Predictive Value of Hepatorenal Status in Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enyuan Zhang ◽  
Yaru Lu ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Lingyu Huang ◽  
Jingkun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
Low Serum

Background: Low serum albumin, high blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and uric acid are regarded closely related to the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), whereas it remains unclear whether they can function as predictors of CIN onset. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the association between abovementioned indicators and CIN incidence rate in patients receiving coronary angiography (CAG) and/or intervention. Methods: Clinical studies were retrieved from the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials, and ScienceDirect from their inception to July 13, 2018. Meta-analysis was performed on pooled eligible studies to determine whether these hepatorenal indicators were associated with CIN. Results: A total of 18 studies involving 16 171 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis results revealed that patients with hypoalbuminemia (odds ratio [OR] = 3.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.44-6.64, P = .004) and hyperuricemia (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50, P < .0001) both exhibited significantly higher CIN rates, regardless of the study design, renal function, and whether urgent clinical situation or not. However, there was no significant association between serum BUN and CIN risk. Conclusion: Hypoalbuminemia and hyperuricemia are independently associated with the occurrence of CIN among the patients undergoing CAG and/or intervention.

Strategies Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 125 Randomized Controlled Trials

Angiology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 389-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadegh Ali-Hassan-Sayegh ◽  
Seyed Jalil Mirhosseini ◽  
Zahra Ghodratipour ◽  
Zahra Sarrafan-Chaharsoughi ◽  
Elham Rahimizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the strength of evidence for the effects of hydration (sodium bicarbonate [SB] and normal saline [NS]), supplementations ( N-acetylcysteine [NAC] and vitamin C), and some common drugs (adenosine antagonists [AAs], statins, loop diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs]) on the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and requirement for hemodialysis after coronary angiography. After screening, a total of 125 trials that reported outcomes were identified. Pooled analysis indicated beneficial effects of SB versus NS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.94; P = .01), NAC (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.70-0.88; P = .001), vitamin C (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45-0.89; P = .01), statins (OR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.35-0.57; P = .001), AA (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.47; P = .001), loop diuretics (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.33-2.85; P = .9), and ACEI (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.61; P = .8). Overall, hydration with SB, use of supplements, such as NAC and vitamin C, and administration of statins and AA should always be considered for the prevention of CIN after coronary angiography.

scholarly journals Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k4738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna C Crocker ◽  
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello ◽  
Adwoa Parker ◽  
Jennifer A Hirst ◽  
Alan Chant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) on rates of enrolment and retention in clinical trials and explore how this varies with the context and nature of PPI.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesTen electronic databases, including Medline, INVOLVE Evidence Library, and clinical trial registries.Eligibility criteriaExperimental and observational studies quantitatively evaluating the impact of a PPI intervention, compared with no intervention or non-PPI intervention(s), on participant enrolment and/or retention rates in a clinical trial or trials. PPI interventions could include additional non-PPI components inseparable from the PPI (for example, other stakeholder involvement).Data extraction and analysisTwo independent reviewers extracted data on enrolment and retention rates, as well as on the context and characteristics of PPI intervention, and assessed risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were used to determine the average effect of PPI interventions on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: main analysis including randomised studies only, secondary analysis adding non-randomised studies, and several exploratory subgroup and sensitivity analyses.Results26 studies were included in the review; 19 were eligible for enrolment meta-analysis and five for retention meta-analysis. Various PPI interventions were identified with different degrees of involvement, different numbers and types of people involved, and input at different stages of the trial process. On average, PPI interventions modestly but significantly increased the odds of participant enrolment in the main analysis (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval and prediction interval 1.01 to 1.34). Non-PPI components of interventions may have contributed to this effect. In exploratory subgroup analyses, the involvement of people with lived experience of the condition under study was significantly associated with improved enrolment (odds ratio 3.14v1.07; P=0.02). The findings for retention were inconclusive owing to the paucity of eligible studies (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 4.14), for main analysis).ConclusionsThese findings add weight to the case for PPI in clinical trials by indicating that it is likely to improve enrolment of participants, especially if it includes people with lived experience of the health condition under study. Further research is needed to assess which types of PPI work best in particular contexts, the cost effectiveness of PPI, the impact of PPI at earlier stages of trial design, and the impact of PPI interventions specifically targeting retention.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42016043808.

Protective effects of anti-oxidant supplementations on contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review

2016 ◽  
pp. 610-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh ◽  
Seyed Jalil Mirhosseini ◽  
Zahra Ghodratipour ◽  
Zahra Sarafan-Chaharsoughi ◽  
Ali Mohammad Dehghan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
Anti Oxidant

The effects of garlic supplementation on weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manije Darooghegi Mofrad ◽  
Jamal Rahmani ◽  
Hamed Kord Varkaneh ◽  
Alireza Teymouri ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Mousavi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Waist Circumference ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Online Databases

Abstract. Obesity is related to increase in the incidence of morbidity and mortality. Studies have suggested anti-obesity properties of garlic; however, results are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis is done to summarize the data obtained from available randomized clinical trials on the effect of garlic supplementation on body weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), and Waist Circumference (WC). The online databases of Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane library were searched until March 2018 for related publications using relevant keywords. Effect sizes of eligible studies were pooled using random-effects models. Cochran’s Q-test and I2 index were used for assessing heterogeneity. We found 1241 records in our initial search, of which 13 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with 15 treatment arms were included. Pooled analysis showed that garlic administration might significantly decrease WC (Weighed Mean Difference (WMD): −1.10 cm, 95% CI: −2.13, −0.07, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). However, garlic intervention had no significant effect on body weight (WMD): −0.17 kg, 95% CI: −0.75 to 0.39, P = 0.54, I2 = 0%) and BMI (WMD: −0.17 kg/m2, 95% CI: −0.52, 0.16, P = 0.30, I2 = 44.5%) as compared to controls. From Subgroup analysis, it was ascertained that the effect of garlic supplementation on BMI was significant in trials with duration < 12 weeks (WMD: −0.58 kg/m2, 95% CI: −1.08, −0.08, I2 = 19.8%, P = 0.02) compared to those with higher duration (>12 weeks). The current meta-analysis results suggest that garlic supplementation seems to reduce waist circumference unlike body weight and BMI.

Heparin Does Not Increase Live Births in Pregnant Women with Previous Unexplained Recurrent Miscarriages: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 504-504
Author(s):  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori ◽  
Zainab S. Al-Hosni ◽  
Hajer M. Al Ghaithi ◽  
Altaf M. Al Maamari ◽  
Wafa S. Bessiso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
Recurrent Miscarriages ◽  
Live Births

Abstract Abstract 504 Background: The impact of heparin in pregnant women with previous unexplained recurrent miscarriages remains uncertain. The use of heparin in this patient population has been increasing with the hope of improving the rate of live births. We performed a systematic review of the randomized clinical trials addressing this question. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (searched July 1st 2012), CENTRAL (Issue 7 of 12, July 2012), American Society of Hematology (searched July 1st 2012), clinical trials registries (http://clinicaltrials.gov/, searched July 1st 2012), and bibliographies of relevant studies for randomized clinical trials comparing heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) to other best care approaches. Use of aspirin was allowed in either study arms. Included patients were pregnant women over 18 years of age with previous recurrent unexplained miscarriages (at least two at any trimester). We performed a meta-analysis using random effects models to estimate the pooled odds ratio. Statistical heterogeneity was calculated by using the I2 statistic. Results: Eight trials proved eligible, five of which provided data from 1141 patients that could be included in the meta-analysis and three of which remain unpublished. Only the subgroup of patients with no antiphospholipid antibodies or inherited thrombophilia was included. There was a total of 839 live births observed. Enoxaparin was used in four trials and nadroparin was used in one trial. All trials randomized patients before the 8th week of gestation. There were 430 live births (among a total of 561 pregnancies) and 409 live births (among a total of 580 pregnancies) in the heparin and other best care treatment arms respectively. The difference between the two treatment arms was not statistically significant with a pooled odds ratio of 1.49 (95% confidence interval: 0.84, 2.66; P = 0.17). There was a substantial heterogeneity among the results of different trials (Chi2 = 14.91, P = 0.005; I2 = 73%). Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that heparin does not increase live births in pregnant women with previous unexplained recurrent miscarriages with no evidence of antiphospholipid antibodies or inherited thrombophilia. Future trials should explore new treatment strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Association between Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dermatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nouf Almuhanna ◽  
Alexandra Finstad ◽  
Raed Alhusayen
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Hidradenitis Suppurativa ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Prevalence

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Several studies report a high prevalence of inflammatory arthritis among hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) patients. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To study the association between HS and inflammatory arthritis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify the association between HS and inflammatory arthritis, spondyloarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Seven studies were entered in the analysis, with 200,361 HS patients and 385,599 controls. Pooled analysis illustrated a significantly increased risk of inflammatory arthritis in HS patients compared to controls (odds ratio [OR] 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92–6.17). There was also a statistically significant association between HS and spondyloarthritis (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.40–3.15), and between HS and AS (OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.14–3.12). Moreover, pooled analysis showed a statistically significant association between HS and RA (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.28–2.98). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our findings show that HS patients have a 3-fold increased risk of developing inflammatory arthritis. HS patients are specifically at a higher risk for spondyloarthritis, its subtype AS, and RA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document