The Earnings Event-Time Seasonal and the Calendar-Time Seasonal in Stock Returns: Naive Use of Earnings Information or Announcement Timing Effect?

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Ball ◽  
Eli Bartov

We document a pattern in the day-of-the-week timing of future earnings announcements that is predictable from knowledge of the current quarter's earnings. The pattern mimics the predictable (+, +, 0, -) dependence previously reported in both seasonally differenced quarterly earnings themselves and in estimated abnormal returns at future quarterly earnings announcement dates (the “SUE effect”; see Rendleman, Jones, and Latané [1987]; Bernard and Thomas [1990]). The predictability of abnormal returns at future earnings announcement dates therefore is not independent of the well-documented day-of-the-week seasonal in stock returns (the “DOW effect”; see Osborne [1962]; Cross [1973]; French [1980]; Gibbons and Hess [1981]). Although the DOW effect is too small to fully explain the SUE effect, it appears to contribute to it, since both past SUE and current earnings announcement DOW are incremental in explaining announcement-day estimated abnormal returns. The unclear role of size and the presence of errors in estimating both unexpected earnings and its announcement day suggest caution in interpreting these results.

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Gosnell ◽  
Andrea J. Heuson ◽  
Robert E. Lamy

Numerous studies have documented that most of the stock price reaction to earnings announcements have occurred by the time the earnings information is made public. This study considers stock price reaction during the time period between the end of the accounting calendar when the forthcoming earnings information is ostensibly available to top management and the earnings release date to measure anticipatory price responses to imminent quarterly earnings announcements. Using bank stocks, the results indicate that portfolios composed of banks that eventually announce improved earnings show significant positive abnormal returns soon after the close of the accounting quarter while portfolios composed of banks that eventually publicize poor profit performance exhibit significant negative abnormal returns.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-109
Author(s):  
Silvia Putri Faridayanti ◽  
Robiyanto Robiyanto

The purpose of this study is to determine investors reactions to earnings announcements and unexpected earnings when facing stickiness cost. Sampling in this study used a purposive sampling technique with a total of 10 infrastructure companies listed on the IDX during 2015-2019. The analysis technique in this study uses panel regression analysis using EVIEWS 9. The results of this study indicate that there is no investor reaction to earnings announcements in infrastructure companies when there are low and high stickiness cost. However, when the company has a combined stickiness cost, there is an investor's reaction to the earnings announcement by seeing a positive CAR value which means good earnings quality. Unexpected Earning has no effect on companies that are facing stickiness cost, so the results of this study indicate that there is no investor reaction to unexpected earnings in infrastructure companies that have low, high, and combined stickiness cost. The conclusion of this study is that earnings information becomes less important in predicting future earnings.


SAGE Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 215824401667019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Albaity ◽  
Diana Syafiza Said

After the Asian financial crisis in 1997, firms listed on Bursa Malaysia were allowed to repurchase their shares on the open market. The number of companies engaged in share buyback is increasing and has become a tool to stabilize price by signaling undervaluation of the share. However, studies on share buyback in Malaysia are limited to the price performance surrounding the buyback events. This study aims to fill this gap by examining long-run price performance after the actual share buyback event over a sampling period of 2 years from 2009 to 2010 for Malaysian firms listed on FTSE Bursa Malaysia. There is no evidence to conclude that there exist long-term abnormal returns using the calendar-time portfolio approach that support the inefficient market hypothesis. On the contrary, buy-and-hold method was found to be significant supporting that the Malaysian stock market is semi-strong efficient.


1988 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Doran ◽  
Robert Nachtmann

This paper analyzes the association of unexpected earnings with stock dividend and stock split announcements. Unexpected earnings are modeled as the percentage deviation of actual earnings from expected. Value Line's earnings forecasts are used as a surrogate for the market's timely expectation of future earnings. The primary findings are: (1) postdistribution earnings realizations are greater than expected; and (2) deviations of realized earnings from expected are (a) directly related to the size of the stock distribution and (b) inversely related to the level of market anticipation of the event. Further, distribution size may be a proxy for market anticipation in that small distributions (stock dividends) are dominated by anticipated events and large distributions (stock splits) by unanticipated events. These findings are robust across samples that control for large measurement error due to small levels of forecasted earnings, and event contamination due to the simultaneous announcement of firm-related events. Examination of analysts' forecasts immediately following the event indicates a significant upward revision in earnings expectations. This finding, coupled with an analysis of a control sample of Value Line earnings forecasts, indicates that the observed unexpected earnings are not the result of systematic Value Line forecast error. Therefore, the paper provides support for the notion that stock distribution announcements convey future earnings information.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nischay Arora ◽  
Balwinder Singh

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the pattern of long-run performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) initial public offerings (IPOs) and examine the firm- and issue-related determinants of long-run performance of SME IPOs in India. Design/methodology/approach The 3 6, 9 and 12 months share returns of Indian SME IPOs is studied using event time methodologies, i.e. buy and hold returns, cumulative abnormal returns and wealth relatives on a sample of 375 SME IPOs issued during February 2012 to May 2018. Additionally, ordinary least square regression has been used to investigate the determinants of long-run performance of SME IPOs on a reduced sample of 104 because of non-availability of price observations. Findings The findings reveal that Indian SME IPOs exhibit long-run overperformance contradicting the international evidences of underperformance, and this overperformance is significantly evident using buy and hold abnormal return (BHAR). Furthermore, based on the divergence of opinion hypothesis, fads theory and windows of opportunity hypothesis, the results reveal that on one hand, issue size and oversubscription negatively affect BHAR, while on the other hand, auditor reputation, underwriter reputation, hot market, underpricing, inverse of issue price, profits prior to listing positively affect long-run performance. However, firm age, firm size, debt equity ratio, volatility and long-run performance computed through BHAR lacks significant relationship. Research limitations/implications The study relied on event time methodology of measuring aftermarket performance of one year because of the limited availability of price offerings. Hence, the study could be extended to analyze aftermarket returns over a period of three to five years to enable reaching the vivid conclusions. Calendar time methodology may also be used to compute abnormal returns. Practical implications The results based on the study provides an implication to the investors by providing them an opportunity to bank higher long-run returns by engaging in active and timely trading strategies. Nevertheless, the results also show that investors should be cautioned while taking investment decisions. Originality/value The study contributes to rising body of international literature by analyzing the larger and recent sample of IPOs issued from 2012 to 2018 listed on SME exchange.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 32-47
Author(s):  
Jeetendra Dangol ◽  
Ajay Bhandari

The study examines the stock returns and trading volume reaction to quarterly earnings announcements using the event analysis methodology. Ten commercial banks with 313 earnings announcements are considered between the fiscal year 2010/11 and 2017/18. The observations are portioned into 225 earning-increased (good-news) sub-samples and 88 earning-decreased (bad-news) sub-samples. This paper finds that the Nepalese stock market is inefficient at a semi-strong level, but there is a strong linkage between quarterly earnings announcement and trading volume. Similarly, the study provides evidence of existence of information content hypothesis in the Nepalese stock market.


2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Bartov ◽  
Suresh Radhakrishnan ◽  
Itzhak Krinsky

This study tests whether the observed patterns in stock returns after quarterly earnings announcements are related to the proportion of firm shares held by institutional investors, a variable used by prior research to proxy for investor sophistication. Our findings show that the institutional holdings variable is negatively correlated with the observed post-announcement abnormal returns. Our findings also show that traditional proxies for transaction costs (i.e., trading volume, stock price) as well as firm size have little incremental power to explain post-announcement abnormal returns when institutional holdings is an explanatory variable. If institutional ownership is a valid proxy for investor sophistication, these findings suggest that the trading activity of unsophisticated investors underlies the predictability of stock returns after earnings announcements. However, tests evaluating the validity of institutional holdings as a proxy for investor sophistication yield only mixed results. This calls for caution in interpreting our findings.


2020 ◽  
pp. 0148558X2093933
Author(s):  
Nilhabra Bhattacharya ◽  
Per Olsson ◽  
Hyungshin Park

We decompose analysts’ earnings forecast error into predictable and unpredictable components and investigate individual vis-à-vis institutional investors’ reactions to each of these components. We find that in the immediate post-earnings announcement window, only individuals under-react to the predictable component, while both individuals and institutions under-react to the unpredictable component. The price drift in this window is driven primarily by investors’ under-reaction to the unpredictable component. This drift remains highly significant in larger firms and intensifies in firms with complex financial reports, suggesting that it likely represents the slow and noisy process of price discovery. Around the next quarterly earnings announcement, only individuals under-react to the previous quarter’s predictable component, and this fixation drives the entire price drift in this window. This drift disappears in larger firms and gets exacerbated in firms with greater forecast error autocorrelations, suggesting that it is likely attributable to incomplete processing of earnings information by individuals.


2002 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Francis ◽  
Katherine Schipper ◽  
Linda Vincent

We investigate three explanations for prior studies' finding that the usefulness of earnings announcements, as measured by their absolute market responses, has increased over time. We confirm this increase for a sample of 426 relatively large, stable firms over 1980–1999. We find no evidence that this over-time increase in the magnitude of the market reaction to our sample firms' earnings announcements is attributable to increases in the absolute amount of unexpected earnings conveyed in the announcements or to increases in the intensity of investors' average reaction to unexpected earnings. To test the third explanation—an over-time expansion in the amount of concurrent (with bottom line earnings) information in earnings announcement press releases—we analyze and code the contents of 2,190 earnings announcement press releases made by 30 of our sample firms over 1980–1999. Concurrent disclosures increased significantly over this period and we find that these concurrent disclosures, especially the inclusion of detailed income statements, explain increases in the absolute market reactions to earnings announcements for our sample firms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document