Improving On-time Discharge in Otolaryngology Admissions

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193
Author(s):  
Steven A. Gordon ◽  
David Garber ◽  
Zahrah Taufique ◽  
Qianhui Shao ◽  
Milan R. Amin ◽  
...  

Objective We conducted a quality improvement project to increase the rate of discharges before noon (DBN) in the otolaryngology department at a tertiary care center. Methods Based on a Plan-Do-Study-Act framework, monthly discharge data and observed-to-expected (O:E) length of stay were collected and shared with the department members monthly. A target of 43% DBN was predetermined by the center (Plan). The following interventions were implemented (Do): discharge planning starting at the time of admission, focus on early attending-to-resident team communication, placement of discharge order prior to rounding, and weekly reminders to the entire department. Results Discharges were monitored for 3 years. For the year prior to this study, a minority of patients were discharged before noon (12 months: 75 of 190, 36%). During the first 6 months of monitoring (Study), no significant improvement was identified (34 of 95, 36%). After interventions, performance significantly improved (31 months: 250 of 548, 68%). The performance was consistently above the predetermined target of 43%. During the study time, O:E length of stay remained below the predetermined target (O:E ratio, 0.90; hospital target, 0.93). Discussion Comprehensive discharge planning beginning at the time of admission, weekly reminders, and improved communication (Act) can help to prioritize DBN and increase the percentage of discharges before noon. Implications for Practice By utilizing a quality improvement framework, significant improvements in timely discharge can be achieved and sustained with changes in workflow and departmental culture. These changes can be achieved without increases in resources or prolonging the length of stay.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-285
Author(s):  
Ann A Wang ◽  
Christopher Tapia ◽  
Yasin Bhanji ◽  
Christopher Campbell ◽  
Daniel Larsen ◽  
...  

Introduction Novel oral oncolytic agents have become the standard of care and first-line therapies for many malignancies. However, issues impacting access to these drugs are not well explored. As part of a quality improvement project in a large tertiary academic institution, we aim to identify potential barriers that delay treatment for patients who are prescribed novel oral oncolytics. Methods This was a retrospective review of adults who were newly prescribed a novel oral oncolytic for Food and Drug Administration-approved indications at a single tertiary care center. Patients were identified via electronic prescription data (e-Scribe). Demographics, insurance information, and prescription dates were extracted from the electronic medical record and pharmacy claims data. Statistical analyses were performed to determine whether time-to-receipt was associated with insurance category, pharmacy transfers, cost assistance, and drug prescribed. Results Of the 270 successfully filled prescriptions, the mean time-to-receipt was 7.3 ± 10.3 days (range: 0–109 days). Patients with Medicare experienced longer time-to-receipt (9.1 ± 13.1 days) compared to patients with commercial insurance (4.4 ± 3.3). Uninsured patients experienced the longest time-to-receipt (15.7 ± 7.8 days) overall. Pharmacy transfers and cost assistance programs were also significantly associated with longer time-to-receipt. Ten prescriptions remained unfilled 90 days after the study period and were considered abandoned. Conclusion Insurance has a significant effect on the time-to-receipt of newly prescribed novel oral oncolytics. Pharmacy transfers and applying for cost assistance are also associated with longer wait times for patients. Our retrospective analysis identifies areas of improvement for future interventions to reduce wait times for patients receiving novel oral oncolytics.


Author(s):  
Susan Alcock ◽  
Jo-Ann V. Sawatzky ◽  
Trevor Strome ◽  
Kathy Doerksen

ABSTRACT:Background:Although stroke rates in Canada are expected to increase dramatically over the next decade, time-driven hyperacute stroke care with thrombolysis increases the likelihood of a good clinical outcome. Following a period of suboptimal performance results for stroke care, our tertiary care center undertook a door-to-needle (DTN) quality improvement initiative. The purpose of our study was to determine if the resulting improved median DTN times and greater proportion of patients treated within 60 minutes of arrival at our emergency department were associated with improved clinical outcomes.Methods:Guided by the Donabedian quality framework, we retrospectively reviewed charts of consecutive patients (n = 324) who received thrombolysis pre- and post-quality improvement initiative. Data on patient characteristics, and process and outcome measures were collected. Primary study outcomes included mortality, adverse events, discharge location, and independence at discharge. Data analysis compared proportions with Chi Square and means using the two-tailed t-test and a 0.05 level of significance.Results:Median DTN times and the percentage of cases with a DTN ≤60 minutes improved significantly post-intervention (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality decreased (p = 0.013), and the proportion of favorable versus unfavorable discharge locations improved (p = 0.005). Mortality rates for all study patients with DTN ≤60 versus >60 minutes were also significantly lower (p = 0.044) post-intervention.Conclusions:Our quality improvement initiative resulted in timelier care and positively influenced clinical outcomes. This study highlights the need for ongoing, innovative investment strategies to ensure timely hyperacute stroke care and optimal patient outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-821
Author(s):  
Scott L. Zuckerman ◽  
Clinton J. Devin ◽  
Vincent Rossi ◽  
Silky Chotai ◽  
E. Hunter Dyer ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVENational databases collect large amounts of clinical information, yet application of these data can be challenging. The authors present the NeuroPoint Alliance and Institute for Healthcare Improvement (NPA-IHI) program as a novel attempt to create a quality improvement (QI) tool informed through registry data to improve the quality of care delivered. Reducing the length of stay (LOS) and readmission after elective lumbar fusion was chosen as the pilot module.METHODSThe NPA-IHI program prospectively enrolled patients undergoing elective 1- to 3-level lumbar fusions across 8 institutions. A three-pronged approach was taken that included the following phases: 1) Research Phase, 2) Development Phase, and 3) Implementation Phase. Primary outcomes were LOS and readmission. From January to June 2017, a learning system was created utilizing monthly conference calls, weekly data submission, and continuous refinement of the proposed QI tool. Nonparametric tests were used to assess the impact of the QI intervention.RESULTSThe novel QI tool included the following three areas of intervention: 1) preoperative discharge assessment (location, date, and instructions), 2) inpatient changes (LOS rounding checklist, daily huddle, and pain assessments), and 3) postdischarge calls (pain, primary care follow-up, and satisfaction). A total of 209 patients were enrolled, and the most common procedure was a posterior laminectomy/fusion (60.2%). Seven patients (3.3%) were readmitted during the study period. Preoperative discharge planning was completed for 129 patients (61.7%). A shorter median LOS was seen in those with a known preoperative discharge date (67 vs 80 hours, p = 0.018) and clear discharge instructions (71 vs 81 hours, p = 0.030). Patients with a known preoperative discharge plan also reported significantly increased satisfaction (8.0 vs 7.0, p = 0.028), and patients with increased discharge readiness (scale 0–10) also reported higher satisfaction (r = 0.474, p < 0.001). Those receiving postdischarge calls (76%) had a significantly shorter LOS than those without postdischarge calls (75 vs 99 hours, p = 0.020), although no significant relationship was seen between postdischarge calls and readmission (p = 0.342).CONCLUSIONSThe NPA-IHI program showed that preoperative discharge planning and postdischarge calls have the potential to reduce LOS and improve satisfaction after elective lumbar fusion. It is our hope that neurosurgical providers can recognize how registries can be used to both develop and implement a QI tool and appreciate the importance of QI implementation as a separate process from data collection/analysis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 791-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Kanokporn Thongphubeth ◽  
Sirinaj Sirinvaravong ◽  
Danai Kitkangvan ◽  
Chananart Yuekyen ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the efficacy of a multifaceted hospitalwide quality improvement program that featured an intervention to remind physicians to remove unnecessary urinary catheters.Methods.A hospitalwide preintervention-postintervention study was conducted over 2 years (July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2006). The intervention consisted of nurse-generated daily reminders that were used by an intervention team to remind physicians to remove unnecessary urinary catheters, beginning 3 days after insertion. Clinical, microbiological, pharmaceutical, and cost data were collected.Results.A total of 2,412 patients were enrolled in the study. No differences were found in the demographic and/or clinical characteristics of patients between the preintervention and postintervention periods. After the intervention, reductions were found in the rate of inappropriate urinary catheterization (mean rate, preintervention vs postintervention, 20.4% vs 11% [P = .04]), the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CA-UTI) (mean rate, 21.5 vs 5.2 infections per 1,000 catheter-days [P <.001]), the duration of urinary catheterization (mean, 11 vs 3 days [P < .001]), and the total length of hospitalization (mean, 16 vs 5 days [P < .001]). A linear relationship was seen between the monthly average duration of catheterization and the rate of CA-UTI (r = 0.89; P < .001). The intervention had the greatest impact on the rate of CA-UTI in the intensive care units (mean rate, preintervention vs postintervention, 23.4 vs 3.5 infections per 1,000 catheter-days [P = .01]). The monthly hospital costs for antibiotics to treat CA-UTI were reduced by 63% (mean, $3,739 vs $1,378 [P < .001]), and the hospitalization cost for each patient during the intervention was reduced by 58% (mean, $366 vs $154 [P < .001]).Conclusions.This study suggests that a multifaceted intervention to remind physicians to remove unnecessary urinary catheters can significantly reduced the duration of urinary catheterization and the CA-UTI rate in a hospital in a developing country.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Piush Kanodia ◽  
R Bhandari ◽  
N Bhatta ◽  
S Yadav

Introduction: Hypothermia is a common and frequent problem in newborns. It has larger impact in outcome related to management of sick infants.Objective: To correlate the severity of hypothermia in sick extramural neonates with fatality and physiological derangements.Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was carried out at Neonatology unit of Pediatric department of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS) Dharan. Total 200 extramural hypothermic neonates were transferred to BPKIHS from June 2015 to June 2016. Neonates weighing more than 1000 g, with abdominal skin temperature less than 36.5°C at admission were included in the study.. Clinical features and associated features were recorded at the time of admission. Oxygen saturation was recorded by a pulse oximeter.Results: Fatality was observed to be 39.3% in mildly hypothermic babies, 51.6% in moderately hypothermic babies and 80% in severely hypothermic babies. However, the presence of associated illness (birth asphyxia, neonatal sepsis and respiratory distress), physiological derangements (hypoxia, hypoglycemia and shock) and weight less than 2000 g were associated with more than 50% fatality even in mildly hypothermic babies. When moderate hypothermia was associated with hypoxia or shock, the fatality was 83.3% and 90.9%, respectively. Similarly, mild hypothermia with hypoglycemia was associated with 71.4% fatality.Conclusion: The presence of associated illness (birth asphyxia, neonatal sepsis and respiratory distress), physiological derangements (hypoxia, hypoglycemia and shock) and weight less than 2000 g should be considered adverse factors in hypothermic neonates. Their presence should classify hypothermia in the next higher category of severity in WHO classification. JNGMC Vol. 14 No. 2 December 2016,   page: 8-11  


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4896-4896
Author(s):  
Grace Tang ◽  
Andrea Lausman ◽  
Jessica Petrucci ◽  
Jameel Abdulrehman ◽  
Rosane Nisenbaum ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Iron deficiency (ID) is the most common and widespread nutritional deficiency in both developing and developed countries (WHO, 2001; Mei et al., 2011). Women of child bearing age are at the highest risk, but this risk increases even more during pregnancy. The expansion of blood volume, growth of the fetus and placenta increase demand for iron to approximately 5.0mg/day by the third trimester (Met et al., 2011). Common symptoms of ID during pregnancy include fatigue, shortness of breath, and difficulty concentrating (WHO, 2001). Poor prenatal iron status is associated with diminished cognitive performance, language ability, and motor functions in the child (Tamura et al, 2002). For the mother, it is associated with risk of blood transfusion and post-partum depression. Despite international recommendations and guidelines on the management of ID in pregnancy, it remains a problem of epidemic proportions and is often unrecognized and left untreated. To increase awareness of ID, a quality improvement project, IRON Deficiency project in Pregnancy: Maternal Iron Optimization (IRON MOM) was implemented January 1st, 2017 at St. Michael's Hospital (SMH), in Toronto, Canada. Phase 1 of the project involved adapting lab requisitions and workflow in the obstetrics clinic to incorporate routine measurement of ferritin in week 12, 16 and 28 of pregnancy. As part of the IRON MOM, laboratory requisitions were modified to include ferritin as part of routine screening for all pregnant women. Objective The primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of ID in pregnant women consistently screened for ID after the implementation of the IRON MOM quality improvement project at a tertiary hospital in Toronto, Canada. Methods Administrative laboratory data was collected from the electronic medical record system at SMH, Toronto, Canada between January 1 and December 31, 2017. Suboptimal iron stores was defined as serum ferritin between 30-50μg/L. ID was defined as serum ferritin between 15-29μg/L, and severe ID was defined as <15μg/L. Significant anemia was defined as hemoglobin levels <100 g/L. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate proportions. SAS version 9.4 was used to perform the analyses. Results In 2017, 2400 ferritin tests were completed on pregnant women at our institution. A total of 76.8% (1844/2400) of tests demonstrated iron deficiency with a ferritin <30μg/L. Of those, 30.2% (726/2400) had ferritin between 15-29μg/L, and 46.6% (1118/2400) were severely iron deficient with a ferritin <15μg/L (Figure 1). 3282 hemoglobin checks, at delivery, occurred in this same one-year period and 10.5% (345/3282) were significantly anemic (<100 g/L). Of those, 6.2% (204/3282) had hemoglobin levels between 90-99g/L, 2.6% (85/3282) had hemoglobin levels between 80-89g/L, and 1.7% (56/3282) had hemoglobin levels <80g/L. Conclusion We found an extremely high prevalence of ID in our pregnant patient population. This confirms that ID remains an underappreciated problem, even at a tertiary care centre. Our findings highlight a tremendous gap in awareness, which demands strategies to improve knowledge translation. Future directions include the simplification and digitization of IRON MOM to empower pregnant patients to advocate for their care. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Lausman: Ferring: Other: gave a talk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document