Abstract P201: Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Outcomes Among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
RAJAN R GADHIA ◽  
Farhaan S Vahidy ◽  
Tariq Nisar ◽  
Destiny Hooper ◽  
David Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment ◽  
Iv Tpa

Objective: Most acute stroke treatment trials exclude patients above the age of 80. Given the clear benefit of revascularization with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT), we sought to assess functional outcomes in patients treated above the age of 80. Methods: We conducted a review of all patients admitted to Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2019 and August 2020 with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) presentation[MOU1] for whom premorbid, discharge, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale scores were available. Patients were categorized by acute stroke treatment (IV tPA, MT, both or none[MOU2] ). mRS values were assessed during admission prior to discharge and at 90 days post stroke event. A delta mRS (Discharge vs. 90-day [MOU3] ) was defined and grouped as no change, improved, or worsened to assess overall functional disability in regards to the index stroke presentation. Results: A total of 865 patients with AIS presentation were included, of whom 651 (75.3%) were <80 years and 214 (24.7%) were > 80 years of age at presentation. A total of 208 patients received IV tPA, 176 underwent revascularization with MT only, 71 had both treatments, and 552 had no acute intervention. In patients >80 yrs who had no acute stroke intervention. mRS improvement was noted in 71.4% compared to 54.1% observed in those patients <80 years. Among patients who received IV tPA, 81.5% of > 80 years improved vs. 61.6% in the younger cohort. A similar trend was noted in the MT and combined treatment groups (76.2% vs. 71.2% and 78.6% vs. 79.3%, respectively). Conclusion: Based on our cohort of acute stroke patients, there was no significant difference in outcomes (as measured by delta mRS) for octogenarians and nonagenarians when compared to younger patients. There was a trend towards improvement in the elderly patients. Chronological age by itself may be an insufficient predictor of functional outcome among stroke patients and age cutoffs for enrollment of patients in acute stroke trials may need additional considerations.

Abstract P119: Factors Influencing Door to Needle Administration for Acute Stroke Patients in the Emergency Department

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolle W Davis ◽  
Meghan Bailey ◽  
Natalie Buchwald ◽  
Amreen Farooqui ◽  
Anna Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background/Objective: There is growing importance on discovering factors that delay time to intervention for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, as rapid intervention remains essential for better patient outcomes. The management of these patients involves a multidisciplinary effort and quality improvement initiatives to safely increase treatment with intravenous thrombolytic (IV tPa). The objective of this pilot is to evaluate factors of acute stroke care in the emergency department (ED) and the impact they have on IV tPa administration. Methods: A sample of 89 acute ischemic stroke patients that received IV tPa from a single academic medical institution was selected for retrospective analysis. System characteristics (presence of a stroke nurse and time of day) and patient characteristics (mode of arrival and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) on arrival) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression to address the study question. Results: The mean door to needle time is 53.74 minutes ( + 38.06) with 74.2% of patients arriving to the ED via emergency medical services (EMS) and 25.8% having a stroke nurse present during IV tPa administration. Mode of arrival ( p = .001) and having a stroke nurse present ( p = .022) are significant predictors of door to needle time in the emergency department (ED). Conclusion: While many factors can influence door to needle times in the ED, we did not find NIHSS on arrival or time of day to be significant factors. Patients arriving to the ED by personal vehicle will have a significant delay in IV tPa administration, therefore emphasizing the importance of using EMS. Perhaps more importantly, collaborative efforts including the addition of a specialized stroke nurse significantly decreased time to IV tPa administration for AIS patients. With this dedicated role, accelerated triage and more effective management of AIS patients is accomplished, leading to decreased intervention times and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Abstract T P267: Development of an EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients During/After IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerrin Connelly ◽  
Rishi Gupta ◽  
Raul Nogueira ◽  
Arthur Yancey ◽  
Alexander Isakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Transport Protocol ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Office ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Iv Tpa

Purpose: To standardize the care of acute stroke patients who receive IV tPA being transported by ground EMS from a treating hospital to a stroke center. Background: National consensus guidelines exist for the hospital management of patients receiving IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke. Such patients require close monitoring and management to minimize risk of clinical deterioration. Although patients are often emergently transported from local hospitals to a stroke center, there are no treatment specific national guidelines for managing such patients enroute. As a result, there is a need to develop and implement a standardized approach to guide EMS personnel, particularly in states like Georgia where the public health burden of stroke is high. Methods: In 2012, the “Georgia EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients during/after IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke” was developed in conjunction with the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry, the Georgia State Office of EMS, a representative group of Georgia hospitals and EMS providers. Stakeholders were brought together with the goal of creating a unified statewide protocol. The intent was to create a streamlined protocol which could be readily implemented by pre-hospital care providers. Results: Stakeholders discussed challenges and opportunities to change the process of pre-hospital care. Challenges included recognition of the broad diversity of EMS providers representing over 250 agencies in the state. Opportunities included establishing the framework for greater collaboration across organizations and providers. The final protocol was endorsed by both the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry and the State Office of EMS, and distributed to all EMS regions in Georgia. EMS agencies are currently implementing the protocol. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse group of statewide stakeholders to develop a new treatment protocol enhances success in implementation and serves to further the public health mission of improving care of acute stroke patients.

Abstract 2268: Trends In Reasons For Non-eligibility For tPA

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Tong ◽  
Mary G George
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Rapid Improvement ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Mild Stroke ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: Use of IV tPA has increased over time, as has the adherence to the NQF endorsed performance measure for receipt of IV tPA within 3 hours. Little is known about trends in the reasons for patient ineligibility for IV tPA. This study examines trends in reasons for not providing IV tPA over time and by race and gender among acute ischemic stroke patients in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry (PCNASR), a quality improvement program for acute stroke implemented by state health departments. Methods: There were 13,164 PCNASR patients enrolled from 2008- 2010 with a clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke with documentation of LKW and who arrived within 2 hours of LKW. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to test for trend on accepted reasons for not providing IV tPA within 3 hours of time last known well (LKW). Chi-square tests were used to test for differences among reasons between men and women and between non-Hispanic whites and minorities. Multiple reasons for not giving tPA could be selected. Results: Among 13,164 acute ischemic patients admitted between 2008 and 2010 with documentation of LKW and who arrived within 2 hours of LKW, 3781 (28.7%) received IV tPA, 7284 (55.3%) had documented reasons for not receiving IV tPA, and 2099 (16.0%) did not receive IV tPA. Contraindications to IV tPA, advanced age, rapid improvement and inability to determine eligibility increased over time. Mild stroke decreased over time. Conditions with warning, advanced age, limited life expectancy and family refusal were more common in women; mild stroke and rapid improvement were more common in men. Contraindications were more common in minorities; advanced age, mild stroke and rapid improvement, and family refusal were more common in non-Hispanic whites. When advanced age was selected, 46.6% of patients were over age 90 and 3.4% were under age 80. When stroke too mild was selected, 44.8% of patients had missing NIHSS scores, 42.1% of scores were 0-4, 8.8% were 5-9, and 4.3% were ≥ 10. The three most common reasons for not providing tPA were rapid improvement (40.9%), mild stroke (33.0%), and contraindications (29.2%) in 2010. Conclusions: More than half of ischemic stroke patients arriving within 2 hours of LKW were ineligible to receive IV tPA. There was little use of advanced age for patients under age 80. Documentation of stroke too mild was not substantiated by an NIHSS score in nearly half of patients. Better documentation of NIHSS score should be provided.

Abstract 2223: Diagnoses and Outcomes of t-PA Treated Patients with No Imaging Evidence of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilana Spokoyny ◽  
Rema Raman ◽  
Karin Ernstrom ◽  
Brett C Meyer ◽  
Thomas M Hemmen
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Stroke Mimics ◽  
Stroke Imaging ◽  
Significant Difference

Background/Purpose: Intravenous Alteplase (t-PA) improves outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Of those who recover fully, some may not have had ischemia. We analyzed the frequency and post-treatment outcomes of patients with no imaging evidence of stroke and aimed to delineate the frequency of strokes with full recovery from that of stroke mimics treated with t-PA. Methods: We included all adult stroke patients treated with IV t-PA within 3 hours of stroke onset from the UCSD SPOTRIAS database. Group 1: Patients with neuroimaging evidence of acute stroke (IPS); Group 2: no neuroimaging evidence of acute stroke (INS). All diagnoses were established by an independent adjudicating body. We reviewed medical records, neuroimaging, and compared discharge diagnosis, 90-day mRS, and incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. We adjusted for age, admission NIHSS, and pre-stroke mRS in multivariable models. Results: We identified 61patients with IPS and 25 with INS, with similar baseline characteristics, except for baseline NIHSS (IPS 13.4±8.2, INS 8.4±5.9, p=0.007) and incidence of cardiac arrhythmias (IPS 36.1%, INS 4.0%, p=0.002). Adjusted for age and baseline NIHSS, we found no difference in outcome. ICH was found in 23% of the IPS patients and was symptomatic in 4.9%. None of the INS patients had ICH. Conclusions: Radiologic evidence of acute ischemic stroke was absent in 10.5% of the 86 patients in the UCSD SPOTRIAS database who were treated with t-PA and given a clinical diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke on adjudicating body review at discharge. The majority (64%) of imaging negative stroke patients in our study ultimately received the clinical diagnosis of acute stroke. No significant difference in outcomes (mRS) was found between imaging negative and imaging positive stroke code patients, aside from the increased ICH frequency in imaging positive patients. This lack of outcome difference emphasizes that while imaging plays an important role as a surrogate marker in determining the diagnosis, a detailed clinical evaluation is essential in the correct treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Imaging negative stroke patients are common and future larger scale prospective data is required to analyze the true frequency of stroke mimics versus imaging negative stroke.

DWI Lesion Characteristics As A Predictor For Outcome In Acute Stroke Patients Treated By IV-tPA

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Aref ◽  
S Farag ◽  
S Helmy ◽  
H Mahmoud
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
P Value ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Tissue Type Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Type Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Iv Tpa

Abstract Background Thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) is a well-proved, widely used treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients, many predictors of functional outcome have been proposed as Age, vascular risk factors, initial clinical evaluation on admission using National institute of health stroke scale(NIHSS), functional state of patient(b.L) baseline before stroke and 3 months (3m) after stroke using modified Rankin stroke scale (MRS)and the most controversial Diffusion weighted image characteristics (volume, heterogeneity) Objective To evaluate DWI MRI characteristics (volume, heterogeneity) as a predictor for outcome in Acute stroke patients treated by IV-tPA Patients and Methods This study will be done on a sample of 100 acute ischemic stroke Egyptian patients receiving intra-venous tissue -type plasminogen activator presenting to Ain-Shams university hospitals Results Highly statistically significant (p-value &lt; 0.001) Positive correlation (r = 0.394) between volume (DWI) and MRS (3m) post discharge in studied patients, No statistically significant (pvalue &gt; 0.05) relation between heterogeneity and other studied parameters (MRS, NIHSS D & ADC values) in studied patients Conclusion DWI infarct volume is a predictor for outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients treated by tPA

Abstract P85: Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Hospitalizations and Outcomes of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients, Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (pcnasp)

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Tong ◽  
Sallyann Coleman King ◽  
Erika Odom ◽  
Quanhe Yang
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Treatment

Introduction: Studies suggest a significant reduction in emergency department visits and hospitalizations for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Few studies have examined AIS hospitalizations, treatments, and outcomes during the pandemic period. The present study compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized with AIS before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (weeks 11-24 in 2019 vs. 2020). Method: We identified 42,371 admissions with a clinical diagnosis of AIS, from 370 participating hospitals who contributed data during weeks 11-24 in both 2019 and 2020 to the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program (PCNASP). Results: During weeks 11-24 of the COVID-19 period, AIS hospitalizations declined by 24.5% compared to the same period in 2019 (18,233 in 2020 vs. 24,138 in 2019). In 2020, the percentage of individuals aged <65 years who were hospitalized with AIS was higher compared with the same period in 2019 (34.6% vs. 32.7%, p<0.001); arriving by EMS were higher in 2020 compared with 2019 (47.7% vs. 44.8%, p<0.001). Individuals admitted with AIS in 2020 had a higher mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score compared with 2019 (6.7 vs. 6.3, p<0.001). In 2020, the in-hospital death rates increased by 16% compared to 2019 (5.0% vs. 4.3%, p<0.001). However, there were no differences in rates of alteplase use, achievement of door to needle in 60 minutes, or complications from reperfusion therapy between the two time periods. Conclusion: A higher percentage of younger (<65 years) individuals and more severe AIS cases were admitted to the participating hospitals during weeks 11 to 24 of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. The AIS in-hospital death rate increased 16% during the pandemic weeks as compared to the same weeks in 2019. Additional studies are needed to examine the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke treatment and outcomes.

scholarly journals Acute Reperfusion Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3677
Author(s):  
Rajeel Imran ◽  
Ghada A Mohamed ◽  
Fadi Nahab
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ischemic Injury ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Tremendous Progress ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment

The field of acute stroke treatment has made tremendous progress in reducing the overall burden of disability. Understanding the pathophysiology of acute ischemic injury, neuroimaging to quantify the extent of penumbra and infarction, and acute stroke reperfusion therapies have together contributed to these advancements. In this review we highlight advancements in reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals In-Hospital Delays for Acute Stroke Treatment Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aristeidis H. Katsanos ◽  
Danielle de Sa Boasquevisque ◽  
Mustafa Ahmed Al-Qarni ◽  
Mays Shawawrah ◽  
Rhonda McNicoll-Whiteman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Treatment Delivery ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Central South

ABSTRACT: Background: We investigated the impact of regionally imposed social and healthcare restrictions due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to the time metrics in the management of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted at the regional stroke referral site for Central South Ontario, Canada. Methods: We compared relevant time metrics between patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and/or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) before and after the declared restrictions and state of emergency imposed in our region (March 17, 2020). Results: We identified a significant increase in the median door-to-CT times for patients receiving intravenous tPA (19 min, interquartile range (IQR): 14–27 min vs. 13 min, IQR: 9–17 min, p = 0.008) and/or EVT (20 min, IQR: 15–33 min vs. 11 min, IQR: 5–20 min, p = 0.035) after the start of social and healthcare restrictions in our region compared to the previous 12 months. For patients receiving intravenous tPA treatment, we also found a significant increase (p = 0.005) in the median door-to-needle time (61 min, IQR: 46–72 min vs. 37 min, IQR: 30–50 min). No delays in the time from symptom onset to hospital presentation were uncovered for patients receiving tPA and/or endovascular reperfusion treatments in the first 1.5 months after the establishment of regional and institutional restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: We detected an increase in our institutional time to treatment metrics for acute ischemic stroke patients receiving tPA and/or endovascular reperfusion therapies, related to delays from hospital presentation to the acquisition of cranial CT imaging for both tPA- and EVT-treated patients, and an added delay to treatment with tPA.

Abstract T P298: Impact of Accurate Weight Based Dosing of IV tPA in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal B Jani ◽  
Sopan Lahewala ◽  
Shilpkumar Arora ◽  
Erin Shell ◽  
Anmar Razak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: Accurate weight-based dosing is essential for efficacy and safety of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Stroke patients may be unable to communicate correct body weight (BW). Dosing may be estimated which can lead to error. Objective: To assess accuracy of weight estimation and the effect of weight and dosing discrepancy on outcome of patients with AIS Methods: 94 patients receiving IV tpa for AIS in a CSC registry between Feb, 2013 and Jul, 2014 were reviewed. All were given estimated weight based tPA- per patient input or agreement of 2 providers in ER. Accurate weights were obtained and recorded later. Actual weight was used to calculate the ideal TPA doses and compared to the weights and doses used. The cohort was separated into two groups based on weight discrepancy to those 10 kg (non forgiven) discrepancy. Rate of hemorrhage, NIHSS and hospice/mortality were assessed. Difference between categorical variables was tested using the chi-square and Fisher’ Exact Test. Differences between continuous variables were tested using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and presented with median and IQ range. Results: 86.1% (forgiven cohort) were given the optimal tPA dose despite estimation. There was a significant difference in stroke severity based on admission NIHSS between the cohorts (33.3% in forgiven vs. 69.2% non-forgiven. P=0.04). Stroke severity based on discharge NIHSS did not reach statistical significance (mild: 71.8% vs 63.6%, moderate: 16.9% vs 9.1% and severe: 11.3% vs 27.3%, p = 0.32). 30 days modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was available for 52 pts without any significant difference (good outcome 44.4% vs 57.1%, poor outcome 35.6 % vs 28.6 %, p = 0.82). Statistically non significance toward higher rate of hemorrhagic conversion (6.4% vs 7.7%, p = 0.41), and higher mortality in non-forgiven group (7.41% vs 15.38%, p= 0.33). Conclusion: Accurate BW measurement prior tPA still remains challenging. In this study, weight estimation by 2 providers is fairly accurate. 14 % of the patients with discrepancy of > 10 kg had higher rate of mortality and hemorrhage although this was not statistically significant. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to examine the safety of weight estimation in AIS patients who receive IV tpa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document