Abstract W P6: North American Solitaire Stent-Retriever Acute Stroke Registry: Choice of Anesthesia and Outcomes

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Abou-Chebl ◽  
Osama O Zaidat ◽  
Alicia C Castonguay ◽  
Guilherme Dabus ◽  
Michael T Froehler ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Previous work has suggested that general anesthesia (GA) may have a negative impact on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular therapy, however, those data predated the availability of the safer and possibly more effective stentriever devices. Methods: The investigator-initiated NASA Registry recruited North American sites to submit demographic, clinical, procedural (including use of GA versus local anesthesia [LA]), and site-adjudicated angiographic and clinical outcome data on consecutive patients treated with the Solitaire™ FR device. The primary outcomes were mRS at 90-days, mortality, and sICH. Results: A total of 281 patients from 18 centers were enrolled in this sub-study. GA was utilized in 69.8% (196/281) of patients. Baseline demographics were comparable between the LA and GA groups, except the former demonstrated a longer time to groin puncture (395.4±254 versus 337.4±208min, p=0.04) and slightly lower NIHSS (16.2±5.8 versus 18.8±6.9, p=0.002). Procedural factors were also similar, although lower balloon-guide catheter usage (22.4% versus 49.2%, p=0.0001) and longer fluoroscopy times (39.5±33 versus 28±22.8min, p=0.008) were seen in the LA versus GA cohorts, respectively. Recanalization (TICI≥2a) success (91.8 versus 86.8%, p=0.3) and the rate of sICH (7.1% versus 11.2%, p=0.4) were similar between the LA and GA patients, respectively. The primary outcome of mRS≤2 was achieved in 52.6% and 35.6% (OR 1.4[1.1-1.8], p=0.01) of LA and GA patients, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, hypertension, NIHSS, unsuccessful revascularization, and GA use (OR 3.3(1.6-7.1), p=0.001) were associated with death. To account for potential confounders, when only anterior circulation patients and patients who were electively intubated were included, there was a persistent difference in good outcomes in favor of the LA patients (50.7% versus 35.5%, OR 1.3[1.01-1.6], p=0.04). Conclusions: The NASA Registry has demonstrated that clinical outcomes and survival are significantly better in patients treated without GA without any increase in sICH. Future AIS trials should prospectively evaluate the effect of GA on outcomes.

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. i45-i49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osama O Zaidat ◽  
Alicia C Castonguay ◽  
Rishi Gupta ◽  
Chung-Huan J Sun ◽  
Coleman Martin ◽  
...  

BackgroundLimited post-marketing data exist on the use of the Solitaire FR device in clinical practice. The North American Solitaire Stent Retriever Acute Stroke (NASA) registry aimed to assess the real world performance of the Solitaire FR device in contrast with the results from the SWIFT (Solitaire with the Intention for Thrombectomy) and TREVO 2 (Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke) trials.MethodsThe investigator initiated NASA registry recruited North American sites to submit retrospective angiographic and clinical outcome data on consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with the Solitaire FR between March 2012 and February 2013. The primary outcome was a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) score of ≥2 or a Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score of ≥2a. Secondary outcomes were 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.Results354 patients underwent treatment for AIS using the Solitaire FR device in 24 centers. Mean time from onset to groin puncture was 363.4±239 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 32.9±25.7 min, and mean procedure time was 100.9±57.8 min. Recanalization outcome: TIMI ≥2 rate of 83.3% (315/354) and TICI ≥2a rate of 87.5% (310/354) compared with the operator reported TIMI ≥2 rate of 83% in SWIFT and TICI ≥2a rate of 85% in TREVO 2. Clinical outcome: 42% (132/315) of NASA patients demonstrated a 90 day mRS ≤2 compared with 37% (SWIFT) and 40% (TREVO 2). 90 day mortality was 30.2% (95/315) versus 17.2% (SWIFT) and 29% (TREVO 2).ConclusionsThe NASA registry demonstrated that the Solitaire FR device performance in clinical practice is comparable with the SWIFT and TREVO 2 trial results.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017027
Author(s):  
Jordi Blasco ◽  
Josep Puig ◽  
Pepus Daunis-i-Estadella ◽  
Eva González ◽  
Juan Jose Fondevila Monso ◽  
...  

BackgroundFirst-pass effect (FPE) has been established as a key metric for technical success and strongly correlates with better clinical outcomes. Most data supporting improved outcomes with the use of a balloon guide catheter (BGC) predate the advent of last-generation large-bore intracranial aspiration catheters. We aim to evaluate the impact of BGC in FPE and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients treated with contemporary technology.MethodsPatients were recruited from the prospectively ongoing ROSSETTI registry. This registry includes all consecutive patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (LVO) from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in Spain. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data were compared between BGC and non-BGC groups. FPE was defined as the achievement of mTICI2c–3 after a single device pass.Results426 patients were included out of which 271 (63.62%) used BCG. BGC-treated patients had higher FPE rate (45.8% vs 27.7%; P<0.001), higher final mTICI ≥2 c recanalization rate (76.8% vs 50.3%, respectively; P<0.001), shorter procedural time [median (IQR), 30 (19–58) vs 43 (33–71) min; P<0.001], higher NIHSS difference from admission to 24 hours [median (IQR), 8 (2–12) vs 3 (0–10); P=0.001], and lower mortality rate (17.6% vs 29.8%, P=0.026) compared with non-BGC patients. BGC use was an independent predictor of FPE (OR 2.197, 95% CI 1.436 to 3.361; P<0.001), and excellent clinical outcome at 3 months (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; P=0.002).ConclusionsOur results support the benefit of BGC use on angiographic and clinical outcomes in anterior circulation LVO ischemic stroke remain significant even when considering recent improvements in intracranial aspiration technology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Prabhakaran ◽  
Alicia C Castonguay ◽  
Rishi Gupta ◽  
Chung-Huan J Sun ◽  
Coleman O Martin ◽  
...  

BackgroundTime to reperfusion following endovascular treatment (ET) predicts outcomes after acute ischemic stroke (AIS).ObjectiveTo assess the time–outcome relationship within reperfusion grades in the North American Solitaire Acute Stroke registry.MethodsWe identified patients given ET for anterior circulation ischemic stroke within 8 h from onset and in whom reperfusion was achieved. Together with clinical and outcome data, site-adjudicated modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) was recorded. We assessed the impact of time to reperfusion (onset to procedure completion time) on good outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 3 months) in patients who achieved TICI 2 or higher reperfusion in multivariable models. We further assessed this relationship within strata of reperfusion grades. A p<0.05 was considered significant.ResultsIndependent predictors of good outcome at 3 months among those achieving TICI ≥2a reperfusion (n=188) were initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95), symptomatic hemorrhage (adj. OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.60), TICI grade (TICI 3: adj. OR=11.52, 95% CI 3.34 to 39.77; TICI 2b: adj. OR=5.14, 95% CI 1.61 to 16.39), and time to reperfusion per 30 min interval (adj. OR=0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99). There was an interaction between final TICI grade and 30 min time to reperfusion intervals (p=0.001) such that the effect of time was strongest in TICI 2a patients.ConclusionsTime to reperfusion was a strong predictor of outcome following ET for AIS. However, the effect varied by TICI grade such that its greatest effect was in those achieving TICI 2a reperfusion.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1257-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie A. van den Berg ◽  
Diederik L.H. Koelman ◽  
Olvert A. Berkhemer ◽  
Anouk D. Rozeman ◽  
Puck S.S. Fransen ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Intra-arterial treatment (IAT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be performed with or without general anesthesia (GA). Previous studies suggested that IAT without the use of GA (non-GA) is associated with better clinical outcome. Nevertheless, no consensus exists about the anesthetic management during IAT of AIS patients. This study investigates the association between type of anesthesia and clinical outcome in a large cohort of patients with AIS treated with IAT. Methods— All consecutive patients with AIS of the anterior circulation who received IAT between 2002 and 2013 in 16 Dutch hospitals were included in the study. Primary outcome was functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale at discharge. Difference in primary outcome between GA and non-GA was estimated using multiple ordinal regression analysis, adjusting for age, stroke severity, occlusion of the internal carotid artery terminus, previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus. Results— Three hundred forty-eight patients were included in the analysis; 70 patients received GA and 278 patients did not receive GA. Non-GA was significantly associated with good clinical outcome (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.02–4.31). After adjusting for prespecified prognostic factors, the point estimate remained similar; statistical significance, however, was lost (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 0.89–4.24). Conclusions— Our study suggests that patients with AIS of the anterior circulation undergoing IAT without GA have a higher probability of good clinical outcome compared with patients treated with general anesthesia.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2021-017341
Author(s):  
Devin V Bageac ◽  
Blake S Gershon ◽  
Jan Vargas ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Zeguang Ren ◽  
...  

BackgroundMost conventional 0.088 inch guide catheters cannot safely navigate intracranial vasculature. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of stroke thrombectomy using a novel 0.088 inch guide catheter designed for intracranial navigation.MethodsThis is a multicenter retrospective study, which included patients over 18 years old who underwent thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusions. Technical outcomes for patients treated using the TracStar Large Distal Platform (TracStar LDP) or earlier generation TRX LDP were compared with a matched cohort of patients treated with other commonly used guide catheters. The primary outcome measure was device-related complications. Secondary outcome measures included guide catheter failure and time between groin puncture and clot engagement.ResultsEach study arm included 45 patients. The TracStar group was non-inferior to the control group with regard to device-related complications (6.8% vs 8.9%), and the average time to clot engagement was 8.89 min shorter (14.29 vs 23.18 min; p=0.0017). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to other technical outcomes, including time to recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2B). The TracStar was successfully advanced into the intracranial internal carotid artery in 33 cases (73.33%); in three cases (6.67%), it was swapped for an alternate catheter. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2B-3) was achieved in 95.56% of cases. Ninety-day follow-up data were available for 86.67% of patients, among whom 46.15% had an modified Rankin Score of 0–2%, and 10.26% were deceased.ConclusionsTracstar LDP is safe for use during stroke thrombectomy and was associated with decreased time to clot engagement. Intracranial access was regularly achieved.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maud ◽  
G. J. Rodriguez ◽  
A. Vellipuram ◽  
F. Sheriff ◽  
M. Ghatali ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review In this review article we will discuss the acute hypertensive response in the context of acute ischemic stroke and present the latest evidence-based concepts of the significance and management of the hemodynamic response in acute ischemic stroke. Recent Findings Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic physiologic response in the early setting of an acute ischemic stroke. The significance of the acute hypertensive response is not entirely well understood. However, in certain types of acute ischemic strokes, the systemic elevation of the blood pressure helps to maintain the collateral blood flow in the penumbral ischemic tissue. The magnitude of the elevation of the systemic blood pressure that contributes to the maintenance of the collateral flow is not well established. The overcorrection of this physiologic hemodynamic response before an effective vessel recanalization takes place can carry a negative impact in the final clinical outcome. The significance of the persistence of the acute hypertensive response after an effective vessel recanalization is poorly understood, and it may negatively affect the final outcome due to reperfusion injury. Summary Acute hypertensive response is considered a common hemodynamic reaction of the cardiovascular system in the context of an acute ischemic stroke. The reaction is particularly common in acute brain embolic occlusion of large intracranial vessels. Its early management before, during, and immediately after arterial reperfusion has a repercussion in the final fate of the ischemic tissue and the clinical outcome.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishita Singh ◽  
Martha Marko ◽  
Petra Cimflova ◽  
Johanna Ospel ◽  
Nima Kashani ◽  
...  

Introduction: Infarct in new territory (INT) is a known complication of endovascular therapy. We assessed the prevalence, predictors and clinical relevance of INT Methods: We included patients from the ESCAPE-NA1: a multicenter, international randomized study that assessed the efficacy of intravenous nerinetide in patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent EVT within 12 hours from onset. All imaging was re-evaluated, and INT was defined by presence of infarct in new vascular territory, outside the baseline target occlusion(s) on follow up CT and MRI. INT’s were classified by maximum diameter (<2mm, 2-20mm and >20mm) and location. Results: Of 1099 analyzed patients in ESCAPE NA1, 107 had INT (9.7%, mean age 67 years, 51.4% females). There were no differences at baseline in those with vs without INT. Most INTs (75.7%) were angiographically occult and 41(38.3%) were > 20mm. The most common INT territory was the ACA alone or in combination with MCA/PCA (30.3%). The presence of emboli in new territory angiographically was significantly associated with INT (OR 16.39, 95%CI 8.14-33.09). Alteplase use, balloon guide catheter use, nerinetide and initial occlusion site did not predict INT. INT patients had higher final median infarct volumes compared to non-INT (44.5cc vs 23.3cc, P<0.001). Large INT (diameter of >20mm) were associated with poor clinical outcome compared to INT (<2mm) OR (mRS 0-2) 0.17, 95%CI 0.05-0.55). Conclusion: Infarcts in new territory are common and are associated with poor outcome.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori L Billinghurst ◽  
Adam Kirton ◽  
Steven Pavlakis ◽  
Jo Ellen Lee ◽  
Luigi Titomanlio ◽  
...  

Introduction: Headache at stroke onset occurs in up to a quarter of adults and is associated with younger age, female gender, right hemisphere and cerebellar infarcts. Little is known about headache at stroke onset in children. Methods: Children (29 days-18 years) with clinical and radiographic confirmation of arterial ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled in the International Pediatric Stroke Study from 2003-2014. Details regarding demographics, stroke presentation and infarct location were obtained from the multi-center, pediatric stroke registry. Headache at stroke presentation was classified and annotated in the registry by the individual site investigators as present, absent or unclear. Results: We analyzed 2103 children. Half of all subjects ≥ 6 yo reported headache at stroke onset (N=509/1047, 49%; Figure). Headache was less prevalent in children < 6 yo (N=112/1056, 11%; p<0.001), though headache presentation was more commonly classified as unclear (10% vs 32%; p<0.001). In children ≥ 6 yo, headache was significantly associated with papilledema (p = 0.03) and vertigo (p = 0.01), but not with hemiparesis (p = 0.11), visual field deficit (p = 0.90), aphasia (p = 0.35), dysarthria (p = 0.44), or ataxia (p = 0.50). Headache was more common in posterior than anterior circulation infarcts (p<0.001). There was a significant association between headache and right or bilateral hemisphere infarcts (p = 0.04) but not with gender (p = 0.76). Conclusion: Headache is more prevalent in children than adults at stroke ictus and shares similar associations, including infarcts involving the posterior circulation and right hemisphere. Headache may be under-reported in young infants and children due to pre-verbal stages of development. These findings have implications for early identification and treatment of pediatric stroke and warrant further investigation in prospective studies to distinguish stroke from more common benign mimics, including migraine.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Peterson ◽  
Ka-Ho Wong ◽  
Michael Dela Cruz ◽  
Kirby Taylor ◽  
Jennifer J Majersik ◽  
...  

Introduction: Antianxiety and antidepressant medications have shown some neuroprotective effects following stroke. However, the effect of premorbid use of these medications remains unclear. Hypothesis: Pre-morbid exposure to antianxiety or antidepressant medications will negatively impact recovery from acute ischemic stroke, measured by modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days after stroke onset. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Albumin in Acute Ischemic Stroke (ALIAS) 2 trial. The primary outcome is 90-day mRS 0-1. The exposure is premorbid antidepressant or antianxiety medication. We fit univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to our outcome, with covariates chosen using a stepwise backwards interactive selection. Results: We included 806 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.4 (12.8) years. The median (IQR) NIH Stroke Scale was 11 (8, 17) and 54.3% were male, 75.6% were Caucasian, 88.8% received tPA, 72.5% had hypertension, and 20.3% had diabetes. A total of 140/806 (17.4%) of patients took either an antidepressant or antianxiety medication, of which 91 took an antidepressant, 34 took an antianxiety medication, and 15 took both. The median (IQR) mRS Scale was one point higher in patients on antidepressant or antianxiety medication pre-stroke (3 vs. 2, p=0.019). The primary outcome of mRS 0-1 was seen in 37.7% of all patients. Taking an antidepressant or antianxiety medication was associated with lower odds of a good outcome in univariate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91, p=0.015) and multivariate models (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.95, p=0.027) (Table 1). Conclusion: Pre-morbid exposure to antianxiety or antidepressant medications is associated with a worse outcome after acute ischemic stroke. This may be due to a negative impact of pre-stroke anxiety and depression that outweigh any neuroprotective factors of these medications.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Freidrich Medlin ◽  
Michael Amiguet ◽  
Peter Vanacker ◽  
Patrik Michel

Objective: We aimed to assess effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) depending on the presence or absence of cervical or intracranial arterial occlusion on acute CT angiography (CTA). Methods: Patients from the Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL) were included in the analysis if they had an onset-to-door-time ≤ 4hours, CTA within 24 hours of onset, premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 2, and a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) >4. Patients having significant intracranial stenosis (50-99%) or receiving endovascular treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was a 3 month handicap of mRS >2. We used an interaction analysis of IVT and initial arterial occlusion after adjusting for potential confounders for the primary outcome. Results: Of 655 included patients, 382 patients (58%) showed arterial occlusion, of whom 263 (69%) received IVT. Of the 273 patients without arterial occlusion, 139 (51%) received IVT. In patients with initial arterial occlusion and after multiple adjustments, IVT was associated with lower likelihood of unfavourable outcome (adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.91, p=0.03) whereas it had no significant effect in non-occluded patients (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.36-4.76, p=0.67). Similarly, the presence of arterial occlusion did not significantly worsen the outcome in thrombolysed patients (OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.68-5.81, p=0.21), whereas it did so in non-thrombolysed patients (OR 7.89, 95% CI 2.29-27.25, p<0.01). Conclusions: IVT for AIS is more effective in the setting of visible arterial occlusions on acute imaging. If confirmed in other studies, this information may influence thrombolysis decisions and planning of further randomized trials. Classification of evidence: This retrospective analysis provides class III evidence that IVT has less benefit in patients without visible occlusion on acute CTA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document