scholarly journals Does COVID-19 offer English school leaders the opportunity to rethink schools?

2021 ◽  
pp. 089202062199430
Author(s):  
Michael Jopling ◽  
Oliver Harness

COVID-19 has closed schools, forced examinations to be abandoned and led to concerns about the negative educational and social effects on children and young people. This short article uses responses to two short surveys of school leaders in the West Midlands and North East of England to explore their views on whether and how schools can be rethought following the disruption of COVID-19.

2007 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. 1403-1403
Author(s):  
C. Moss ◽  
M. Walters ◽  
J. Edgar ◽  
K. Gilchrist

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Dorer

Child and adolescent deliberate self-harm is a common problem faced by medical services. In 1982 the Royal College of Psychiatrists recommended that certain guidelines be followed in all cases of child and adolescent self-harm. This paper examines to what extent these guidelines are being incorporated into child and adolescent self-harm policies in the West Midlands region. The implications of the findings are discussed for young people and the NHS Trusts who treat them.


2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90b ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Blakey ◽  
Gillian Johnson ◽  
Richard JQ McNally ◽  
Simon Court ◽  
Adam Potts ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306
Author(s):  
Annette McKeown ◽  
Aisling Martin ◽  
Patrick J. Kennedy ◽  
Amy Wilson

Purpose The SECURE STAIRS framework has promoted young person involvement as a key feature of innovative service provision. In the North East of England, Secure Children’s Homes (SCHs) have pioneered young person involvement in team formulation. Young people have also led on the development of formulation materials through a young person involvement project. Young people’s attendance at team formulation meetings has become embedded. These service developments have also begun to expand across broader SCHs, Secure Training Centres (STCs) and Young Offender Institutions (YOIs) and reflect the national impact of such pioneering developments. There is a notable lack of research examining the impact of young person involvement in formulation. The purpose of this study is to elucidate this area. Design/methodology/approach Between April and August 2019, there were 86 staff attendances at formulation meetings where young people were present across two SCHs in the North East of England. Findings Paired samples t-tests indicated staff-reported significant post-formulation improvements across all domains measured including knowledge [t(85) = 11.38, p < 0.001]; confidence working with the young person [t(85) = 5.87, p < 0.001]; motivation [t(85) = 3.58, p < 0.001]; understanding [t(85) = 9.03, p < 0.001]; and satisfaction with the treatment plan [t(85) = 8.63, p < 0.001]. Research limitations/implications Implications of findings are discussed and further developments outlined. Practical implications Young people attending team formulation is a new and evolving area, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no existing research evaluating this area. The current findings suggest that staff knowledge, motivation, confidence and satisfaction with the treatment plan is improved following attendance at team formulation where the young person is present and actively participating. Young people’s participation and involvement is central to planning, developing and progressing meaningful provision within children and young people secure provision. Social implications Involving children and young people in decision-making, service development and evaluation are also key components of ensuring the voice of young people is central in our minds. It also supports empowering the young people we work with. Young people and their journey should always be at the heart of what we do. Originality/value Young people attending team formulation is a new and evolving area, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no existing research evaluating this area. This is the first study of its type evaluating formulation directions within the SECURE STAIRS framework.


1979 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 79-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Everitt

It is a remarkable fact, and one that needs to be pondered, that almost all our current regional terms in this country are of very recent origin. Expressions like Tyneside and Merseyside, the West Midlands and the North-East, have no very lengthy lineage; such phrases as the Home Counties cannot be traced back beyond the early decades of the railway era; the present usage even of a genuine historic name like Wessex is no more than an antiquarian revival; while the current reanimation of Mercia seems to be chiefly attributable to a contemporary police force. Perhaps the only regional name of this kind with a continuous history to the present day is East Anglia. In other words, behind most of our modern expressions, ideas and preconceptions lie implicit that were not necessarily of much significance to the people of earlier centuries. A phrase like the Home Counties, for example, implies a kind of regional unity between the shires surrounding London which until recent centuries—and in many respects until recent generations—is entirely fallacious. There was no connexion between the origins of settlement, for example, in Hertfordshire and in Sussex, and next to none between settlement in Essex and in Kent. Even in the Civil War period there was singularly little contact and no cohesion, as parliament quickly found to its cost, between the counties surrounding the capital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document