scholarly journals Career Confidential

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Phyllis L. Fagell

In her regular advice column for education professionals, Phyllis Fagell responds to a principal’s question about a teacher who is competent, but too rigid and inflexible with her students. A teacher wonders about the value of a principal selection process in which the decisions appear to have been made without sufficient input from the selection committee.

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. vii-viii
Author(s):  
Brian Whalen

This, our second in a series of Special Issues highlighting undergraduate research abroad, continues a fruitful collaboration between Frontiers and the Forum on Education Abroad. Our purpose is to publish what we believe are some of the very best examples of study abroad learning. Our shared hope is that students, faculty, and education abroad professionals will find inspiration in these pages and consider ways that they might incorporate research into study abroad programming.  The selection of the papers for this volume began with the Forum’s Undergraduate Research Award. The two winners of the award were Emily Kanstrom and Colin Smith, and they were invited to submit their papers to Frontiers for consideration. An additional 12 students who were ranked highly by the selection committee were also asked to submit their papers to Frontiers. The Frontiers editorial board recommended those included in this volume for publication.  This volume includes impressive articles that reflect the variety of learning experiences in which our students abroad are engaged. The research paradigm is a powerful one for engaging students actively in a host culture and society. The students represented in this volume utilized a wide range of interpersonal, intercultural and analytical skills to carry out their research, and in the process it is clear that they learned a tremendous amount about their topics, the host nationals with whom they lived, and about themselves. What comes through in reading these papers is the way in which study abroad can be a process of maturation during which students discover confidence in themselves as learners. Readers will recall that in our first Special Issue we asked on-campus faculty advisors to write about the importance of the students’ research within the context of the home campus curriculum and the students’ academic major. For this volume we wanted to take a different approach and ask on-site directors and faculty familiar with the students’ work to write about the research from their perspective. These reflections appear after each student article, and together they help us to understand the framework for each student’s research. We are committed to tracing the outcomes of these students’ learning by asking previous student authors to provide updates about their lives and how their experience abroad continues to impact them. As we might have predicted, these students have continued to engage the world in very interesting and valuable ways. We hope that you enjoy these updates and the ones that will appear in future volumes. Special thanks to Lee Miller of Sam Houston State University who coordinated the Undergraduate Research Awards and the mentoring of the students who presented at the 2005 Forum conference. Lee worked with the selection committee that chose the winners and that nominated the other students who were invited to submit their papers. A full description of the selection process is available on the Forum web site at www.forumea.org.  Thanks also to Paul Houlihan of the School for Field Studies for his thoughtful introduction to this volume, which helps us to look at study abroad from the perspective of the on-site faculty and staff who receive students. Paul points out several useful ways in which home campuses can better prepare students for research abroad The Forum Undergraduate Research Awards are now in their third year and is a project of the Forum’s Committee on Outcomes Assessment. We believe that honoring students for their research and publishing fine examples of study abroad academic work helps both to raise the bar for rigorous study abroad and to document learning outcomes. The Committee welcomes nominations and applications for the Undergraduate Research Awards from all Forum member institutions. This volume would not have been possible without funding from the IFSA Foundation, which provided a grant to publish this and our other Special Issues. The continued support of the institutional sponsors of Frontiers, especially Dickinson College, which provides a home to both the Forum and to Frontiers, is very much appreciated. Brian Whalen, Editor Dickinson College The Forum on Education Abroad  


Nova Economia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-621
Author(s):  
Paula Pereda ◽  
Andrea Lucchesi ◽  
Karen Mendes ◽  
Antonio Bresolin

Abstract Educational quality in Brazil has improved at a slow pace despite continued public policy efforts. The international literature has noted the importance of school management and the principal’s profile on students’ performance, but this discussion is recent in Brazil. In this study, we investigate the effects of the selection process of principals on students’ performance from public state schools in Brazil. We conclude that while the “selection process” channel is not clear, the “principal quality effect” indicates that the more democratic and technical selection methods tend to select most qualified principals in terms of leadership and managerial abilities. The principal who has time to implement changes, who adopts management practices to encourage teachers and has experience being the leader of the school present better results in terms of student’s performance. Therefore, it is important that the principal selection process choose professionals with the skills mentioned.


Intizar ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Ainur Ropik ◽  
Alva Beriansyah ◽  
Wijaya Wijaya

The era of direct and simultaneous regional head elections makes political parties really have to pay attention to the regional head candidates who will be promoted. The candidate factor has a very big role in determining the victory in the elections. On Musi Banyuasin regional election in 2017 there is one pair of regional head candidates carried by all existing political parties. One of the parties that participated in carrying out the regional head candidates was PAN (Partai Amanat Nasional or National Mandate Party). However, regional head candidates who are carried by PAN are not PAN cadres. PAN is the party that won the election in 2014 and is the only party that can support its own regional head candidates. Determination of candidates for regional head by PAN is done through open recruitment. Open recruitment is carried out by the DPD (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah or Regional Representative Council) PAN Musi Banyuasin Regency by forming a selection committee. The selection committee is tasked with selecting prospective regional heads. The selection process is done by opening a registration. Registration is done by completing the registration form and fulfilling the registration requirements. The mechanism for determining prospective regional heads is proposed by conducting regional deliberations. The reference used in determining the prospective regional head to be carried out is an analysis of the nomination registration requirements, Second, the electability and popularity surveys and the Third is result of the fit and proper test. Candidates for the elected regional head will be proposed to the DPW (Dewan Pimpinan Wilayah or Regional Leadership Council), the DPW will proceed to the DPP (Dewan Pimpinan Pusat or Central Board), then the DPP will issue a recommendation that is used as a requirement in registering at the KPUD (Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah or Election Commission).


2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Das Neves ◽  
D. Fenn ◽  
P. Sulcas

In order to determine the process organisations go through in selecting an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, a field study was undertaken on eleven cases. Based on the findings a best practice selection process is proposed.A benchmark selection criteria checklist was drawn up as part of this investigation and each of the criteria listed should be considered prior to final selection.Other issues discussed in this article include the original motivation and justification for ERP purchase, change management, customisation of source code and the roles of the selection committee, consultants and vendors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-75
Author(s):  
Mark S. Nagel ◽  
Lynn W. McGee

In 2002, the state of South Carolina authorized the University of South Carolina Beaufort (USCB) to alter its role and mission from a two-year college to a four-year, baccalaureate-granting institution. As part of its desire to become a “full-service” university, USCB planned to begin intercollegiate athletic competition by 2007. In addition to launching the athletic department, USCB needed to select a mascot and logo that would be appropriate not only for the new athletic department, but also for the two-campus institution that was located in the beautiful South Carolina Sea Islands. Rather than simply have the chancellor or the new athletic director select the mascot and color scheme, USCB formed a mascot selection committee comprised of various on and off-campus stakeholders who utilized survey research to solicit a wide variety of potential mascot choices before undertaking its evaluations and making its final recommendation. This case provides details regarding USCB’s mascot selection process and poses a variety of questions for students to contemplate when making athletic branding decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117
Author(s):  
Paul J. Oxley ◽  
Jeremy A. Lotto

Introduction: As plastic surgeons are continuing to form larger groups, it is essential to select candidates who will contribute to a positive work environment. This article shows which traits may be the most valuable when selecting candidates and in which ways a selection committee may want to focus their search. Methods: For the study, the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons’ members answered a survey containing questions about demographics, the factors which influence the selection process, and their hiring experiences. Responses were separated and compared in groups based on gender, practice type, group size, and years practising. Significance was established if P < .05 using the χ2 test. Results: The most and least important factors regarding hiring a new group member were established. Statistically significant results were obtained between several different factors, including hiring a non-Canadian, the importance of the candidate’s professional reputation, the number of publications by the candidate, and the presence or absence of program director letters. A majority (54%) of society members regret having hired a candidate, with the vast majority of these (75%) indicating personality and work ethic issues as opposite to professional skills as the uncomplimentary feature. Conclusion: This study has identified the key features which influence hiring new candidates. The need to develop a more efficient hiring process has been identified and has highlighted the difficulty faced by Canadian plastic surgery groups when recruiting new members.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 893-915
Author(s):  
Michael H Romanowski ◽  
Hissa Sadiq ◽  
Abdullah M Abu-Tineh ◽  
Abdou Ndoye ◽  
Mofed Aql

Research indicates that principals are critical in school reform since the implementation of policies and practices is to a large extent determined by the role that principals play in educational change. This study examines the principal selection process used in Qatar for the government schools and identifies knowledge and skills necessary for effective principals from the perspectives of policy makers, principals and teachers working in these schools. Qualitative interviews were held with three policy makers, 21 principals and 82 teachers in focus groups. Findings provide insight into the principal selection process and demonstrate that principals should develop their decision-making skills, should advance as instructional leaders and, since government schools are very diverse, principals must be able to manage issues of nationality, culture and equality. Recommendations are offered to improve the principal selection process for principals working in Qatar or other countries in the Gulf Region.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-92
Author(s):  
John R. Baker

The facilitative benefits of genre-specific reading have often been cited as a truism in the field of writing education. In line with this, writing center self-access libraries typically provide a selection of composition texts, including rhetorics (anthologies of model paragraphs and essays). Readability formulae (e.g., the Lexile Readability Formula) are often used to determine whether these texts will be a good fit for potential readers, and although the Lexile Formula reliably and validly assesses two features (i.e., semantic and syntactic), it does not consider other contributing features during the text selection process (e.g., rhetorical organization). To address this, this sequential, mixed-methods study explored the effects of rhetorical organization on undergraduate English language learners’ perceptions of difficulty when reading exemplars (i.e., essays) excerpted from rhetorics. The results indicated that rhetorical organization influences readability both as (a) a primary (i.e., an isolated feature) and (b) a conjoined feature (i.e., comprising two or more associated entities where the second impacts the first). The article also provides a suggestion for writing education professionals and the publishing industry: Readability formulae should be administered in a hybrid fashion, where additional features such as rhetorical organization are subjectively considered when assessing the difficulty of exemplars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document