Comparing the Cost and Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis in Children

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 861-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie B Groves ◽  
Mitchell R. Ladd ◽  
Jared R. Gallaher ◽  
John Swanson ◽  
Robert D. Becher ◽  
...  

Although laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is accepted treatment for perforated appendicitis (PA) in children, concerns remain whether it has equivalent outcomes with open appendectomy (OA) and increased cost. A retrospective review was conducted of patients younger than age 17 years treated for PA over a 12.5-year period at a tertiary medical center. Patient characteristics, pre-operative indices, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed for patients undergoing LA and OA. Of 289 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 86 had LA (29.8%) and 203 OA (70.2%), the two groups having equivalent patient demographics and preoperative indices. Inpatient costs were not significantly different between LA and OA. LA had a lower rate of wound infection (1.2 vs 8.9%, P = 0.017), total parenteral nutrition use (23.3 vs 50.7%, P < 0.0001), and length of stay (5.56 ± 2.38 days vs 7.25 ± 3.77 days, P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative organ space abscess, surgical re-exploration, or rehospitalization. In children with PA, LA had fewer surgical site infections and shorter lengths of hospital stay compared with OA without an increase in inpatient costs.

2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110502
Author(s):  
Patrick F. Walker ◽  
Joseph D. Bozzay ◽  
David W. Schechtman ◽  
Faraz Shaikh ◽  
Laveta Stewart ◽  
...  

Background Intestinal anastomoses in military settings are performed in severely injured patients who often undergo damage control laparotomy in austere environments. We describe anastomotic outcomes of patients from recent wars. Methods Military personnel with combat-related intra-abdominal injuries (June 2009-December 2014) requiring laparotomy with resection and anastomosis were analyzed. Patients were evacuated from Iraq or Afghanistan to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (Germany) before being transferred to participating U.S. military hospitals. Results Among 341 patients who underwent 1053 laparotomies, 87 (25.5%) required ≥1 anastomosis. Stapled anastomosis only was performed in 57.5% of patients, while hand-sewn only was performed in 14.9%, and 9.2% had both stapled and hand-sewn techniques (type unknown for 18.4%). Anastomotic failure occurred in 15% of patients. Those with anastomotic failure required more anastomoses (median 2 anastomoses, interquartile range [IQR] 1-3 vs. 1 anastomosis, IQR 1-2, P = .03) and more total laparotomies (median 5 laparotomies, IQR 3-12 vs. 3, IQR 2-4, P = .01). There were no leaks in patients that had only hand-sewn anastomoses, though a significant difference was not seen with those who had stapled anastomoses. While there was an increasing trend regarding surgical site infections (SSIs) with anastomotic failure after excluding superficial SSIs, it was not significant. There was no difference in mortality. Discussion Military trauma patients have a similar anastomotic failure rate to civilian trauma patients. Patients with anastomotic failure were more likely to have had more anastomoses and more total laparotomies. No definitive conclusions can be drawn about anastomotic outcome differences between hand-sewn and stapled techniques.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S56-S57
Author(s):  
Vinay Rao ◽  
Scott Baumgartner ◽  
Danielle Kirelik ◽  
Katherine Negreira ◽  
Jessica Gibilisco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biologics are a mainstay in the treatment of moderate-severe IBD. Unlike other IBD medications, biologics typically require prior authorization from insurance providers. There is a paucity of information characterizing the length of the authorization process. Delays in the initiation of biologic therapy have the potential to impact clinical outcomes and quality of life. This study identified the time of biologic prescription and subsequent time for authorization and time of administration at a university medical center. Methods A chart review evaluating IBD patients seen in the GI clinic of a university medical center over a 5-year period was performed. Patient age, gender, race, IBD diagnosis, and biologic use were recorded in a confidential database generated using Microsoft Excel. Biologic agents evaluated included infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. The agreed upon date (AUD) of starting a biologic, length of time to approval (TTA), and length of time to first infusion (TFI) were recorded. TTA was set as the number of days between agreeing to start a biologic and prior authorization approval. TFI was set as the number of days between agreeing to start a biologic and their first infusion or injection. Patients were excluded if biologic was initiated at another institution or documentation of AUD or TFI was not apparent. Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test with significance set at p&lt;0.05. The study was approved by the institutional IRB. Results 458 total IBD patients were analyzed. 66 are currently being treated with a biologic (32 infliximab, 14 adalimumab, 13 vedolizumab, 7 ustekinumab). 37 patients had ulcerative colitis, 27 Crohn’s disease, and 2 indeterminate colitis. There were 38 men and 28 women (mean age 43.2 years; range 23–76). 32 patients were white, 26 African American, 1 Asian, 5 other/unknown, and 2 declined. Average TTA was 30.5 days (range 1–145) and average TFI was 45.3 days (range 2–166). There was no significant difference in TFI between a specific biologic compared to all others: infliximab (p=0.615), adalimumab (p=0.183), vedolizumab (p=0.804), ustekinumab (p=0.812). There were no significant differences in TFI with regard to gender (p=0.562), race (p=0.575), or IBD diagnosis (p=0.209). Discussion In IBD patients with an indication for biologic treatment, reducing the time to initiation of biologics can result in improved patient outcomes and quality of life. Average wait time for first infusion at our institution was 43.5 days with no difference based on the type of biologic or patient demographics. While a national benchmark does not exist for initiating patients on biologics, there is a need for continued evaluation of the authorization and treatment processes. As new biologic therapies for IBD become available, streamlining the approval process will be of increasing importance.


2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982096473
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Prussin ◽  
Eric Babajanian ◽  
Marc Error ◽  
J. Fredrik Grimmer ◽  
Jessica Ku ◽  
...  

Objective To analyze patients’ return to normal activity, pain scores, narcotic use, and adverse events after undergoing tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy with monopolar electrocautery or radiofrequency ablation. Study Design Randomized double-blinded clinical trial based on prospective parallel design. Setting Academic medical center and tertiary children’s hospital between March 2018 and July 2019. Methods Inclusion criteria included patients aged ≥3 years with surgical indication of recurrent tonsillitis or airway obstruction/sleep-disordered breathing. Patients were randomly assigned to monopolar electrocautery or radiofrequency ablation. Patients were blinded to treatment assignment. Survey questions answered via text or email were collected daily until postoperative day 15. The primary outcome was the patient’s return to normal activity. Secondary outcomes included daily pain score, total amount of postoperative narcotic use, and adverse events. Results Of the 236 patients who met inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to radiofrequency ablation or monopolar electrocautery, 230 completed the study (radiofrequency ablation, n = 112; monopolar electrocautery, n = 118). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the number of days for return to normal activity ( P = .89), daily pain scores over 15 postoperative days ( P = .46), postoperative narcotic use ( P = .61), or return to hospital for any reason ( P = .60), including bleeding as an adverse event ( P = .13). Conclusions As one of the largest randomized controlled trials examining instrumentation in tonsillectomy, our data do not show a difference between monopolar electrocautery and radiofrequency ablation with regard to return to normal activity, daily pain scores, total postoperative narcotic use, or adverse events.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zak Cerminara ◽  
Alison Duffy ◽  
Jennifer Nishioka ◽  
James Trovato ◽  
Steven Gilmore

Background Methotrexate has a wide dosing range. High-dose methotrexate is a dose of 1000 mg/m2 or greater. In the 1970s, the incidence of mortality associated with High-dose methotrexate ranged from 4.6 to 6%. In 2012, the University of Maryland Medical Center implemented a standardized high-dose methotrexate protocol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the institution followed recommendations based on the Bleyer nomogram for the administration of high-dose methotrexate more closely after the implementation of the protocol. Methods In this retrospective chart review, 37 patients received 119 cycles of high-dose methotrexate before the protocol implementation (1 January 2009 through 31 December 2010) and 45 patients received 106 cycles of high-dose methotrexate after protocol implementation (1 January 2013 through 31 December 2014). Patient characteristics, protocol data, and complications were analyzed. Results Protocol implementation significantly reduced the deviation of methotrexate level timing at 24, 48, and 72 h: median 7.47 vs. 1.46 h, 7.23 vs. 1.35 h, and 7.00 vs. 1.52 h before and after implementation, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each). The protocol significantly reduced deviation of the first dose of leucovorin administration: median 5.2 vs. 0.675 h before and after implementation, respectively (p<0.0001). After protocol implementation, there was an increase in the use of leucovorin prescriptions written appropriately for patients discharged before methotrexate levels reached a value of ≤0.05 µmol/L. Conclusions Implementation of a protocol for the administration of high-dose methotrexate improved the adherence to consensus recommendations. Further analysis is needed to assess clinical pharmacist involvement and the cost savings implications within this protocol.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ercan Şahin ◽  
Mahmut Kalem

Objectives. To evaluate the costs and efficacy of radiographs taken in the third week after fixation of bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures. Patients and method. A retrospective evaluation was made of patients who underwent surgical fixation because of bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures between January 1, 2008, and October 1, 2013. Patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index), fracture type, follow-up periods, and fixation methods were recorded, and the radiographs taken on postoperative day 1, at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and the final follow-up were examined by 2 orthopedists. Measurements were taken of the medial clear space (MCS ≤ 4 mm), the tibiofibular clear space (TFCS < 5 mm), and the talocrural angle (TCA = 83° ± 4°) on the mortise radiograph and of the overlap between the tibial tubercle and fibula (TFO > 10 mm) on the anteroposterior radiograph; residual step (mm) was measured on the lateral radiograph. Results. A total of 263 patients were examined, and of these, 112 were included for evaluation. In the measurements of postoperative day 1, third week, and sixth week and the final radiographs, no statistically significant difference was determined in the MCS, TFCS, TCA, TFO, and residual step values. Because the cost of a series of 3-way ankle radiographs in Turkey is US$3.81 per patient, the cost of the control series for the 112 patients in this study was US$ 427.3. Conclusions. In patients treated surgically for bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures, the radiographs taken in the third week rarely resulted in a change of patient management. Therefore, it simply constitutes an additional cost for the patient or the hospital. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective Cohort study


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Smith ◽  
Hannah Merriman ◽  
Safia Haidar ◽  
Grace Knudsen ◽  
Victoria Kinkaid ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Surgical site infection (SSI) can be a significant cause of morbidity in the emergency laparotomy patient. Previous research into the role of negative pressure wound dressings to improve the rate of SSI culminated with NICE guidelines in 2019 recommending the use of negative pressure wound dressings in people who would be considered high risk for developing an SSI. Based on this guideline, we changed our policy to recommend the use of PICO dressings for all emergency laparotomies in order to decrease our rate of SSI. Our aim of this study was to assess the success of this policy change. Methods In this closed-loop audit we analysed data from all laparotomy patients at Frimley Park Hospital over 12 months. We retrospectively analysed the data of the pre-intervention group between January – June 2019, and prospectively audited all laparotomy patients between July – December 2019. Results We found that there was no significant decrease in the rate of superficial SSI, from a pre intervention rate of 22.2% to a post intervention 24.1%. Similarly, we found no significant decrease in the rate of wound dehiscence, which increased from 13.8% to 17.7%. In further assessment we saw no significant difference in the rates of contamination, ASA grades, or closure techniques to account for these increased rates. Conclusion While other studies have demonstrated a decrease in SSIs following the use of PICO dressings, we did not show such a result, leading us to question the cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound dressings in the emergency laparotomy patient.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abutorabi ◽  
Maryam Radinmanesh ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Mahnaz Afshari ◽  
Ghasem Taheri

Abstract Backgroundthe health service tariff is an appropriate policymaking tool and the financial leverage of the health system control which affects quality, availability, cost, efficiency, equity and accountability of health services. Global surgeries include 91 common cases of general and specialized surgeries in hospitals; fixed tariffs are annually defined for these surgeries, and insurance companies must pay medical centers based on these tariffs. The aim of this study was to examine and compare hospital bills with global surgery tariffs at Hazrate Rasoole Akram Educational and Medical Center in 2017.MethodsThis descriptive-analytic study was conducted retrospectively and compared the global and actual costs of global surgeries performed in the third quarter of the year 2017 at Hazrate Rasoole Akram Educational and Medical Center. Required data on the actual costs of surgeries was collected through the Hospital Information System (HIS) and patients’ records. Information on the global costs was obtained from the Annual Circulars of Insurance Council for the studied period about the cost of global surgeries. Linear regression (STATA13 software) was used to investigate the effect of items on tariff and invoice differences; concerning other calculations, EXCEL software was used.ResultsThe highest frequency of global surgeries was related to ophthalmic surgery which accounted for approximately half of total surgeries performed at Hazrate Rasoole Akram Hospital. The most significant difference between global tariff and invoice was also related to ophthalmic surgery (6502876538 Rials a year).Overall, the actual hospital bills were much higher than the tariffs approved for global surgeries, and the total difference was 15913703073 Rials. The results revealed that there was a significant relationship between some of the items such as the cost of operating rooms, anesthesia and other services.ConclusionsReferral hospitals which are at the level three of referral networks usually treat more complex patients; this should be taken into account when defining surgery tariffs of these centers. On the other hand, hospitals need to control the costs and reduce the end cost of these surgeries by improving clinical management and cost management. In addition, prospective and case-based payment methods can control health costs.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Sheth ◽  
Habeeb F Kazimuddin ◽  
Douglas McElroy ◽  
Aniruddha Singh

Introduction: Since the start of the novel coronavirus outbreak in the U.S., the CDC and AHA have introduced new CPR guidelines involving increased precautions for protecting healthcare providers from infection. These precautions have been widely adopted for both known and potential COVID+ patients despite debate over increased strain on CPR providers and potentially inferior outcomes. In order to bridge the knowledge gap surrounding safe, effective CPR practices in the presence of COVID-19, patient outcomes for codes performed in our medical center since March 2020 were compared to those of the same time last year. Methods: A total of 94 hospital codes across 80 patients were included. Age, BMI, and code duration were tested for significant differences in means between groups using ANOVA, with pairwise comparisons done using Tukey’s HSD test. Discrete variables were tested for significant differences among groups using chi-square association tests. Results: Groups were well matched on patient characteristics. There were no significant differences in age, comorbidities, or rhythm type among groups. COVID+ patients had significantly higher BMI than non-COVID patients. Code duration was significantly greater in the COVID+ group. However, there was no significant difference in code survival; 5 of 10 COVID+ patients (50%) survived the code event, compared to 54 of 84 (64%) non-COVID patients. Only 1 of 10 (10%) COVID+ patients was discharged alive vs. 18 of 71 non-COVID patients (25%); while not significant, this difference is perhaps worthy of further attention. Conclusions: Patient outcomes between 2019 and 2020 were comparable, indicating that extra precautions taken by healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 outbreak are not degrading the quality of CPR administered. However, COVID+ patients had significantly longer code durations than non-COVID patients in both years, suggesting a greater difficulty in restoring spontaneous circulation in the virus group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document