Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Physicians and Other Health Care Providers Regarding Artificial Nutrition and Hydration at the End of Life

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1121-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roschelle Heuberger ◽  
Helen Wong
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Artificial Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
Eol Care

Objective: Despite the growing evidence against artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) use among patients with advanced dementia, little is known about the perspectives of the health care team. This study examined the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of physicians and other health care providers regarding the use of ANH at the end of life (EOL). Methods: A cross-sectional survey explored the provision of EOL care using a hypothetical case scenario of a patient with advanced dementia and dysphagia. Questionnaire items were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric approaches. Results: In this sample of 323 respondents, statistical significance was found between physicians and other health care providers’ views on ANH and its related beneficial effects or health outcomes in EOL care. Discussion: Results indicate knowledge deficits in physicians and other health care professionals and highlight the need for comprehensive continuing education programs on EOL topics. Conclusion: Differences in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding ANH in EOL among healthcare providers were observed and education regarding evidence based clinical guidelines are necessary.

Are Health-Care Providers Well Prepared in Providing Optimal End-of-Life Care to Critically Ill Patients? A Cross-Sectional Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1080-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kartikeya Rajdev ◽  
Nina Loghmanieh ◽  
Maria A. Farberov ◽  
Seleshi Demissie ◽  
Theodore Maniatis
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Strongly Agree ◽  
Eol Care

It is important for health-care providers to be comfortable in providing end-of-life (EOL) care to critically ill patients and realizing when continuing aggressive measures would be futile. Therefore, there is a need to understand health-care providers’ self-perceived skills and barriers to providing optimum EOL care. A total of 660 health-care providers from medicine and surgery departments were asked via e-mail to complete an anonymous survey assessing their self-reported EOL care competencies, of which 238 responses were received. Our study identified several deficiencies in the self-reported EOL care competencies among health-care providers. Around 34% of the participants either disagreed (strongly disagree or disagree) or were neutral when asked whether they feel well prepared for delivering EOL care. Around 30% of the participants did not agree (agree and strongly agree) that they were well prepared to determine when to refer patients to hospice. 51% of the participants, did not agree (agree and strongly agree) that clear and accurate information is delivered by team members to patients/family. The most common barrier to providing EOL care in the intensive care unit was family not accepting the patient’s poor prognosis. Nursing staff (registered nurse) had higher knowledge and attitudes mean competency scores than the medical staff. Attending physicians reported stronger knowledge competencies when compared to residents and fellows. More than half of the participants denied having received any previous training in EOL care. 82% of the participants agreed that training should be mandatory in this field. Most of the participants reported that the palliative care team is involved in EOL care when the patient is believed to be terminally ill. Apart from a need for a stronger training in the field of EOL care for health-care providers, the overall policies surrounding EOL and palliative care delivery require further evaluation and improvement to promote better outcomes in caring patients at the EOL.

scholarly journals Identification, assessment, and management of pain in patients with advanced dementia

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasey L. Malotte ◽  
Mary Lynn McPherson
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Patient Behavior ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Prevalent Symptom

Abstract Patients with advanced dementia have a high symptom burden at end of life. Many of those with dementia have reports of symptoms similar to those without dementia, yet are treated less frequently. Pain is a prevalent symptom that can be underrecognized because of the ability of the patient to self-report. Several tools are available to help with the identification of pain, but they should only be one aspect in the overall assessment. Health care providers must anticipate this and screen for and treat potential pain. This includes obtaining a self-report, searching for potential causes for pain, observing patient behavior, gaining proxy reporting of pain, and attempting an appropriate analgesic trial. It is beneficial for all those involved with a patient's care to screen for pain because of the potential benefits in decreasing behaviors and subsequent antipsychotic use.

Self-Perceived End-of-Life Care Competencies of Health-Care Providers at a Large Academic Medical Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1409-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Montagnini ◽  
Heather M. Smith ◽  
Deborah M. Price ◽  
Bidisha Ghosh ◽  
Linda Strodtman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Eol Care

Background: In the United States, most deaths occur in hospitals, with approximately 25% of hospitalized patients having palliative care needs. Therefore, the provision of good end-of-life (EOL) care to these patients is a priority. However, research assessing staff preparedness for the provision of EOL care to hospitalized patients is lacking. Objective: To assess health-care professionals’ self-perceived competencies regarding the provision of EOL care in hospitalized patients. Methods: Descriptive study of self-perceived EOL care competencies among health-care professionals. The study instrument (End-of-Life Questionnaire) contains 28 questions assessing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to the provision of EOL care. Health-care professionals (nursing, medicine, social work, psychology, physical, occupational and respiratory therapist, and spiritual care) at a large academic medical center participated in the study. Means were calculated for each item, and comparisons of mean scores were conducted via t tests. Analysis of variance was used to identify differences among groups. Results: A total of 1197 questionnaires was completed. The greatest self-perceived competency was in providing emotional support for patients/families, and the least self-perceived competency was in providing continuity of care. When compared to nurses, physicians had higher scores on EOL care attitudes, behaviors, and communication. Physicians and nurses had higher scores on most subscales than other health-care providers. Conclusions: Differences in self-perceived EOL care competencies were identified among disciplines, particularly between physicians and nurses. The results provide evidence for assessing health-care providers to identify their specific training needs before implementing educational programs on EOL care.

scholarly journals Voluntary Refusal of Foods and Fluids: A Comparative Survey Across Health Disciplines (P12-044-19)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roschelle Heuberger ◽  
Jessie Zenchak ◽  
Cody Stankowicz
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Technological Advancement ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Artificial Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
Animal Populations

Abstract Objectives To compare differences in attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of Voluntary Refusal of Foods and Fluids among disciplines and health care providers. This project is of a comparative nature in keeping with One Health paradigms, and the first of its kind. Methods A cross-sectional, incentivized, email survey of human health care providers, veterinary personnel, professional caregivers and lay persons. Questionnaire development through sequential focus groups of experts in palliative care was validated, piloted and revised accordingly. Data was acquired through Qualtrics, and analyzed with Nvivo and SPSS. Descriptives, correlations and regressions were employed, along with other non-parametric methods for analyses. The research was approved by IRB and Human Subjects Committees at the primary institution where the research was conducted. Results The demographics significantly correlated with parameters of Voluntary Refusal of Foods and Fluids (VRFF) were religiosity, education and profession. Interestingly, geographic locale, method of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration (ANH), and “patient wishes” were not influential. There was a lack of uniformity in decision-making. Age was inversely related to institution of ANH in VRFF (P < 0.001). Veterinary personnel showed far greater fiscal conservancy for treatment of VRFF (P < 0.01), and were more willing to try ANH with poor prognoses (P < 0.05) versus human healthcare providers. Caregivers were far more likely to oppose intervention in patients with VRFF (P < .0.01). Conclusions Etiology leading to VRFF was most important, as was experience with health care, death, ethics and technological advancement. Limitations include inability to show causality with cross sectional data. Further research on end of life decisions is required in light of the burgeoning geriatric population worldwide among both the human and companion animal populations. It is of great importance to conduct cross disciplinary research when an area of study is in its infancy, as is the case with VRFF. Funding Sources The project was funded through a foundation grant from Bridges to a Cure.

scholarly journals Caregiver-Reported Barriers to Quality End-of-Life Care in Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Qualitative Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 728-737
Author(s):  
Melissa J. Armstrong ◽  
Slande Alliance ◽  
Pamela Corsentino ◽  
Susan M. Maixner ◽  
Henry L. Paulson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Dementia With Lewy Bodies ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Lewy Bodies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Eol Care

Objective: This study investigated barriers to quality end-of-life (EOL) care in the context of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), one of the most common degenerative dementias in the United States. Methods: The study consisted of telephone interviews with caregivers and family members of individuals who died with DLB in the last 5 years. Interviews used a semi-structured questionnaire. Investigators employed a qualitative descriptive approach to analyze interview transcripts and identify common barriers to quality EOL care. Results: Thirty participants completed interviews. Reported barriers to quality EOL experiences in DLB pertained to the DLB diagnosis itself and factors relating to the US health-care system, facilities, hospice, and health-care providers (physicians and staff). Commonly reported barriers included lack of recognition and knowledge of DLB, lack of education regarding what to expect, poor coordination of care and communication across health-care teams and circumstances, and difficulty accessing health-care resources including skilled nursing facility placement and hospice. Conclusion: Many identified themes were consistent with published barriers to quality EOL care in dementia. However, DLB-specific EOL considerations included diagnostic challenges, lack of knowledge regarding DLB and resultant prescribing errors, difficulty accessing resources due to behavioral changes in DLB, and waiting to meet Medicare dementia hospice guidelines. Improving EOL experiences in DLB will require a multifaceted approach, starting with improving DLB recognition and provider knowledge. More research is needed to improve recognition of EOL in DLB and factors that drive quality EOL experiences.

Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members’ Experiences

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Ching Lee ◽  
Daniel P. Sulmasy ◽  
Joseph Gallo ◽  
Joan Kub ◽  
Mark T. Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillators

Introduction: Many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) experience the life-extending benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), but at the end stage of HF, patients may experience shocks with increasing frequency and change the plan for end-of-life (EOL) care including the deactivation of the ICD. This report describes family members’ experiences of patients with ICD making decisions at EOL. Understanding the decision-making of patients with ICD at EOL can promote informed decision-making and improve the quality of EOL care. Methods: This pilot study used a mixed methods approach to test the effects of a nurse-guided discussion in decision-making about ICD deactivation (turning off the defibrillation function) at the EOL. Interviews were conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed in 2012 to 2013 with 6 family members of patients with advanced HF and ICDs. Three researchers coded the data and identified themes in 2014. Results: Three main themes described family members’ experiences related to patients having HF with ICDs making health-care decision at EOL: decision-making preferences, patients’ perception on ICD deactivation, and communication methods. Discussion: Health-care providers need to have knowledge of patients’ decision-making preferences. Preferences for decision-making include the allowing of appropriate people to involve and encourages direct conversation with family members even when advance directives is completed. Information of ICD function and the option of deactivation need to be clearly delivered to patients and family members. Education and guidelines will facilitate the communication of the preferences of EOL care.

scholarly journals A descriptive analysis of end-of-life discussions for high-grade glioma patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Chikada ◽  
Sayaka Takenouchi ◽  
Yoshiki Arakawa ◽  
Kazuko Nin
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eol Care

Abstract Background End-of-life discussions (EOLDs) in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) have not been well described. Therefore, this study examined the appropriateness of timing and the extent of patient involvement in EOLDs and their impact on HGG patients. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 105 bereaved families of HGG patients at a university hospital in Japan between July and August 2019. Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to assess the association between patient participation in EOLDs and their outcomes. Results In total, 77 questionnaires were returned (response rate 73%), of which 20 respondents replied with refusal documents. Overall, 31/57 (54%) participated in EOLDs at least once in acute hospital settings, and a significant difference was observed between participating and nonparticipating groups in communicating the patient’s wishes for EOL care to the family (48% vs 8%, P = .001). Moreover, &gt;80% of respondents indicated that the initiation of EOLDs during the early diagnosis period with patients and families was appropriate. Most EOLDs were provided by neurosurgeons (96%), and other health care providers rarely participated. Additionally, patient goals and priorities were discussed in only 28% of the EOLDs. Patient participation in EOLDs was not associated with the quality of EOL care and a good death. Conclusions Although participation in EOLDs is relatively challenging for HGG patients, this study showed that participation in EOLDs may enable patients to express their wishes regarding EOL care. It is important to initiate EOLDs early on through an interdisciplinary team approach while respecting patient goals and priorities.

Views of Registered Dietitians Compared to Speech-Language Pathologists on Artificial Nutrition and Hydration at the End of Life

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912199431
Author(s):  
Molly K Bigford ◽  
Roschelle Heuberger ◽  
Erica Raymond ◽  
Viki Shayna ◽  
James Paauw
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Artificial Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
Evidenced Based ◽  
Registered Dietitian Nutritionists

Objective: To analyze and compare the knowledge and opinions of registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) about artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in a terminal illness. Beliefs of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) were also considered and compared against RDN data. Methods: This is a descriptive analysis utilizing survey responses from RDNs and SLPs regarding ANH in a case study patient with advanced dementia. Results: There was a strong belief among RDNs that ANH at end of life (EOL) would improve nutritional status, although a correlation was found between those in favor of ANH and believing it was ethical to withhold ANH at EOL (R2 = 0.109, p = 0.002). Responses indicated that SLPs need more education regarding ANH techniques, while RDNs felt ANH would improve aspiration risk. Place of employment, religion and age of respondents were also found to impact beliefs. Conclusion: Clinicians, specifically RDNs, working with patients at EOL need more evidenced-based education on the risks and benefits of ANH. Decisions regarding care of patients at EOL should be void of clinicians’ personal bias which may affect ethical treatment in the clinical setting. Further controlled trials must be performed before claims can be made regarding ANH at EOL.

Pandemic Visitation Restrictions at the End of Life

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Molly Antone ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Practices ◽  
Whole Person ◽  
Catholic Health Care

Dying today looks dramatically different than it did a century ago, largely due to wider treatment options and more specialized medical practices. Often missing from these advancements is the focus on factors relative to a patient’s total circumstances. Especially in light of the recent pandemic, it is incumbent upon Catholic health care providers to treat who whole person rather than simply focus on more utilitarian philosophies of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document