Retrieval of Cloud Properties for Partly Cloudy Imager Pixels

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Coakley ◽  
Michael A. Friedman ◽  
William R. Tahnk
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Number Concentration ◽  
Threshold Method ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Retrieval Scheme ◽  
Column Number ◽  
Pixel Scale

Abstract Retrievals of cloud properties from satellite imagery often invoke the assumption that the fields of view are overcast when cloud-contaminated, even though a significant fraction are only partially cloud-covered. The overcast assumption leads to biases in the retrieved cloud properties: cloud amounts and droplet effective radii are typically overestimated, while visible optical depths, cloud altitudes, cloud liquid water amounts, and column droplet number concentrations are typically underestimated. In order to estimate these biases, a retrieval scheme was developed to obtain the properties of clouds for partially covered imager fields of view. The partly cloudy pixel retrieval scheme is applicable to single-layered cloud systems and invokes the assumption that clouds that only partially cover a field of view are at the same altitude as nearby clouds from the same layer that completely cover imager pixels. The properties of the retrieval are illustrated through its application to 2-km Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS) data from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) for a marine stratocumulus scene. The scene was chosen because the cloud properties are typical of such systems based on an analysis of VIRS data for February and March 1998. Comparisons of properties for clouds in partly cloudy pixels and those for clouds in nearby overcast pixels reveal that the optical depths and droplet effective radii are generally smaller for the clouds in the partly cloudy pixels. In addition, for pixel-scale cloud fractions between 0.2 and 0.8, optical depth, droplet effective radius, and column droplet number concentration decrease slowly with decreasing cloud cover fraction. The changes are only about 20%–30%, while cloud cover fraction changes by 80%. For comparison, changes in optical depth and column number concentration retrieved using a threshold method decrease by 80%–90%. As long as the cloud cover in partly cloudy pixels is greater than about 0.1, uncertainties in the estimates of the cloud altitudes and of the radiances for the cloud-free portions of the fields of view give rise to uncertainties in the retrieved cloud properties that are comparable to the uncertainties in the properties retrieved for overcast pixels.

scholarly journals Object-Based Evaluation of MERRA Cloud Physical Properties and Radiative Fluxes during the 1998 El Niño–La Niña Transition

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 7313-7327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Posselt ◽  
Andrew R. Jongeward ◽  
Chuan-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Gerald L. Potter
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Convective Cloud ◽  
Shortwave Radiation ◽  
Total Water ◽  
Water Path ◽  
Convective Systems ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Cloud Tops ◽  
Deep Convective Cloud

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Application (MERRA) is a reanalysis designed to produce an improved representation of the Earth’s hydrologic cycle. This study examines the representation of deep convective clouds in MERRA, comparing analyzed liquid and ice clouds with deep convective cloud objects observed by instruments on the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission satellite. Results show that MERRA contains deep convective cloud in 98.1% of the observed cases. MERRA-derived probability density functions (PDFs) of cloud properties have a similar form as the observed PDFs and exhibit a similar trend with changes in object size. Total water path, optical depth, and outgoing shortwave radiation (OSR) in MERRA are found to match the cloud object observations quite well; however, there appears to be a bias toward higher-than-observed cloud tops in the MERRA. The reanalysis fits the observations most closely for the largest class of convective systems, with performance generally decreasing with a transition to smaller convective systems. Comparisons of simulated total water path, optical depth, and OSR are found to be highly sensitive to the assumed subgrid distribution of condensate and indicate the need for caution when interpreting model-data comparisons that require disaggregation of grid-scale cloud to satellite pixel scales.

scholarly journals The Influence of Entrainment and Mixing Assumption on Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Marine Stratocumulus

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1450-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian A. Hill ◽  
Graham Feingold ◽  
Hongli Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Relative Sensitivity ◽  
Number Concentration ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Aerosol Cloud ◽  
Aerosol Cloud Interactions ◽  
Entrainment Effect ◽  
The Impact

Abstract This study uses large-eddy simulation with bin microphysics to investigate the influence of entrainment and mixing on aerosol–cloud interactions in the context of idealized, nocturnal, nondrizzling marine stratocumulus (Sc). Of particular interest are (i) an evaporation–entrainment effect and a sedimentation–entrainment effect that result from increasing aerosol concentrations and (ii) the nature of mixing between clear and cloudy air, where homogeneous and extreme inhomogeneous mixing represent the bounding mixing types. Simulations are performed at low resolution (Δz = 20 m; Δx, y = 40 m) and high resolution (Δz = 10 m; Δx, y = 20 m). It is demonstrated that an increase in aerosol from clean conditions (100 cm−3) to polluted conditions (1000 cm−3) produces both an evaporation–entrainment and a sedimentation–entrainment effect, which couple to cause about a 10% decrease in liquid water path (LWP) when all warm microphysical processes are included. These dynamical effects are insensitive to both the resolutions tested and the mixing assumption. Regardless of resolution, assuming extreme inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous mixing results in a small reduction in cloud-averaged drop number concentration, a small increase in cloud drop effective radius, and ∼1% decrease in cloud optical depth. For the case presented, these small changes play a negligible role when compared to the impact of increasing aerosol and the associated entrainment effects. Finally, it is demonstrated that although increasing resolution causes an increase in LWP and number concentration, the relative sensitivity of cloud optical depth to changes in aerosol is unaffected by resolution.

scholarly journals Seasonal cycle of cloud cover analyzed using Meteosat images

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Massons ◽  
D. Domingo ◽  
J. Lorente
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
High Spatial Resolution ◽  
Detection Method ◽  
Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Detection ◽  
Total Cloud Amount ◽  
Cloud Parameters ◽  
Cloud Properties

Abstract. A cloud-detection method was used to retrieve cloudy pixels from Meteosat images. High spatial resolution (one pixel), monthly averaged cloud-cover distribution was obtained for a 1-year period. The seasonal cycle of cloud amount was analyzed. Cloud parameters obtained include the total cloud amount and the percentage of occurrence of clouds at three altitudes. Hourly variations of cloud cover are also analyzed. Cloud properties determined are coherent with those obtained in previous studies.Key words. Cloud cover · Meteosat

Common summertime total cloud cover and aerosol optical depth weekly variabilities over Europe: Sign of the aerosol indirect effects?

2015 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 59-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Georgoulias ◽  
K.A. Kourtidis ◽  
G. Alexandri ◽  
S. Rapsomanikis ◽  
A. Sanchez-Lorenzo
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Total Cloud Cover ◽  
Aerosol Indirect Effects

scholarly journals The interdependence of continental warm cloud properties derived from unexploited solar background signals in ground-based lidar measurements

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 8389-8401 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Chiu ◽  
J. A. Holmes ◽  
R. J. Hogan ◽  
E. J. O'Connor
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Effective Radius ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Warm Cloud ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Geometric Thickness

Abstract. We have extensively analysed the interdependence between cloud optical depth, droplet effective radius, liquid water path (LWP) and geometric thickness for stratiform warm clouds using ground-based observations. In particular, this analysis uses cloud optical depths retrieved from untapped solar background signals that are previously unwanted and need to be removed in most lidar applications. Combining these new optical depth retrievals with radar and microwave observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility in Oklahoma during 2005–2007, we have found that LWP and geometric thickness increase and follow a power-law relationship with cloud optical depth regardless of the presence of drizzle; LWP and geometric thickness in drizzling clouds can be generally 20–40% and at least 10% higher than those in non-drizzling clouds, respectively. In contrast, droplet effective radius shows a negative correlation with optical depth in drizzling clouds and a positive correlation in non-drizzling clouds, where, for large optical depths, it asymptotes to 10 μm. This asymptotic behaviour in non-drizzling clouds is found in both the droplet effective radius and optical depth, making it possible to use simple thresholds of optical depth, droplet size, or a combination of these two variables for drizzle delineation. This paper demonstrates a new way to enhance ground-based cloud observations and drizzle delineations using existing lidar networks.

scholarly journals The relevance of aerosol optical depth to cumulus fraction changes: a five-year climatology at the ACRF SGP site

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 11797-11837 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Kassianov ◽  
L. K. Berg ◽  
C. Flynn ◽  
S. McFarlane
Keyword(s):  
Aerosol Optical Depth ◽  
Optical Depth ◽  
Great Plains ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Cloud Fraction ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Size Dependent ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

Abstract. The objective of this study is to investigate, by observational means, the magnitude and sign of the actively discussed relationship between cloud fraction N and aerosol optical depth τa. Collocated and coincident ground-based measurements and Terra/Aqua satellite observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility (ACRF) Southern Great Plains (SGP) site form the basis of this study. The N–τa relationship occurred in a specific 5-year dataset of fair-weather cumulus (FWC) clouds and mostly non-absorbing aerosols. To reduce possible contamination of the aerosols on the cloud properties estimation (and vice versa), we use independent datasets of τa and N obtained from the Multi-filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR) measurements and from the ARM Active Remotely Sensed Clouds Locations (ARSCL) value-added product, respectively. Optical depth of the FWC clouds τcld and effective radius of cloud droplets re are obtained from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. We found that relationships between cloud properties (N,τcld, re) and aerosol optical depth are time-dependent (morning versus afternoon). Observed time-dependent changes of cloud properties, associated with aerosol loading, control the variability of surface radiative fluxes. In comparison with pristine clouds, the polluted clouds are more transparent in the afternoon due to smaller cloud fraction, smaller optical depth and larger droplets. As a result, the corresponding correlation between the surface radiative flux and τa is positive (warming effect of aerosol). Also we found that relationship between cloud fraction and aerosol optical depth is cloud size dependent. The cloud fraction of large clouds (larger than 1 km) is relatively insensitive to the aerosol amount. In contrast, cloud fraction of small clouds (smaller than 1 km) is strongly positively correlated with τa. This suggests that an ensemble of polluted clouds tends to be composed of smaller clouds than a similar one in a pristine environment. One should be aware of these time- and size-dependent features when qualitatively comparing N–τa relationships obtained from the satellite observations, surface measurements, and model simulations.

scholarly journals The interdependence of continental warm cloud properties derived from unexploited solar background signal in ground-based lidar measurements

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 8963-8996
Author(s):  
J. C. Chiu ◽  
J. A. Holmes ◽  
R. J. Hogan ◽  
E. J. O'Connor
Keyword(s):  
Optical Depth ◽  
Effective Radius ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Background Signal ◽  
Cloud Optical Depth ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Lidar Measurements ◽  
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ◽  
Ground Based Lidar ◽  
Geometric Thickness

Abstract. We have extensively analysed the interdependence between cloud optical depth, droplet effective radius, liquid water path (LWP) and geometric thickness for stratiform warm clouds using ground-based observations. In particular, this analysis uses cloud optical depths retrieved from untapped solar background signal that is previously unwanted and needs to be removed in most lidar applications. Combining these new optical depth retrievals with radar and microwave observations at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility in Oklahoma during 2005–2007, we have found that LWP and geometric thickness increase and follow a power-law relationship with cloud optical depth regardless of the presence of drizzle; LWP and geometric thickness in drizzling clouds can be generally 20–40% and at least 10% higher than those in non-drizzling clouds, respectively. In contrast, droplet effective radius shows a negative correlation with optical depth in drizzling clouds, while it increases with optical depth and reaches an asymptote of 10 μm in non-drizzling clouds. This asymptotic behaviour in non-drizzling clouds is found in both droplet effective radius and optical depth, making it possible to use simple thresholds of optical depth, droplet size, or a combination of these two variables for drizzle delineation. This paper demonstrates a new way to enhance ground-based cloud observations and drizzle delineations using existing lidar networks.

The Surface Longwave Cloud Radiative Effect from Space Lidar Observations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assia Arouf
Keyword(s):  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Radiative Effect ◽  
Cloud Properties ◽  
Cloud Radiative Effect ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The One ◽  
Natural Climate ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lidar Observations

<p>Clouds exert important effects on Earth's surface energy balance through their effects on longwave (LW) and shortwave (SW) radiation. Indeed, clouds radiatively warm the surface in the LW domain by emitting LW radiation back to the ground. The surface LW cloud radiative effect (CRE) quantifies this warming effect. To study the impact of clouds on the interanual natural climate variability, we need to observe them on a long time scale over all kinds of surfaces. The CALIPSO space lidar provides these observations by sampling the atmosphere along its track over all kinds of surfaces for over than 14 years (2006-2020).</p><p>In this work, we propose new estimates of the surface LW CRE from space-based lidar observations only. Indeed, we show from 1D atmospheric column radiative transfer calculations, that surface LW CRE at sea level linearly decreases with the cloud altitude. Thus, these computations allow to establish simple relationships between the surface LW CRE, and five cloud properties observed by the CALIPSO space lidar: the opaque cloud cover and altitude, the thin cloud cover, altitude, and emissivity. Over the 2008–2011, CALIPSO-based retrieval (27.7 W m<sup>-2</sup>) is 1.2 W m<sup>-2</sup> larger than the one derived from combined space radar, lidar, and radiometer observations. Over the 2008–2018 period, the global mean CALIPSO-based retrieval (27.5 W m<sup>-2</sup>) is 0.1 W m<sup>-2</sup> larger than the one derived from CERES space radiometer. Our estimates show that globally, opaque clouds warm the surface by 23.3 W m<sup>-2</sup> and thin clouds contribute only by 4.2 W m<sup>-2</sup>. At high latitudes North and South over oceans, the largest surface LW opaque CRE occurs in fall (40.4 W m<sup>-2</sup>, 31.6 W m<sup>-2</sup>) due to the formation of additional opaque low clouds after sea ice melting over a warmer ocean.</p><p>To quantify the cloud property that drives the temporal variations of the surface LW CRE, the surface LW CRE needs to be related by simple relationships to a finite number of cloud properties such as cloud opacity, cloud altitude and cloud cover. This study allows a decomposition and attribution approach of the surface LW CRE variations and shows that they are driven by the variations occurring in the opaque cloud properties. Moreover, opaque cloud cover drives over than 73% of global surface LW CRE interannual variations.</p>

Quantifying how model assumptions affect aerosol-cloud interactions in large-eddy simulations of warm stratocumulus clouds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Schwarz ◽  
Julien Savre ◽  
Annica Ekman
Keyword(s):  
Number Concentration ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Radiation Balance ◽  
Marine Stratocumulus ◽  
Aerosol Cloud ◽  
Reference Simulation ◽  
Model Aerosol ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Stratocumulus Clouds ◽  
Climate Interactions

<p>Subtropical low-level marine stratocumulus clouds effectively reflect downwelling shortwave radiation while having a small effect on outgoing longwave radiation. Hence, they impose a strong negative net radiative effect on the Earth’s radiation balance. The optical and microphysical properties of these clouds are susceptible to anthropogenic changes in aerosol abundance. Although these aerosol-cloud-climate interactions (ACI) are generally explicitly treated in state-of-the-art Earth System Models (ESMs), they are accountable for large uncertainties in current climate projections.</p><p>Here, we present preliminary work where we exploit Large-Eddy-Simulations (LES) of warm stratocumulus clouds to identify and constrain processes and model assumptions that affect the response of cloud droplet number concentration (N<sub>d</sub>) to changes in aerosol number concentration (N<sub>a</sub>). Our results are based on simulations with the MISU-MIT Cloud-Aerosol (MIMICA, Savre et al., 2014) LES, which has two-moment bulk microphysics (Seifert and Beheng, 2001) and a two-moment aerosol scheme (Ekman et al., 2006). The reference simulation is based on observations made during the Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus Field Study (DYCOMS-II, Stevens et al., 2003) which were used extensively during previous LES studies (e.g., Ackerman et al., 2009).</p><p>Starting from the reference simulation, we conduct sensitivity experiments to examine how the susceptibility (β=dln(N<sub>d</sub>)/dln(N<sub>a</sub>)) changes depending on different model setups. We run the model with fixed and interactive aerosol concentrations, with and without saturation adjustment, with different aerosol populations, and with different model parameter choices. Our early results suggest that β is sensitive to these choices and can vary roughly between 0.6 to 0.9 depending on the setup. The overall purpose of our study is to guide future model developments and evaluations concerning aerosol-cloud-climate interactions.  </p><p> </p><p><strong>References</strong></p><p>Ackerman, A. S., vanZanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Savic-Jovcic, V., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., et al. (2009). Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer. Monthly Weather Review, 137(3), 1083–1110. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2582.1</p><p>Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Ström, J., & Krejci, R. (2006). Explicit Simulation of Aerosol Physics in a Cloud-Resolving Model: Aerosol Transport and Processing in the Free Troposphere. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 63(2), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3645.1</p><p>Savre, J., Ekman, A. M. L., & Svensson, G. (2014). Technical note: Introduction to MIMICA, a large-eddy simulation solver for cloudy planetary boundary layers. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 6(3), 630–649. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000292</p><p>Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., Vali, G., Gerber, H., Bandy, A., Blomquist, B., et al. (2003). Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus—DYCOMS-II. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84(5), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-5-579</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document