Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Etzkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
The Other ◽  
Government Relations ◽  
Academic Knowledge ◽  
Technological Level ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry ◽  
Endogenous Process ◽  
Rules Of The Game

Innovation is increasingly based upon a “Triple Helix” of university-industry-government interactions. The increased importance of knowledge and the role of the university in incubation of technology-based firms has given it a more prominent place in the institutional firmament. The entrepreneurial university takes a proactive stance in putting knowledge to use and in broadening the input into the creation of academic knowledge. Thus it operates according to an interactive rather than a linear model of innovation. As firms raise their technological level, they move closer to an academic model, engaging in higher levels of training and in sharing of knowledge. Government acts as a public entrepreneur and venture capitalist in addition to its traditional regulatory role in setting the rules of the game. Moving beyond product development, innovation then becomes an endogenous process of “taking the role of the other”, encouraging hybridization among the institutional spheres.

scholarly journals Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

Triple Helix ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhuo Cai ◽  
Henry Etzkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Theoretical Development ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Research Fields ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

The Triple Helix of university-industry-government interactions, highlighting the enhanced role of the university in the transition from industrial to knowledge-based society, has become widespread in innovation and entrepreneurship studies. We analyze classic literature and recent research, shedding light on the theoretical development of a model that has engendered controversy for being simultaneously analytical and normative, theoretical, practical and policy-relevant. We identify lacunae and suggest future analytical trajectories for theoretical development of the Triple Helix model. The explanatory power of Triple Helix has been strengthened by integrating various social science concepts, e.g. Simmel’s triad, Schumpeter’s organizational entrepreneur, institutional logics and social networks, into its framework. As scholars and practitioners from various disciplinary and inter-disciplinary research fields, e.g. artificial intelligence, political theory, sociology, professional ethics, higher education, regional geography and organizational behavior join Triple Helix studies or find their perspectives integrated, new directions appear for Triple Helix research.

Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 549-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Etzkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Economy ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
The Other ◽  
Academic Science ◽  
Hybrid Organizations ◽  
Triadic Interactions ◽  
Evolutionary Event ◽  
Normative Change ◽  
University Industry

A process of normative change in academic science makes spin-off entrepreneurship compatible with the advancement of knowledge. A parallel process of normative change in industrial science produces a creative tension between organizational and scientific goals that enhances the attainment of both objectives. The creation of hybrid organizations mediating between university–industry and university–government brings these institutional spheres into closer contiguity. The emergence of triadic interactions and ‘taking the role of the other’ among university–industry–government in the transition from an industrial to a knowledge economy may be seen as a conscious innovative stream rather than a chance evolutionary event.

The formation and growth of Google: A firm-level triple helix perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Steiber ◽  
Sverker Alänge
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Formation ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Triple Helix Model ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Changing Roles ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

The Triple Helix model of innovation systems is widely diffused. The fundamental idea of the model is that ‘university’ can play an enhanced role in innovation in knowledge-based societies and that the three helices – ‘university’, ‘industry’ and ‘government’ – interact in order to produce innovation and therefore regional and national economic growth. This is, however, only one model among several different systemic approaches for explaining regional differences in innovativeness. While the triple helix model emphasizes the role of the university for regional innovativeness, the other systemic approaches call attention to either industry or government as having the lead role in innovation. Further, the triple helix model is developed and primarily explored from a macro-level perspective and not from a firm-level perspective. Finally, while the theoretical value of triple helix interactions are reasonably confirmed, there are still gaps in the triple helix concept, and the practical value is only just beginning to realize its potential. From a firm-level perspective, the purpose of this article is therefore to test the applicability and practical value of the triple helix model when exploring the formation and growth of firms using the case of Google Inc. Useful when exploring a firm’s formation and growth, the triple helix model forces the exploration to start even before the entrepreneur enters the scene, which provides a more holistic picture of firm formation. The three helices were all found to play important but changing roles in the different phases of firm formation and growth. The Google case contributes further understanding of the nature and historical evolution of interactions between the three helices, thereby filling some gaps in the triple helix concept. The Google case also identifies a number of mechanisms for interaction and the important role of the bridging organizations that connect the helices and contribute to the development of interactions. Finally, the concept of ‘spaces’ proved relevant and useful, although in the perspective of a firm, the concept has a broader meaning and exists on different levels.

The Eastern European Transition

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franc Mali
Keyword(s):  
Social Process ◽  
National Level ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
Government Relations ◽  
Dramatic Decline ◽  
Communist Countries ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

University–industry–government relations are in a period of transition in Eastern and Central Europe. This transformation is a complex and multidimensional historical and social process. Eastern and Central European countries are being forced to make structural shifts not only in regard to the collapse of communist regimes, but also in relation to the worldwide changes in the production, dissemination and application of scientific knowledge. This article is concerned with the barriers which are preventing a more rapid transformation of the university research system in the region. Key problems include: a dramatic decline in the resources dedicated to R&D at the national level; rigid separation of the different components of the R&D system; the concentration of research outside the universities; and the influence of traditionalist lobby groups which do not understand the role of the modern university. There is also insufficient awareness among academics about issues relating to intellectual property, too much reliance in industry on the linear model of innovation, and an inadequate recognition among political decision makers that universities must now organize new forms of cooperation with industry, as well as with society in general. Against this background, the paper makes it clear that the institutional restructuring of academic research and its cooperation with industry in transitional post-communist countries is far from concluded.

scholarly journals Transitive university – innovative ecosystem development driver in the region

2019 ◽  
pp. 101-109
Author(s):  
Mikhail V. Boguslavsky ◽  
Natalia S. Ladyzhets ◽  
Olga V. Sannikova ◽  
Egor V. Neborsky
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Ecosystem Development ◽  
Innovation Ecosystem ◽  
Active Participant ◽  
Close Interaction ◽  
Media Space ◽  
The University ◽  
University Industry

The article is devoted to understanding a transitive university as a driver for the development of an innovative ecosystem in a region. The article analyzes the concept of the “triple helix” and the expanded “five helix”, which is the integration interaction of the university, industry and government, as well as the civil society and media space. The development of innovations is ensured through close interaction of all these actors, and the university is assigned the role of the most active participant, prognostically building the interaction between them for the development of the innovation ecosystem.

Giải pháp hợp tác giữa trường đại học điện lực và doanh nghiệp trong việc đào tạo kỹ năng nghề cho sinh viên

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Thanh Dan
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Vocational Skills ◽  
Government Relations ◽  
World Economic ◽  
Competency Based ◽  
Social Partnerships ◽  
Market Needs ◽  
Global Agenda ◽  
University Industry ◽  
And Training

  The purpose of the paper is to research some solutions of cooperation between universities and enterprises in training vocational skills for students. Through the survey on assessment of vocational skills of students and the need for cooperation between Enterprises and Electric Power University, the research proposes some solutions  between two elements of the mechanism of cooperation between University  and Enterprises in training vocational skills for students to ensure graduates can meet the requirements of recruitment agencies as well as the requirements of socio-economic development and employment. Keywords Volcational skill, cooperation, universities, enterprises, Electric Power University References [1] Mạnh Xuân, Gắn kết trường đại học và doanh nghiệp trong đào tạo nhân lực, Nhân dân điện tử, 2015. http://www.nhandan.com.vn/giaoduc/tin-tuc/item/25807602-gan-ket-truong-dai-hoc-va-doanh-nghiep-trong-dao-tao-nhan-luc.html [2] Nguyễn Đình Luận, Sự gắn kết giữa nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trong đào tạo nguồn nhân lực phục vụ phát triển kinh tế xã hội ở Việt Nam: Thực trạng và Khuyến nghị, Tạp chí Phát triển và hội nhập, số 22 (32), Tháng 5-6/2015.[3] Nguyễn Thị Thanh Dần, Động lực hợp tác giữa nhà trường và doanh nghiệp trong việc nâng cao kỹ năng nghề cho sinh viên, Tạp chí giáo dục, Số đặc biệt 11/2016[4] Nguyễn Tiến Long, Phạm Hồng Hạnh. Xây dựng kho dữ liệu kĩ thuật, ứng dụng cho nghiên cứu khoa học và dạy học tại trường sư phạm kỹ thuật – đạo tạo nghề. Tạp chí khoa học giáo dục, số 338 kì 2 (7/2014) [5] Trịnh Thị Hoa Mai, Liên kết đào tạo giữa trường Đại học với doanh nghiệp ở Việt Nam, Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, Kinh tế - Luật 24 (2008), 30-34[6] Vũ Thị Phương Anh, Liên kết đào tạo giữa nhà trường và doanh nghiệp thiếu mắt xích quan trọng, Báo Nhân dân cuối tuần, 2013. http://www.nhandan.com.vn/cuoituan/chuyen-de/item/21342502-thieu-mat-xich-quan-trong.html[7] Competency-based training, TAFE Queensland, 03 December, 2008, http://www.tafe.qld.gov.au/courses/flexible study/ competencv.html. [8] Croissant, J.L., Smith-Doerr, L. (2008). Organizational Contexts of Science: Boundaries and Relationships between University and Industry. In: Hackett, Edward J.; Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J. (eds.): The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edition. Cambridge u.a.: The MIT Press, pp. 691-718 [9] Dalley, Stephanie and Peter Oleson (2003).“Senacherib, Archimedes, and the Water Screw: The Context of Invention in the Ancient World”, Technology and Culture vol. 44 no. 1, pp. 1–26. 
[10] Davos Kloster (2014), Matching skills and labour market needs – Building social partnerships for better skills and better jobs, Global Agenda Council on Employment, World Economic Forum.[11] Davos Kloster (2014), Matching skills and labour market needs – Building social partnerships for better skills and better jobs, Global Agenda Council on Employment, World Economic Forum.[12] Dzisah, J. & Etzkowitz, H., (2008): Triple Helix Circulation: The Heart of Innovation and Development, International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2), pp. 101-115 [13] Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000): The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. In: Research Policy, 29, pag. 109-123 [14] Harris, R., Guthrie, H., Hobart B., & Lundberg, D. (1995). Competency based education and training: Between a Rock and a Whirlpool. South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.[15] Henry Etzkowitz (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation. Routledge
270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016, ISBN 0-203-92960-8 Master e-book ISBN [16] Jones, L., & Moore, R. (1995). Appropriating competence. British Journal of Education and Work, 8(2) 78-92[17] Kathleen Santopietro Weddel (2006), Competency Based Education and Content Standards, Northern Colorado Literacy Resource Center, USA.[18] Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (1996): Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Science and Public Policy, 23, pp.279-286. [19] Mihaela & Cornelia Dan (2013). Why Should University and Business Cooperate? A Discussion of Advantages and Disadvantages, International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013 (January), e-ISSN 2247–7225 [20] Paprock, K. E. (1996) Conceptual structure to develop adaptive competencies in professional. IPN Ciencia Are: Cultura, Nueva Epoca, 2 (8), 22-25.[21] Perkmann, M. (2007): University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (4), pp. 259–280 [22] Robert E. Norton: Dacum Handbook. Center on Education and training for Employment – College of Education – The Ohio State University, 1997.[23] Shirley Fletcher (1995). Designing Competence-based Assessment in the Professions in Australia, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & practice, Volume1, Issue 1.[24] Urayaa, E. (2010). Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions, European Planning Studies, 18(8), pp. 1227-1246

scholarly journals The university-industry relationship under diferent approaches: the entrepreneurial university to academic capitalism

Educação ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Evandro Coggo Cristofoletti ◽  
Milena Pavan Serafim
Keyword(s):  
Academic Capitalism ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Entrepreneurial University ◽  
The Public ◽  
The World ◽  
Industry Relationship ◽  
The University ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
University Industry

The economic and political changes in the world, from the 1970s, changed the political education of the Public Institutions of Higher Education in the world. The direction of these changes was clear: the university approachedthe market and the company and created interaction mechanisms that did not exist. The article therefore reviews the academic literature that interprets the relationship between university and market/company from two perspectives: approaches that positively position of interactions, exposing their motivations, interests and forms of interaction, especially the notions on Knowledge Economy and Entrepreneurial University; approaches that observe this interaction critically and reflectively, exposing the problems of interaction, its negative aspects and the reflection of the true role of the public university from the perspective of Academic Capitalism.

scholarly journals A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Etzkowitz ◽  
Loet Leydesdorff
Keyword(s):  
Triple Helix ◽  
Government Relations ◽  
University Industry

scholarly journals The role of word frequencies in detecting unfamiliar terms and their effect on response quality

Psihologija ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Slavec ◽  
Vasja Vehovar
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
The Other ◽  
International Exchange ◽  
Subjective Perception ◽  
Exchange Students ◽  
Text Corpora ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
The University

Research into cognitive aspects of survey response has indicated unfamiliar terms as one of the psycholinguistic determinants of question comprehensibility problems. In this paper the estimates of wording familiarity based on text corpora for the English and Slovenian languages were used to detect potentially incomprehensible wordings in two web survey questionnaires for international exchange students at the University of Ljubljana, one for incoming (English) and the other for outgoing students (Slovenian). Two versions of the questionnaire were developed for each language, one with low-frequency (complex) and the other with high-frequency (improved) wordings, and compared in a split-ballot experiment. The results show a lower drop-out rate and a decreased subjective perception of difficulty for the improved language versions.

Who Controls Whom?

2015 ◽  
pp. 173-186
Author(s):  
Ainurul Rosli ◽  
Peter Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Transfer ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Knowledge Exchange ◽  
Full Understanding ◽  
Boundary Spanner ◽  
Enterprise Network ◽  
The University ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
University Industry

This chapter looks into the importance of having a clear identity of a boundary spanner in determining the role of the partners in a university-industry knowledge transfer programme. It highlights issues around the relationship between the business and the graduate as the boundary spanner, where the university's level of control differs between two programmes: Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) and Knowledge Exchange and Enterprise Network (KEEN) programme. The four case studies illustrate interesting points since the university is the employer for the KTPs associate and the business is the employer for the KEEN associate, whilst successful KTP and KEEN projects rely on a full understanding of the role of the graduate within the business.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document