Age and Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comparison Across 3 Age Groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. Lin ◽  
Berkcan Akpinar ◽  
David A. Bloom ◽  
Thomas Youm
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Limited evidence exists concerning the effect of age on hip arthroscopy outcomes for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical failure rates across various age groups in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. We hypothesized that older patients would experience lower improvements in PROs and higher clinical failure rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 109 of 130 eligible consecutive patients underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into 3 groups for comparison (ages 15-34, 35-50, and 51-75 years). Clinical survival rates to revision surgery or total hip arthroplasty (THA) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and PROs were assessed using analysis of variance. Regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with clinical failure and ΔPROs from baseline to 5 years. Results: The 5-year survival-to-revision rate was 71% (survival time, 69.2 months; 95% CI, 62.8 to 75.5 months). A significant difference in survival to THA was found between groups ( P = .030). Being in the older group versus the young and middle-aged groups predicted increased risk of THA conversion (hazard ratio, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 28.6; P = .035). Overall modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) improved from baseline to 5 years (mHHS, P < .001; NAHS, P < .001). Body mass index (mHHS: beta, −1.2; 95% CI, −2.2 to −0.3; P = .013; NAHS: beta, −1.6; 95% CI, −2.6 to −0.5; P = .005) and baseline PROs (mHHS: beta, −0.8; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001; NAHS: beta, −0.7; 95% CI, −1.1 to −0.4; P < .001) were predictive of 5-year ΔPROs. A decrease was seen in minimal clinically important difference rates in middle-aged ( P = .011) and old ( P = .030) groups from 6-month to 5-year outcomes. Conclusion: Although hip arthroscopy for FAI yielded improvements in PROs regardless of age, middle-aged and older patients experienced greater declines in clinical outcomes over time than younger patients. Older patients remain good candidates for arthroscopy despite a greater risk for conversion to THA.

scholarly journals Bilateral versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-232
Author(s):  
Claire E Fernandez ◽  
Allison M Morgan ◽  
Ujash Sheth ◽  
Vehniah K Tjong ◽  
Michael A Terry
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract One in four patients presenting with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has bilateral symptoms, and despite excellent outcomes reported after arthroscopic treatment of FAI, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes following bilateral hip arthroscopy. This systematic review aims to examine the outcomes following bilateral (either ‘simultaneous’ or ‘staged’) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. A systematic review of multiple electronic databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All studies comparing simultaneous, staged and/or unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI were eligible for inclusion. Case series, case reports and reviews were excluded. All study, patient and hip-specific data were extracted and analyzed. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity among outcome measures. A total of six studies, including 722 patients (42.8% male) and 933 hips were eligible for inclusion. The mean age across patients was 35.5. The average time between staged procedures was 7.7 months. Four of the six studies were retrospective cohort studies, while the remaining two were prospective in nature. The overall quality of the eligible studies was found to be good. No significant difference was noted among patient-reported outcomes (modified Harris hip score, hip outcome score and non-arthritic hip score), visual analog scale, return to sport, traction time and complications between those undergoing bilateral (simultaneous or staged) versus unilateral hip arthroscopy. Based on the current available evidence, bilateral hip arthroscopy (whether simultaneous or staged) exhibits similar efficacy and safety when compared with unilateral hip arthroscopy. However, further prospective study is required to confirm this finding.

Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy in High-Level Athletes: Results of a Shorter Interval Between Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopies

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 654-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Hassebrock ◽  
Anikar Chhabra ◽  
Justin L. Makovicka ◽  
Kostas J. Economopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Index Procedure ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
High Level

Background: Hip arthroscopy is a safe and effective mechanism for treating femoroacetabular impingement symptoms in high level athletes. Bilateral symptoms occur in a subset of this population. Purpose: To discuss outcomes of bilateral hip arthroscopy in high-level athletes and compare a standard staged timeline for bilateral hip arthroscopic surgery versus an accelerated timeline. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review of all staged bilateral hip arthroscopies was performed on high-level athletes over a 3-year period. Patients were categorized into cohorts based upon when the second procedure was performed (4-6 weeks after the index procedure or >6 weeks after the index procedure). Exclusion criteria included any prior hip surgery, advanced arthritis, previous pelvic or femoral fracture, or inflammatory arthropathy. Demographics, radiographic measurements, operative reports of procedures performed, and patient-reported outcomes (Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, return to sports, return to same level of play) were compared between groups at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year intervals, with the Student t test used for continuous data and a chi-square test used for categorical data. Results: 50 patients were identified: 22 in the accelerated surgery (AS) group and 28 in the standard surgery (SS) group. Age and number of collegiate participants were greater in the AS group, whereas the number of high school participants and the time away from sports were higher in the SS group. Preoperative alpha angles were significantly larger among the AS group, but no differences were found in postoperative alpha angles, center edge angles, or Tönnis grades. No significant difference was seen in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Bilateral hip arthroscopy performed 4 to 6 weeks apart is a safe and effective treatment option for athletes with bilateral femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears; the procedures entail a high rate of return to sports, return to the same level of sports, and decreased time lost from sports. This information could be useful for an athlete deciding on whether to proceed with bilateral hip arthroscopy and deciding on the timing for the procedures.

scholarly journals Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110345
Author(s):  
Steven F. DeFroda ◽  
Thomas D. Alter ◽  
Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽  
Alexander C. Newhouse ◽  
Felipe S. Bessa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Femoral Torsion ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Improvement ◽  
Clinically Significant

Background: The influence of femoral torsion on clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has not been well-studied. Purpose: To quantify femoral torsion in FAIS patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and explore the relationship between femoral torsion and clinically significant outcome improvement after hip arthroscopy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and August 2018 and had 2-year follow-up and preoperative MRI scans containing transcondylar slices of the knee. Participants were categorized as having severe retrotorsion (SR; <0°), normal torsion (NT; 0°-25°), and severe antetorsion (SA; >25°) as measured on MRI. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) included the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale, modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were analyzed among cohorts. Results: Included were 183 patients (SR, n = 13; NT, n = 154; SA, n = 16) with a mean age, body mass index, and femoral torsion of 30.6 ± 12.1 years, 24.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2, and 12.55° ± 9.58°, respectively. The mean torsion was –4.5° ± 2.6° for the SR, 12.1° ± 6.8° for the NT, and 31.0° ± 3.6° for the SA group. There were between-group differences in the proportion of patients who achieved PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12, pain VAS, and any PRO ( P < .05). Post hoc analysis indicated that the SA group achieved lower rates of PASS and SCB on the iHOT-12 and pain VAS, and lower rates of PASS on any PRO versus the SR group ( P < .05); the SR group achieved higher rates of PASS and SCB on pain VAS scores versus the NT group ( P = .003). Conclusion: The orientation and severity of femoral torsion during hip arthroscopy influenced the propensity for clinically significant outcome improvement. Specifically, patients with femoral retrotorsion and femoral antetorsion had higher and lower rates of clinically significant outcome improvement, respectively.

scholarly journals Acetabular Morphologic Characteristics Predict Early Conversion to Arthroplasty After Isolated Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Giordano ◽  
Benjamin D. Kuhns ◽  
Itay Perets ◽  
Leslie Yuen ◽  
Benjamin G. Domb
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Preoperative Imaging ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Center Edge ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Outerbridge Grade ◽  
Tönnis Grade

Background: Hip arthroscopy in the setting of dysplasia and borderline dysplasia is controversial. Dysplasia severity is most often defined by the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) but can also be evaluated radiographically by the acetabular inclination (AI). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the effect of AI on outcomes after isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We hypothesized that patients with dysplasia would have higher rates of arthroplasty as well as inferior clinical and functional outcomes compared with patients who did not have dysplasia. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A hip arthroscopy registry was reviewed for participants undergoing arthroscopic correction of FAI from February 28, 2008, to June 10, 2013. Participants required a clinical diagnosis and isolated arthroscopic correction of FAI with preoperative imaging and intraoperative cartilage status recorded. AI dysplasia was defined as an AI greater than 10°, LCEA dysplasia as LCEA less than 18°, and borderline LCEA dysplasia as LCEA 18° to 25°. Patients without an acetabular deformity (LCEA 25°-40°; AI <10°) served as a control population. Postoperative variables included patient-reported outcome surveys with conversion to arthroplasty as the primary endpoint. Minimum 5-year outcome scores were obtained for 337 of 419 patients (80.4%) with an average follow-up of 75.2 ± 12.7 months. Results: This study included 419 patients: 9 (2%) with LCEA dysplasia, 42 (10%) with AI dysplasia, and 51 (12%) with borderline dysplasia. The AI but not LCEA was significantly correlated with lower outcome scores on the modified Harris Hip Score ( r = 0.13; P = .01), Non-Arthritic Hip Score ( r = 0.10; P = .04), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale ( r = 0.11; P = .04). A total of 58 patients (14%) underwent arthroplasty at 31 ± 20 months postoperatively. Patients with LCEA dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 56% (odds ratio, 8.4), whereas patients with AI dysplasia had an arthroplasty rate of 31% (odds ratio, 3.3), which was significantly greater than the rate for the nondysplastic cohort (13.5%; P < .0001). Patients with borderline LCEA dysplasia did not have increased rates of arthroplasty. A multivariate analysis found increasing age, increasing AI, Tönnis grade higher than 1, and femoral Outerbridge grade higher than 2 to be most predictive of conversion to arthroplasty. Conclusion: We found that an elevated AI, along with increasing age, Tönnis grade, and femoral Outerbridge grade significantly predict early conversion to arthroplasty after isolated hip arthroscopy. We recommend using the AI, in addition to the LCEA, in evaluating hip dysplasia before hip arthroscopy.

Fast Starters and Slow Starters After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Correlation of Early Postoperative Pain and 2-Year Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2903-2909
Author(s):  
Thu Quynh Nguyen ◽  
James M. Friedman ◽  
Sergio E. Flores ◽  
Alan L. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Pain Level ◽  
Component Score ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Patients experience varying degrees of pain and symptoms during the early recovery period after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Some “fast starters” report minimal discomfort and are eager to advance activities, while “slow starters” describe severe pain and limitations. The relationship between these early postoperative symptoms and 2-year outcomes after hip arthroscopy is unknown. Purpose: To analyze the relationship between early postoperative pain and 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients without arthritis or dysplasia who were undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively enrolled and completed validated PROs. Scores for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were collected preoperatively and at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 2 years postoperatively. Scores for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Paired t tests were used to evaluate PRO score changes, and correlation analyses were used to assess relationships between early postoperative pain and 2-year postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 166 patients were included (55% female; mean ± SD age, 35.29 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 25.07 ± 3.98 kg/m2). Patients demonstrated significant improvements in PRO scores (VAS, SF-12 Physical Component Score, mHHS, and all HOOS subscales) at 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAI ( P < .001). There was a significant correlation between lower 1-week VAS pain level (fast starters) and lower 2-year VAS pain level ( R = 0.31; P < .001) as well as higher 2-year PRO scores (SF-12 Physical Component Score, mHHS, and all HOOS subscales: R = −0.21 to −0.3; P < .001). There was no correlation between 1-week VAS pain and 2-year SF-12 Mental Component Score ( P = .17). Preoperative VAS pain levels showed positive correlations with 1-week postoperative pain scores ( R = 0.39; P < .001) and negative correlations with 2-year patient outcomes ( R = −0.15 to −0.33, P < .01). There was no correlation between 6-week postoperative pain scores and 2-year PRO scores. Conclusion: Fast starters after hip arthroscopy for FAI experience sustained improvements in outcomes at 2 years after surgery. Patient pain levels before surgery may delineate potential fast starters and slow starters.

scholarly journals Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Correction of Sports-Related Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Percentage of Possible Improvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711989474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Carton ◽  
David Filan
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Minimal Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Baseline Score ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ceiling Effects ◽  
The Impact

Background: Measures of clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcomes within orthopaedics are becoming a minimum requirement to establish the success of an intervention. Purpose: To (1) define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at 2 years postoperatively in competitive athletes undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic, sports-related femoroacetabular impingement utilizing existing anchor- and distribution-based methods and (2) derive a measure of the MCID using the percentage of possible improvement (POPI) method and compare against existing techniques. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: There were 2 objective outcome measures—the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)—administered at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. External anchor questions were used to determine the MCID through mean change, mean difference, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques. Distribution-based calculations consisted of 0.5 SD, effect size, and standard error of measurement techniques. The POPI was calculated alongside each technique as an achieved percentage change of maximum available improvement for each athlete relative to the individual baseline score. The impact of the preoperative baseline score on the MCID was assessed by assigning athletes to groups determined by baseline percentiles. Statistical analysis was performed, with P < .05 considered significant. Results: There were 576 athletes (96% male; mean age, 25.9 ± 5.7 years). The MCID score change (and POPI) for the mHHS and SF-36 ranged from 2.4 to 16.7 (21.6%-63.6%) and from 3.3 to 24.9 (22.1%-57.4%), respectively. The preoperative threshold value for achieving the ROC-determined MCID was 80.5 and 86.5 for the mHHS and 70.1 and 72.4 for the SF-36 for the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) score– and POPI-calculated MCID, respectively. Through the commonly used mean change method, 40.0% (mHHS) and 42.4% (SF-36) of athletes were unable to achieve the MCID because of high baseline scores and PROM ceiling effects compared with 0% when the POPI technique was used. A highly significant difference for the overall MCID was observed between preoperative baseline percentile groups for the mHHS ( P = .014) and SF-36 ( P = .004) (improvement in points), while there was no significant difference between groups for either the mHHS ( P = .487) or SF-36 ( P = .417) using the POPI technique. Conclusion: The MCID defined by an absolute value of improvement was unable to account for postoperative progress in a large proportion of higher functioning athletes. The POPI technique negated associated ceiling effects, was unrestricted by the baseline score, and may be more appropriate in quantifying clinically important improvement.

scholarly journals Is there a gender gap in outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement? Assessment of clinically meaningful improvements in a prospective cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0043
Author(s):  
Sergio Flores ◽  
Caitlin Chambers ◽  
Kristina Borak ◽  
Alan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Gender Gap ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Power Calculation ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Patient Gender ◽  
Patient Reported

Objectives: Although patients have been found to have significant improvements after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), prior studies suggest women have worse outcomes compared to men. These previous studies lack comparisons of patient reported outcome (PRO) scores based on gender with respect to clinical significance measurements, including the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes following hip arthroscopy for FAI based on patient gender by prospectively assessing changes in PRO scores, MCID, and PASS. Methods: Women and men undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI were prospectively enrolled and preoperative radiographic and intra-operative findings were collected. The cohort was stratified based on self-identified patient gender so the term gender as well as the terms women and men were used to describe the patients as opposed to sex and the terms female and male. Patients completed the following PRO surveys before surgery and 2-years postoperatively: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the 12-Item Short Form Health survey (SF-12). Mean scores and the percentage of patients reaching MCID and PASS were analyzed. An a priori power calculation was performed which determined 42 hips in each group were needed to adequately power the study to 95%. Results: A total of 131 hips, from 72 women and 59 men were included. The mean ± SD age for women and men was 34.2 ± 9.5 vs 35.8 ± 10.3 years, respectively; P= .347 and body mass index (BMI) of 24.9 ± 4.4 vs 25.5 ± 3.3 kg/m2, respectively; P= .379. Women had smaller preoperative alpha angles (59.1 vs 63.7, respectively; P< 0.001) and lower acetabular cartilage injury grade (6.9% vs 22.0% with grade 4 injury, respectively; P= 0.013). Both women and men achieved equivalent significant improvements in PRO scores after surgery (PRO scores increased 18.4 to 45.1 points for mHHS and HOOS). Women and men reached PASS for mHHS at similar rates (76.4% and 77.2%, respectively; P=0.915). MCID was also achieved at similar rates between women and men for all scores (ranged 61.4% to 88.9%) except HOOS-ADL in which a higher percentage of women reached MCID compared to men (79.2% vs 62.7%, respectively; P= .037). Additional stratification by age group using the median cohort age of 34 showed no significant differences in PRO improvement based on age group for each gender. Conclusions: Women can achieve clinically meaningful improvements in patient reported outcomes scores after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Compared to men, women demonstrated equivalent high rates of achieving MCID and PASS at 2 years following surgery. [Table: see text]

Patient-Reported Outcomes Within the First Year After Hip Arthroscopy and Rehabilitation for Femoroacetabular Impingement and/or Labral Injury: The Difference Between Getting Better and Getting Back to Normal

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2607-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Thorborg ◽  
Otto Kraemer ◽  
Anne-Dorthe Madsen ◽  
Per Hölmich
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
First Year ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Minimal Important Change ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Labral Injury

Background: The Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) was recently found valid, reliable, and responsive for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. However, it is currently unknown to what degree patients undergoing hip arthroscopy improve and/or normalize their HAGOS result within the first year after surgery. Purpose: First, to use HAGOS to evaluate clinical outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and/or labral injury and compare the HAGOS results with the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Second, to explore how many patients would (a) improve to a degree of minimal clinical importance (MIC) and (b) obtain scores within the reference intervals of healthy controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From September 2011 to March 2014, 97 consecutive patients [56 females (mean age, 38 years; range, 17-60 years) and 41 males (mean age, 37 years; range, 19-59 years)] underwent first-time hip arthroscopy for FAI and/or labral injury. Standardized postoperative rehabilitation instructions were provided. HAGOS (0-100 points) and mHHS (0-100 points) values were obtained preoperatively and again postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Furthermore, 158 healthy controls, matched on age and sex, were included to obtain HAGOS and mHHS reference values for comparison. Minimal important change was determined by using the 0.5 SD of the baseline values for HAGOS and mHHS. Results: Improvements for all HAGOS subscales and mHHS results were seen at 3 months ( P < .001). Further improvements were seen only for HAGOS Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) and Participation in Physical Activities (PA) subscales between 3 and 12 months ( P < .05) but not for HAGOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), or Hip-Related Quality of Life (QOL) subscales or the mHHS. Furthermore, on HAGOS Sport/Rec, PA, and QOL subscales, patients reached scores of only 54 to 70 points 1 year after surgery. At the individual level, up to 70% of the patients experienced minimal important improvements during the first year after surgery, but only up to 38% and 36% of patients reached a score within the reference interval of HAGOS and mHHS, respectively. Conclusion: Statistically and clinically relevant improvements in HAGOS and mHHS results after hip arthroscopy and rehabilitation can be seen at 3 months and up to 1 year. However, specific HAGOS subscales suggest that a patient’s ability to function and participate in sport and physical activity is still markedly reduced 1 year after surgery. Furthermore, the majority of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy cannot expect to reach the level of the healthy population on self-reported pain and function within the first year after surgery.

Correlation of Short Form-36 and Disability Status with Outcomes of Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Debridement

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. Potter ◽  
Brett A. Freedman ◽  
Romney C. Andersen ◽  
John A. Bojescul ◽  
Timothy R. Kuklo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Arthroscopic Debridement ◽  
Short Form 36 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Modified Harris Hip Score ◽  
The Impact

Background Arthroscopic debridement is the standard of care for the treatment of acetabular labral tears. The Short Form-36 has not been used to measure hip arthroscopy outcomes, and the impact of disability status on hip arthroscopy outcomes has not been reported. Hypothesis Short Form-36 subscale scores will demonstrate good correlation with the modified Harris hip score, but patients undergoing disability evaluation will have significantly worse outcome scores. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The records of active-duty soldiers who underwent hip arthroscopy at the authors’ institution were retrospectively reviewed. Forty consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for the primary indication of labral tear formed the basis of the study group. Patients completed the modified Harris hip score, the Short Form-36 general health survey, and a subjective overall satisfaction questionnaire. Results Thirty-three patients, with a mean age of 34.6 years, were available for follow-up at a mean of 25.7 months postoperatively. Fourteen (43%) patients were undergoing medical evaluation boards (military equivalent of workers’ compensation or disability claim). Pearson correlation coefficients for comparing the Short Form-36 Bodily Pain, Physical Function, and Physical Component subscale scores to the modified Harris hip score were 0.73, 0.71, and 0.85, respectively (P <. 001). The mean modified Harris hip score was significantly lower in patients on disability status than in those who were not (92.4 vs 61.1; P <. 0001). The Short Form-36 subscale scores were significantly lower in disability patients (P <. 02). Patient-reported satisfaction rates (70% overall) were 50% for those undergoing disability evaluations and 84% for those who were not (P <. 04). There was no significant difference in outcomes based on patient age, surgically proven chondromalacia, or gender for military evaluation board status. Conclusion The Short Form-36 demonstrated good correlation with the modified Harris hip score for measuring outcomes after arthroscopic partial limbectomy. Arthroscopic debridement yielded a high percentage of good results when patients undergoing disability evaluations were excluded. Disability status may be a negative predictor of success after hip arthroscopy.

scholarly journals Does capsular closure influence patient-reported outcomes in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tear?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Atzmon ◽  
Zachary T Sharfman ◽  
Barak Haviv ◽  
Michal Frankl ◽  
Gilad Rotem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Capsulotomy is necessary to facilitate instrument manoeuvrability within the joint capsule in many arthroscopic hip surgical procedures. In cases where a clear indication for capsular closure does not exist, surgeon’s preference and experience often determines capsular management. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of capsular closure on clinical outcome scores and satisfaction in patients who underwent hip arthroscopy surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tear. Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed for hip arthroscopy surgeries with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip, previous back or hip surgeries, and degenerative changes to this hip and secondary gains were excluded. Demographic data, intraoperative findings and patient-reported outcome scores were recorded, including the Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS). A total of 29 and 35 patients were included in the non-closure and closure groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was over 3 years for both groups. The mean pre-operative and post-operative HOS scores and MHHS scores did not significantly differ between groups (pre-operative HOS: 65.6 and 66.3, P = 0.898; post-operative HOS: 85.4 and 87.2, P = 0.718; pre-operative MHHS: 63.2 and 58.4, P = 0.223; post-operative MHHS: 85.7 and 88.7, P = 0.510). Overall patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between groups (non-closure 86.3%, closure group 88.6%; P = 0.672). Capsular closure did not significantly influence satisfaction or clinical outcome scores in patients who underwent arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI or labral tear.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document