Patient Contact Time and Prehospital Interventions in Hypotensive Trauma Patients: Should We Reconsider the “ABC” Algorithm When Time Is of the Essence?

Introduction There is disagreement in the trauma community concerning the extent to which emergency medical services (EMS) should perform on-scene interventions. Additionally, in recent years the “ABC” algorithm has been questioned in hypotensive patients. The objective of this study was to quantify the delay introduced by different on-scene interventions. Methods A retrospective analysis of hypotensive trauma patients brought to an urban level 1 trauma center by EMS from 2007 to 2018 was performed, and patients were stratified by mechanism of injury and new injury severity score (NISS). Independent samples median tests were used to compare median on-scene times. Results Among 982 trauma patients, median on-scene time was 5 minutes (interquartile range 3-8). In penetrating trauma patients ( n = 488) with NISS of 16-25, intubation significantly increased scene time from 4 to 6 minutes ( P < .05). In penetrating trauma patients with NISS of 10-15, wound care significantly increased scene time from 3 to 6 minutes ( P < .05). Tourniquet use, interosseous (IO) access, intravenous (IV) access, and needle decompression did not significantly increase scene time. Conclusion Understanding that intubation increases scene time in penetrating trauma, while IV and IO access do not, alterations to the traditional “ABC” algorithm may be warranted. Further investigation of prehospital interventions is needed to determine which are appropriate on-scene.

Download Full-text

How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect Trauma Volume at an Urban Level I Trauma Center?

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/00031348211054075 ◽

2022 ◽

pp. 000313482110540

Author(s):

Alexandra Hahn ◽

Tommy Brown ◽

Brett Chapman ◽

Alan Marr ◽

Lance Stuke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Penetrating Trauma ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Minor Trauma ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Urban Level ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic changed the face of health care worldwide. While the impacts from this catastrophe are still being measured, it is important to understand how this pandemic impacted existing health care systems. As such, the objective of this study was to quantify its effects on trauma volume at an urban Level 1 trauma center in one of the earliest and most significantly affected US cities. Methods A retrospective chart review of consecutive trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 was completed. The total trauma volume in the years prior to the pandemic (2017-2019) was compared to the volume in 2020. These data were then further stratified to compare quarterly volume across all 4 years. Results A total of 4138 trauma patients were treated in the emergency room throughout 2020 with 4124 seen during 2019, 3774 during 2018, and 3505 during 2017 in the pre-COVID-19 time period. No significant difference in the volume of minor trauma or trauma transfers was observed ( P < .05). However, there was a significant increase in the number of major traumas in 2020 as compared to prior years (38.5% vs 35.6%, P < .01) and in the volume of penetrating trauma (29.1% vs 24.0%, P < .01). Discussion During the COVID-19 outbreak, trauma remained a significant health care concern. This study found an increase in volume of penetrating trauma, specifically gunshot wounds throughout 2020. It remains important to continue to devote resources to trauma patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Download Full-text

Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

Journal of Hospital Administration ◽

10.5430/jha.v4n5p1 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (5) ◽

pp. 1 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Erin Powers Kinney ◽

Kamal Gursahani ◽

Eric Armbrecht ◽

Preeti Dalawari

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Hospital Capacity ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Download Full-text

Delays in Transfer of Elderly Less-injured Trauma Patients Can Have Deadly Consequences

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313481408001130 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 80 (11) ◽

pp. 1132-1135 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Peter E. Fischer ◽

Paul D. Colavita ◽

Gregory P. Fleming ◽

Toan T. Huynh ◽

A. Britton Christmas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Trauma Center ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Severely Injured ◽

Severely Injured Patients ◽

Local Trauma ◽

Level 1 ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Injured Patients ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Transfer of severely injured patients to regional trauma centers is often expedited; however, transfer of less-injured, older patients may not evoke the same urgency. We examined referring hospitals’ length of stay (LOS) and compared the subsequent outcomes in less-injured transfer patients (TP) with patients presenting directly (DP) to the trauma center. We reviewed the medical records of less-injured (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 9 or less), older (age older than 60 years) patients transferred to a regional Level 1 trauma center to determine the referring facility LOS, demographics, and injury information. Outcomes of the TP were then compared with similarly injured DP using local trauma registry data. In 2011, there were 1657 transfers; the referring facility LOS averaged greater than 3 hours. In the less-injured patients (ISS 9 or less), the average referring facility LOS was 3 hours 20 minutes compared with 2 hours 24 minutes in more severely injured patients (ISS 25 or greater, P < 0.05). The mortality was significantly lower in the DP patients (5.8% TP vs 2.6% DP, P = 0.035). Delays in transfer of less-injured, older trauma patients can result in poor outcomes including increased mortality. Geographic challenges do not allow for every patient to be transported directly to a trauma center. As a result, we propose further outreach efforts to identify potential causes for delay and to promote compliance with regional referral guidelines.

Download Full-text

Higher Mortality Rate in Moderate-to-Severe Thoracoabdominal Injury Patients with Admission Hyperglycemia Than Nondiabetic Normoglycemic Patients

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph16193562 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 16 (19) ◽

pp. 3562

Author(s):

Wei-Ti Su ◽

Shao-Chun Wu ◽

Sheng-En Chou ◽

Chun-Ying Huang ◽

Shiun-Yuan Hsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mortality Rate ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Burn Injury ◽

Past History ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Thoracoabdominal Injuries ◽

History Of ◽

Level 1 ◽

The Impact ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Background: Hyperglycemia at admission is associated with an increase in worse outcomes in trauma patients. However, admission hyperglycemia is not only due to diabetic hyperglycemia (DH), but also stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH). This study was designed to evaluate the mortality rates between adult moderate-to-severe thoracoabdominal injury patients with admission hyperglycemia as DH or SIH and in patients with nondiabetic normoglycemia (NDN) at a level 1 trauma center. Methods: Patients with a glucose level ≥200 mg/dL upon arrival at the hospital emergency department were diagnosed with admission hyperglycemia. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed when patients had an admission glycohemoglobin A1c ≥6.5% or had a past history of DM. Admission hyperglycemia related to DH and SIH was diagnosed in patients with and without DM. Patients who had a thoracoabdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score <3, a polytrauma, a burn injury and were below 20 years of age were excluded. A total of 52 patients with SIH, 79 patients with DH, and 621 patients with NDN were included from the registered trauma database between 1 January 2009, and 31 December 2018. To reduce the confounding effects of sex, age, comorbidities, and injury severity of patients in assessing the mortality rate, different 1:1 propensity score-matched patient populations were established to assess the impact of admission hyperglycemia (SIH or DH) vs. NDN, as well as SIH vs. DH, on the outcomes. Results: DH was significantly more frequent in older patients (61.4 ± 13.7 vs. 49.8 ± 17.2 years, p < 0.001) and in patients with higher incidences of preexisting hypertension (2.5% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001) and congestive heart failure (3.8% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.014) than NDN. On the contrary, SIH had a higher injury severity score (median [Q1–Q3], 20 [15–22] vs. 13 [10–18], p < 0.001) than DH. In matched patient populations, patients with either SIH or DH had a significantly higher mortality rate than NDN patients (10.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.022, and 5.3% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.043, respectively). However, the mortality rate was insignificantly different between SIH and DH (11.4% vs. 8.6%, odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–6.66; p = 0.690). Conclusion: This study revealed that admission hyperglycemia in the patients with thoracoabdominal injuries had a higher mortality rate than NDN patients with or without adjusting the differences in patient’s age, sex, comorbidities, and injury severity.

Download Full-text

Helicopter Transport of Trauma Patients Improves Survival Irrespective of Transport Time

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/0003134820943564 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 000313482094356

Author(s):

Andrew M. Schneider ◽

Joseph A. Ewing ◽

John D. Cull

Keyword(s):

Injury Severity ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Mechanism Of Injury ◽

Transport Time ◽

Level 1 ◽

Student’S T ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center ◽

Student’S T Test ◽

Transportation Type

Objectives Helicopter transport of trauma patients remains controversial. We examined the survival rates of patients undergoing helicopter versus ground transport to a Level 1 trauma center. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on trauma patients treated between 2014 and 2017. Student’s t-test was used to compare air versus ground transport times. A logistic regression was then used to examine the association of transportation type on survival controlling for demographics, mechanism of injury, transport time, field intubation, and injury severity. Results Of 3967 patients identified, 69.6% (2762) were male, and the average age was 40 years. Most patients suffered blunt injuries (86.8%, 3445), while the remaining had penetrating injuries (11.6%, 459) or burns (1.6%, 63). The majority of patients were transferred by ground (3449) with only 13% (518) transferred by air. Patients transported by air had increased Injury Severity Score (ISS) with a median of 17 (IQR 9-24) versus 9 (IQR 5-14), increased length of stay (LOS) at 6 days versus 3 ( P < .001), and increased mortality at 12.6% vs 6.5% ( P < .001). Patients transported by air arrived 16.6 ± 6.7 minutes faster compared with ground for the zip codes examined. When adjusting for the mechanism of injury, ISS, age, gender, intubation status, and transport time, air transport was associated with an increased likelihood of survival (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06-2.40). Conclusion In our analysis of 3967 patients, those transported by air had a significant improvement in the likelihood of survival compared with those transported by ground even when adjusting for both ISS and time.

Download Full-text

Emergency Medical Service Transport Time and Trauma Outcomes at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center: Evaluation of Prehospital Emergency Medical Service Response

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/0003134820988827 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 000313482098882

Author(s):

Adel Elkbuli ◽

Brianna Dowd ◽

Carol Sanchez ◽

Saamia Shaikh ◽

Mason Sutherland ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Medical Service ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Medical Service ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Future Research ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Transport Time ◽

Emergency Medical ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Background The use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) for trauma patients has been debated since its introduction. We aim to compare outcomes for trauma patients transported by ground EMS (GEMS) vs. HEMS using raw and adjusted mortality in a level 1 trauma center. Methods A 6-year retrospective cohort study utilizing our level 1 trauma center registry for patients transferred by GEMS or HEMS was performed. Demographics and outcome measures were compared. Raw and adjusted mortality was evaluated. Adjusted mortality was determined incorporating confounders, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, and EMS transport time. Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, and independent sample T-test were utilized with significance, defined as P < .05. Results Of 12 633 patients, 10 656 were transported via GEMS and 1977 with HEMS. Mean age was 55 for GEMS and 40 for HEMS ( P < .001). Mean ISS was 9.29 and 11.73 for GEMS and HEMS ( P < .001). Mean Revised Trauma Score was higher (less severe) for GEMS vs. HEMS (7.6 vs. 7.12, P < .001). Mean transport times for GEMS and HEMS was 39.45 vs. 47.29 minutes ( P = .02). Raw mortality was 2.55% (307/10 656) for GEMS and 6.78% (134/1977) for HEMS. Adjusted mortality revealed a 16.6% increased mortality for GEMS compared to HEMS (adjusted odds ratio = 1.166, 95% CI: .815-1.668). Conclusions Air-lifted trauma patients were younger, more severely injured, and more hemodynamically unstable and required longer transport time but experienced lower adjusted mortality. Future research is needed to investigate whether reducing transport times and augmenting the advanced care already implemented by HEMS crews can improve outcomes.

Download Full-text

Minor change in initial PEEP setting decreases rates of ventilator-associated events in mechanically ventilated trauma patients

Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open ◽

10.1136/tsaco-2020-000455 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

pp. e000455

Author(s):

Ethan Ferrel ◽

Kristina M Chapple ◽

Liviu Gabriel Calugaru ◽

Jennifer Maxwell ◽

Jessica A Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Trauma Centers ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Mechanically Ventilated ◽

Change In Practice ◽

Level 1 ◽

The Impact ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

BackgroundSurveillance of ventilator-associated events (VAEs) as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) is performed at many US trauma centers and considered a measure of healthcare quality. The surveillance algorithm relies in part on increases in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to identify VAEs. The purpose of this cohort study was to evaluate the effect of initiating mechanically ventilated trauma patients at marginally higher PEEP on incidence of VAEs.MethodsAnalysis of level-1 trauma center patients mechanically ventilated 2+ days from 2017 to 2018 was performed after an institutional ventilation protocol increased initial PEEP setting from 5 (2017) to 6 (2018)cm H2O. Incidence of VAEs per 1000 vent days was compared between PEEP groups. Logistic regression modelling was performed to evaluate the impact of the PEEP setting change adjusted to account for age, ventilator days, injury mechanism and injury severity.Results519 patients met study criteria (274 PEEP 5 and 245 PEEP 6). Rates of VAEs were significantly reduced among patients with initial PEEP 5 versus 6 (14.61 per 1000 vent days vs. 7.13 per 1000 vent days; p=0.039). Logistic regression demonstrated that initial PEEP 6 was associated with 62% reduction in VAEs.ConclusionsOur data suggest that an incrementally increased baseline PEEP setting was associated with a significantly decreased incidence of VAEs among trauma patients. This minor change in practice may have a major impact on a trauma center’s quality metrics.Level of evidenceIV.

Download Full-text

Females Fall More From Heights But Males Survive Less Among A Geriatric Population: Insights From An American Level 1 Trauma Center

10.21203/rs.2.10378/v3 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Ayman El-Menyar ◽

Elizabeth Tilley ◽

Hassan Al-Thani ◽

Rifat Latifi

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Trauma Center ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Age Groups ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Chi Square ◽

Geriatric Population ◽

Fall Injury ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center

Abstract Background Approximately one third of subjects ≥65 year old and half of subjects ≥80 years old sustain a fall injury each year. We aimed to study the outcomes of fall from a height (FFH) among older adults. We hypothesized that in an elderly population, fall-related injury and mortality are the same in both genders.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted between January 2012 and December 2016 in patients who sustained fall injury at age of at least 60 years and were admitted into a Level 1 Trauma center. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Gp-I: 60-69, Gp-II: 70-79 and Gp-III: ≥80 years old. Data were analyzed and compared using Chi-square, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and logistic regression analysis tests.Results Forty-three percent (3665/8528) of adult trauma patients had FFH and 59.5% (2181) were ≥ 60 years old and 52% were women. The risk of fall increased with age with an Odd ratio (OR) 1.52 for age 70-79 and an OR 3.40 for ≥80. Females fell 1.2 times more (age-adjusted OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.05-1.45) and 47% of ≥80 years old suffered FFH. Two-thirds of FFH occurred at a height ≤1 meter. Injury severity (ISS, NISS and GCS) were worse in Gp-II, lower extremities max Abbreviated Injury score (max AIS) was higher in Gp-III. Overall mortality was 8.7% (Gp-I 3.6% vs. 11.3% in Gp-II and 14% in Gp- III). Males showed higher mortality than females in the entire age groups (Gp-I: 4.6% vs 1%, Gp-II: 12.9% vs 4.2% and Gp-III: 17.3% vs 6.9% respectively). On multivariate analysis, shock index (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.27-11.33) and male gender (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.69-4.16) were independent predictors of mortality.Conclusions Fall from a height is more common in older adult female patients, but male patients have worse outcomes. Preventive measures for falls at home still are needed for the older adults of both genders.

Download Full-text

Is Field Hypotension a Reliable Indicator of Significant Injury in Trauma Patients who are Normotensive on Arrival to the Emergency Department?

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/000313480507100915 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 71 (9) ◽

pp. 768-771 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Panna Codner ◽

Amal Obaid ◽

Diana Porral ◽

Stephanie Lush ◽

Marianne Cinat

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Neck Injuries ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 1 Trauma Center ◽

Significant Injury ◽

Overall Mortality ◽

Critical Injury

There is a subset of trauma patients who are hypotensive in the field but normotensive on arrival to the emergency department (ED). Our objective was to evaluate the presence, type, and severity of injuries in these patients. Data were retrospectively reviewed from patients treated at a level 1 trauma center over 1 year. Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 90 mm Hg. Forty-seven patients were included. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 37 patients and penetrating in 10. The average field SBP was 76 ± 11 mm Hg. The average SBP on arrival to the ED was 120 ± 19 mm Hg. The average injury severity score (ISS) was 16.3 ± 10.3 (range, 1–43). Twenty-four patients (51%) had significant injury (ISS ≥ 16). Nine patients (19%) had critical injury (ISS ≥ 25). Twenty-six patients (55%) required surgery, and 43 (91%) required ICU admission. Common injury sites included the head and neck (57%), thorax (44%), pelvis and extremities (40%), and abdomen (34%). Overall mortality was 10 per cent (n = 5). All patients that died had significant head and neck injuries (AIS ≥ 3). Field hypotension was a significant marker for potential serious internal injury requiring prompt diagnostic workup.

Download Full-text

Analysis of pre-hospital rescue times on mortality in trauma patients in a Scandinavian urban setting

Trauma ◽

10.1177/1460408616649217 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

pp. 28-34 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

A Bagher ◽

L Todorova ◽

L Andersson ◽

CJ Wingren ◽

A Ottosson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Response Time ◽

Injury Severity ◽

Penetrating Trauma ◽

Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽

Urban Setting ◽

Blunt Injury ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

New Injury Severity Score ◽

Transport Distance ◽

Centre Hospital

Objective To analyze if pre-hospital rescue times were associated with mortality in a trauma cohort arriving by ambulance to hospital in a Scandinavian urban setting. Methods Between 2011 and 2013, individuals and pre-hospital rescue times were identified in Emergency Medical Dispatcher Centre, hospital, and forensic records in red alarm trauma. Major trauma was defined as a New Injury Severity Score (NISS)>15. Results Overall, 89% of 378 trauma patients received hospital care within 60 min; 51% had a response time of ≤8 min, and 95% had response time within ≤20 min. The on-scene time (p < 0.05) and total pre-hospital time (p < 0.05) were longer for patients ≥65 years, in comparison with patients <65 years. The patients with penetrating trauma had shorter on-scene time (p < 0.01), total pre-hospital time (p < 0.01), and shorter transport distance from trauma scene to hospital (p = 0.004), compared to those with blunt trauma. Patients with NISS > 15 were found to have the same pre-hospital rescue times as those with NISS ≤ 15. There was a trend that the occurrence of gunshots was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.074). When entering age, NISS, penetrating versus blunt injury, response time, and on-scene time in a multivariate regression analysis, age (p < 0.001), NISS (p < 0.001), and penetrating injury (p = 0.009) remained as independent factors associated with mortality and a trend for shorter on-scene time (p = 0.093). Conclusions Pre-hospital rescue times had less impact on mortality than injury severity, age, and penetrating trauma. Even though penetrating traumas were associated with shorter on-scene time and shorter transport distance to hospital, mortality was increased in this Scandinavian urban setting.

Download Full-text