scholarly journals Experimental Assimilation of the GPM Core Observatory DPR Reflectivity Profiles for Typhoon Halong (2014)

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 2307-2326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kozo Okamoto ◽  
Kazumasa Aonashi ◽  
Takuji Kubota ◽  
Tomoko Tashima
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Large Diameter ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Accurate Analysis ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Position Errors ◽  
Cloud Resolving Model ◽  
Microwave Imager

Abstract Space-based precipitation radar data have been underused in data assimilation studies and operations despite their valuable information on vertically resolved hydrometeor profiles around the globe. The authors developed direct assimilation of reflectivities (Ze) from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on board the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory to improve mesoscale predictions. Based on comparisons with Ze observations, this cloud resolving model mostly reproduced Ze but produced overestimations of Ze induced by excessive snow with large diameter particles. With an ensemble-based variational scheme and preprocessing steps to properly treat reflectivity observations including conservative quality control and superobbing procedures, the authors assimilated DPR Ze and/or rain-affected radiances of GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) for the case of Typhoon Halong in July 2014. With the vertically resolving capability of DPR, the authors effectively selected Ze observations most suited to data assimilation, for example, by removing Ze above the melting layer to avoid contamination due to model bias. While the GMI radiance had large impacts on various control variables, the DPR made a fine delicate analysis of the rain mixing ratio and updraft. This difference arose from the observation characteristics (coverage width and spatial resolution), sensitivities represented in the observation operators, and structures of the background error covariance. Because the DPR assimilation corrected excessive increases in rain and clouds due to the radiance assimilation, the combined use of DPR and GMI generated more accurate analysis and forecast than separate use of them with respect to the agreement of observations and tropical cyclone position errors.

scholarly journals Validation of GPM Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) Rainfall Products over Italy

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 907-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Petracca ◽  
L. P. D’Adderio ◽  
F. Porcù ◽  
G. Vulpiani ◽  
S. Sebastianelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Reference Network ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Microwave Imager ◽  
Global Precipitation

Abstract The Ka–Ku Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) and the Microwave Imager on board the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission core satellite have been collecting data for more than 3 years, providing precipitation products over the globe, including oceans and remote areas where ground-based precipitation measurements are not available. The main objective of this work is to validate the GPM-DPR products over a key climatic region with complex orography such as the Italian territory. The performances of the DPR precipitation rate products are evaluated over an 18-month period (July 2015–December 2016) using both radar and rain gauge data. The ground reference network is composed of 22 weather radars and more than 3000 rain gauges. DPR dual-frequency products generally show better performance with respect to the single-frequency (i.e., Ka- or Ku-band only) products, especially when ground radar data are taken as reference. A sensitivity analysis with respect to season and rainfall intensity is also carried out. It was found that the normal scan (NS) product outperforms the high-sensitivity scan (HS) and matched scan (MS) during the summer season. A deeper analysis is carried out to investigate the larger discrepancies between the DPR-NS product and ground reference data. The most relevant improvement of the DPR products’ performance was found by limiting the comparison to the upscaled radar data with a higher quality index. The resulting scores in comparison with ground radars are mean error (ME) = −0.44 mm h−1, RMSE = 3.57 mm h−1, and fractional standard error (FSE) = 142%, with the POD = 65% and FAR = 1% for rainfall above 0.5 mm h−1.

An Efficient Dual-Resolution Approach for Ensemble Data Assimilation and Tests with Simulated Doppler Radar Data

2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 945-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jidong Gao ◽  
Ming Xue
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Radial Velocity ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Velocity Data ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Cross Covariance ◽  
Radial Velocity Data

Abstract A new efficient dual-resolution (DR) data assimilation algorithm is developed based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) method and tested using simulated radar radial velocity data for a supercell storm. Radar observations are assimilated on both high-resolution and lower-resolution grids using the EnKF algorithm with flow-dependent background error covariances estimated from the lower-resolution ensemble. It is shown that the flow-dependent and dynamically evolved background error covariances thus estimated are effective in producing quality analyses on the high-resolution grid. The DR method has the advantage of being able to significantly reduce the computational cost of the EnKF analysis. In the system, the lower-resolution ensemble provides the flow-dependent background error covariance, while the single-high-resolution forecast and analysis provides the benefit of higher resolution, which is important for resolving the internal structures of thunderstorms. The relative smoothness of the covariance obtained from the lower 4-km-resolution ensemble does not appear to significantly degrade the quality of analysis. This is because the cross covariance among different variables is of first-order importance for “retrieving” unobserved variables from the radar radial velocity data. For the DR analysis, an ensemble size of 40 appears to be a reasonable choice with the use of a 4-km horizontal resolution in the ensemble and a 1-km resolution in the high-resolution analysis. Several sensitivity tests show that the DR EnKF system is quite robust to different observation errors. A 4-km thinned data resolution is a compromise that is acceptable under the constraint of real-time applications. A data density of 8 km leads to a significant degradation in the analysis.

scholarly journals Development of a Hybrid En3DVar Data Assimilation System and Comparisons with 3DVar and EnKF for Radar Data Assimilation with Observing System Simulation Experiments

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Kong ◽  
Ming Xue ◽  
Chengsi Liu
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
System Simulation ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Mixing Ratio ◽  
State Variables ◽  
Ensemble Size ◽  
Simulation Experiments ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Variational Minimization ◽  
Water Vapor Mixing Ratio

Abstract A hybrid ensemble–3DVar (En3DVar) system is developed and compared with 3DVar, EnKF, “deterministic forecast” EnKF (DfEnKF), and pure En3DVar for assimilating radar data through perfect-model observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs). DfEnKF uses a deterministic forecast as the background and is therefore parallel to pure En3DVar. Different results are found between DfEnKF and pure En3DVar: 1) the serial versus global nature and 2) the variational minimization versus direct filter updating nature of the two algorithms are identified as the main causes for the differences. For 3DVar (EnKF/DfEnKF and En3DVar), optimal decorrelation scales (localization radii) for static (ensemble) background error covariances are obtained and used in hybrid En3DVar. The sensitivity of hybrid En3DVar to covariance weights and ensemble size is examined. On average, when ensemble size is 20 or larger, a 5%–10% static covariance gives the best results, while for smaller ensembles, more static covariance is beneficial. Using an ensemble size of 40, EnKF and DfEnKF perform similarly, and both are better than pure and hybrid En3DVar overall. Using 5% static error covariance, hybrid En3DVar outperforms pure En3DVar for most state variables but underperforms for hydrometeor variables, and the improvement (degradation) is most notable for water vapor mixing ratio qυ (snow mixing ratio qs). Overall, EnKF/DfEnKF performs the best, 3DVar performs the worst, and static covariance only helps slightly via hybrid En3DVar.

scholarly journals An Initial Assessment of the Surface Reference Technique Applied to Data from the Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) on the GPM Satellite

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 2281-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Meneghini ◽  
Hyokyung Kim ◽  
Liang Liao ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
John M. Kwiatkowski
Keyword(s):  
Cross Section ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Precipitation Radar ◽  
Frequency Method ◽  
Ka Band ◽  
Spaceborne Radar ◽  
Ku Band

AbstractIt has long been recognized that path-integrated attenuation (PIA) can be used to improve precipitation estimates from high-frequency weather radar data. One approach that provides an estimate of this quantity from airborne or spaceborne radar data is the surface reference technique (SRT), which uses measurements of the surface cross section in the presence and absence of precipitation. Measurements from the dual-frequency precipitation radar (DPR) on the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite afford the first opportunity to test the method for spaceborne radar data at Ka band as well as for the Ku-band–Ka-band combination.The study begins by reviewing the basis of the single- and dual-frequency SRT. As the performance of the method is closely tied to the behavior of the normalized radar cross section (NRCS or σ0) of the surface, the statistics of σ0 derived from DPR measurements are given as a function of incidence angle and frequency for ocean and land backgrounds over a 1-month period. Several independent estimates of the PIA, formed by means of different surface reference datasets, can be used to test the consistency of the method since, in the absence of error, the estimates should be identical. Along with theoretical considerations, the comparisons provide an initial assessment of the performance of the single- and dual-frequency SRT for the DPR. The study finds that the dual-frequency SRT can provide improvement in the accuracy of path attenuation estimates relative to the single-frequency method, particularly at Ku band.

scholarly journals A radar reflectivity operator with ice-phase hydrometeors for variational data assimilation (version 1.0) and its evaluation with real radar data

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4031-4051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shizhang Wang ◽  
Zhiquan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Variational Data Assimilation ◽  
Radar Reflectivity ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Background Fields ◽  
Ice Phase

Abstract. A reflectivity forward operator and its associated tangent linear and adjoint operators (together named RadarVar) were developed for variational data assimilation (DA). RadarVar can analyze both rainwater and ice-phase species (snow and graupel) by directly assimilating radar reflectivity observations. The results of three-dimensional variational (3D-Var) DA experiments with a 3 km grid mesh setting of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model showed that RadarVar was effective at producing an analysis of reflectivity pattern and intensity similar to the observed data. Two to three outer loops with 50–100 iterations in each loop were needed to obtain a converged 3-D analysis of reflectivity, rainwater, snow, and graupel, including the melting layers with mixed-phase hydrometeors. It is shown that the deficiencies in the analysis using this operator, caused by the poor quality of the background fields and the use of the static background error covariance, can be partially resolved by using radar-retrieved hydrometeors in a preprocessing step and tuning the spatial correlation length scales of the background errors. The direct radar reflectivity assimilation using RadarVar also improved the short-term (2–5 h) precipitation forecasts compared to those of the experiment without DA.

scholarly journals Data Assimilation of Cloud-Affected Radiances in a Cloud-Resolving Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanne Polkinghorne ◽  
Tomislava Vukicevic
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Atmospheric Modeling ◽  
Separate Experiment ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Cloud Resolving Model ◽  
Infrared Radiances ◽  
Cloud Mask

Abstract Assimilation of cloud-affected infrared radiances from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-8 (GOES-8) is performed using a four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) system designated as the Regional Atmospheric Modeling Data Assimilation System (RAMDAS). A cloud mask is introduced in order to limit the assimilation to points that have the same type of cloud in the model and observations, increasing the linearity of the minimization problem. A series of experiments is performed to determine the sensitivity of the assimilation to factors such as the maximum-allowed residual in the assimilation, the magnitude of the background error decorrelation length for water variables, the length of the assimilation window, and the inclusion of other data such as ground-based data including data from the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI), a microwave radiometer, radiosonde, and cloud radar. In addition, visible and near-infrared satellite data are included in a separate experiment. The assimilation results are validated using independent ground-based data. The introduction of the cloud mask where large residuals are allowed has the greatest positive impact on the assimilation. Extending the length of the assimilation window in conjunction with the use of the cloud mask results in a better-conditioned minimization, as well as a smoother response of the model state to the assimilation.

Comparisons of Hybrid En3DVar with 3DVar and EnKF for Radar Data Assimilation: Tests with the 10 May 2010 Oklahoma Tornado Outbreak

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-40
Author(s):  
Rong Kong ◽  
Ming Xue ◽  
Chengsi Liu ◽  
Youngsun Jung
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Radial Velocity ◽  
Forecast Error ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Separate Analysis ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Mixing Ratios ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Radial Velocity Data ◽  
Made In

AbstractIn this study, a hybrid En3DVar data assimilation (DA) scheme is compared with 3DVar, EnKF, and pure En3DVar for the assimilation of radar data in a real tornadic storm case. Results using hydrometeor mixing ratios (CVq) or logarithmic mixing ratios (CVlogq) as the control variables are compared in the variational DA framework. To address the lack of radial velocity impact issues when using CVq, a procedure that assimilates reflectivity and radial velocity data in two separate analysis passes is adopted. Comparisons are made in terms of the root-mean-square innovations (RMSIs) as well as the intensity and structure of the analyzed and forecast storms. For pure En3DVar that uses 100% ensemble covariance, CVlogq and CVq have similar RMSIs in the velocity analyses, but errors grow faster during forecasts when using CVlogq. Introducing static background error covariance at 5% in hybrid En3DVar (with CVlogq) significantly reduces the forecast error growth. Pure En3DVar produces more intense reflectivity analyses than EnKF that more closely match the observations. Hybrid En3DVar with 50% outperforms other weights in terms of the RMSIs and forecasts of updraft helicity and is thus used in the final comparison with 3DVar and EnKF. The hybrid En3DVar is found to outperform EnKF in better capturing the intensity and structure of the analyzed and forecast storms and outperform 3DVAR in better capturing the intensity and evolution of the rotating updraft.

scholarly journals Validation of Cloud-Resolving Model Background Data for Cloud Data Assimilation

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 781-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanne Polkinghorne ◽  
Tomislava Vukicevic ◽  
K. Franklin Evans
Keyword(s):  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Liquid Water Path ◽  
Background Error ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
Cloud Resolving Model ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cloud Mask

Abstract Results from a cloud-resolving model are systematically compared with a variety of observations, both ground based and satellite, in order to better understand the mean background errors and their correlations. This is a step in the direction of developing a background error covariance matrix for use in cloud data assimilation. Observation sources include the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI), a microwave radiometer (MWR), radiosonde, and cloud radar. When exploring model biases in temperature, precipitable water vapor, and liquid water path, a warm and moist bias at night and a cool and dry bias during the day are observed. Values for the background decorrelation length of water variables are determined. In addition, a dynamic cloud mask is presented to give more control in the assimilation of cloudy satellite radiances, allowing different cloud types to be excluded from the assimilation as well as establishing values for the maximum residuals to be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document