusting for the other benchmarks and NIHSS, only door to CT remained significantly correlated with door to IV tPA (partial correlation coefficient=0.40, p<0.001). The ROC curve showed that a goal time of 20 minutes or less for door to CT initiation had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting tPA administration within 60 minutes. Conclusion: In keeping with the recommended time goals, median times for the intermediate steps were within target. Our median tPA times, however, did not meet the 60 minute goal. Door to CT initiation was the variable that most strongly correlated with door to needle times. Process issues such as order entry and scheduling protocols may be barriers to obtaining CT within the 20 minute time frame identified by our analysis. Other barriers after the CT scan is obtained must be identified to facilitate faster tPA administration. Further evaluation of these factors is warranted to better ensure the timely delivery of tPA to stroke patients, thereby improving patient outcomes.