Abstract W P57: Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients With Mild Stroke: An Observational Study

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose G Romano ◽  
Eric E Smith ◽  
Li Liang ◽  
Hannah Gardener ◽  
Sara Camp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Mild Stroke ◽  
Independent Ambulation ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Objective: Mild stroke has traditionally been excluded from thrombolytic treatment trials and only few series have reported outcomes after IV rtPA in this group. The objectives of this study are to determine the proportion of mild stroke patients treated with IV rtPA and evaluate complications and short-term outcomes in this population. Methods: We analyzed patients in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry that arrived within 4.5 hours from symptom onset with a mild ischemic stroke defined as a baseline NIHSS ≤5 who received IV rtPA between May 2010 and October 2012. The following outcomes and complications were analyzed: in-hospital mortality, home discharge, independent ambulation, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital death, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) <36 h. Multivariable analysis was performed for predictors of outcomes and complications. Results: Of 147,917 patients who arrived <4.5 hours, 39,821 were treated with IV rtPA, of whom 8,243 (20.7%) had an NIHSS ≤5. We analyzed 5,910 treated patients with NIHSS ≤5 and complete data. The mean baseline NIHSS was 3.5 (median 4); 98.2% arrived within 3 hours and 78.6% were treated within 3 hours. Outcomes and predictors of worse outcome are described in the table. There was no difference in short-term outcomes amongst those treated at 0-3 vs. 3-4.5 hours. Conclusions: A sizeable minority of ischemic stroke patients treated with IV rtPA have a NIHSS ≤5. sICH occurred at a low rate of 1.8% and about 30% of these patients were unable to return home and could not ambulate independently. Longer-term outcomes are needed to define predictors of poor outcome in this population and which patients may benefit most from treatment.

Abstract 203: Use of Endovascular Therapy and Trends in Clinical Outcomes within the Nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bijoy K Menon ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Mayank Goyal ◽  
Raul Noguiera ◽  
Shyam Prabhakaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Large Size ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Independent Ambulation ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Purpose: To determine hospital and patient level characteristics associated with use of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke and to analyze trends in clinical outcome. Methods: Data were from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals from 4/1/2003 to 6/30/2013. We looked at secular trends in number of hospitals providing endovascular therapy, use of endovascular therapy in these hospitals, and clinical outcomes. We also analyzed hospital and patient characteristics associated with endovascular therapy utilization. Results: Of 1087 hospitals, 454 provided endovascular therapy to at least one patient in the study period. From 2003 to 2012, the proportion of hospitals providing endovascular therapy increased by 1.6%/year (from 12.9% to 28.9%), with a modest drop in 2013 to 23.4%. Use in these hospitals increased from 0.7% to 2% of all ischemic stroke patients (p<0.001) with a modest drop in 2013 to 1.9%. In multivariable analyses, patient outcomes after endovascular therapy improved over time, with reductions in in-hospital mortality (29.6% in 2004 to 16.2% in 2013; p=0.002); and from late 2010, reduction in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (11% in 2010 to 5% in 2013; p<0.0001) and increased independent ambulation at discharge (24.5% in 2010 to 33% in 2013; p<0.0001) and discharge home (17.7% in 2010 to 26.1% in 2013; p<0.0001) (Attached figure). Hospital characteristics associated with endovascular therapy use included large size, teaching status and urban location while patient characteristics included younger age, EMS transport, absence of prior stroke and white race. Conclusion: Use of endovascular therapy increased modestly in this national registry from 2003 to 2012 and decreased in 2013. Clinical outcomes improved notably from 2010 to 2013, coincident with the introduction of newer thrombectomy devices.

Influence of Statin Pretreatment on Initial Neurological Severity and Short-Term Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: The Fukuoka Stroke Registry

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromi Ishikawa ◽  
Yoshinobu Wakisaka ◽  
Ryu Matsuo ◽  
Noriko Makihara ◽  
Jun Hata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Favorable Functional Outcome

Background: Statins have neuroprotective effects against ischemic stroke. However, associations between pre-stroke statin treatment and initial stroke severity and between the treatment and functional outcome remain controversial. This study aimed at determining these associations in ischemic stroke patients. Methods: Among patients registered in the Fukuoka Stroke Registry from June 2007 to October 2014, 3,848 patients with ischemic stroke within 24 h of onset, who had been functionally independent before onset, were enrolled in this study. Ischemic stroke was classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic infarction. Primary and secondary study outcomes were mild neurological symptoms defined as a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≤4 on admission and favorable functional outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2 at discharge, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to quantify associations between pre-stroke statin treatment and study outcomes. Results: Of all 3,848 participants, 697 (18.1%) were taking statins prior to the stroke. The frequency of mild neurological symptoms was significantly higher in patients with pre-stroke statin treatment (64.1%) than in those without the treatment (58.3%, p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that pre-stroke statin treatment was significantly associated with mild neurological symptoms (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.65; p < 0.01). Sensitivity analysis in patients with dyslipidemia (n = 1,998) also showed the same trend between pre-stroke statin treatment and mild neurological symptoms (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.99-1.62; p = 0.06). In contrast, the frequency of favorable functional outcome was not different between patients with (67.0%) and without (65.3%) the treatment (p = 0.40). Multivariable analysis also showed no significant association between pre-stroke statin treatment and favorable functional outcome (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.91-1.60; p = 0.19). Continuation of statin treatment, however, was significantly associated with favorable functional outcome among patients with pre-stroke statin treatment (multivariable-adjusted OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.16-4.00; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Pre-stroke statin treatment in ischemic stroke patients was significantly associated with mild neurological symptoms within 24 h of onset. Pre-stroke statin treatment per se did not significantly influence the short-term functional outcome; however, continuation of statin treatment during the acute stage of stroke seems to relate with favorable functional outcome for patients with pre-stroke statin treatment.

Assessment and provision of rehabilitation among patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke in China: Findings from the China National Stroke Registry II

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Prvu Bettger ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
Liping Liu ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Model ◽  
Recommended Care ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Rehabilitation Assessment

Background Stroke rehabilitation improves functional recovery among stroke patients. However, little is known about clinical practice in China regarding the assessment and provision of rehabilitation among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Aims We examined the frequency and determinants of an assessment for rehabilitation among acute ischemic stroke patients from the China National Stroke Registry II. Methods Data for 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to 219 hospitals from June 2012 to January 2013 were analyzed. The multivariable logistic regression model with the generalized estimating equation method accounting for in-hospital clustering was used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with having a rehabilitation assessment during the acute hospitalization. Results Among 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients, 11,451 (59.4%) were assessed for rehabilitation. Rates of rehabilitation assessment varied among 219 hospitals (IQR 41.4% vs 81.5%). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased likelihood of a rehabilitation assessment ( p < 0.05) included disability prior to stroke, higher NIHSS on admission, receipt of a dysphagia screen, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, carotid vessel imaging, longer length of stay, and treatment at a hospital with a higher number of hospital beds (per 100 units). In contrast, patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and hospitals with higher number of annual stroke discharges (per 100 patients) were less likely to receive rehabilitation assessment during the acute stroke hospitalization. Conclusions Rehabilitation assessment among acute ischemic stroke patients was suboptimal in China. Rates varied considerably among hospitals and support the need to improve adherence to recommended care for stroke survivors.

Abstract 183: Time to Alteplase and Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Complication Rates

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad U Farooq ◽  
Kathie Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Background/Objective: The American Heart Association’s Target Stroke initiative focuses on reducing door-to-needle time for faster treatment with Alteplase and improved patient outcomes. The concern for reducing door-to-needle time is that there will be an increase in complication rates, specifically the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This study sought to review whether reduced door-to-needle times were associated with increased rates of complications in Midwest hospitals. Methods: A retrospective review of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with Alteplase was conducted from 2010-2018 in 13 Midwestern states (IN, IL, KS, KY, MI, MN, NO, ND, OH, SD, and WI) using the American Stroke Association’s Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Stroke database. Percentage of eligible patients treated with Alteplase, treatment times, and complication rates were reviewed. Results: From 2010-2018 the rate of ischemic stroke patients treated with Alteplase in the approved 3-hour window increased from 68.9% to 88.5%. The number of patients treated with Alteplase in 60 minutes increased from 24.1% in 2010 to 74.9% in 2018. The median time to treatment for Alteplase was reduced from 80 minutes in 2010 to 46 minutes in 2018. The rate of complications associated with thrombolytics was 6.5% in 2010 and dropped to 4.5% in 2018. This is statistically significant at a p-value of .05. Conclusions: In the Midwest Region, a reduction in door-to-needle times was not associated with increased complication rates. Interestingly, a reduction in door-to-needle times was associated with a reduction in complication rates. This supports the American Heart Association’s new Target Stroke Phase III initiative which seeks to further reduce door-to-needle times.

scholarly journals Early transition to comfort measures only in acute stroke patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Prabhakaran ◽  
Margueritte Cox ◽  
Barbara Lytle ◽  
Phillip J. Schulte ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Hospital Level ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Early Decision ◽  
Stroke Type ◽  
Get With The Guidelines ◽  
Hospital Characteristics

AbstractBackground:Death after acute stroke often occurs after forgoing life-sustaining interventions. We sought to determine the patient and hospital characteristics associated with an early decision to transition to comfort measures only (CMO) after ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke registry.Methods:We identified patients with IS, ICH, or SAH between November 2009 and September 2013 who met study criteria. Early CMO was defined as the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments and interventions by hospital day 0 or 1. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified patient and hospital factors associated with an early (by hospital day 0 or 1) CMO order.Results:Among 963,525 patients from 1,675 hospitals, 54,794 (5.6%) had an early CMO order (IS: 3.0%; ICH: 19.4%; SAH: 13.1%). Early CMO use varied widely by hospital (range 0.6%–37.6% overall) and declined over time (from 6.1% in 2009 to 5.4% in 2013; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, older age, female sex, white race, Medicaid and self-pay/no insurance, arrival by ambulance, arrival off-hours, baseline nonambulatory status, and stroke type were independently associated with early CMO use (vs no early CMO). The correlation between hospital-level risk-adjusted mortality and the use of early CMO was stronger for SAH (r = 0.52) and ICH (r = 0.50) than AIS (r = 0.15) patients.Conclusions:Early CMO was utilized in about 5% of stroke patients, being more common in ICH and SAH than IS. Early CMO use varies widely between hospitals and is influenced by patient and hospital characteristics.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Prestroke Mobility Impairment

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Beekman ◽  
Jie-Lena Sun ◽  
Brooke Alhanti ◽  
Lee H. Schwamm ◽  
Eric E. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Mobility Impairment ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Get With The Guidelines

Background and Purpose: Patients with prestroke mobility impairment (PSMI) were excluded from endovascular clinical trials. There are limited data regarding safety and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in this population. We used a large, national data set (Get With The Guidelines–Stroke) to evaluate the safety and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with PSMI. Methods: We included patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy in the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke registry between 2015 and 2019. PSMI was defined as the inability to ambulate independently. Generalized estimating equations for logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between PSMI and outcomes. Results: Of 56 762 patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy, 2919 (5.14%) had PSMI. PSMI was not associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.0% versus 5.4%; P =0.979). In-hospital death or discharge to hospice occurred in 32.3% of patients with PSMI versus 17.5% without PSMI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45 [1.32–1.58]). Conclusions: While procedural adverse outcomes were no higher in patients with PSMI, further study is necessary to determine clinical benefit in this population.

scholarly journals Patterns and Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Mild Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 2101-2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negar Asdaghi ◽  
Dileep R. Yavagal ◽  
Kefeng Wang ◽  
Nils Mueller-Kronast ◽  
Nirav Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
South Florida ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Mild Stroke ◽  
Independent Ambulation

Background and Purpose— We aimed to evaluate the current practice patterns, safety and outcomes of patients who receive endovascular therapy (EVT) having mild neurological symptoms. Methods— From Jan 2010 to Jan 2018, 127,794 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled in the Florida-Puerto Rico Stroke Registry. Patients presenting within 24 hours of symptoms who received EVT were classified into mild (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] ≤5) or moderate/severe (NIHSS>5) categories. Differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Results— Among 4110 EVT patients (median age, 73 [interquartile range=20] years; 50% women), 446 (11%) had NIHSS ≤5. Compared with NIHSS >5, those with NIHSS ≤5 arrived later to the hospital (median, 138 versus 101 minutes), were less likely to receive intravenous alteplase (30% versus 43%), had a longer door-to-puncture time (median, 167 versus 115 minutes) and more likely treated in South Florida (64% versus 53%). In multivariable analysis younger age, private insurance (versus Medicare), history of hypertension, prior independent ambulation and hospital size were independent characteristics associated with NIHSS ≤5. Among EVT patients with NIHSS ≤5, 76% were discharged home/rehabilitation and 64% were able to ambulate independently at discharge as compared with 53% and 32% of patients with NIHSS >5. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 4% of mild stroke EVT patients and 6.4% in those with NIHSS >5. Conclusions— Despite lack of evidence-based recommendations, 11% of patients receiving EVT in clinical practice have mild neurological presentations. Individual, hospital and geographic disparities are observed among endovascularly treated patients based on the severity of clinical symptoms. Our data suggest safety and overall favorable outcomes for EVT patients with mild stroke.

Thrombolysis in young adults with stroke

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (24) ◽  
pp. e2784-e2792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi A. Dodds ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
Shubin Sheng ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Brain Imaging ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Get With The Guidelines ◽  
To Receive

ObjectiveTo determine whether young adults (≤40 years old) with acute ischemic stroke are less likely to receive IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and more likely to have longer times to brain imaging and treatment.MethodsWe analyzed data from the Get With The Guidelines–Stroke registry for patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized between January 2009 and September 2015. We used multivariable models with generalized estimating equations to evaluate tPA treatment and outcomes between younger (age 18–40 years) and older (age >40 years) patients with acute ischemic stroke.ResultsOf 1,320,965 patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to 1,983 hospitals, 2.3% (30,448) were 18 to 40 years of age. Among these patients, 12.5% received tPA vs 8.8% of those >40 years of age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56–1.71). However, younger patients were less likely to receive brain imaging within 25 minutes (62.5% vs 71.5%, aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.84) and to be treated with tPA within 60 minutes of hospital arrival (37.0% vs 42.8%, aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68–0.79). Compared to older patients, younger patients treated with tPA had a lower symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (1.7% vs 4.5%, aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42–0.72) and lower in-hospital mortality (2.0% vs 4.3%, aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52–0.81).ConclusionsIn contrast to our hypothesis, younger patients with acute ischemic stroke were more likely to be treated with tPA than older patients, but they were more likely to experience delay in evaluation and treatment. Compared with older patients, younger patients had better outcomes, including fewer intracranial hemorrhages.

scholarly journals Impact of bridging thrombolysis on clinical outcome in stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: a retrospective analysis of a regional stroke registry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Seker ◽  
Susanne Bonekamp ◽  
Susanne Rode ◽  
Sonja Hyrenbach ◽  
Martin Bendszus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose It is unclear whether stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) should receive bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), if eligible. This study aims at analyzing the impact of bridging IVT on short-term clinical outcome. Methods In a prospective regional stroke registry, all stroke patients with premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 who were admitted within 4.5 h after onset and treated with EVT were analyzed retrospectively. Patients receiving “IVT prior to EVT” (IVEVT) were compared to those undergoing “EVT only” regarding the ratio of good outcome, discharge mRS, mRS shift, hospital mortality, and occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results In total, 2022 patients were included, 816 patients (40.4%) achieved good clinical outcome; 1293 patients (63.9%) received bridging IVT. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the ratio of good outcome (IVEVT 41.4% vs. EVT 38.5%, P = 0.231), discharge mRS (median, IVEVT 3 vs. EVT 3, P = 0.178), mRS shift (median, IVEVT 3 vs. EVT 3, P = 0.960), and hospital mortality (IVEVT 19.3% vs. EVT 19.5%, P = 0.984). Bridging IVT was not a predictor of outcome (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79–1.26, P = 0.979). However, it was an independent predictor of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.21–2.72, P = 0.005). Conclusions The results of the present study suggest that bridging IVT does not seem to improve short-term clinical outcome of patients undergoing EVT. Nonetheless, there might be a subgroup of patients that benefits from IVT. This needs to be addressed in randomized controlled trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document