Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Treatment in Preventing Surgical Site Infections after Whipple Procedures

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1166-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Gupta ◽  
Geoffrey C. Darby ◽  
David K. Imagawa
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Whipple Procedure ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Significant Difference

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occur at an average rate of 21.1 per cent after Whipple procedures per NSQIP data. In the setting of adherence to standard National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Hepatopancreatobiliary recommendations including wound protector use and glove change before closing, this study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of using negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) over closed incision sites after a Whipple procedure to prevent SSI formation. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients from January 2014 to July 2016 who met criteria of completing Whipple procedures with full primary incision closure performed by a single surgeon at a single institution. Sixty-one patients were included in the study between two cohorts: traditional dressing (TD) (n = 36) and NPWT dressing (n = 25). There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01) in SSI formation between the TD cohort (n = 15, SSI rate = 0.41) and the NPWT cohort (n = 3, SSI rate = 0.12). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of SSI formation was significant for NPWT use [OR = 0.15, P = 0.036] and for hospital length of stay [OR = 1.21, P = 0.024]. Operative length, operative blood loss, units of perioperative blood transfusion, intraoperative gastrojejunal tube placement, preoperative stent placement, and postoperative antibiotic duration did not significantly impact SSI formation (P > 0.05).

Repetitive Imaging following Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum Is Unnecessary

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Sola ◽  
Yangyang R. Yu ◽  
Tyler C. Friske ◽  
Abdur R. Jamal ◽  
Eric H. Rosenfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Pectus Excavatum ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Tube Placement ◽  
Haller Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Repeat Imaging

Introduction The objective of this study was to evaluate the necessity of repeat imaging after an initial chest radiograph (CXR) following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent MIRPE from January 2012 to July 2016 at two academic children's hospitals. Data collected included demographics, severity of pectus defect (Haller index [HI]), utilization of CXRs, outpatient follow-up, and clinical outcomes. Results A total of 360 patients (171 at Hospital 1 and 189 at Hospital 2) underwent MIRPE. Median age was 15.6 years and 84% were males. The median HI was 4.0. Median postoperative hospital length of stay was 4.2 days and median time to bar removal was 34 months. There was significant variation in postoperative imaging between the hospitals, including frequency of immediate postoperative CXR, total number of CXRs during hospitalization, and number of postoperative outpatient CXRs prior to bar removal. However, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the hospitals, including postoperative pneumothorax, postoperative chest tube placement, and complications. Conclusion These data suggest that increased repetitive imaging after an initial postoperative CXR does not affect clinical outcomes and may not be necessary after MIRPE.

Surgical Outcomes of Distal Pancreatectomy in Elderly Patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482098257
Author(s):  
Derek Tessman ◽  
Jesse Chou ◽  
Saad Shebrain ◽  
Gitonga Munene
Keyword(s):  
Distal Pancreatectomy ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Postoperative Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Background The extent to which age impacts surgical outcomes remains poorly characterized. This study aims to evaluate the impact of age on 30-day outcomes in patients after distal pancreatectomy. Methods Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2017), distal pancreatectomy patients were identified and age-stratified, groups A (≤75 years) and B (>75 years). Outcomes included 30-day mortality, morbidity, readmissions, operative time (min), and hospital length of stay (LOS, days). Results Of 3042 total patients identified, 1686 (55.4%) were women. A total of 2649 patients (87.1%) were in group A. Overall, both groups had similar baseline characteristics with the exception of the following: diabetes mellitus (24.8% vs. 30.0%, P = .03), smoking (19.3% vs. 4.8%, P < .001), congestive heart failure (.5% vs. 1.8%, P = .010), hypertension (HTN) (47.9% vs. 72.5%, P < .001), bleeding disorders (3.1% vs. 5.3%, P = .036), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) (III-V) scores (67.6% vs. 85.5%, P < .001), and body mass index (29.2 [±6.7] vs. 27.4 [±5.6], P = .001). Deep surgical site infection was higher in group A (12.1% vs. 6.6%, P = .001), while acute renal failure (ARF) and postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) were higher in group B. 30-day readmissions were higher in group A (17.4% vs. 12.2%, P = .011) despite no statistically significant difference in LOS (7.10 [±6.36] vs. 7.30 [±4.93] days, P = .553) or overall morbidity (29.4% vs. 28.8%, P = .859). Conclusion(s) Those undergoing distal pancreatectomy experienced similar overall morbidity and mortality outcomes regardless of age. However, those older than 75 years had more cardiovascular risk factors, which may have contributed to their higher rates of postoperative ARF and MI.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Total versus Partial Colectomy in Fulminant Clostridium Difficile Colitis. A Propensity Matched Analysis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasim Ahmed ◽  
YenHong Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Partial Colectomy

Abstract BackgroundThe Total Abdominal Colectomy (TAC) is the recommended procedure for Fulminant Clostridium Difficile Colitis (FCDC), however, occasionally, FCDC is also treated with partial colectomies. The purpose of the study was to identify the outcomes of partial colectomy in FCDC cases.MethodThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was accessed and eligible patients from 2012 through 2016 were reviewed. Patients 18 years and older who were diagnosed with FCDC and who underwent colectomies were included in the study. Patients’ demography, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, mortality, morbidities, length of hospital stay and discharge disposition were compared between the group who underwent partial colectomy and the group who underwent TAC. Univariate analysis followed by propensity matching were performed. A p value of <0.05 is considered as statistically significant. ResultsOut of 491 patients who qualified for the study, 93 (18.94%) patients underwent partial colectomy. The pair matched analysis showed no significant difference in patients’ characteristics and comorbidities in the two groups. There was no significant difference found in mortality between the two groups (30.1% vs. 30.15, P>0.99). There were no differences found in the median [95% CI] hospital length of stay [LOS] (23 days [19-31] vs. 21 [17-25], P=0.30), post-operative complications (P>0.05), and discharged disposition to home (43.1% vs. 33.8%) or transfer to rehab (21.55 vs. 12.3%, P=0.357) between the TAC and partial colectomy groups.Conclusion The overall 30 days mortality remains very high in FCDC. Partial colectomy did not increase risk of mortality or morbidities and LOS.

scholarly journals Mortality after cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a medical ICU

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rezar ◽  
Bernhard Wernly ◽  
Michael Haslinger ◽  
Clemens Seelmaier ◽  
Philipp Schwaiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Postresuscitation Care ◽  
Significant Difference

Summary Background Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and postresuscitation care in the intensive care unit (ICU) are standardized procedures; however, there is evidence suggesting sex-dependent differences in clinical management and outcome variables after cardiac arrest (CA). Methods A prospective analysis of patients who were hospitalized at a medical ICU after CPR between December 2018 and March 2020 was conducted. Exclusion criteria were age < 18 years, hospital length of stay < 24 h and traumatic CA. The primary study endpoint was mortality after 6 months and the secondary endpoint neurological outcome assessed by cerebral performance category (CPC). Differences between groups were calculated by using U‑tests and χ2-tests, for survival analysis both univariate and multivariable Cox regression were fitted. Results A total of 106 patients were included and the majority were male (71.7%). No statistically significant difference regarding 6‑month mortality between sexes could be shown (hazard risk, HR 0.68, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35–1.34; p = 0.27). Neurological outcome was also similar between both groups (CPC 1 88% in both sexes after 6 months; p = 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences regarding general characteristics, pre-existing diseases, as well as the majority of clinical and laboratory parameters or measures performed on the ICU. Conclusion In a single center CPR database no statistically significant sex-specific differences regarding post-resuscitation care, survival and neurological outcome after 6 months were observed.

scholarly journals Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Wagner ◽  
Anja Wetz ◽  
Armin Wiegering ◽  
Johan F. Lock ◽  
Stefan Löb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Abstract Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds “preconditioned” with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013–2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

scholarly journals Effects of statins on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052093858
Author(s):  
Rony M. Zeenny ◽  
Hanine Mansour ◽  
Wissam K Kabbara ◽  
Nibal Chamoun ◽  
Myriam Audi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chronic Use

Objective We evaluated the effect of chronic use of statins based on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods We conducted a retrospective study over 12 months at a teaching hospital in Lebanon comparing patients with CAP taking chronic statins with patients not taking statins. Included patients with CAP were older than age 18 years and had two CRP level measures during hospitalization. CURB-65 criteria were used to assess the severity of pneumonia. A decrease in CRP levels on days 1 and 3, LOS, and normalization of fever were used to assess the response to antibiotics. Results Sixty-one patients were taking statins and 90 patients were not taking statins. Patients on statins had significantly more comorbid conditions; both groups had comparable CURB-65 scores. In both groups, no statistically significant difference was seen for the decrease in CRP level on days 1 and 3 and LOS. No difference in days to normalization of fever was detected in either group. Conclusion No association was found between the chronic use of statins and CRP levels, LOS, or days to fever normalization in patients with CAP.

Characterizing Firearms-Related Injuries and Craniofacial Fractures: A TQIP Study

FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110574
Author(s):  
Alexandra T. Bourdillon ◽  
Sebastian Dobrow ◽  
Benjamin Steren ◽  
Parsa P. Salehi ◽  
Kevin Y. Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Brain Injuries ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
Hospital Size ◽  
Firearm Injuries ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Craniofacial Fractures

Background: Interest in firearm injuries (FAIs), from medical and public health perspectives continues to grow. Few studies have analyzed the relationship of FAIs, craniofacial fractures, and traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Methods: FAIs were isolated from national data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) 2014 to 2016 using external cause encodings. Pertinent demographic, injury, and hospital characteristics were extracted to characterize trends and statistically significant outcomes. Results: Thirty-two thousand eight hundred ninety-three (out of 829 805 cases) FAIs were captured, with a majority of patients being male and non-Hispanic/Latino Black. Multivariate linear regression revealed that race/ethnicity, age, hospital size, hospital region, intent of injury, and ISS significantly contributed to risk of mortality, increased hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) duration. Five thousand nine hundred ten (18.0%) FAIs had at least 1 craniofacial fracture, and among these 75.1% (4441) incurred a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Mortality rate among patients with craniofacial FAI was 43.8% (2586/5910), compared to 9.7% (2618/26 983) without. Delayed surgical repair significantly increased hospital LOS ( P < .01), but not mortality ( P = .09). Conclusion: FAIs with craniofacial injury have significantly higher mortality rates than those without craniofacial injury. FAI-associated craniofacial injuries are frequently associated with TBI which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Such findings pose important public health and economic implications.

Outcomes of Tube Thoracostomies Performed by Advanced Practice Providers vs Trauma Surgeons

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Bevis ◽  
Gina M. Berg-Copas ◽  
Bruce W. Thomas ◽  
Donald G. Vasquez ◽  
Ruth Wetta-Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Trauma Surgeons

Background The role of advanced registered nurse practitioners and physician assistants in emergency departments, trauma centers, and critical care is becoming more widely accepted. These personnel, collectively known as advanced practice providers, expand physicians’ capabilities and are being increasingly recruited to provide care and perform invasive procedures that were previously performed exclusively by physicians. Objectives To determine whether the quality of tube thoracostomies performed by advanced practice providers is comparable to that performed by trauma surgeons and to ascertain whether the complication rates attributable to tube thoracostomies differ on the basis of who performed the procedure. Methods Retrospective blinded reviews of patients’ charts and radiographs were conducted to determine differences in quality indicators, complications, and outcomes of tube thoracostomies by practitioner type: trauma surgeons vs advanced practice providers. Results Differences between practitioner type in insertion complications, complications requiring additional interventions, hospital length of stay, and morbidity were not significant. The only significant difference was a complication related to placement of the tube: when the tube extended caudad, toward the feet, from the insertion site. Interrater reliability ranged from good to very good. Conclusions Use of advanced practice providers provides consistent and quality tube thoracostomies. Employment of these practitioners may be a safe and reasonable solution for staffing trauma centers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document