Combining abiraterone and radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a review of current evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Livi ◽  
Beatrice Detti ◽  
Giulio Francolini ◽  
Francesca Terziani ◽  
Luca Triggiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Very High

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide, with a very high rate of progression despite treatment. The most aggressive form of the disease is known as castration-resistant prostate cancer, which carries a poor prognosis. We reviewed available literature regarding the combination of abiraterone acetate antihormonal drug and ablative radiation therapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This dual treatment may enhance the effects of second-line hormonal therapy, as radiotherapy renders cancer cells more prone to immune-mediated cytotoxicity. Moreover, radiotherapy exerts its effect both on directly irradiated cells and on other distant tissues, with an abscopal effect, already demonstrated in other solid tumors. This combination treatment is safe and effective, with few adverse events. Moreover, it is of paramount importance in patients with oligoprogression of the primary disease, when current guidelines recommend continuing abiraterone treatment. Ablative radiation therapy is a noninvasive, nontoxic treatment with very high efficacy on local tumor growth control. In the available literature, the combination of radiation therapy and abiraterone acetate has prolonged both overall survival and progression-free survival, with a positive impact also on locoregional recurrence and distant metastases.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed first-line androgen-deprivation therapy: a single-arm, phase 4 study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kobayashi ◽  
N Okuno ◽  
G Arai ◽  
H Nakatsu ◽  
A Maniwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant

Abstract Aim The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone in patients with chemotherapy-naïve early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed first-line androgen deprivation therapy. Methods Patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with confirmed prostate-specific antigen progression within 1-year or prostate-specific antigen progression without having normal prostate-specific antigen level (<4.0 ng/mL) during first-line androgen deprivation therapy were enrolled and administered abiraterone acetate (1000 mg) plus prednisolone (10 mg). A minimum of 48 patients were required according to Simon’s minimax design. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen response rate (≥50% prostate-specific antigen decline by 12 weeks), secondary endpoints included prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival. Safety parameters were also assessed. Results For efficacy, 49/50 patients were evaluable. Median age was 73 (range: 55–86) years. The median duration of initial androgen deprivation therapy was 32.4 (range: 13.4–84.1) weeks and 48 patients experienced prostate-specific antigen progression within 1-year after initiation of androgen deprivation therapy. prostate-specific antigen response rate was 55.1% (95% confidence interval: 40.2%–69.3%), median prostate-specific antigen–progression-free survival was 24.1 weeks, and median overall survival was 102.9 weeks (95% confidence interval: 64.86 not estimable [NE]). Most common adverse event was nasopharyngitis (15/50 patients, 30.0%). The most common ≥grade 3 adverse event was alanine aminotransferase increased (6/50 patients, 12.0%). Conclusions Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone demonstrated a high prostate-specific antigen response rate of 55.1%, suggesting tumor growth still depends on androgen synthesis in patients with early metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, prostate-specific antigen–progression-free survival was shorter than that reported in previous studies. Considering the benefit–risk profile, abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone would be a beneficial treatment option for patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic prostate cancer who show early castration resistance.

The hematologic parameters in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone acetate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Onal Cem ◽  
Ali Murat Sedef ◽  
Fatih KOse ◽  
Ezgi Oymak ◽  
Ozan Cem Guler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response

308 Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 102 mCRPC treated with abiraterone either pre- or post-chemotherapy between November 2012 and October 2017 in three institutions. We calculated NLR and PLR at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks after initiation of abiraterone, and we evaluated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response every 4 weeks. Fifty patients (49%) were treated with abiraterone post-docetaxel, and 52 patients (51%) received abiraterone pre-chemotherapy. Based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, patients were stratified as low NLR ( < 3.1) or high NLR (≥ 3.1), and low PLR ( < 163) or high PLR (≥ 163). The cutoff for anemia was < 12g/dL. Results: Median follow-up times for patients overall and for those who survived were 24.0 months (range, 0.3 – 54.9 months) and 25.5 months (range, 2.8 – 54.9 months), respectively. The median time of abiraterone treatment was 8.1 months (range, 2.4 – 40.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 20.8 months (interquartile range: 17.3–24.4). In univariate analysis, NLR, PLR, PSA response, and low hemoglobin (Hgb) were found significantly predictive of OS and progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, declines in NLR and PSA of ≥ 90% emerged as significant independent predictors of OS and PFS. High-NLR patients who remained high or who returned to low NLR after 4 and 12 weeks showed significantly worse OS than patients with low baseline NLR. Patients with baseline Hgb > 12 g/dL had significantly longer median OS compared with patients with Hgb ≤ 12 g/dL; however, the significance of Hgb was lost at 12 weeks. Conclusions: NLR and PSA response to abiraterone was a significant predictor of OS and PFS in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone delivered either pre- or post-chemotherapy. Furthermore, persistent increase in NLR during abiraterone has prognostic value for OS in patients with mCRPC.

scholarly journals Androgen Receptor Targeted Therapy + Radiotherapy in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Massaro ◽  
Giuseppe Facondo ◽  
Gianluca Vullo ◽  
Anna Maria Aschelter ◽  
Alessandro Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant

ObjectivesTo investigate whether radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) on oligo-progressive sites in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients during treatment with androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ARTT) may lead to control resistant lesions, prolonging ARTT. We analysed progression free survival, overall survival and prognostic parameters that can identify patients that best suit to this approach.Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of a total of 67 lesions in 42 mCRPC patients treated with ablative or palliative RT to oligoprogressive lesions during ARTT. Twenty-eight patients (67%) underwent ARTT with Abiraterone acetate and 14 patients (33%) underwent ARTT with Enzalutamide. Median time between the start of ADT and ARTT beginning was 50.14 months (range 3.37-219 months). We treated 58 lesions (87%) with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and nine lesions (13%) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The Kaplan Meier method was used to assess the median overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsMedian follow-up was 28 months (range 3-82 months). Median OS was 32.5 months (95% CI 25.77-39.16), 1 and 2-year OS were 71.6% and 64.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 19,8 months (95% CI 11.34–28.31), 1 and 2-year PFS were 67.2% and 47.4%, respectively. Median OS for patients that underwent radiotherapy before 6 months from the start of ARTT was 23.4 months (95% CI 2.04-44.89) and 45.5 months (95% CI 31.19-59.8) for patients that underwent radiotherapy after 6 months (p = 0.009).ConclusionLocal ablative radiation therapy directed to progressive metastasis is a non-invasive, well tolerated treatment with efficacy on prolonging clinical benefit of systemic therapies with ARTT. Patients who underwent RT &gt;6 months from the start of ARTT presented a statistically better OS and PFS compared with patients who underwent radiotherapy &lt;6 months from the start of ARTT.

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone compared with enzalutamide in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer before or after chemotherapy: A retrospective study of real-world data (ACES).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 303-303
Author(s):  
Prantik Das ◽  
James Price ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Cristina Martin-Fernandez ◽  
Akram Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Biochemical Progression

303 Background: Abiraterone acetate (a prodrug of abiraterone, which is a selective inhibitor of androgen biosynthesis) combined with prednisone/prednisolone (AA+P) and enzalutamide (ENZ) (an androgen-receptor–signalling inhibitor) have proven survival benefit in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in chemo naïve and prior chemo patients. There have been no studies directly comparing the effectiveness of ENZ to AA+P in mCRPC patients. Methods: A retrospective, survival analysis study of 143 real world mCRPC patients (90 in AA+P and 53 in ENZ group) was conducted. Patients who started their treatment between 1st February 2012 and 31st May 2016 were included. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Data was analysed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for covariates: prior radical or palliative treatment; Gleason score; baseline PSA; age; and chemo naïve or not. Results: After median follow up of 15 months (IQR 7 to 23) 112 events of biochemical progression were observed (71 in AA+P and 41 in ENZ). 41%in AA+P group and 30% patients in ENZ group received prior chemo. The chance of biochemical progression was significantly lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (Hazard Ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.82, p=0.004. There was a trend implying the chance of rPFS could be higher among ENZ patients than AA+P patients (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.02, p=0.4). OS is lower among ENZ patients than AA+P patients, when adjusting for all covariates in the Cox PH model (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.41, p=0.7). 38% of ENZ patients reported fatigue compared to 16% of AA+P patients while hypertension was reported slightly more in AA+P patients than in ENZ patients. Conclusions: This study showed a statistically significant difference in biochemical progression-free survival, favouring ENZ, but no significant difference in radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival.

scholarly journals Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Two Alternative Sequences with Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doo Yong Chung ◽  
Dong Hyuk Kang ◽  
Jong Won Kim ◽  
Do Kyung Kim ◽  
Joo Yong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Castration Resistant

Sequential treatment of androgen receptor axis targeted agents (ARAT), abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZA), in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) demonstrated some positive effects, but cross-resistances between ABI and ENZA that reduce activity have been suggested. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare oncologic outcomes between the treatment sequences of ABI-ENZA and ENZA-ABI in patients with mCRPC. The primary endpoint was a combined progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A total of five trials on 553 patients were included in this study. Each of the included studies was retrospective. In two studies including both chemo-naïve and post-chemotherapy mCRPC patients, for ABI-ENZA compared with ENZA-ABI, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS were 0.37 (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.23–0.60) and 0.64 (p = 0.10; 95% CIs, 0.37–1.10), respectively. In three studies with chemo-naïve mCRPC patients only, for ABI-ENZA compared with ENZA-ABI, pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.57 (p = 0.02; 95% CIs, 0.35–0.92) and 0.86 (p = 0.39; 95% CIs, 0.61–1.21), respectively. The current meta-analysis revealed that ABI-ENZA had a significantly more favorable oncological outcome, but the level of evidence was low. Therefore, large-scale randomized trials may be needed.

Cabazitaxel in the Management of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing After Docetaxel-based Chemotherapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Heidenreich ◽  
David Pfister ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Counselling ◽  
Castration Resistant

Docetaxel is the guideline-recommended first-line chemotherapy in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite its proven survival benefit, however, all patients will progress after a mean interval of six to eight months. Recently, the FDA approved cabazitaxel and abiraterone acetate as effective second-line treatment options in this clinical scenario. By comparison with mitoxantrone, cabazitaxel improves progression-free survival, overall survival, time to prostate surface antigen (PSA) progression and time to metastatic progression. On the other hand, cabazitaxel (Sanofi) is asscociated with a significantly higher frequency of grade 3 and 4 haematotoxic and gastrointestinal side effects than mitoxantrone. In experienced hands, and with the use of proactive therapeutic measures – such as weekly monitoring, adequate patient counselling and appropriate application of the guidelines on management and prophylaxis of neutropenia and diarrhoea — all side effects can be handled easily without harming the patient, as has been shown recently by the analysis of the results of the German and European compassionate use programmes. Cabazitaxel is one of the key components in the management of disease progression after docetaxel, and might be of benefit in men with high metastatic burden, rapid PSA doubling time and minimal side effects during first-line docetaxel therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document