Intranasal Corticosteroid Injection: Indications, Technique, and Complications

1979 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Mabry

The intranasal injection of corticosteroids for symptomatic relief of nasal obstruction in selected cases has been described by several authors1–8 and widely used for over 25 years. Recently, circulated reports of blindness following such injections caused a number of otolaryngologists to discontinue using the procedure. All reported cases of visual complications following intranasal corticosteroid injection are reviewed, 9,12,13,17 together with the reported experiences of the author20 and others15–17 who have successfully used the technique in thousands of cases. Preliminary topical cocainization of nasal mucosa and slow submucosal injection of a micronized corticosteroid suspension to minimize the risk of vasospasm and embolization involving the ophthalmic circulation are stressed. Indications for the procedure, the most common side effects, and the proper technique of injection are described.

Author(s):  
Nina Werkhäuser ◽  
Andreas Bilstein ◽  
Kathrin Mahlstedt ◽  
Uwe Sonnemann

Abstract Introduction Symptomatic relief of acute rhinosinusitis is commonly achieved with nasal decongestants. The current observational study investigated the efficacy and safety of treatment of acute rhinosinusitis with Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray compared to or in combination with Xylometazoline-containing decongesting nasal spray. Methods Patients with acute rhinosinusitis applied either Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray, Xylometazoline nasal spray or a combination of both products. Rhinosinusitis symptoms were assessed, and nasal oedema and endonasal redness were determined by rhinoscopy. Patient diaries based on the validated SNOT (Sino Nasal Outcome Test) questionnaire evaluated rhinosinusitis parameters over time and influences of the disease on quality of life. Following treatment, investigators and patients judged the efficacy and tolerability. Results Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray diminished common rhinosinusitis symptoms such as nasal obstruction, nasal secretion, facial pain/headache, and smell/taste impairment. Upon treatment over 7 days, rhinosinusitis sum scores decreased statistically significantly (p < 0.001) by − 64.25%, which was comparable to that achieved with Xylometazoline-containing decongesting nasal spray (− 67.60%). No side effects were observed during treatment with Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray, whereas treatment with Xylometazoline-containing nasal spray resulted in nasal mucosa dryness. Concomitant treatment with both products diminished the development of nasal dryness and required fewer applications of Xylometazoline-containing nasal spray. Conclusion Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray is an effective, natural treatment option for acute rhinosinusitis, which may be used as monotherapy or as add-on treatment with a Xylometazoline-containing nasal spray. The concomitant use of Ectoin® Rhinitis Spray might reduce the needed dose of decongestant nasal spray and counteract bothersome side effects such as dry nasal mucosa. Trial registration The current study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database under the identifier: NCT03693976 (date of registration: Oct 3, 2018).


ORL ro ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Bogdan Mocanu ◽  
Daniel Mirea ◽  
Silviu Oprescu ◽  
Anca Vișan ◽  
Mihai Tușaliu ◽  
...  

Introduction. The primitive malignant melanoma of nasal mucosa and paranasal sinus is a rare tumor of uncertain etiology, with unpredictable biologic behavior and bad prognosis. Unlike skin melanomas, there are no risk factors and the disease is frequently manifested in older patients, whose clinical otorhinolaryngology complaints are normally non-specific and ranges from nasal obstruction to rhinorrhea and epistaxis. Unfortunately, this disease is diagnosed basically in advanced stages which makes the surgery difficult. Objective. To report a case of primitive malignant melanoma of nasal mucosa, ethmoid and frontal sinuses, that was diagnosed in 2015. It was performed a subtotal resection in another hospital in 24.08.2015, with a large local reccurence. Report. Our patient was a 78-year-old woman with bilateral nasal obstruction, light epistaxis and unilateral rhinorrhea. The ENT, CT and  MRI exams showed a tumour with important, invasion of the nasal cavity structures (billateral nasal bones, left frontal process of the maxilla, the superior midpoint of the nasal septum, bilateral middle and superior turbinates, left ethmoid and bilateral frontal sinuses). The patient was submited for surgery: total macroscopic resection in the combined endoscopic approach; transnasal and modified lateral rhinotomy with titaniul plates reconstruction of the external nose architecture. Conclusions. Malignant melanomas of nasal mucosa are, in general, diagnosed in advanced stages. Their histological characteristics in the mucosa makes difficult the surgical treatment, which is one of the most efficient options, because they are resistant to chemo and radiotherapy. The early diagnosis and a good surgical treatment plan are the best option for this tumor nowadays.  


ORL ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Pecorari ◽  
Giuseppe Riva ◽  
Claudia Bartoli ◽  
Mattia Ravera ◽  
Valeria Dell’Era ◽  
...  

Introduction: Radiofrequency turbinate volume reduction (RFTVR) is an effective treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. RFTVR can reduce epithelial cell alterations in nasal mucosa. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effects of RFTVR on nasal obstruction and cytology, stratifying for different types of rhinitis. Methods: Nasal cytology and subjective nasal obstruction were evaluated on 113 patients before RFTVR (T0) and after 3 months (T1). The patients were divided into groups on the basis of the underlying disease: allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, rhinitis medicamentosa, and other diseases (e.g., hormonal-based turbinate hypertrophy). Results: Nasal cytology at T0 identified 42 patients with allergic rhinitis, 40 with nonallergic rhinitis, 19 with rhinitis medicamentosa, and 12 with other diseases. An improvement of nasal cytology at T1 was observed in 29.2% of cases. They mainly consisted of patients with nonallergic rhinitis with neutrophils, whose neutrophil infiltrate decreased. Only 2 cases (1.7%) showed a worsening of nasal cytology at T1. A statistically significant decrease in subjective nasal obstruction was observed for every group (p < 0.05). Higher differences of nasal obstruction between T0 and T1 were found in patients with rhinitis medicamentosa or other diseases. Conclusion: RFTVR represents a safe and effective treatment for turbinate hypertrophy of various etiology. It is not responsible for a worsening of inflammatory infiltrate of the nasal mucosa.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 01-09
Author(s):  
Ravi Shrivastava

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis (AR) in children is a common chronic pathology with a strong impact on patient quality of life. The main physiopathology affects the nasal cavity as a multi-factorial disease involving nasal mucosa damage, nasal inflammation with high concentrations of histamine, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as histamine, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, and IgE antibodies on the nasal mucosa. Systemic entry of these proteins through damaged nasal mucosa maintains continued inflammatory and allergen cascades. Therefore, an ideal treatment should be multitarget in order to stop allergen exposure, inflammation, and nasal mucosa barrier degradation, but such treatments are nearly impossible to conceive. We envisaged an osmotic and protective nasal barrier film, not only capable of protecting the nasal mucosa from allergen exposure but also of trapping and neutralizing selected cytokines and cleaning the nasal surface continuously without using any harmful substance for children. Materials and Methods: We associated highly osmotic glycerol solution with specific plant polymers to conceive an osmotic but stable film. As plant polymers (tannins) can bind with selective proteins, a range of glycerol binding non-cytotoxic polymers were screened using the sandwich ELISA method to select those having binding affinity for allergen induced nasal proinflammatory cytokines. After verifying cytotoxicity and irritant potential, a 15-day observational clinical study was performed with approval from the ethics committee on 30 children aged between 4-13, suffering from allergic rhinitis. The test product (TP) was supplied in 15-ml nasal sprays and applied 2-3 times per day for a period of 15 days. Saline solution served as control (CP). The scores of nasal and ocular symptoms, effect on quality of life, eosinophil count in nasal smears, and need for antihistamine treatment was evaluated at the start, at 30 minutes and on days 2, 3 and 15 of treatment. Results: A few specific polymers were able to bind with selected cytokines and histamine at adequate filmogen concentrations. The osmotic film was stable, non-irritant and was able to clean the nasal mucosa continuously for 4-6h after each application. Clinical observations of Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) grouping the scores of nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and itching, revealed a strong decrease right after the 1st treatment in both groups but the reduction was much stronger and faster with the TP. The mean TNSS score reduction was 44.74% in CP vs 83.53% in the TP group after 7 days of treatment (p<0.001). Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) was decreased by 21.13% and 51.41% in CP v/s 35.12 and 99.59% in TP group on days 2 and 7, respectively. Nasal smear eosinophil count was equally strongly reduced in the TP v/s CP group. No treatment-related side effects were recorded in any of the groups. Conclusion: Protecting the nasal mucosa against allergens, neutralizing inflammatory cytokines, and keeping the nasal surface clean with an osmotic polymeric film, constitute a major breakthrough for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children. This simple but scientific and logical approach should avoid exposing children to chemicals and to their long-term side effects.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 954-955
Author(s):  
Peter G. Lacouture ◽  
Allen A. Mitchell ◽  
Frederick H. Lovejoy

The phenothiazines are probably the most commonly used medications for the symptomatic relief of nausea and vomiting and may be effective irrespective of the primary cause.1,2 Along with their beneficial effects, these agents carry with them a risk of extrapyramidal side effects which may appear as parkinsonian syndromes, akathisias, acute dystonic reactions, and tardive dyskinesias.3 syptoympttoms commonly associated with acute dysic reactionsns with phenothiazines include oculogyri crisis, torticollis, trismus, facial grimace, protusion of the tongue, hyperreflexia, opisthotonos, and rigidity. The majority of these reactions have been reported in children taking the drugs in therapeutic doses.4-6 We wish to report four cases of acute dystonic reactions occurring in association with thiethylperazine (Torecan), a phenothiazine that has recently experienced increased pediatric usage.


1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 851-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Whiteman ◽  
David A. Rosen ◽  
R.M.H. Pinkerton

JAMA ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 262 (10) ◽  
pp. 1329b-1329
Author(s):  
R. L. Mabry

1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
N B Waterfall ◽  
Grant Williams

A study of the effects of the action of phenoxybenzamine on bladder neck opening during micturition is reported. Twenty patients with symptoms of prostatism but minimal prostatic enlargement were studied. Bladder neck opening was measured radiographically. Phenoxybenzamine was shown to increase bladder neck opening by an average of 30% and give symptomatic relief. Minimal side effects were noted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. 1118-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant S. Gillman ◽  
Giuseppe V. Staltari ◽  
Yue-Fang Chang ◽  
Jose L. Mattos

Objective Examine outcomes of septoplasty with turbinate reductions in patients with allergic rhinitis as compared to patients without allergic rhinitis using validated outcome and quality-of-life (QOL) instruments. Study Design Prospective observational cohort study. Setting Single surgeon, university hospital. Subjects and Methods Consecutive study-eligible patients with a symptomatic nasal septal deviation, with (n = 30) or without (n = 30) documented allergic rhinitis, were enrolled from March 2014 to February 2017. All patients subsequently underwent nasal septoplasty and inferior turbinate reductions. Outcomes were studied using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, mini–Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-RQLQ), and Ease-of-Breathing (EOB) Likert scores completed preoperatively and, together with a patient satisfaction Likert, at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results NOSE scores, EOB scores, and mini-RQLQ scores improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Results were sustained from 3 to 6 months. Although mini-RQLQ scores in allergic patients were higher at all intervals, the magnitude of change in scores in both groups was comparable. Conclusion Although patients with allergic rhinitis report greater allergy-related QOL impairment (mini-RQLQ) on a day-to-day basis than nonallergic patients, this does not appear to attenuate the benefit they might experience from septoplasty and turbinate reductions when indicated for nasal obstruction. Furthermore, the symptomatic relief of their structural nasal obstruction appears to significantly improve their overall allergy-related quality of life. If appropriate expectations are set pre-operatively, allergic rhinitis is neither a contraindication nor a deterrent to septoplasty and turbinate reductions and these patients can reasonably expect a high degree of satisfaction post-operatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document