Abstract 376: Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risks Multi-disciplinary Awareness Project

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkata Sai Gogineni ◽  
Ki Park ◽  
Denise Manfrini ◽  
Robert Egerman ◽  
Sharon Aroda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Risks ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Traditional Risk Factors

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of death amongst women. There has been much effort put forth over the past decade in reducing both the incidence and prevalence of this disease burden through screening and treating the traditional risk factors. Recent guidelines have shown that adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), including pre-eclampsia (PEC), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-term birth (PTB) have been associated with future maternal CVD risk. Much of the current literature focuses almost exclusively on PEC. Our investigation is more comprehensive, covering not only these other APOs but assessing whether providers of multiple specialties in our community are aware of the APO to CVD risk association. The primary objective of this study was to investigate if there exist any knowledge gaps regarding the progression from APO to CVD and if this knowledge varies by specialty. Methods: An anonymous voluntary survey through REDCap© was sent to providers in the fields of Internal medicine (IM, 21%), Family medicine (FM, 26%), Obstetrics-Gynecology (Ob-Gyn, 23%) and Cardiology (30%) who have been in practice for greater than five years in our local Gainesville community. This project was registered as a QI project and descriptive analysis was used to examine the responses. Results: A total of 53 providers responded to the survey. Despite having the majority of patients being women, Ob-Gyn was the least likely amongst all specialties to routinely screen for CV risk factors. However, when addressed, they were the most likely to ask about APOs. Cardiologists, despite declaring to be aware of the association between APOs and CV risk, were least likely to ask about APOs. All specialties recognized PEC and GDM as APOs linked to long-term maternal CV risk but failed to associate PTB as an APO. The majority of providers amongst IM, FM, and Cardiology did not ask about APOs and lacked the knowledge of how often to appropriately screen for secondary risk factors associated with APOs. Additionally, these providers outright admitted that they are not familiar with the current AHA and/or ACOG guidelines for screening and follow-up. Conclusion: Descriptive statistical analysis of our data suggests that there exists a notable knowledge gap between all four specialties investigated in our survey. Education concerning the link between APOs and future maternal CV risk is needed amongst all specialties, especially amongst the providers in Cardiology, IM, and FM. Targeted efforts at our institution to improve awareness of all APOs, their associated secondary risk factors, and appropriate screening is required in all specialties to help reduce CVD morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Long-Term Cardiovascular Risks Associated With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (16) ◽  
pp. 2106-2116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbi D. Lane-Cordova ◽  
Sadiya S. Khan ◽  
William A. Grobman ◽  
Philip Greenland ◽  
Sanjiv J. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Risks ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

scholarly journals Does Adding Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Improve the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score in Women? Data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz ◽  
Ali Sheidaei ◽  
Ali Aflatounian ◽  
Fereidoun Azizi ◽  
Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Framingham Risk Score ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
C Statistic ◽  
Framingham Risk ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Background Limited and conflicting evidence is available regarding the predictive value of adding adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) to established cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine whether adding APOs to the Framingham risk score improves the prediction of CVD events in women. Methods and Results Out of 5413 women who participated in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 4013 women met the eligibility criteria included for the present study. The exposure and the outcome variables were collected based on the standard protocol. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the association of APOs and CVDs. The variant of C‐statistic for survivals and reclassification of subjects into Framingham risk score categories after adding APOs was reported. Out of the 4013 eligible subjects, a total of 1484 (36.98%) women reported 1 APO, while 395 (9.84%) of the cases reported multiple APOs. Univariate proportional hazard Cox models showed the significant relations between CVD events and APOs. The enhanced model had a higher C‐statistic indicating more acceptable discrimination as well as a slight improvement in discrimination (C‐statistic differences: 0.0053). Moreover, we observed a greater risk of experiencing a CVD event in women with a history of multiple APOs compared with cases with only 1 APO (1 APO: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22; 2 APOs: HR; 1.94; ≥3 APOs: HR = 2.48). Conclusions Beyond the established risk factors, re‐estimated CVDs risk by adding APOs to the Framingham risk score may improve the accurate risk estimation of CVD. Further observational studies are needed to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Unique Opportunities for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisha I. Parikh ◽  
Juan M. Gonzalez ◽  
Cheryl A.M. Anderson ◽  
Suzanne E. Judd ◽  
Kathryn M. Rexrode ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
White Women ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

This statement summarizes evidence that adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, gestational diabetes, small-for-gestational-age delivery, placental abruption, and pregnancy loss increase a woman’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and of developing subsequent CVD (including fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and heart failure). This statement highlights the importance of recognizing APOs when CVD risk is evaluated in women, although their value in reclassifying risk may not be established. A history of APOs is a prompt for more vigorous primordial prevention of CVD risk factors and primary prevention of CVD. Adopting a heart-healthy diet and increasing physical activity among women with APOs, starting in the postpartum setting and continuing across the life span, are important lifestyle interventions to decrease CVD risk. Lactation and breastfeeding may lower a woman’s later cardiometabolic risk. Black and Asian women experience a higher proportion APOs, with more severe clinical presentation and worse outcomes, than White women. More studies on APOs and CVD in non-White women are needed to better understand and address these health disparities. Future studies of aspirin, statins, and metformin may better inform our recommendations for pharmacotherapy in primary CVD prevention among women who have had an APO. Several opportunities exist for health care systems to improve transitions of care for women with APOs and to implement strategies to reduce their long-term CVD risk. One proposed strategy includes incorporation of the concept of a fourth trimester into clinical recommendations and health care policy.

scholarly journals Association between neighbourhood deprivation, fetal growth, small-for-gestational age and preterm birth: a population-based prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e049075
Author(s):  
Dionne V Gootjes ◽  
Anke G Posthumus ◽  
Vincent W V Jaddoe ◽  
Eric A P Steegers
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Preterm Birth ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Neighbourhood Deprivation ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

ObjectiveTo study the associations between neighbourhood deprivation and fetal growth, including growth in the first trimester, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingThe Netherlands, Rotterdam.Participants8617 live singleton births from the Generation R cohort study.ExpositionLiving in a deprived neighbourhood.Main outcome measuresFetal growth trajectories of head circumference, weight and length.Secondary outcomes measuresSmall-for-gestational age (SGA) and preterm birth (PTB).ResultsNeighbourhood deprivation was not associated with first trimester growth. However, a higher neighbourhood status score (less deprivation) was associated with increased fetal growth in the second and third trimesters (eg, estimated fetal weight; adjusted regression coefficient 0.04, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.06). Less deprivation was also associated with decreased odds of SGA (adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.97, p=0.01) and PTB (adjusted OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96, p=0.01).ConclusionsWe found an association between neighbourhood deprivation and fetal growth in the second and third trimester pregnancy, but not with first trimester growth. Less neighbourhood deprivation is associated with lower odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The associations remained after adjustment for individual-level risk factors. This supports the hypothesis that living in a deprived neighbourhood acts as an independent risk factor for fetal growth and adverse pregnancy outcomes, above and beyond individual risk factors.

Studies Assessing Risk of Treatments for Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Should Control for Known Risk Factors

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1183-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Edson-Heredia ◽  
R.D. Rohwer ◽  
M. Wong ◽  
P. Wang ◽  
A. Vambergue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Do adverse pregnancy outcomes contribute to accelerated cardiovascular events seen in young women with systemic lupus erythematosus?

Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 1351-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
M C Soh ◽  
C Nelson-Piercy ◽  
M Westgren ◽  
L McCowan ◽  
D Pasupathy
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Cardiovascular events (CVEs) are prevalent in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and it is the young women who are disproportionately at risk. The risk factors for accelerated cardiovascular disease remain unclear, with multiple studies producing conflicting results. In this paper, we aim to address both traditional and SLE-specific risk factors postulated to drive the accelerated vascular disease in this cohort. We also discuss the more recent hypothesis that adverse pregnancy outcomes in the form of maternal–placental syndrome and resultant preterm delivery could potentially contribute to the CVEs seen in young women with SLE who have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The pathophysiology of how placental-mediated vascular insufficiency and hypoxia (with the secretion of placenta-like growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-tyrosine-like kinase-1 (sFlt-1), soluble endoglin (sEng) and other placental factors) work synergistically to damage the vascular endothelium is discussed. Adverse pregnancy outcomes ultimately are a small contributing factor to the complex pathophysiological process of cardiovascular disease in patients with SLE. Future collaborative studies between cardiologists, obstetricians, obstetric physicians and rheumatologists may pave the way for a better understanding of a likely multifactorial aetiological process.

scholarly journals Association Between Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Preceding Risk Factors: an Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Prabhakarrao Doke ◽  
Sonali Hemant Palkar ◽  
Jayashree Sachin Gothankar ◽  
Archana Vasantrao Patil ◽  
Amruta Paresh Chutke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Tobacco Consumption ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Mountainous Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Heavy Work ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy

Abstract Background: The health of women during the preconception phase though critical, is a comparatively ignored part in her life cycle. The presence of health risks is judged as hazardous to the wellbeing of women and their forthcoming progeny. The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of various pregnancy outcomes and assess the association between various risk factors and adverse outcomes. Methods: It was a population-based cross-sectional analytical study. The study was carried out in Nashik District, having a large mountainous area. It included two randomly selected blocks, one tribal and one nontribal, in which interventions were planned in the later stage. For comparison, two adjacent blocks, one tribal and one nontribal, were also included. All women who had a pregnancy outcome in the preceding 12 months (01 April 2017 to 31 March 2018) were interviewed. Trained Accredited Social Health Activists under the direct supervision of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives and Medical Officers conducted the survey. Multivariate analysis was carried out to find the adjusted risk ratio of having a particular adverse outcome because of the specified potential risk factors.Results: A total of 9,307 women participated in the study. The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was abortion 4.1%; stillbirth 1.6%; preterm birth 4.1%; LBW 11.2%; congenital physical defect 2.6%. Prevalence of consanguineous marriage, heavy work during the last six months of pregnancy, pre-existing illness, tobacco consumption, direct exposure to pesticides and domestic violence during pregnancy was 17.6%; 16.9%; 2.2%; 5.6%; 2.3%; and 0.8%, respectively. Risk factors that were significantly associated with abortion include existing illness at the time of conception and performing heavy work in the last six months of pregnancy. Consanguinity, tobacco consumption during pregnancy and pre-existing illness were identified as risk factors for stillbirth. Significant risk factors of LBW were heavy work in the last six months of pregnancy, pre-existing illness and residence in a tribal area. Conclusion: The survey showed that risk factors differentially affect outcomes of pregnancy. Preconception and antenatal care should include counselling about consanguineous marriages, identifying and managing a pre-existing illness, avoiding tobacco consumption in the prenatal and natal period, and avoiding heavy work during pregnancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document