scholarly journals Health Care Today: Whom Do We Really Care About

2020 ◽  
pp. 002436392095166
Author(s):  
Brother Ignatius Perkins

Health services in the United States, driven by moral relativism, technology, financial algorithms, present draconian threats to the ability of these services to respond to the health care needs of the American people. Critical moral issues must be addressed, resolved, and serve as the foundation for a renewed health care system that fulfills the call for the common good and provides services in response to the question “who do we really care about.” Millions of our brothers and sisters continue to join the ranks of the uninsured and unemployed. What is urgently needed is a fair, equitable, accessible, affordable, and, most importantly, an ethical system of health care where the dignity and freedom of the human person, across the continuum of life from conception to natural death, is once again recognized as the summit of the work before us.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda D Santos ◽  
Vera Caine ◽  
Paula J Robson ◽  
Linda Watson ◽  
Jacob C Easaw ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND With the current proliferation of clinical information technologies internationally, patient portals are increasingly being adopted in health care. Research, conducted mostly in the United States, shows that oncology patients have a keen interest in portals to gain access to and track comprehensive personal health information. In Canada, patient portals are relatively new and research into their use and effects is currently emerging. There is a need to understand oncology patients’ experiences of using eHealth tools and to ground these experiences in local sociopolitical contexts of technology implementation, while seeking to devise strategies to enhance portal benefits. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of oncology patients and their family caregivers when using electronic patient portals to support their health care needs. We focused on how Alberta’s unique, 2-portal context shapes experiences of early portal adopters and nonadopters, in anticipation of a province-wide rollout of a clinical information system in oncology facilities. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study employed individual semistructured interviews and demographic surveys with 11 participants. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically. The study was approved by the University of Alberta Human Research Ethics Board. RESULTS Participants currently living with nonactive cancer discussed an online patient portal as one among many tools (including the internet, phone, videoconferencing, print-out reports) available to make sense of their diagnosis and treatment, maintain connections with health care providers, and engage with information. In the Fall of 2020, most participants had access to 1 of 2 of Alberta’s patient portals and identified ways in which this portal was supportive (or not) of their ongoing health care needs. Four major themes, reflecting the participants’ broader concerns within which the portal use was occurring, were generated from the data: (1) experiencing doubt and the desire for transparency; (2) seeking to become an informed and active member of the health care team; (3) encountering complexity; and (4) emphasizing the importance of the patient–provider relationship. CONCLUSIONS Although people diagnosed with cancer and their family caregivers considered an online patient portal as beneficial, they identified several areas that limit how portals support their oncology care. Providers of health care portals are invited to recognize these limitations and work toward addressing them.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-274
Author(s):  
ROBERT J. HAGGERTY ◽  
FREDRIC D. BURG

Since the beginning of the 1980s, criticism of medical education in the United States has increased. At the same time, while biomedical science has undergone a revolution, medical education has been all too often mired in the same post-Flexnerian mode. Even today, basic sciences are often taught with no connection to clinical practice and with little connection among the basic sciences. Social and behavioral sciences, and the newer disciplines of clinical epidemiology and information sciences, may not be taught at all or only in a token manner. Criticism of the current curriculum has been increasing, and at least 11 national commissions in the past 40 years have made observations like "Medical education has kept only fitful pace with changes in biomedical science and health care needs."1


2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-149
Author(s):  
Susan M. Yussman ◽  
Sheryl A. Ryan ◽  
Jonathan D. Klein ◽  
Peggy Auinger ◽  
Andrew W. Dick ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Gail Shearer

Advocates for health care reform (representing a broad range of constituencies) raise serious concerns about the ability of managed competition to meet the health care needs of the American people. Similarities in managed competition proposals include establishment of a collective purchasing authority, creation of health plans, standardization of rules and requirements, and limitation on tax subsidies. Managed competition proposals vary as to whether they call for true universality, meaningful cost containment, and fair financing. The article raises questions about managed competition, including the technical feasibility; the link to employment; the role for insurance companies; severing the link between insurance and income, age, or health status; comprehensive benefits; cost containment; the role for managed care; universality of coverage; and the role for insurance companies to make treatment decisions.


2020 ◽  
pp. 148-188
Author(s):  
Gerald J. Beyer

This chapter treats the corporatization of higher education in the United States. In particular, the chapter contends that corporatized higher education has imported individualistic practices and models from the business world, modern economics, and more broadly neoliberal capitalism into higher education. A vision of the human person as selfish, hypercompetitive, solipsistic, and unwilling to sacrifice for the common good (homo economicus) undergirds these models and practices. The chapter discusses the so-called Dickeson model and Responsibility Centered Management (RCM) to illustrate the kinds of practices that flow from this anthropology. It also advances the argument that harmful “symptoms” of the corporatization of higher education such as the casualization of the academic workforce (known as “adjunctification”) have been accepted, at least partially, as a result this flawed understanding of human person. The second half of the essay turns to the Catholic social tradition to prescribe some possible “cures” to the “disease” in corporatized higher education.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Helsel

Introduction: Fresno, California, is home to more than 30,000 Hmong. The purpose of this research was to explore the utilization of Hmong shamans 40 years after the first Hmong immigrants arrived in the United States. Hmong shamanism is examined to identify and analyze changes to shamans’ practices or patients. Methods: Using grounded theory, semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 20 shamans in their homes. Transcribed data were qualitatively analyzed. Results: Shamans continue to train and practice in this community; utilization by older patients persists while young adult patients have become the fastest-growing group of users. Healing rituals have changed in response to the legalities of animal sacrifice in urban areas and the time demands of work schedules. Discussion: Nurses’ awareness that the availability of biomedicine does not preclude the continuing or recurring utilization of traditional healers can facilitate understanding of culturally defined health care needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document