Conformity in Prescription and Administration of Respiratory Distress Protocols in a Tertiary Care Hospital in the Province of Quebec: RELIEVE Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Camille Dufort-Rouleau ◽  
Benjamin Martin ◽  
Vincent Barré ◽  
Véronique Bédard ◽  
Émilie Dufort Rouleau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Trial Period ◽  
Appropriateness Criteria ◽  
Provider Training

Background: Respiratory distress protocols (RDPs) are protocolized prescriptions comprised of 3 medications (a benzodiazepine, an opioid, and an anticholinergic) administered simultaneously as an emergency treatment for respiratory distress in palliative care patients in the province of Quebec, Canada. However, data on appropriate use that justifies the combination of all 3 components is scarce and based on individual pharmacodynamic properties along with expert consensus. Objectives: Our study aimed to evaluate the conformity and the effectiveness of RDPs prescribed and administered to hospitalized adult patients. Methods: This was a prospective and descriptive study conducted in a single center. Prescription and administration conformity were assessed based on predefined appropriateness criteria. Results: A total of 467 adult patients were prescribed a RDP, 175 administrations were documented, and 78 patients received at least 1 RDP. Prescription conformity was assessed on 1473 separate occasions over the trial period. Overall prescription conformity was found to be 37% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.6-40.4), and administration conformity was 37.7% (95% CI: 26.2-50.7). Low administration conformity was primarily explained by incorrect indications for RDP use. Seemingly important determinants of higher conformity were prescriber’s speciality in palliative care, use of preprinted orders, pharmacist involvement, and hospitalization in the palliative care unit. Conclusion: This study highlights important gaps in the use of RDPs in our institution. Health-care provider training appears necessary in order to ensure adequate conformity and allow for further evaluation of RDP effectiveness.

scholarly journals 1475. Etiology and Outcome of Fever and Respiratory Distress in Adult Patients Presenting to Medical Emergency in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S456-S457
Author(s):  
Vikas Suri ◽  
Harshit R Rao ◽  
Ashish Bhalla ◽  
Inderpaul Singh ◽  
Manisha Biswal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
North India ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Care Hospital

scholarly journals Impact of legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying on the Use of Palliative Sedation in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110304
Author(s):  
Amy Nolen ◽  
Rawaa Olwi ◽  
Selby Debbie
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Palliative Sedation ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Medical Assistance ◽  
Medical Assistance In Dying ◽  
Before And After

Background: Patients approaching end of life may experience intractable symptoms managed with palliative sedation. The legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada in 2016 offers a new option for relief of intolerable suffering, and there is limited evidence examining how the use of palliative sedation has evolved with the introduction of MAiD. Objectives: To compare rates of palliative sedation at a tertiary care hospital before and after the legalization of MAiD. Methods: This study is a retrospective chart analysis of all deaths of patients followed by the palliative care consult team in acute care, or admitted to the palliative care unit. We compared the use of palliative sedation during 1-year periods before and after the legalization of MAiD, and screened charts for MAiD requests during the second time period. Results: 4.7% (n = 25) of patients who died in the palliative care unit pre-legalization of MAiD received palliative sedation compared to 14.6% (n = 82) post-MAiD, with no change in acute care. Post-MAiD, 4.1% of deaths were medically-assisted deaths in the palliative care unit (n = 23) and acute care (n = 14). For patients who requested MAiD but instead received palliative sedation, the primary reason was loss of decisional capacity to consent for MAiD. Conclusion: We believe that the mainstream presence of MAiD has resulted in an increased recognition of MAiD and palliative sedation as distinct entities, and rates of palliative sedation increased post-MAiD due to greater awareness about patient choice and increased comfort with end-of-life options.

VALIDATION OF QUICK COVID SEVERITY INDEX IN COVID PATIENTS ADMITTED THROUGH EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF A PRIVATE TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN WEST BENGAL, INDIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 53-55
Author(s):  
Harsimran Singh Das
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Oxygen Requirement ◽  
Clinical Tool

Introduction:qCSI (Quick COVID severity index) is a clinical tool established recently post pandemic to predict respiratory failure within 24 hours of admission in COVID-19 patients; respiratory failure being explain as increased oxygen requirement greater than 6L/min by low ow device, high ow device, noninvasive or invasive ventilation to maintain spO2 of greater than or equal to 94%, or death. Aim:To verify and validate the application of the qCSI in Emergency Department in Indian demographic for evidence-based guidance to aid physician decision making in safely dispositioning adult patients with COVID-19 with oxygen requirement less than or equal to 6L/min via low ow devices including nasal cannula and oxygen mask Materials and methods:This is an observational, retrospective study from Emergency Department in a private tertiary care hospital of admitted adult patients with COVID-19 disease. Clinical parameters in qCSI and disposition of 210 patients admitted through Emergency Department included in this study selected randomly was sought on admission and clinical status with level of care 24 hours following admission was recorded and compared with prediction based on qCSI from a period of 1 May 2020 to 31 October 2020. Result:We found that19(9.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low, 80(38.1%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low-intermediate, 84(40.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was High-intermediate and 27(12.9%)patients Initial qCSI Score was High.qCSI Score after 24 hours 16(11.4%) patients were Low, 43(30.7%) patients were Low-intermediate, 63(45.0%) patients was High-intermediate and 18(12.9%) patients was High.Out of 210(100.0%) patients, 70 (33.3%) patients were critically ill. Conclusion:In conclusion these data show that the quick COVID-19 Severity Index provides easily accessed risk stratication relevant to Emergency Department provider.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document