Strength deficits in lower limb prosthesis users: A scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-340
Author(s):  
Alex Hewson ◽  
Shaquitta Dent ◽  
Andrew Sawers

Background: Strength deficits may play a central role in the severity of balance, mobility, and endurance impairments in lower limb prosthesis users. A body of literature detailing the scope and specifics of muscle weakness in lower limb prosthesis users is emerging, but has yet to be summarized. A synopsis of strength deficits, and their impact on functional abilities in lower limb prosthesis users, may inform rehabilitation and research needs. Objectives: Synthesize reported strength deficits in lower limb prosthesis users, and discuss possible causes, consequences, and solutions. Study Design: Scoping review. Methods: A search of biomedical databases was performed, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied to identify publications relevant to the purpose of the review. Results: In all, 377 publications were identified, of which 12 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. When compared with the controls and the intact limb, the primary strength outcome, peak torque, was lower in transtibial residual limb knee flexors and extensors, as well as transfemoral residual limb hip muscles. Conclusions: The reviewed studies provide evidence of strength deficits in lower limb prosthesis users. These deficits appear to be consequential, as they may contribute to balance, mobility, and endurance impairments. Additional research exploring alternative strength metrics, clinical tests, and causal links to functional impairments is required. Clinical relevance Evidence of muscle weakness among lower limb prosthesis users, and its influence on balance, mobility, and endurance, suggests that greater clinical attention and scientific inquiry into physical conditioning of lower limb prosthesis users is merited and required.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine C. Davies ◽  
Mike McGrath ◽  
Alison Stenson ◽  
Zoe Savage ◽  
David Moser ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Excessive sweating of the residual limb has a substantial effect on the daily activities of people with lower limb amputation. Prosthetic liners offer protection and comfort to sensitive areas but often exacerbate perspiration. They act as insulators, trapping sweat on the skin’s surface to the detriment of skin health. Recently, liners with perforations have been developed, allowing the moisture to escape. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of such liners. METHODS: A sample group of 13 patients with unilateral transtibial amputation, who wore a perforated liner (PL) as part of their current prescription, was compared to 20 control patients who wore non-perforated liners (NPL). During their routine appointments, they completed a survey of scientifically validated outcome measures relating to their limb health, pain and the impact on daily life over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Patients using the PL had healthier residual limbs, reporting higher scores on questions relating to limb health, experiencing fewer skin issues (p<0.001) and estimating a 61.8% lower rating in perceived sweat (p=0.004). Perhaps consequentially, there was a lower incidence of residual (p=0.012) and phantom (p=0.001) limb pain when compared to the control group. The prevalence of individual issues affecting the residual limbs of PL users was also lower. Of the issues that remained, only 23% were attributed to sweating in PL users, compared to 49% for the NPL group (p=0.066). PL users missed fewer days of work in the year (2.4 vs 11.6, p=0.267) and were also limited on fewer days (1.4 vs 75.4, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: The use of perforated liners shows much promise within prosthetic care, significantly improving the health of the residual limb. The observed effects on perceived sweat reduction, residual skin health, pain levels and patient limitation suggest that perforated liners are highly beneficial to patients. Layman's Abstract Individuals with amputation often find that they sweat more as they exert more energy when walking and because the total surface area of their body is reduced. Silicone liners are used to cushion the residual limb and as a way of attaching a prosthetic leg, but they act as insulators causing the residual limb to get hot and sweaty. The material isn’t breathable, so the sweat is not able to escape, instead staying on the skin’s surface and causing discomfort or leading to the development of skin conditions. Liners that have small holes in them allow sweat to travel away from the body and preserve skin health. Patients who wore a perforated liner, as well as patients who wore a liner without holes, filled in questionnaires about their experience, the results of which were compared. Generally, patients who wore the perforated liner had healthier skin on their residual limbs and experienced fewer skin conditions than the other patient group. Out of the issues they did experience, fewer were attributed to sweating. The study group experienced less frequent pain both in their physical and phantom limbs. They also considered themselves less limited by their prosthetic device and missed fewer days of work. These observations suggest that perforated liners are highly beneficial to patients within the prosthetic field. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/34610/26579 How To Cite: Davies K.C, McGrath M, Savage Z, Stenson A, Moser D, Zahedi S. Using perforated liners to combat the detrimental effects of excessive sweating in lower limb prosthesis users. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2020;Volume 3, Issue 2, No.1. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v3i2.34610 Corresponding Author: K.C Davies, Blatchford Group, Unit D Antura, Bond Close, Basingstoke, RG24 8PZ, UK.E-mail: [email protected]: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-4365


Author(s):  
Giorgio Colombo ◽  
Stella Gabbiadini ◽  
Daniele Regazzoni ◽  
Caterina Rizzi

Modular lower limb prosthesis is composed by custom-fit parts, such as the socket containing the residual limb, and standard components available on market, such as knee or foot. For both custom and standard parts the support offered by existing design tools is not efficient or integrated enough and, as a result, most prosthetists do not use computer-aided tools and still rely only on their personal expertise. This paper presents an approach to design and configure complete lower limb prosthesis for transfemoral and transtibial amputees, using patient’s digital data (e.g., residual limb model acquired by MRI) and specification sheets of components. The ultimate goal is to realise a virtual laboratory where the technicians can design lower limb prosthesis guided step by step by the system. We have identified key patient’s characteristics guiding the prosthetist during the four main steps of the production process: acquiring patient’s data, socket modelling, standard components selection and prosthesis assembly and check. The developed innovative framework integrates different tools to guide the technicians during each design task providing specific knowledge and rules. Thus, it allows a quicker and easier definition of the virtual prosthesis, on which virtual test could be performed (e.g., pressure distribution on residual limb, gait evaluation) in order to be able to realize the definitive prosthesis at the first attempt. The results have been evaluated and validated with the technical staff of a certified orthopaedic laboratory.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan E Sanders ◽  
Tyler L Hartley ◽  
Reid H Phillips ◽  
Marcia A Ciol ◽  
Brian J Hafner ◽  
...  

Background: Lower-limb prosthesis users typically experience residual limb volume losses over the course of the day that can detrimentally affect socket fit. Objectives: To determine whether temporarily doffing the prosthesis encouraged residual limb fluid volume recovery and whether the recovered fluid was maintained. Study Design: Experimental design. Methods: Residual limb fluid volume was monitored on 16 participants in three test sessions each. Participants conducted six cycles of resting/standing/walking. Between the third and fourth cycles, participants sat for 30 min with the prosthesis and liner: donned (ON), the prosthesis doffed but the liner donned (LINER), or the prosthesis and liner doffed (OFF). Results: Percentage fluid volume gain and retention were greatest for the OFF condition followed by the LINER condition. Participants experienced fluid volume losses for the ON condition. Conclusion: Doffing the prosthesis or both the prosthesis and liner during rest improved residual limb fluid volume retention compared with leaving the prosthesis and liner donned. Clinical relevance Practitioners should advise patients who undergo high daily limb volume losses to consider temporarily doffing their prosthesis. Fluid volume retention during subsequent activity will be highest if both the prosthesis and liner are doffed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Realmuto ◽  
Glenn Klute ◽  
Santosh Devasia

This article studies the design of passive elastic elements to reduce the actuator requirements for powered ankle prostheses. The challenge is to achieve most of the typically nonlinear ankle response with the passive element so that the active ankle-torque from the actuator can be small. The main contribution of this article is the design of a cam-based lower-limb prosthesis to achieve such a nonlinear ankle response. Results are presented to show that the addition of the cam-based passive element can reduce the peak actuator torque requirement substantially, by ∼74%. Moreover, experimental results are presented to demonstrate that the cam-based design can achieve a desired nonlinear response to within 10%.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saffran Möller ◽  
David Rusaw ◽  
Kerstin Hagberg ◽  
Nerrolyn Ramstrand

Background: Individuals using a lower-limb prosthesis indicate that they need to concentrate on every step they take. Despite self-reports of increased cognitive demand, there is limited understanding of the link between cognitive processes and walking when using a lower-limb prosthesis. Objective: The objective was to assess cortical brain activity during level walking in individuals using different prosthetic knee components and compare them to healthy controls. It was hypothesized that the least activity would be observed in the healthy control group, followed by individuals using a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and finally individuals using a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An optical brain imaging system was used to measure relative changes in concentration of oxygenated and de-oxygenated haemoglobin in the frontal and motor cortices during level walking. The number of steps and time to walk 10 m was also recorded. The 6-min walk test was assessed as a measure of functional capacity. Results: Individuals with a transfemoral or knee-disarticulation amputation, using non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee ( n = 14) or microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee ( n = 15) joints and healthy controls ( n = 16) participated in the study. A significant increase was observed in cortical brain activity of individuals walking with a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee when compared to healthy controls ( p < 0.05) and individuals walking with an microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Individuals walking with a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee demonstrated an increase in cortical brain activity compared to healthy individuals. Use of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee was associated with less cortical brain activity than use of a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee. Clinical relevance Increased understanding of cognitive processes underlying walking when using different types of prosthetic knees can help to optimize selection of prosthetic components and provide an opportunity to enhance functioning with a prosthesis.


PM&R ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janis Kim ◽  
Matthew J. Major ◽  
Brian Hafner ◽  
Andrew Sawers

PM&R ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S1-S1
Author(s):  
Shane R. Wurdeman ◽  
Phillip M. Stevens ◽  
James H. Campbell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document