Investigation of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants and the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Weighing ≥120 kg Compared to Patients Weighing <120 kg

2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001985457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin G. Aloi ◽  
Joseph J. Fierro ◽  
Bradley J. Stein ◽  
Sullivan M. Lynch ◽  
Robert J. Shapiro
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Service Network ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
Integrated Service Network ◽  
Retrospective Database

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present a favorable alternative to warfarin based on the decreased burden of monitoring and fewer drug and food interactions. Although studied in the general population, limited clinical data justifying efficacy in patients weighing ≥120 kg present concern for using DOACs in this specific population. Objective: The purpose was to identify if a difference exists in incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events in patients receiving a DOAC for the indication of venous thromboembolism (VTE) weighing ≥120 kg compared to patients weighing <120 kg. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was conducted with patients on apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban for treatment of VTE from the Veterans Integrated Service Network 8 between January 2012 and June 2017. The primary outcome was incidence of recurrent VTEs while on anticoagulation. Fisher’s exact tests were used to evaluate difference in VTEs between the groups. Results: There were 133 patients weighing ≥120 kg and 1063 patients weighing <120 kg identified within the 5-year time frame that met inclusion criteria. Although no statistically significant difference was found in incidence of recurrent VTEs between study groups (0.8% vs 1.1%; odds ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.09-5.14; P = .69) few events occurred limiting the power to be able to detect a difference. Conclusion: This study found no difference in VTE recurrence in patients weighing ≥120 kg compared to patients <120 kg with few events in either group. Although promising, additional studies are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in malignancy induced venous thromboembolism-a systematic review and meta analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Abdul Razzack ◽  
N Hussain ◽  
S Adeel Hassan ◽  
S Mandava ◽  
F Yasmin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Dichotomous Data ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background- Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven to be more effective in the management of venous thromboembolism (MVTE). The efficacy and safety of LMWH or DOACs in treatment of recurrent or malignancy induced VTE is not studied in literature. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of LMWH and  DOACs in the management of malignancy induced  VTE Methods- Electronic databases ( PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to November  28th, 2020. Dichotomous data was extracted for prevention of VTE and risk of major bleeding in patients taking either LMWH or DOACs. Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance to be considered if the confidence interval excludes 1 and p &lt; 0.05.  Results- Three studies with 2607 patients (DOACs n = 1301 ; LMWH n = 1306) were included in analysis. All the study population had active cancer of any kind diagnosed within the past 6 months. Average follow-up period for each trial was 6 months. Patients receiving DOACs have a lower odds of recurrence of MVTE as compared to LMWH( OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.09; P = 0.003, I2 = 0). There was no significant difference in major bleeding among patients receiving LMWH or DOACs  (OR-0.71, 95%CI 0.46-1.10, P = 0.13, I2 = 22%) (Figure 1). We had no publication bias in our results (Egger’s regression p &gt; 0.05). Conclusion- DOACs are superior to LMWH in prevention of MVTE and have similar major bleeding risk as that of LMWH. Abstract Figure. A)VTE Recurrence B)Major Bleeding events

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001989650
Author(s):  
Lindsey M. Fovel ◽  
Robert W. Seabury ◽  
Christopher D. Miller ◽  
William Darko ◽  
Luke A. Probst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second leading cause of death in patients with malignancy. The currently available guidelines have shown greater support for utilization of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in cancer-associated VTE. Current data on the safety and efficacy of DOAC therapy in patients with cancer are lacking. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the use of DOACs compared to LMWH in patients with cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of outpatient records was completed to identify patients with documented cancer diagnosis and either a DOAC or LMWH as a listed medication. Patients were excluded if they had atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, current pregnancy, body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 or weight >120 kg, severe renal or hepatic impairment, or were on concomitant therapy with a significant interacting medication. The primary outcome was frequency of VTE recurrence, and secondary outcomes included the frequency of major and minor bleeding and other thrombotic events. Results: One hundred fifty-six patients were included in the study population, 78 in both the DOAC and LMWH groups. Venous thromboembolism recurrence occurred in 5 (6.4%) patients in the DOAC group and 8 (10.3%) patients in the LMWH group ( P = .39). There was no significant difference in major or minor bleeding or other thrombotic events between the 2 groups. Conclusion: The frequency of VTE recurrence was similar between DOACs and LMWH in patients with cancer. DOACs may be an alternative agent to LMWH for the prevention of recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.

Levels of Prothrombin Fragment F1+2 in Patients with Hyperhomocysteinemia and a History of Venous Thromboembolism

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (05) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Kyrle ◽  
Andreas Stümpflen ◽  
Mirko Hirschl ◽  
Christine Bialonczyk ◽  
Kurt Herkner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Thrombin Generation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Prothrombin Fragment ◽  
Hemostatic System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
System Activation ◽  
One Year

SummaryIncreased thrombin generation occurs in many individuals with inherited defects in the antithrombin or protein C anticoagulant pathways and is also seen in patients with thrombosis without a defined clotting abnormality. Hyperhomocysteinemia (H-HC) is an important risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We prospectively followed 48 patients with H-HC (median age 62 years, range 26-83; 18 males) and 183 patients (median age 50 years, range 18-85; 83 males) without H-HC for a period of up to one year. Prothrombin fragment Fl+2 (Fl+2) was determined in the patient’s plasma as a measure of thrombin generation during and at several time points after discontinuation of secondary thromboprophylaxis with oral anticoagulants. While on anticoagulants, patients with H-HC had significantly higher Fl+2 levels than patients without H-HC (mean 0.52 ± 0.49 nmol/1, median 0.4, range 0.2-2.8, versus 0.36 ± 0.2 nmol/1, median 0.3, range 0.1-2.1; p = 0.02). Three weeks and 3,6,9 and 12 months after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants, up to 20% of the patients with H-HC and 5 to 6% without H-HC had higher Fl+2 levels than a corresponding age- and sex-matched control group. 16% of the patients with H-HC and 4% of the patients without H-HC had either Fl+2 levels above the upper limit of normal controls at least at 2 occasions or (an) elevated Fl+2 level(s) followed by recurrent VTE. No statistical significant difference in the Fl+2 levels was seen between patients with and without H-HC. We conclude that a permanent hemostatic system activation is detectable in a proportion of patients with H-HC after discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy following VTE. Furthermore, secondary thromboprophylaxis with conventional doses of oral anticoagulants may not be sufficient to suppress hemostatic system activation in patients with H-HC.

scholarly journals Management of anticoagulants in delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (07) ◽  
pp. E1128-E1135
Author(s):  
Xianhong Zhao ◽  
Yangxue Huang ◽  
Jiarong Li ◽  
Aoqiang Zhou ◽  
Gengxin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Clinical Effect ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Best Management ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Bridge Therapy

Abstract Background and study aims Delayed bleeding and thrombotic events are uncontrolled adverse events that are hard to balance in patients receiving anticoagulants after endoscopic resection. The present study aims to assess the clinical effect of warfarin, when compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), in terms of delayed bleeding and thrombotic events. Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted for eligible literature. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed on outcomes of delayed bleeding and thrombotic events. Two networks within the Bayesian framework were established based on the management of anticoagulants and type of DOAC. Results Eight cohort studies with 2,046 patients were eligible for inclusion, including 1,176 patients treated with warfarin and 870 with DOACs. There was no significant difference between warfarin and DOACs, in terms of delayed bleeding (OR = 1.29, 95 % CI [0.99–1.69]) and thromboembolism (OR = 2.0, 95 % CI [0.32–12.39]). In the network meta-analyses for delayed bleeding, the rank probabilities revealed that the safest management was discontinuous warfarin without heparin bridge therapy (HBT). Rank probabilities for the types of DOACs demonstrated that the safest drug was dabigatran. Conclusions There was no significant difference in delayed bleeding and thromboembolism between warfarin and DOACs in patients receiving endoscopic treatment. In terms of delayed bleeding, discontinuous warfarin without HBT was suggested as the best management, and dabigatran was recommended as the best type of DOAC.

scholarly journals Anticoagulant treatment satisfaction with warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C. Fang ◽  
Alan S. Go ◽  
Priya A. Prasad ◽  
Jin-Wen Hsu ◽  
Dongjie Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Laboratory Monitoring ◽  
Routine Laboratory ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
The Difference

AbstractTreatment options for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although DOACs are easier to administer than warfarin and do not require routine laboratory monitoring, few studies have directly assessed whether patients are more satisfied with DOACs. We surveyed adults from two large integrated health systems taking DOACs or warfarin for incident VTE occurring between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the validated Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS), divided into the ACTS Burdens and ACTS Benefits scores; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Mean treatment satisfaction was compared using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics. The effect size of the difference in means was calculated using a Cohen’s d (0.20 is considered a small effect and ≥ 0.80 is considered large). We surveyed 2217 patients, 969 taking DOACs and 1248 taking warfarin at the time of survey. Thirty-one point five percent of the cohort was aged ≥ 75 years and 43.1% were women. DOAC users were on average more satisfied with anticoagulant treatment, with higher adjusted mean ACTS Burdens (50.18 v. 48.01, p < 0.0001) and ACTS Benefits scores (10.21 v. 9.84, p = 0.046) for DOACs vs. warfarin, respectively. The magnitude of the difference was small (Cohen’s d of 0.29 for ACTS Burdens and 0.12 for ACTS Benefits). Patients taking DOACs for venous thromboembolism were on average more satisfied with anticoagulant treatment than were warfarin users, although the magnitude of the difference was small.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Korean Cancer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962097957
Author(s):  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Jin-Hyoung Kang ◽  
Min Hee Hong ◽  
Jin-Seok Ahn ◽  
So Yeon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Medical Chart Review ◽  
Deep Vein

This study assessed epidemiologic data and clinical outcomes, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding events, in patients with cancer-associated VTE, and assessed factors associated with clinical outcomes. Data were extracted from retrospective medical-chart review of adult patients diagnosed with cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who received anticoagulation treatment for ≥3 months. Patients were classified by: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and other anticoagulants. First VTE recurrence and bleeding events, and factors associated with their occurrence, were assessed during the initial 6 months of treatment. Overall, 623 patients (age: 63.7 ± 11.3 years, 49.3% male) were included (119, 132, and 372 patients in LMWH, DOACs and other anticoagulants groups, respectively). The cumulative 6-month incidence of VTE recurrence was 16.6% (total), 8.3% (LMWH), 16.7% (DOACs), and 20.7% (other); respective bleeding events were 22.5%, 11.0%, 12.3%, and 30.7%). VTE recurrence and bleeding rates differed only between LMWH and other anticoagulants (HR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-5.0 and 3.6, 1.9-6.8, respectively). These results highlight the importance of initial VTE treatment choice for preventing VTE recurrence and bleeding events. LMWH or DOACs for ≥3 months can be considered for effective VTE management in cancer patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document