From Mare Liberum to the Global Commons: Building on the Grotian Heritage

Grotiana ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vid Prislan ◽  
Nico Schrijver

AbstractThis article addresses the heritage of Grotius's concept of common goods (res communes) as developed in his seminal work Mare liberum. This contribution identifies the basic tenets of Grotius's thinking on the nature of common property and identifies the relevance of these ideas for the present day management of global commons, i.e., the areas and natural resources beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. Successively, the article examines the regimes for: the deep seabed, the high seas, and marine mammals; outer space, particularly the moon; the two polar regions; and the atmosphere, in particular the ozone layer and the climate system. The article demonstrates how some of the original tenets of Grotius's concept of res communis – in particular the idea of inexhaustibility – can no longer be upheld and how the freedom of access to the global commons has become increasingly qualified and supplemented, if not replaced by a new law of international co-operation aimed at conservation and sustainable use of natural wealth and resources beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The global commons function as laboratories for the testing of new principles of international law and new forms of international co-operation, which can be said to clearly build upon the Grotian heritage.

2021 ◽  
pp. 13-45
Author(s):  
Nilufer Oral

The global commons, or common areas, are those areas that lie beyond the national jurisdiction and control of any state. In general, these areas include the deep seabed, the high seas, the atmosphere, the Moon and outer space, and Antarctica. However, other than falling under a common nomenclature there is no common regime that applies to these common areas, or global commons. This chapter examines the different regimes of common heritage, common concern, and the freedom of the high seas, as they apply to the different global commons looking at the specific case of the new international legally binding instrument for conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction under negotiations at the United Nations. In conclusion the legal landscape that emerges for the global commons is one more of variation than commonality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 75-82
Author(s):  
Cymie Payne ◽  
Brian Egan ◽  
Lydia Slobodian ◽  
Stefan Kirchner

Professor Cymie Payne introduced this session, the final event for the Society's Signature Topic, “Beyond National Jurisdiction,” which examined international law governing the oceans, polar regions, cyberspace, and outer space.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Bosselmann

This article offers some ideas about a system of governance which reflects the reality of planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2009; Steffen et al., 2015). The goal of living safely within the boundaries of our planet cannot be achieved by relying on traditional forms of governance based on the concept of sovereign nation states. States, driven by national interest, have been resistant to accepting responsibility for areas beyond national jurisdiction known as the global commons (Ostrom, 1990). The focus for governing the global commons – the polar regions, oceans, atmosphere, outer space – needs to shift from states to Earth as a whole, evoking what might be called ‘Earth governance’.


AUC IURIDICA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-166
Author(s):  
Šimon Pepřík

The aim of this article is to describe the legal regime of the natural resources of celestial bodies. In recent months and years, there has been an increase in debates regarding mining on the moon and asteroids. This article is dedicated to the analysis of the legal regime of such activities. In particular, whether such activities are possible from the point of view of international law, how they are regulated and what are the potential future developments in this area. The article offers an analysis and comparison of the legal regime governing the natural resources of celestial bodies based on the Outer Space Treaty and the Moon Agreement, respectively. The Moon Agreement is given special attention despite its limited international significance, and arguments are presented in favour of its possible recognition by more states in the future. In both cases, arguments are presented that the non-appropriation principle regarding the outer space and celestial bodies, as expressed in both international treaties, does not apply to the natural resources.


Author(s):  
Rüdiger Wolfrum

This chapter explores the general question of how to establish that the regulation of a certain matter constitutes a matter of community-wide concern, which is the necessary step for the recognition of community obligation. The hypothesis is that such a qualification must, first, be well founded factually and, secondly, accepted as such in a legal or political legitimizing process. On this basis, the chapter suggests that the governance of spaces beyond national jurisdiction constitutes a community interest and has to be guided by the interests of the international community. Exploring this question with respect to key common spaces and particular issues, the chapter notes the difficulty of most of the dispute settlement systems, which, being bilateral, are not fully adequate to address questions related to the management of global commons as well as for the protection of the environment. To avoid this difficulty, the chapter suggests greater reliance on advisory opinions where available.


1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Watson

It is a commonplace that Rome's greatest contribution to the modern world is its law. Whether this is strictly true or not, Roman law is certainly the basis of the law of Western Europe (with the exception of England and Scandinavia), of much of Africa including South Africa, Ethiopia and in general the former colonies of countries in continental Europe, of Quebec and Louisiana, of Japan and Ceylon and so on. Perhaps even more important for the future is that International law is very largely modelled, by analogy, on Roman law. Just think of the perfectly serious arguments of a few years ago as to whether outer space (including the moon and planets) were res nullius or res communes and whether they were, or were not, susceptible of acquisition by occupatio. This persistence of Roman law has had undesirable consequences. First, Roman law as an academic subject has got into the hands of lawyers whose love of technicalities has frightened off classical scholars who tend not to use the legal sources. Secondly, scholars of antiquity, since Roman law is left well alone, have also been reluctant to look at other ancient legal systems. So have lawyers since these other systems have no ‘practical” value. Thirdly, following upon these but worse still, the usefulness of Roman law for later ages, coupled with its enforced isolation from other systems of antiquity, has often led to an exaggerated respect for it, and to its being regarded as well-nigh perfect, immutable, fit for all people. Many in “the Age of Reason” were ready to regard Roman law as “the Law of Reason”.


2021 ◽  
pp. 617-723
Author(s):  
Alan Boyle ◽  
Catherine Redgwell

Our survival on earth, this chapter argues, depends on the conservation of the world’s natural resources. These resources comprise of soil, water, the atmosphere, plants, trees, and other life forms. The chapter looks at the earth’s current ‘ecological footprint’ and the future of that ecological footprint as it stands now. There is now widespread scientific consensus that biodiversity is being lost, and that pressures on biodiversity are increasing. The chapter asks what we can do about this, in terms of international law. The chapter identifies how international law seeks to ensure the protection and conservation and sustainable use of nature, its ecosystems and biodiversity, and the effectiveness of measures developed to conserve land?based living resources, forests, and deserts.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego De Blasi

<p>Outer space activities are increasingly bringing the international (scientific) community to upper stages of knowledge and awareness. With particular reference to <strong>Lunar exploration</strong>, general involvement of all States (also within a context of public-private partnerships initiatives) towards <strong>the principle of sustainable utilization of lunar resources</strong> shall represent an important requirement for the future of all Mankind</p><p><br>Thus, the <strong>safeguarding of lunar environment</strong> (the equitable/intragenerational utilization of its resources) shall represent a critical issue for the whole evolutionary framework of the <em>Corpus Iuris Spatialis</em></p><p>Firstly, the principle herein shall be taken into examination under the provisions laid down in the A<em>greement governing the Activities of States on the Moon and other Celestial Bodies.</em> Accordingly, article 11 states <em>“the moon and its natural resources are the common heritage of mankind”[..]; as well, “The moon is not subject to national appropriation by any claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means..” (paragraph 2)</em></p><p><em> </em><br>Secondly, other concerns may also take into account: a)<strong> the perspective of ISRU (in situ resources utilization) processes</strong>, which shall take place towards sustainability means b) the undertaking of well balanced measures in exploring and using natural resources <em>vis-à-vis</em> adverse changes in lunar environment <em>(article 7, par. 1, Moon Treaty)</em>. In addition, besides the terms pursuant to the establishment of peaceful use of (space) lunar activities, an adequate <em>consensus</em> shall be called upon States beyond the <em>status quo</em></p><p>  <br>In conclusion, the aferomentioned background shall also consider the adoption of a comprehensive <em><strong>Additional Protocol to the Moon Treaty</strong></em> concerning <em>the sustainable utilization of lunar resources</em>. Arguably, this progressive framework may also be welcomed as milestones towards <em>further legal developments in international space law </em></p><p> </p><p> </p>


1980 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Q. Christol

The exploration and use of the space environment, consisting of outer space per se, the moon, and celestial bodies, may result in harm to persons and to property. International law and municipal law have focused on rules allowing for the payment of money damages for harm caused by space objects and their component parts, including the “payload.” Both forms of law have accepted the basic proposition that money damages should compensate for harm. Principal attention will be given in this analysis to the kinds of harm caused by space objects that are considered to be compensable under international law at the present time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document