scholarly journals Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes?

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 6938-6959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex J. Cannon ◽  
Stephen R. Sobie ◽  
Trevor Q. Murdock
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Extreme Value Analysis ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Value Analysis

Abstract Quantile mapping bias correction algorithms are commonly used to correct systematic distributional biases in precipitation outputs from climate models. Although they are effective at removing historical biases relative to observations, it has been found that quantile mapping can artificially corrupt future model-projected trends. Previous studies on the modification of precipitation trends by quantile mapping have focused on mean quantities, with less attention paid to extremes. This article investigates the extent to which quantile mapping algorithms modify global climate model (GCM) trends in mean precipitation and precipitation extremes indices. First, a bias correction algorithm, quantile delta mapping (QDM), that explicitly preserves relative changes in precipitation quantiles is presented. QDM is compared on synthetic data with detrended quantile mapping (DQM), which is designed to preserve trends in the mean, and with standard quantile mapping (QM). Next, methods are applied to phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) daily precipitation projections over Canada. Performance is assessed based on precipitation extremes indices and results from a generalized extreme value analysis applied to annual precipitation maxima. QM can inflate the magnitude of relative trends in precipitation extremes with respect to the raw GCM, often substantially, as compared to DQM and especially QDM. The degree of corruption in the GCM trends by QM is particularly large for changes in long period return values. By the 2080s, relative changes in excess of +500% with respect to historical conditions are noted at some locations for 20-yr return values, with maximum changes by DQM and QDM nearing +240% and +140%, respectively, whereas raw GCM changes are never projected to exceed +120%.

scholarly journals High-end climate change impact on European runoff and low flows – exploring the effects of forcing biases

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1785-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamprini V. Papadimitriou ◽  
Aristeidis G. Koutroulis ◽  
Manolis G. Grillakis ◽  
Ioannis K. Tsanis
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Low Flows ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract. Climate models project a much more substantial warming than the 2 °C target under the more probable emission scenarios, making higher-end scenarios increasingly plausible. Freshwater availability under such conditions is a key issue of concern. In this study, an ensemble of Euro-CORDEX projections under RCP8.5 is used to assess the mean and low hydrological states under +4 °C of global warming for the European region. Five major European catchments were analysed in terms of future drought climatology and the impact of +2 °C versus +4 °C global warming was investigated. The effect of bias correction of the climate model outputs and the observations used for this adjustment was also quantified. Projections indicate an intensification of the water cycle at higher levels of warming. Even for areas where the average state may not considerably be affected, low flows are expected to reduce, leading to changes in the number of dry days and thus drought climatology. The identified increasing or decreasing runoff trends are substantially intensified when moving from the +2 to the +4° of global warming. Bias correction resulted in an improved representation of the historical hydrology. It is also found that the selection of the observational data set for the application of the bias correction has an impact on the projected signal that could be of the same order of magnitude to the selection of the Global Climate Model (GCM).

scholarly journals Response of extreme precipitation to uniform surface warming in quasi-global aquaplanet simulations at high resolution

2021 ◽  
Vol 379 (2195) ◽  
pp. 20190543
Author(s):  
P. A. O’Gorman ◽  
Z. Li ◽  
W. R. Boos ◽  
J. Yuval
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Coarse Grained ◽  
The Tropics

Projections of precipitation extremes in simulations with global climate models are very uncertain in the tropics, in part because of the use of parameterizations of deep convection and model deficiencies in simulating convective organization. Here, we analyse precipitation extremes in high-resolution simulations that are run without a convective parameterization on a quasi-global aquaplanet. The frequency distributions of precipitation rates and precipitation cluster sizes in the tropics of a control simulation are similar to the observed distributions. In response to climate warming, 3 h precipitation extremes increase at rates of up to 9 %   K − 1 in the tropics because of a combination of positive thermodynamic and dynamic contributions. The dynamic contribution at different latitudes is connected to the vertical structure of warming using a moist static stability. When the precipitation rates are first averaged to a daily timescale and coarse-grained to a typical global climate-model resolution prior to calculating the precipitation extremes, the response of the precipitation extremes to warming becomes more similar to what was found previously in coarse-resolution aquaplanet studies. However, the simulations studied here do not exhibit the high rates of increase of tropical precipitation extremes found in projections with some global climate models. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes and implications for flash flood risks’.

scholarly journals Bias in downscaled rainfall characteristics

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Potter ◽  
Francis H. S. Chiew ◽  
Stephen P. Charles ◽  
Guobin Fu ◽  
Hongxing Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Resource ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Hydrological Modelling ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Rainfall Characteristics

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling of future projections of global climate model outputs can potentially provide useful information about plausible and possible changes to water resource availability, for which there is increasing demand for regional water resource planning processes. By explicitly modelling climate processes within and across global climate model gridcells for a region, dynamical downscaling can provide higher resolution hydroclimate projections, as well as independent (from historical timeseries) and physically plausible future rainfall timeseries for hydrological modelling applications. However, since rainfall is not typically constrained to observations by these methods, there is often a need for bias correction before use in hydrological modelling. Many bias correction methods (such as scaling, empirical and distributional mapping) have been proposed in the literature, but methods that treat daily amounts only (and not sequencing) can result in residual biases in certain rainfall characteristics, which flow through to biases and problems with subsequently modelled runoff. We apply quantile-quantile mapping to rainfall dynamically downscaled by NARCliM in the State of Victoria, Australia and examine the effect of this on: (i) biases both before and after bias correction in different rainfall metrics; (ii) change signals in metrics in comparison to the bias; and (iii) the effect of bias correction on wet-wet and dry-dry transition probabilities. After bias correction, persistence of wet states is under-correlated (i.e. more random than observations), and this results in a significant bias (underestimation) of runoff using hydrological models calibrated on historical data. A novel representation of quantile-quantile mapping is developed based on lag-one transition probabilities of dry and wet states, and we use this to explain residual biases in transition probabilities. This demonstrates that any quantile mapping bias correction methods are unable to correct the underestimation of autocorrelation of rainfall sequencing, which suggests that new methods are needed to properly bias correct dynamical downscaling rainfall outputs.

scholarly journals GCMs Derived Projection of Precipitation and Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Variation over N-W Himalayan Region

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Dharmaveer Singh ◽  
R.D. Gupta ◽  
Sanjay K. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Himalayan Region ◽  
Mean Annual Precipitation ◽  
Hadcm3 Model

The ensembles of two Global Climate Models (GCMs) namely, third generation Canadian Coupled Global Climate Model (CGCM3) and Hadley Center Coupled Model, version 3 (HadCM3) are used to project future precipitation in a part of North-Western (N-W) Himalayan region, India. Statistical downscaling method is used to downscale and generate future scenarios of precipitation at station scale from large scale climate variables obtained from GCMs. The observed historical precipitation data has been collected for three metrological stations, namely, Rampur, Sunni and Kasol falling in the basin for further analysis. The future trends and patterns in precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model, and A2 and B2 for HadCM3 model are analyzed for these stations under three different time periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. An overall rise in mean annual precipitation under scenarios A2 and A1B for CGCM3 model have been noticed for future periods: 2020’s, 2050’s and 2080’s. Decrease, in precipitation has been found under A2 and B2 scenarios of HadCM3 model for 2050’s and slight increase for 2080’s periods. Based on the analysis of results, CGCM3 model has been found better for simulation of precipitation in comparison to HadCM3 model.Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology, Vol. 9(1) 2015, p.1-14

scholarly journals Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 3309-3314 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Thrasher ◽  
E. P. Maurer ◽  
C. McKellar ◽  
P. B. Duffy
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Technical Note ◽  
Daily Temperature ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Temperature Extremes ◽  
Quantile Mapping

Abstract. When applying a quantile mapping-based bias correction to daily temperature extremes simulated by a global climate model (GCM), the transformed values of maximum and minimum temperatures are changed, and the diurnal temperature range (DTR) can become physically unrealistic. While causes are not thoroughly explored, there is a strong relationship between GCM biases in snow albedo feedback during snowmelt and bias correction resulting in unrealistic DTR values. We propose a technique to bias correct DTR, based on comparing observations and GCM historic simulations, and combine that with either bias correcting daily maximum temperatures and calculating daily minimum temperatures or vice versa. By basing the bias correction on a base period of 1961–1980 and validating it during a test period of 1981–1999, we show that bias correcting DTR and maximum daily temperature can produce more accurate estimations of daily temperature extremes while avoiding the pathological cases of unrealistic DTR values.

scholarly journals Set-up of the PMIP3 paleoclimate experiments conducted using an Earth system model, MIROC-ESM

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sueyoshi ◽  
R. Ohgaito ◽  
A. Yamamoto ◽  
M. O. Chikamoto ◽  
T. Hajima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Volcanic Eruptions ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Intercomparison Project

Abstract. Paleoclimate experiments using contemporary climate models are an effective measure to evaluate climate models. In recent years, Earth system models (ESMs) were developed to investigate carbon cycle climate feedbacks, as well as to project the future climate. Paleoclimate events can be suitable benchmarks to evaluate ESMs. The variation in aerosols associated with the volcanic eruptions provide a clear signal in forcing, which can be a good test to check the response of a climate model to the radiation changes. The variations in atmospheric CO2 level or changes in ice sheet extent can be used for evaluation as well. Here we present implementations of the paleoclimate experiments proposed by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5/Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP5/PMIP3) using MIROC-ESM, an ESM based on the global climate model MIROC (Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate). In this paper, experimental settings and spin-up procedures of the mid-Holocene, the Last Glacial Maximum, and the Last Millennium experiments are explained. The first two experiments are time slice experiments and the last one is a transient experiment. The complexity of the model requires various steps to correctly configure the experiments. Several basic outputs are also shown.

scholarly journals Future precipitation increase from very high resolution ensemble downscaling of extreme atmospheric river storms in California

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (29) ◽  
pp. eaba1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingying Huang ◽  
Daniel L. Swain ◽  
Alex D. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Flood Management ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Precipitation Extremes ◽  
Atmospheric River ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events

Precipitation extremes will likely intensify under climate change. However, much uncertainty surrounds intensification of high-magnitude events that are often inadequately resolved by global climate models. In this analysis, we develop a framework involving targeted dynamical downscaling of historical and future extreme precipitation events produced by a large ensemble of a global climate model. This framework is applied to extreme “atmospheric river” storms in California. We find a substantial (10 to 40%) increase in total accumulated precipitation, with the largest relative increases in valleys and mountain lee-side areas. We also report even higher and more spatially uniform increases in hourly maximum precipitation intensity, which exceed Clausius-Clapeyron expectations. Up to 85% of this increase arises from thermodynamically driven increases in water vapor, with a smaller contribution by increased zonal wind strength. These findings imply substantial challenges for water and flood management in California, given future increases in intense atmospheric river-induced precipitation extremes.

scholarly journals Bias in dynamically downscaled rainfall characteristics for hydroclimatic projections

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 2963-2979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Potter ◽  
Francis H. S. Chiew ◽  
Stephen P. Charles ◽  
Guobin Fu ◽  
Hongxing Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Rainfall Characteristics

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling of future projections of global climate model outputs can provide useful information about plausible and possible changes to water resource availability, for which there is increasing demand in regional water resource planning processes. By explicitly modelling climate processes within and across global climate model grid cells for a region, dynamical downscaling can provide higher-resolution hydroclimate projections and independent (from historical time series), physically plausible future rainfall time series for hydrological modelling applications. However, since rainfall is not typically constrained to observations by these methods, there is often a need for bias correction before use in hydrological modelling. Many bias-correction methods (such as scaling, empirical and distributional mapping) have been proposed in the literature, but methods that treat daily amounts only (and not sequencing) can result in residual biases in certain rainfall characteristics, which flow through to biases and problems with subsequently modelled runoff. We apply quantile–quantile mapping to rainfall dynamically downscaled by the NSW and ACT Regional Climate Modelling (NARCliM) Project in the state of Victoria, Australia, and examine the effect of this on (i) biases both before and after bias correction in different rainfall metrics, (ii) change signals in metrics in comparison to the bias and (iii) the effect of bias correction on wet–wet and dry–dry transition probabilities. After bias correction, persistence of wet states is under-correlated (i.e. more random than observations), and this results in a significant bias (underestimation) of runoff using hydrological models calibrated on historical data. A novel representation of quantile–quantile mapping is developed based on lag-one transition probabilities of dry and wet states, and we use this to explain residual biases in transition probabilities. Representing quantile–quantile mapping in this way demonstrates that any quantile mapping bias-correction method is unable to correct the underestimation of autocorrelation of rainfall sequencing, which suggests that new methods are needed to properly bias-correct dynamical downscaling rainfall outputs.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ensembles Projections of Rainfall from Four Bias Correction Methods over Nigeria

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3044
Author(s):  
Mohammed Sanusi Shiru ◽  
Inhwan Park
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Linear Scaling ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
Quantile Mapping ◽  
Global Precipitation Climatology Centre

This study compares multi model ensemble (MME) projections of rainfall using general quantile mapping, gamma quantile mapping, Power Transformation and Linear Scaling bias correction (BC) methods for representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 (CMIP5) global climate models (GCMs). Using the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre historical period (1961–2005) rainfall data as the reference, projection was conducted over 323 grid points of Nigeria for the periods 2010–2039, 2040–2069 and 2070–2099. The performances of the different BC methods in removing biases from the GCMs were assessed using different statistical indices. The computation of the MME of the projected rainfall was conducted by aggregation of 20 GCMs using random forest regression method. The percentage differences in the future rainfall relative to the historical period were estimated for all BC methods. Spatial projection of the percentage changes in rainfall for Linear scaling, which was the best performing BC method, showed increases in rainfall of 5.5–6.9% under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, while the decrease range was −3.2–−4.2% respectively during the wet season. The range of annual increases in precipitation was 5.7–7.3% for RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, while the decrease range was −1.0–−4.3%. This study also revealed monthly rainfall within the country will decrease during the wet season between June and September, which is a significant period where most crops need the water for growth. Findings from this study can be of importance to policy makers in the management of changes in hydrological processes due to climate change and management of related disasters such as floods and droughts.

scholarly journals Trends in projections of standardized precipitation indices in a future climate in Poland

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1947-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzena Osuch ◽  
Renata J. Romanowicz ◽  
Deborah Lawrence ◽  
Wai K. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Standardized Precipitation Index ◽  
Future Climate ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Monthly Precipitation

Abstract. Possible future climate change effects on dryness conditions in Poland are estimated for six climate projections using the standardized precipitation index (SPI). The time series of precipitation represent six different climate model runs under the selected emission scenario for the period 1971–2099. Monthly precipitation values were used to estimate the SPI for multiple timescales (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months) for a spatial resolution of 25 km for the whole country. Trends in the SPI were analysed using the Mann–Kendall test with Sen's slope estimator for each grid cell for each climate model projection and aggregation scale, and results obtained for uncorrected precipitation and bias corrected precipitation were compared. Bias correction was achieved using a distribution-based quantile mapping (QM) method in which the climate model precipitation series were adjusted relative to gridded precipitation data for Poland. The results show that the spatial pattern of the trend depends on the climate model, the timescale considered and on the bias correction. The effect of change on the projected trend due to bias correction is small compared to the variability among climate models. We also summarize the mechanisms underlying the influence of bias correction on trends in precipitation and the SPI using a simple example of a linear bias correction procedure. In both cases, the bias correction by QM does not change the direction of changes but can change the slope of trend, and the influence of bias correction on SPI is much reduced. We also have noticed that the results for the same global climate model, driving different regional climate model, are characterized by a similar pattern of changes, although this behaviour is not seen at all timescales and seasons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document