scholarly journals Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Strokes

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1207-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Sean Savitz ◽  
Deep Pujara ◽  
Haris Kamal ◽  
Kirsten Carroll ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Timely access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers is vital for best acute ischemic stroke outcomes. Methods— US stroke-treating centers were mapped utilizing geo-mapping and stratified into non-EVT or EVT if they reported ≥1 acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy code in 2017 to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Direct EVT-access, defined as the population with the closest facility being an EVT-center, was calculated from validated trauma-models adapted for stroke. Current 15- and 30-minute access were described nationwide and at state-level with emphasis on 4 states (TX, NY, CA, IL). Two optimization models were utilized. Model-A used a greedy algorithm to capture the largest population with direct access when flipping 10% and 20% non-EVT to EVT-centers to maximize access. Model-B used bypassing methodology to directly transport patients to the nearest EVT centers if the drive-time difference from the geo-centroid to hospital was within 15 minutes from the geo-centroid to the closest non-EVT center. Results— Of 1941 stroke-centers, 713 (37%) were EVT. Approximately 61 million (19.8%) Americans have direct EVT access within 15 minutes while 95 million (30.9%) within 30 minutes. There were 65 (43%) EVT centers in TX with 22% of the population currently within 15-minute access. Flipping 10% hospitals with top population density improved access to 30.8%, while bypassing resulted in 45.5% having direct access to EVT centers. Similar results were found in NY (current, 20.9%; flipping, 34.7%; bypassing, 50.4%), CA (current, 25.5%; flipping, 37.3%; bypassing, 53.9%), and IL (current, 15.3%; flipping, 21.9%; bypassing, 34.6%). Nationwide, the current direct access within 15 minutes of 19.8% increased by 7.5% by flipping the top 10% non-EVT to EVT-capable in all states. Bypassing non-EVT centers by 15 minutes resulted in a 16.7% gain in coverage. Conclusions— EVT-access within 15 minutes is limited to less than one-fifth of the US population. Optimization methodologies that increase EVT centers or bypass non-EVT to the closest EVT center both showed enhanced access. Results varied by states based on the population size and density. However, bypass showed more potential for maximizing direct EVT-access. National and state efforts should focus on identifying gaps and tailoring solutions to improve EVT-access.

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
James C Grotta ◽  
Sheryl Martin-Schild ◽  
Haris Kamal ◽  
Anjail Z Sharrief ◽  
...  

Background: Timely access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers is vital for best stroke outcome. We map current EVT access in the US then utilize modeling to optimize it. Methods: US designated stroke centers were mapped utilizing geo-mapping and stratified into EVT or non-EVT if they reported ≥1 thrombectomy code for acute ischemic stroke in 2017 to CMS. Direct EVT access, defined as the population with the closest facility to EVT centers, was calculated from validated trauma models adapted for stroke. Current 15 and 30 min access were described nationwide and in 4 states (TX, NY, CA, IL). Two optimization models were utilized. Model A used a greedy algorithm to capture the largest population with direct access when flipping 10 non-EVT to EVT centers to maximize access. Model B used bypassing methodology to directly transport patients to EVT centers within 15 min from the closest non-EVT center. Results: Of 1941 stroke centers, 714 were EVT. Approximately 99 million/32% Americans have direct EVT access within 15 min while 111 million (36.0%) within 30 minutes (Fig 1). There were 65 (43%) EVT centers in TX with 22% current 15 min access. Flipping the top 10 population density hospitals improved access to 32%, while bypassing resulted in 46% having direct access to EVT centers (fig 2 A-B). Direct access in CA was 26% which improved to 35% with flipping and 54% by 15 min bypassing from the closest non-EVT to EVT centers. Similar results were found in NY (current 21%, flipping 39%, bypassing 50%) and IL (15%, 27% and 35%, respectively), Tab 1. Conclusion: EVT access within 15 min is limited to less than 1/3 of the US population. Optimization methodology that increase EVT centers or bypass non-EVT to the closest EVT center both showed enhanced access. Results varied by states based on the population size and density. However, bypass showed more potential for maximizing direct EVT access. National and state efforts should focus on identifying gaps and tailoring solutions to improve EVT access.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Saber ◽  
Amytis Towfighi ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver

Introduction: Studies have suggested sex-related and age-related variations in frequency of reperfusion therapy, but have been limited by constrained geographic scope, data from before the modern thrombectomy era, and incomplete exploration of sex-related differences in discrete age ranges. We therefore analyzed sex-, age-, and sex-age interaction in the frequency of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke in the US National Inpatient Sample. Methods: In the National Inpatient Sample , we identified all adult ischemic stroke EVT hospitalizations from 2010-2016, using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. Patient age was categorized as: <50y, 50-59y, 60-69y, 70-79y and ≥80ys. Rates of use of EVT were assessed standardized to the 2010 US Census population. Results: Among 50,573 EVT hospitalizations, 50.1% were female. The number of EVTs increased from 4091 in 2010 to 12,875 in 2016. Over the entire 7y time period, a sex-age interaction was noted: 49% in <50y; 37% in 50-59y; 35% in 60-69y; 53% in 70-79y; and 66% in ≥80y. This sex-age interaction was present as well for EVT rates per 100,000 individuals in the population, with the total ratio of female to male rate of EVT per 100,000: 0.93 for in <50y; 0.52 in 50-59y; 0.58 in 60-69y; 0.91 in 70-79y; and 1.1 in ≥80y. EVT utilization rates increased substantially over time in both men and women in all age groups. However, the ratio of women to men per 100,000 receiving EVT changed for only one age range, decreasing among <50y from 0.98 in 2010 to 0.79 in 2016 (P<0.05). Conclusion: While half of all endovascular thrombectomies in the US are performed in women, there are major age-related sex-specific variations in EVT rates, with rates of EVT much lower among women than men in 50-70 age group. Determinants of these age-specific female-male disparities in EVT treatment merit detailed investigation. Figure: Age- and sex-specific female to male thrombectomy utilization rates.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee H Schwamm ◽  
Haolin Xu ◽  
Roland Matsouaka ◽  
Shreyansh Shah ◽  
Kori Zachrison ◽  
...  

Introduction: Two recent RCTs have shown benefit of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) 6-24 h from last known well (LKW) using imaging-guided patient selection, however little is known about outcomes in contemporary non-trial settings. We assessed the frequency and outcomes of EVT beyond 6 h in the US national GWTG-Stroke clinical registry. Methods: We analyzed all AIS hospitalizations between 1/1/09 - 10/1/18 at fully participating GWTG-Stroke sites to identify 53,702 patients at 697 sites treated with EVT (± IV tPA) who had valid LKW, symptom discovery (SxD) and treatment times recorded. Hospital characteristics were analyzed at the 470 sites that treated > 10 patients during the study. Table 1 shows significant covariates (standardized differences >10%) and adjusted outcomes based on logistic regression models. Results: Treatment >6 h from LKW occurred in 33% of all EVT cases (median 4.7 h, IQR 3.3-7 h), and all were treated <6 h from SxD. The proportion of EVT cases treated >6 h from LKW varied widely across sites (median 30%, IQR 24-38%) and increased sharply in 2018 (Fig). Compared to < 6 h, patients treated >6 h differed in age, AF, arrival mode/time, stroke severity and use of anticoagulation, and presented to higher EVT volume centers. Late window EVT patients had less favorable adjusted outcomes at discharge for mortality, ambulation and disposition to home or IRF compared to <6 h patients (Table). Conclusions: EVT is frequently performed >6h, accounting for one-third of cases nationally. As adjusted functional outcomes at discharge are worse in these patients, further research is required to ensure optimal EVT outcomes in clinical practice settings


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tasneem F. Hasan ◽  
Nathaniel Todnem ◽  
Neethu Gopal ◽  
David A. Miller ◽  
Sukhwinder S. Sandhu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Al-Khaled ◽  
Christine Matthis ◽  
Andreas Binder ◽  
Jonas Mudter ◽  
Joern Schattschneider ◽  
...  

Background: Dysphagia is associated with poor outcome in stroke patients. Studies investigating the association of dysphagia and early dysphagia screening (EDS) with outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are rare. The aims of our study are to investigate the association of dysphagia and EDS within 24 h with stroke-related pneumonia and outcomes. Methods: Over a 4.5-year period (starting November 2007), all consecutive AIS patients from 15 hospitals in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, were prospectively evaluated. The primary outcomes were stroke-related pneumonia during hospitalization, mortality, and disability measured on the modified Rankin Scale ≥2-5, in which 2 indicates an independence/slight disability to 5 severe disability. Results: Of 12,276 patients (mean age 73 ± 13; 49% women), 9,164 patients (74%) underwent dysphagia screening; of these patients, 55, 39, 4.7, and 1.5% of patients had been screened for dysphagia within 3, 3 to <24, 24 to ≤72, and >72 h following admission. Patients who underwent dysphagia screening were likely to be older, more affected on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and to have higher rates of neurological symptoms and risk factors than patients who were not screened. A total of 3,083 patients (25.1%; 95% CI 24.4-25.8) had dysphagia. The frequency of dysphagia was higher in patients who had undergone dysphagia screening than in those who had not (30 vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001). During hospitalization (mean 9 days), 1,271 patients (10.2%; 95% CI 9.7-10.8) suffered from stroke-related pneumonia. Patients with dysphagia had a higher rate of pneumonia than those without dysphagia (29.7 vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that dysphagia was associated with increased risk of stroke-related pneumonia (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.8-4.2; p < 0.001), case fatality during hospitalization (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.1-3.7; p < 0.001) and disability at discharge (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.6-2.3; p < 0.001). EDS within 24 h of admission appeared to be associated with decreased risk of stroke-related pneumonia (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89; p = 0.006) and disability at discharge (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.46-0.77; p < 0.001). Furthermore, dysphagia was independently correlated with an increase in mortality (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4-4.2; p < 0.001) and disability (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.8-3.0; p < 0.001) at 3 months after stroke. The rate of 3-month disability was lower in patients who had received EDS (52 vs. 40.7%; p = 0.003), albeit an association in the logistic regression was not found (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.51-1.2; p = 0.2). Conclusions: Dysphagia exposes stroke patients to a higher risk of pneumonia, disability, and death, whereas an EDS seems to be associated with reduced risk of stroke-related pneumonia and disability.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungmin Hong ◽  
Anne-katrin Giese ◽  
Markus D Schirmer ◽  
Adrian V Dalca ◽  
Anna Bonkhoff ◽  
...  

Objective: Ability of the brain to recover after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is linked to the pre-stroke burden of white matter hyperintensity (WMH), a radiographic marker of brain health. We sought to determine the excessive WMH burden in an AIS population and investigate its association with 3-month stroke outcomes. Data: We used 2,435 subjects from the MRI-GENIE study. Three-month functional outcomes of 872 subjects among those subjects were measured by 90-day modified Ranking Scale (mRS). Methods: We automatically quantified WMH volume (WMHv) on FLAIR images and adjusted for a brain volume. We modeled a trend using the factor analysis (FA) log-linear regression using age, sex, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease and smoking as input variables. We categorized three WMH burden groups based on the conditional probability given by the model (LOW: lower 33%, MED: middle 34%, and HIGH: upper 33%). The subgroups were compared with respect to mRS (median and dichotomized odds ratio (OR) (good/poor: mRS 0-2/3-6)). Results: Five FA components out of seven with significant relationship to WMHv (p<0.001) were used for the regression modeling (R 2 =0.359). The HIGH group showed higher median (median=2, IQR=2) mRS score than LOW (median=1, IQR=1) and MED (median=1, IQR=1). The odds (OR) of good AIS outcome for LOW and MED were 1.8 (p=0.0001) and 1.6 (p=0.006) times higher than HIGH, respectively. Conclusion: Once accounted for clinical covariates, the excessive WMHv was associated with worse 3-month stroke outcomes. These data suggest that a life-time of injury to the white matter reflected in WMH is an important factor for stroke recovery and an indicator of the brain health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 169-183
Author(s):  
Sharath Kumar G G ◽  
Chinmay Nagesh

AbstractAppropriate patient selection and expedient recanalization are the mainstay of modern management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Only a minority of patients (7–15%) of patients are eligible for endovascular therapy. Patient selection may be time based or perfusion based. Central to both paradigms is the selection of a patient with a small core, a significant penumbra that can be differentiated from areas of oligemia. A brief review of patient selection methods is presented. Endovascular thrombectomy techniques using stentrievers or aspiration catheters have now become the treatment of choice for AIS with large vessel occlusion. A range of devices, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are available in the market for the neurointerventionist to choose. Techniques vary between devices and between operators, but standardization and protocolization are important within each center. Complications must be anticipated to be avoided. Once reperfusion is achieved, outcomes must be safeguarded with competent postprocedure management to prevent secondary brain injury. These aspects are reviewed in this article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document