Leadership Capacity and Collective Efficacy: Interacting to Sustain Student Learning in a Professional Learning Community

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne F. Olivier ◽  
Kristine Kiefer Hipp
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Mohd Fadzil Jamil ◽  
Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah

Distributed leadership offers a new-thinking in transforming the school's leadership. Teachers' collective efficacy and professional learning community have been identified to have a strong influence on improving the teaching quality of teachers. This article examines the effects of distributed leadership of secondary school administrators on teacher collective efficacy and professional learning community. The literature suggests that distributed leadership perspective is a good alternative strategy to improve the quality of educational institutions, but empirical evidence showing the effects of distributed leadership on teachers’ collective  efficacy and professional learning community that can improve the quality of teacher’s teaching is limited. Data were collected from 592 teachers working in secondary schools in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Distributed leadership of secondary school administrators were determined with Distributed Leadership Inventory developed by Hulpia (2009) while teachers’ collective efficacy was determined using the Collective Efficacy Scales developed by Goddard and Hoy (2003) and professional learning community was determined with the School Professional Staff as Learning Community Questionnaire developed by Hord (1996). Data analysis was done based on Structural Equation Modeling using AMOS software. Regression weight, variance and squared multiple correlations tests were used in data analysis. In conclusion, a strong positive relationship was revealed between distributed leadership of secondary school administrators on teachers’ collective efficacy and professional learning community. Distributed leadership of secondary school administrators was also a significant predictor of teachers’ collective efficacy and professional learning community.


Author(s):  
Thanomwan Prasertcharoensuk ◽  
Jenphop Chaiwan ◽  
Keow Ngang Tang ◽  
Pattrawadee Makmee

This research aimed to examine the causal relationship model of primary school students’ achievement. The coverage included all types of primary public schools, namely formal and extended primary, in urban and rural areas, respectively, throughout Thailand. A survey was carried out with 1,200 school administrators and teachers from 600 schools with the intention of testing the goodness of fit of the causal relationship model with the empirical data. Results disclosed that the causal relationship model of students’ achievement were identified as congruous with empirical data, with χ2 =58.381, df = 45, χ2/df = 1.307, CFI = 1.000, TLI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.016, and SRMR = 0.007. In addition, the three main variables, namely teachers’ collective efficacy, transformational leadership, and professional learning community, significantly affected students’ achievement, directly and positively. On top of that, transformational leadership significantly affected both the variables of teachers’ collective efficacy and professional learning community; the professional learning community significantly affected teachers’ collective efficacy directly and positively. Finally, the test of invariability of the linear causal relationship model of students’ achievement indicated that the two models, in either formal primary school or extended primary, were found to have the goodness of fit with the empirical data. Results contribute significantly to knowledge by proposing the causal relationship model to provide a connection between the three key factors, namely transformational leadership, professional learning community, and teachers’ collective efficacy, to improve primary school students’ achievement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-90
Author(s):  
Sam Oh Neill

In 2003, I began a longitudinal study into the purpose of education. The process of my investigation included getting involved in new innovations as they were introduced to our school board. As I looked deeper into the purpose of schooling I discovered some startling things about how and why systems of education, through the apparatus of schooling, influence who and what, professionally, people become. I also discovered patterns related to the act of becoming that exist in school reforms. This study analyzes three reforms introduced between 2003 and 2017: Professional Learning Community, Differentiation of Instruction, and Social-Emotional Learning. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 2789-2796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sompong Samoot ◽  
Erawan Prawit ◽  
Dharm tad sa na non Sudharm

Author(s):  
Justinas Monkevicius ◽  
Renaldas Čiužas

The article presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of institutional factors of creation and development of successful teacher professional learning communities. On the basis of the conducted theoretical analysis, institutional factors were systemised and divided into four groups:factors related to organisational culture, to processes, to organisational structure, and factors related to financial and material resources.The empirical research reveals the relevance of theoretically distinguished factors to the practical processes of creation and development of successful teacher professional learning communities. It also singles out new factors that have not been investigated by other scholars and highlights the encountered barriers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document