scholarly journals The Observed Hemispheric Symmetry in Reflected Shortwave Irradiance

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 468-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiko Voigt ◽  
Bjorn Stevens ◽  
Jürgen Bader ◽  
Thorsten Mauritsen
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Atmospheric Aerosols ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Hemispheric Differences ◽  
Satellite Measurements ◽  
Planetary Albedo ◽  
Accurate Observation

Abstract While the concentration of landmasses and atmospheric aerosols on the Northern Hemisphere suggests that the Northern Hemisphere is brighter than the Southern Hemisphere, satellite measurements of top-of-atmosphere irradiances found that both hemispheres reflect nearly the same amount of shortwave irradiance. Here, the authors document that the most precise and accurate observation, the energy balanced and filled dataset of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System covering the period 2000–10, measures an absolute hemispheric difference in reflected shortwave irradiance of 0.1 W m−2. In contrast, the longwave irradiance of the two hemispheres differs by more than 1 W m−2, indicating that the observed climate system exhibits hemispheric symmetry in reflected shortwave irradiance but not in longwave irradiance. The authors devise a variety of methods to estimate the spatial degrees of freedom of the time-mean reflected shortwave irradiance. These are used to show that the hemispheric symmetry in reflected shortwave irradiance is a nontrivial property of the Earth system in the sense that most partitionings of Earth into two random halves do not exhibit hemispheric symmetry in reflected shortwave irradiance. Climate models generally do not reproduce the observed hemispheric symmetry, which the authors interpret as further evidence that the symmetry is nontrivial. While the authors cannot rule out that the observed hemispheric symmetry in reflected shortwave irradiance is accidental, their results motivate a search for mechanisms that minimize hemispheric differences in reflected shortwave irradiance and planetary albedo.

Libera – Observing and Understanding Earth’s Energy Budget

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Z. Hakuba ◽  
Peter Pilewskie ◽  
Graeme Stephens ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Deposition ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Near Ir ◽  
Planetary Albedo ◽  
Insight Into

<p>The recently selected NASA mission Libera, named for the daughter of Ceres in Roman mythology, will provide continuity of the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Earth radiation budget (ERB) observations from space.</p><p>Seamless extension of the ERB climate data record is achieved by acquiring integrated radiances over the CERES FM6-heritage broad spectral bands in the shortwave (0.3 to 5 μm), longwave (5 to 50 μm) and total (0.3 to beyond 100 μm). To gain deeper insight into shortwave energy deposition, Libera adds a split-shortwave band (0.7 to 5 μm) that allows to provide deeper insight into shortwave energy deposition.</p><p>Libera’s advanced detector technologies is based on vertically aligned black-carbon nanotubes with closed-loop electrical substitution radiometry to achieve radiometric uncertainty of approximately 0.2%. Additionally, a wide field-of-view camera is employed to provide scene context and explore pathways for separating future ERB missions from complex imagers.</p><p>This presentation will summarize Libera’s attributes and mission goals, as well as some of the applications of the camera radiances, and the role of the additional split-shortwave channel that splits the shortwave band into its visible and near-IR contributions. This split is vital for the better understanding of shortwave absorption, feedbacks, and planetary albedo variability. The hemispheric symmetry of planetary albedo, as observed by CERES, is not achieved by most state-of-the-art climate models and is associated with long-standing biases in circulation and cloud properties. We will exemplify the study of processes relevant to albedo symmetry by means of CMIP6 simulations that provide the visible and near-IR fluxes.</p>

scholarly journals Global maps of aerosol single scattering albedo using combined CERES-MODIS retrieval

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Devi ◽  
Sreedharan Krishnakumari Satheesh
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Single Scattering ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Single Scattering Albedo ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Climatic Impact ◽  
Aerosol Absorption ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) is a leading contributor to the uncertainty in aerosol radiative impact assessments. Therefore accurate information on aerosol absorption is required on a global scale. In this study, we have applied a multi-satellite algorithm to retrieve SSA using the concept of ‘critical optical depth.’ Global maps of SSA were generated following this approach using spatially and temporally collocated data from Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors on board Terra and Aqua satellites. The method has been validated using the data from aircraft-based measurements of various field campaigns. The retrieval uncertainty is ±0.03 and depends on both the surface albedo and aerosol absorption. Global mean SSA estimated over land and ocean is 0.93 and 0.97, respectively. Seasonal and spatial distribution of SSA over various regions are also presented. The global maps of SSA, thus derived with improved accuracy, provide important input to climate models for assessing the climatic impact of aerosols on regional and global scales.

scholarly journals Assessing Snow Albedo Feedback in Simulated Climate Change

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2617-2630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Qu ◽  
Alex Hall
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Attenuation Effect ◽  
Albedo Feedback ◽  
Snow Albedo ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Planetary Albedo

Abstract In this paper, the two factors controlling Northern Hemisphere springtime snow albedo feedback in transient climate change are isolated and quantified based on scenario runs of 17 climate models used in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. The first factor is the dependence of planetary albedo on surface albedo, representing the atmosphere's attenuation effect on surface albedo anomalies. It is potentially a major source of divergence in simulations of snow albedo feedback because of large differences in simulated cloud fields in Northern Hemisphere land areas. To calculate the dependence, an analytical model governing planetary albedo was developed. Detailed validations of the analytical model for two of the simulations are shown, version 3 of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM3) and the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory global coupled Climate Model 2.0 (CM2.0), demonstrating that it facilitates a highly accurate calculation of the dependence of planetary albedo on surface albedo given readily available simulation output. In all simulations it is found that surface albedo anomalies are attenuated by approximately half in Northern Hemisphere land areas as they are transformed into planetary albedo anomalies. The intermodel standard deviation in the dependence of planetary albedo on surface albedo is surprisingly small, less than 10% of the mean. Moreover, when an observational estimate of this factor is calculated by applying the same method to the satellite-based International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) data, it is found that most simulations agree with ISCCP values to within about 10%, despite further disagreements between observed and simulated cloud fields. This suggests that even large relative errors in simulated cloud fields do not result in significant error in this factor, enhancing confidence in climate models. The second factor, related exclusively to surface processes, is the change in surface albedo associated with an anthropogenically induced temperature change in Northern Hemisphere land areas. It exhibits much more intermodel variability. The standard deviation is about ⅓ of the mean, with the largest value being approximately 3 times larger than the smallest. Therefore this factor is unquestionably the main source of the large divergence in simulations of snow albedo feedback. To reduce the divergence, attention should be focused on differing parameterizations of snow processes, rather than intermodel variations in the attenuation effect of the atmosphere on surface albedo anomalies.

scholarly journals Assessment of Sea Ice Albedo Radiative Forcing and Feedback over the Northern Hemisphere from 1982 to 2009 Using Satellite and Reanalysis Data

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1248-1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Cao ◽  
Shunlin Liang ◽  
Xiaona Chen ◽  
Tao He
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Surface Albedo ◽  
Kernel Method ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Albedo Feedback

Abstract The decreasing surface albedo caused by continuously retreating sea ice over Arctic plays a critical role in Arctic warming amplification. However, the quantification of the change in radiative forcing at top of atmosphere (TOA) introduced by the decreasing sea ice albedo and its feedback to the climate remain uncertain. In this study, based on the satellite-retrieved long-term surface albedo product CLARA-A1 (Cloud, Albedo, and Radiation dataset, AVHRR-based, version 1) and the radiative kernel method, an estimated 0.20 ± 0.05 W m−2 sea ice radiative forcing (SIRF) has decreased in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) owing to the loss of sea ice from 1982 to 2009, yielding a sea ice albedo feedback (SIAF) of 0.25 W m−2 K−1 for the NH and 0.19 W m−2 K−1 for the entire globe. These results are lower than the estimate from another method directly using the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) broadband planetary albedo. Further data analysis indicates that kernel method is likely to underestimate the change in all-sky SIRF because all-sky radiative kernels mask too much of the effect of sea ice albedo on the variation of cloudy albedo. By applying an adjustment with CERES-based estimate, the change in all-sky SIRF over the NH was corrected to 0.33 ± 0.09 W m−2, corresponding to a SIAF of 0.43 W m−2 K−1 for NH and 0.31 W m−2 K−1 for the entire globe. It is also determined that relative to satellite surface albedo product, two popular reanalysis products, ERA-Interim and MERRA, severely underestimate the changes in NH SIRF in melt season (May–August) from 1982 to 2009 and the sea ice albedo feedback to warming climate.

scholarly journals Computation of Radiation Budget on an Oblate Earth

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 7203-7206
Author(s):  
G. Louis Smith ◽  
David R. Doelling
Keyword(s):  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Length Of Day ◽  
Satellite Measurements ◽  
Error Sources ◽  
Solar Declination ◽  
Earth’S Oblateness ◽  
Geodetic Coordinate System ◽  
Geocentric Coordinates

Abstract The effects of the earth’s oblateness on computation of its radiation budget from satellite measurements are evaluated. For the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) data processing, geolocations of the measurements are computed in terms of the geodetic coordinate system. Using this system accounts for oblateness in the computed solar zenith angle and length of day. The geodetic and geocentric latitudes are equal at the equator and poles but differ by a maximum of 0.2° at 45° latitude. The area of each region and zone is affected by oblateness as compared to geocentric coordinates, decreasing from zero at the equator to 1.5% at the poles. The global area receiving solar radiation is calculated using the equatorial and polar axes. This area varies with solar declination by 0.0005. For radiation budget computations, the earth oblateness effects are shown to be small compared to error sources of measuring or modeling.

scholarly journals Quantification of Monthly Mean Regional-Scale Albedo of Marine Stratiform Clouds in Satellite Observations and GCMs

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2139-2148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frida A.-M. Bender ◽  
Robert J. Charlson ◽  
Annica M. L. Ekman ◽  
Louise V. Leahy
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
System Modeling ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Radiative Properties ◽  
Cloud Albedo ◽  
Stratiform Clouds

AbstractPlanetary albedo—the reflectivity for solar radiation—is of singular importance in determining the amount of solar energy taken in by the Earth–atmosphere system. Modeling albedo, and specifically cloud albedo, correctly is crucial for realistic climate simulations. A method is presented herein by which regional cloud albedo can be quantified from the relation between total albedo and cloud fraction, which in observations is found to be approximately linear on a monthly mean scale. This analysis is based primarily on the combination of cloud fraction data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and albedo data from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES), but the results presented are also supported by the combination of cloud fraction and proxy albedo data from satelliteborne lidar [Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO)]. These data are measured and derived completely independently from the CERES–MODIS data. Applied to low-level marine stratiform clouds in three regions (off the coasts of South America, Africa, and North America), the analysis reveals regionally uniform monthly mean cloud albedos, indicating that the variation in cloud shortwave radiative properties is small on this scale. A coherent picture of low “effective” cloud albedo emerges, in the range from 0.35 to 0.42, on the basis of data from CERES and MODIS. In its simplicity, the method presented appears to be useful as a diagnostic tool and as a constraint on climate models. To demonstrate this, the same method is applied to cloud fraction and albedo output from several current-generation climate models [from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 3 (CMIP3), archive]. Although the multimodel mean cloud albedo estimates agree to within 20% with the satellite-based estimates for the three focus regions, model-based estimates of cloud albedo are found to display much larger variability than do the observations, within individual models as well as between models.

Constraints on Climate Sensitivity from Radiation Patterns in Climate Models

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1034-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Huber ◽  
Irina Mahlstein ◽  
Martin Wild ◽  
John Fasullo ◽  
Reto Knutti
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Concentration ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Surface Radiation ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Radiation Patterns ◽  
Strong Constraint

Abstract The estimated range of climate sensitivity, the equilibrium warming resulting from a doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, has not decreased substantially in past decades. New statistical methods for estimating the climate sensitivity have been proposed and provide a better quantification of relative probabilities of climate sensitivity within the almost canonical range of 2–4.5 K; however, large uncertainties remain, in particular for the upper bound. Simple indices of spatial radiation patterns are used here to establish a relationship between an observable radiative quantity and the equilibrium climate sensitivity. The indices are computed for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) multimodel dataset and offer a possibility to constrain climate sensitivity by considering radiation patterns in the climate system. High correlations between the indices and climate sensitivity are found, for example, in the cloud radiative forcing of the incoming longwave surface radiation and in the clear-sky component of the incoming surface shortwave flux, the net shortwave surface budget, and the atmospheric shortwave attenuation variable β. The climate sensitivity was estimated from the mean of the indices during the years 1990–99 for the CMIP3 models. The surface radiative flux dataset from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) together with its top-of-atmosphere Energy Balanced and Filled equivalent (CERES EBAF) are used as a reference observational dataset, resulting in a best estimate for climate sensitivity of 3.3 K with a likely range of 2.7–4.0 K. A comparison with other satellite and reanalysis datasets show similar likely ranges and best estimates of 1.7–3.8 (3.3 K) [Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE)], 2.9–3.7 (3.3 K) [International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project radiative surface flux data (ISCCP-FD)], 2.8–4.1 (3.5 K) [NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Application (MERRA)], 3.0–4.2 (3.6 K) [Japanese 25-yr Reanalysis (JRA-25)], 2.7–3.9 (3.4 K) [European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim)], 3.0–4.0 (3.5 K) [ERA-40], and 3.1–4.7 (3.6 K) for the NCEP reanalysis. For each individual reference dataset, the results suggest that values for the sensitivity below 1.7 K are not likely to be consistent with observed radiation patterns given the structure of current climate models. For the aggregation of the reference datasets, the climate sensitivity is not likely to be below 2.9 K within the framework of this study, whereas values exceeding 4.5 K cannot be excluded from this analysis. While these ranges cannot be interpreted properly in terms of probability, they are consistent with other estimates of climate sensitivity and reaffirm that the current climatology provides a strong constraint on the lower bound of climate sensitivity even in a set of structurally different models.

scholarly journals Aerosols enhance cloud lifetime and brightness along the stratus-to-cumulus transition

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (30) ◽  
pp. 17591-17598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Christensen ◽  
William K. Jones ◽  
Philip Stier
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Average Lifetime ◽  
Atmospheric Conditions ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Planetary Albedo

Anthropogenic aerosols are hypothesized to enhance planetary albedo and offset some of the warming due to the buildup of greenhouse gases in Earth’s atmosphere. Aerosols can enhance the coverage, reflectance, and lifetime of warm low-level clouds. However, the relationship between cloud lifetime and aerosol concentration has been challenging to measure from polar orbiting satellites. We estimate two timescales relating to the formation and persistence of low-level clouds over1○×1○spatial domains using multiple years of geostationary satellite observations provided by the Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Synoptic (SYN) product. Lagrangian trajectories spanning several days along the classic stratus-to-cumulus transition zone are stratified by aerosol optical depth and meteorology. Clouds forming in relatively polluted trajectories tend to have lighter precipitation rates, longer average lifetime, and higher cloud albedo and cloud fraction compared with unpolluted trajectories. While liquid water path differences are found to be negligible, we find direct evidence of increased planetary albedo primarily through increased drop concentration (Nd) and cloud fraction, with the caveat that the aerosol influence on cloud fraction is positive only for stable atmospheric conditions. While the increase in cloud fraction can be large typically in the beginning of trajectories, the Twomey effect accounts for the bulk (roughly 3/4) of the total aerosol indirect radiative forcing estimate.

scholarly journals On the determination of the global cloud feedback from satellite measurements

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Masters
Keyword(s):  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Cloud Feedback ◽  
Radiative Flux ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Clear Sky ◽  
Flux Data ◽  
Time Period

Abstract. A detailed analysis is presented in order to determine the sensitivity of the estimated short-term cloud feedback to choices of temperature datasets, sources of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) clear-sky radiative flux data, and temporal averaging. It is shown that the results of a previous analysis, which suggested a likely positive value for the short-term cloud feedback, depended upon combining all-sky radiative fluxes from NASA's Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) with reanalysis clear-sky forecast fluxes when determining the cloud radiative forcing (CRF). These results are contradicted when ΔCRF is derived using both all-sky and clear-sky measurements from CERES over the same period. The differences between the radiative flux data sources are thus explored, along with the potential problems in each. The largest discrepancy is found when including the first two years (2000–2002), and the diagnosed cloud feedback from each method is sensitive to the time period over which the regressions are run. Overall, there is little correlation between the changes in the ΔCRF and surface temperatures on these timescales, suggesting that the net effect of clouds varies during this time period quite apart from global temperature changes. Given the large uncertainties generated from this method, the limited data over this period are insufficient to rule out either the positive feedback present in most climate models or a strong negative cloud feedback.

scholarly journals Trutinor: A Conceptual Study for a Next-Generation Earth Radiant Energy Instrument

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3281
Author(s):  
Cindy L. Young ◽  
Constantine Lukashin ◽  
Patrick C. Taylor ◽  
Rand Swanson ◽  
William S. Kirk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Radiant Energy ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Energy System ◽  
Radiation Budget ◽  
Absolute Calibration ◽  
Satellite Platform ◽  
Angular Extent ◽  
Longwave Band ◽  
Conceptual Study

Uninterrupted and overlapping satellite instrument measurements of Earth’s radiation budget from space are required to sufficiently monitor the planet’s changing climate, detect trends in key climate variables, constrain climate models, and quantify climate feedbacks. The Clouds and Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) instruments are currently making these vital measurements for the scientific community and society, but with modern technologies, there are more efficient and cost-effective alternatives to the CERES implementation. We present a compact radiometer concept, Trutinor (meaning “balance” in Latin), with two broadband channels, shortwave (0.2–3 μm) and longwave (5–50 μm), capable of continuing the CERES record by flying in formation with an existing imager on another satellite platform. The instrument uses a three-mirror off-axis anastigmat telescope as the front optics to image these broadband radiances onto a microbolometer array coated with gold black, providing the required performance across the full spectral range. Each pixel of the sensor has a field of view of 0.6°, which was chosen so the shortwave band can be efficiently calibrated using the Moon as an on-orbit light source with the same angular extent, thereby reducing mass and improving measurement accuracy, towards the goal of a gap-tolerant observing system. The longwave band will utilize compact blackbodies with phase-change cells for an absolute calibration reference, establishing a clear path for SI-traceability. Trutinor’s instrument breadboard has been designed and is currently being built and tested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document