scholarly journals Revisiting Whether Recent Surface Temperature Trends Agree with the CMIP5 Ensemble

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (24) ◽  
pp. 8673-8687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marena Lin ◽  
Peter Huybers
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Trends ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Temperature Trends ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Slope Estimator ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract In an earlier study, a weaker trend in global mean temperature over the past 15 years relative to the preceding decades was characterized as significantly lower than those contained within the phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) ensemble. In this study, divergence between model simulations and observations is estimated using a fixed-intercept linear trend with a slope estimator that has one-third the noise variance compared to simple linear regression. Following the approach of the earlier study, where intermodel spread is used to assess the distribution of trends, but using the fixed-intercept trend metric demonstrates that recently observed trends in global mean temperature are consistent () with the CMIP5 ensemble for all 15-yr intervals of observation–model divergence since 1970. Significant clustering of global trends according to modeling center indicates that the spread in CMIP5 trends is better characterized using ensemble members drawn across models as opposed to using ensemble members from a single model. Despite model–observation consistency at the global level, substantial regional discrepancies in surface temperature trends remain.

scholarly journals Changes in regional climate extremes as a function of global mean temperature: an interactive plotting framework

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Wartenburger ◽  
Martin Hirschi ◽  
Markus G. Donat ◽  
Peter Greve ◽  
Andy J. Pitman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Cycle ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Regional Analyses ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. This article extends a previous study (Seneviratne et al., 2016) to provide regional analyses of changes in climate extremes as a function of projected changes in global mean temperature. We introduce the DROUGHT-HEAT Regional Climate Atlas, an interactive tool to analyse and display a range of well-established climate extremes and water-cycle indices and their changes as a function of global warming. These projections are based on simulations from the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). A selection of example results are presented here, but users can visualize specific indices of interest using the online tool. This implementation enables a direct assessment of regional climate changes associated with global temperature targets, such as the 2 degree and 1.5 degree limits agreed within the 2015 Paris Agreement.

scholarly journals Changes in regional climate extremes as a function of global mean temperature: an interactive plotting framework

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3609-3634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Wartenburger ◽  
Martin Hirschi ◽  
Markus G. Donat ◽  
Peter Greve ◽  
Andy J. Pitman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Cycle ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Projected Changes ◽  
Regional Analyses ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. This article extends a previous study Seneviratne et al. (2016) to provide regional analyses of changes in climate extremes as a function of projected changes in global mean temperature. We introduce the DROUGHT-HEAT Regional Climate Atlas, an interactive tool to analyse and display a range of well-established climate extremes and water-cycle indices and their changes as a function of global warming. These projections are based on simulations from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). A selection of example results are presented here, but users can visualize specific indices of interest using the online tool. This implementation enables a direct assessment of regional climate changes associated with global mean temperature targets, such as the 2 and 1.5° limits agreed within the 2015 Paris Agreement.

scholarly journals Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Rehfeld ◽  
Raphaël Hébert ◽  
Juan M. Lora ◽  
Marcus Lofverstrom ◽  
Chris M. Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Temperature Variability ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. It is virtually certain that the mean surface temperature of the Earth will continue to increase under realistic emission scenarios. Yet comparatively little is known about future changes in climate variability. We explore changes in climate variability over the large range of climates simulated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5/6) and the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (PMIP3). This consists of time slices of the Last Glacial Maximum, the Mid Holocene and idealized warming experiments (1 % CO2) and abrupt4×CO2), and encompasses climates with a range of 12 K of global mean temperature change. We examine climate variability from different perspectives: the local interannual change, coherent climate modes and through compositing extremes. The change in the interannual variability of precipitation is strongly dependent upon the local change in the total amount of precipitation. Meanwhile only over tropical land is the change in the interannual temperature variability positively correlated to temperature change, and then weakly. In general, temperature variability is inversely related to mean temperature change – with analysis of power spectra demonstrating that this holds from intra-seasonal to multi-decadal timescales. We systematically investigate changes in the standard deviation of modes of climate variability, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, with global mean temperature change. While several modes do show consistent relationships (most notably the Atlantic Zonal Mode), no generalisable pattern emerges. By compositing extreme precipitation events across the ensemble, we demonstrate that the atmospheric drivers dominating rainfall variability in Mediterranean climates persist throughout palaeoclimate and future simulations. The robust nature of the response of climate variability, between both cold and warm climates and across multiple timescales, suggests that observations and proxy reconstructions could provide a meaningful constraint on climate variability in future projections.

scholarly journals Discrepancies of surface temperature trends in the CMIP5 simulations and observations on the global and regional scales

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 6161-6178 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zhao ◽  
J. Xu ◽  
A. M. Powell Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Cmip5 Model ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Temperature Trends ◽  
North Polar

Abstract. Using the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) model simulations and two observational datasets, the surface temperature trends and their discrepancies have been examined. The temporal-spatial characteristics for the surface temperature trends are discussed. Different from a constant estimated linear trend for the entire simulation period of 1850–2012, a dynamical trend using running linear least squares fitting with the moving 10 yr time windows are calculated. The results show that the CMIP5 model simulations are generally in good agreement with the observational measurements for the global scale warming, but the temperature trends depend on the temporal change and the regional differences. Generally, contrary to the small discrepancies on the global scale, the large discrepancies are observed in the south- and north-polar regions and other sub-regions.

scholarly journals Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Rehfeld ◽  
Raphaël Hébert ◽  
Juan M. Lora ◽  
Marcus Lofverstrom ◽  
Chris M. Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Temperature Variability ◽  
Last Interglacial ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Extreme Precipitation Events ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Project Phases ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Mean

<p>It is virtually certain that the mean surface temperature of the Earth will continue to increase under realistic emission scenarios. Yet comparatively little is known about future changes in climate variability. We explore changes in climate variability over the large range of climates simulated in the framework the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6 (CMIP5/6) and the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phases 3 and 4 (PMIP3/4). <br>This consists of time slice simulations for the Pliocene, Last Interglacial, Last Glacial Maximum, the Mid Holocene and idealized warming experiments (1% CO<sub>2</sub> and abrupt 4xCO<sub>2</sub>), and encompasses climates with a range of 12°C of global mean temperature change. We examine climate variability from different perspectives: from local interannual change, to coherent climate modes and through compositing extremes. The change in the interannual variability of precipitation is strongly dependent upon the local change in the total amount of precipitation. Meanwhile only over tropical land is the change in the interannual temperature variability positively correlated to temperature change, and then weakly. In general, temperature variability is inversely related to mean temperature change - with analysis of power spectra demonstrating that this holds from intra-seasonal to multi-decadal timescales. We systematically investigate changes in the standard deviation of modes of climate variability. Overall, no generalisable pattern emerges. Several modes do show, sometimes weak, increasing variability with global mean temperature change (most notably the Atlantic Zonal Mode), but also the El Niño/Southern Oscillation indices (NINO3.4 and NINO4). The annular modes in the Northern (Southern) hemisphere show only weakly increasing (decreasing) relationships. <br>By compositing extreme precipitation events across the ensemble, we demonstrate that the atmospheric drivers dominating rainfall variability in Mediterranean climates persist throughout palaeoclimate and future simulations. The robust nature of the response of climate variability in model simulations, between both cold and warm climates and across multiple timescales, suggests that observations and proxy reconstructions could provide a meaningful constraint on climate variability in future projections.</p>

scholarly journals Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 5175-5190
Author(s):  
Zebedee R. J. Nicholls ◽  
Malte Meinshausen ◽  
Jared Lewis ◽  
Robert Gieseke ◽  
Dietmar Dommenget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Temperature Response ◽  
Earth System ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Radiative Forcings ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Reduced Complexity ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Reduced-complexity climate models (RCMs) are critical in the policy and decision making space, and are directly used within multiple Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports to complement the results of more comprehensive Earth system models. To date, evaluation of RCMs has been limited to a few independent studies. Here we introduce a systematic evaluation of RCMs in the form of the Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project (RCMIP). We expect RCMIP will extend over multiple phases, with Phase 1 being the first. In Phase 1, we focus on the RCMs' global-mean temperature responses, comparing them to observations, exploring the extent to which they emulate more complex models and considering how the relationship between temperature and cumulative emissions of CO2 varies across the RCMs. Our work uses experiments which mirror those found in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), which focuses on complex Earth system and atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. Using both scenario-based and idealised experiments, we examine RCMs' global-mean temperature response under a range of forcings. We find that the RCMs can all reproduce the approximately 1 ∘C of warming since pre-industrial times, with varying representations of natural variability, volcanic eruptions and aerosols. We also find that RCMs can emulate the global-mean temperature response of CMIP models to within a root-mean-square error of 0.2 ∘C over a range of experiments. Furthermore, we find that, for the Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP)-based scenario pairs that share the same IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)-consistent stratospheric-adjusted radiative forcing, the RCMs indicate higher effective radiative forcings for the SSP-based scenarios and correspondingly higher temperatures when run with the same climate settings. In our idealised setup of RCMs with a climate sensitivity of 3 ∘C, the difference for the ssp585–rcp85 pair by 2100 is around 0.23∘C(±0.12 ∘C) due to a difference in effective radiative forcings between the two scenarios. Phase 1 demonstrates the utility of RCMIP's open-source infrastructure, paving the way for further phases of RCMIP to build on the research presented here and deepen our understanding of RCMs.

scholarly journals Variability of surface climate in simulations of past and future

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira Rehfeld ◽  
Raphaël Hébert ◽  
Juan M. Lora ◽  
Marcus Lofverstrom ◽  
Chris M. Brierley
Keyword(s):  
Climate Variability ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Temperature Variability ◽  
Climate Modes ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. It is virtually certain that the mean surface temperature of the Earth will continue to increase under realistic emission scenarios, yet comparatively little is known about future changes in climate variability. This study explores changes in climate variability over the large range of climates simulated by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 and 6 (CMIP5/6) and the Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (PMIP3), including time slices of the Last Glacial Maximum, the mid-Holocene, and idealized experiments (1 % CO2 and abrupt4×CO2). These states encompass climates within a range of 12 ∘C in global mean temperature change. We examine climate variability from the perspectives of local interannual change, coherent climate modes, and through compositing extremes. The change in the interannual variability of precipitation is strongly dependent upon the local change in the total amount of precipitation. At the global scale, temperature variability is inversely related to mean temperature change on intra-seasonal to multidecadal timescales. This decrease is stronger over the oceans, while there is increased temperature variability over subtropical land areas (40∘ S–40∘ N) in warmer simulations. We systematically investigate changes in the standard deviation of modes of climate variability, including the North Atlantic Oscillation, the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, and the Southern Annular Mode, with global mean temperature change. While several climate modes do show consistent relationships (most notably the Atlantic Zonal Mode), no generalizable pattern emerges. By compositing extreme precipitation years across the ensemble, we demonstrate that the same large-scale modes influencing rainfall variability in Mediterranean climates persist throughout paleoclimate and future simulations. The robust nature of the response of climate variability, between cold and warm climates as well as across multiple timescales, suggests that observations and proxy reconstructions could provide a meaningful constraint on climate variability in future projections.

scholarly journals Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. e1501923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Friedrich ◽  
Axel Timmermann ◽  
Michelle Tigchelaar ◽  
Oliver Elison Timm ◽  
Andrey Ganopolski
Keyword(s):  
Climate Sensitivity ◽  
Radiative Forcing ◽  
Model Simulation ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Glacial Cycles ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Surface Temperatures ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Future Warming ◽  
Global Mean

Global mean surface temperatures are rising in response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. The magnitude of this warming at equilibrium for a given radiative forcing—referred to as specific equilibrium climate sensitivity (S)—is still subject to uncertainties. We estimate global mean temperature variations andSusing a 784,000-year-long field reconstruction of sea surface temperatures and a transient paleoclimate model simulation. Our results reveal thatSis strongly dependent on the climate background state, with significantly larger values attained during warm phases. Using the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 for future greenhouse radiative forcing, we find that the range of paleo-based estimates of Earth’s future warming by 2100 CE overlaps with the upper range of climate simulations conducted as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Furthermore, we find that within the 21st century, global mean temperatures will very likely exceed maximum levels reconstructed for the last 784,000 years. On the basis of temperature data from eight glacial cycles, our results provide an independent validation of the magnitude of current CMIP5 warming projections.

scholarly journals Stratospheric and tropospheric SSU/MSU temperature trends and compared to reanalyses and IPCC CMIP5 simulations in 1979–2005

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 3957-3992 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Powell ◽  
J. Xu ◽  
C.-Z. Zou ◽  
L. Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Correlation ◽  
Cmip5 Model ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Middle Troposphere ◽  
Global Mean Temperature ◽  
Temperature Trends ◽  
Mean Temperature ◽  
Microwave Sounding ◽  
Stratospheric Cooling ◽  
Global Mean

Abstract. Using the satellite temperature measurements from the Stratospheric Sounding Units (SSU) and Microwave Sounding Units (MSU including the advanced microwave sounding unit, AMSU) since 1979, the trends and uncertainties in the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) model simulations from the middle troposphere to the upper stratosphere (5–50 km) have been explored. The temperature trend discrepancies between the new generation reanalyses are investigated. Both the temporal character of the global mean temperature and the regional spatial pattern of the temperature trends are discussed. The results show that the CMIP5 model simulations reproduced common stratospheric cooling and tropospheric warming features although a significant discrepancy among the selected models was observed. For the temporal variation of the global mean temperature, the CMIP5 simulations reproduce the volcanic signal and were highly consistent with the SSU measurements in the upper stratosphere. In contrast, the CFSR and MERRA reanalyses (excluding ERA-I) exhibit a different result from the CMIP5 simulations. For the spatial variation of the temperature trends, the CMIP5 simulations displayed a different latitudinal-longitudinal pattern from SSU/MSU measurements in all six layers from the middle troposphere to the upper stratosphere. The CFSR reanalysis shows a good spatial correlation with satellite observations in the troposphere but poor spatial correlation in the stratosphere. The ERA-I and MERRA reanalyses have good spatial correlation in the upper stratosphere and an even better spatial correlation in the troposphere. Generally, the CMIP5 simulations significantly underestimated the stratospheric cooling in the tropics and substantially overestimated the cooling over the Antarctic in the MSU observations. The largest trend spread among the seven CMIP5 simulations is seen in both the south- and north-polar regions in the stratosphere and troposphere. The tropospheric spread values are generally smaller than the stratospheric spread values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document