A Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in the Emergency Department

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 774-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Losier ◽  
Tasha D. Ramsey ◽  
Kyle John Wilby ◽  
Emily K. Black
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Improve Patient

Background/Objective: To improve antimicrobial utilization, development and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in the emergency department (ED) has been recommended. The primary objective of this review was to characterize antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the ED and to identify interventions that improve patient outcomes or process of care and/or reduce consequences of antimicrobial use. Methods: This study was completed as a systematic review. The following databases were searched from inception through November, 2016: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after studies, interrupted time series studies, and repeated-measures studies evaluating AMS interventions in the ED were included in the review. Studies published in languages other than English were excluded. Results: A total of 43 studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified from our search. Patient or provider education and guideline or clinical pathway implementation were the most commonly reported interventions. Few studies reported on audit and feedback, and no study evaluated preauthorization. Impact of interventions showed variable results. Where identified, benefits of AMS interventions primarily included improvement in delivery of care or a decrease in antimicrobial utilization; however, most studies were rated as having unclear or high risk of bias. Conclusion: AMS interventions in the ED may improve patient care. However, the optimal combination of interventions is unclear. Additional studies with more rigorous design evaluating core components of AMS programs, including prospective audit and feedback are needed.

scholarly journals Leveraging Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department to Improve the Quality of Urinary Tract Infection Management and Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah C J Jorgensen ◽  
Samantha L Yeung ◽  
Mira Zurayk ◽  
Jill Terry ◽  
Maureen Dunn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Rapid Change ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Return Visits

Abstract Background The complex and fast-paced emergency department (ED) practice setting presents unique challenges that demand a tailored approach to antimicrobial stewardship. In this article, we describe the strategies applied by 1 institution’s antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) that were successful in improving prescribing practices and outcomes for urinary tract infection (UTI) in the ED. Methods Core strategies included pre-implementation research characterizing the patient population, antimicrobial resistance patterns, prescribing behavior, and morbidity related to infection; collaboration across multiple disciplines; development and implementation of a UTI treatment algorithm; education to increase awareness of the algorithm and the background and rationale supporting it; audit and feedback; and early evaluation of post-implementation outcomes. Results We observed a rapid change in prescribing post-implementation with increased empiric nitrofurantoin use and reduced cephalosporin use (P < .05). Our elevation of nitrofurantoin to firstline status was supported by our post-implementation analysis showing that its use was independently associated with reduced 30-day return visits (adjusted odds ratio, 0.547; 95% confidence interval, 0.312–0.960). Furthermore, despite a shift to a higher risk population and a corresponding decrease in antimicrobial susceptibility rates post-implementation, the preferential use of nitrofurantoin did not result in higher bug-drug mismatches while 30-day return visits to the ED remained stable. Conclusions We demonstrate that an outcomes-based ASP can impart meaningful change to knowledge and attitudes affecting prescribing practices in the ED. The success of our program may be used by other institutions as support for ASP expansion to the ED.

scholarly journals Interventions to reduce emergency department consultation time: A systematic review of the literature

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Weiwei Beckerleg ◽  
Krista Wooller ◽  
Delvina Hasimjia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Decision Time ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Consultation Process ◽  
Admission Process ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTObjectivesOvercrowding in the emergency department (ED) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Studies have shown that consultation to decision time, defined as the time when a consultation has been accepted by a specialty service to the time when disposition decision is made, is one important contributor to the overall length of stay in the ED.The primary objective of this review is to evaluate the impact of workflow interventions on consultation to decision time and ED length of stay in patients referred to consultant services in teaching centres, and to identify barriers to reducing consultation to decision time.MethodsThis systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted to identify relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL databases. Study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out by two independent reviewers.ResultsA total of nine full text articles were included in the review. All studies reported a decrease in consultation to decision time post intervention, and two studies reported cost savings. Interventions studied included short messaging service (SMS) messaging, education with audit and feedback, standardization of the admission process, implementation of institutional guideline, modification of the consultation process, and staffing schedules. Overall study quality was fair to poor.ConclusionsThe limited evidence suggests that audit and feedback in the form of SMS messaging, direct consultation to senior physicians, and standardization of the admission process may be the most effective and feasible interventions. Additional high-quality studies are required to explore sustainable interventions aimed at reducing consultation to decision time.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Inpatient Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittin Wagner ◽  
Gregory A. Filice ◽  
Dimitri Drekonja ◽  
Nancy Greer ◽  
Roderick MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
English Language ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Cochrane Library

ObjectiveEvaluate the evidence for effects of inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on patient, prescribing, and microbial outcomes.DesignSystematic review.MethodsSearch of MEDLINE (2000 through November 2013), Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. We included English language studies with patient populations relevant to the United States (ie, infectious conditions and prescriptions required for antimicrobials) that evaluated ASP interventions and reported outcomes of interest. Study characteristics and outcomes data were extracted and reviewed by investigators and trained research personnel.ResultsFew intervention types (eg, audit and feedback, guideline implementation, and decision support) substantially impacted patient outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, readmission, or incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. However, most interventions were not powered adequately to demonstrate impacts on patient outcomes. Most interventions were associated with improved prescribing patterns as measured by decreased antimicrobial use or increased appropriate use. Where reported, ASPs were generally associated with improvements in microbial outcomes, including institutional resistance patterns or resistance in the study population. Few data were provided on harms, sustainability, or key intervention components. Studies were typically of short duration, low in methodological quality, and varied in study design, populations enrolled, hospital setting, ASP intent, intervention composition and implementation, comparison group, and outcomes assessed.ConclusionsNumerous studies suggest that ASPs can improve prescribing and microbial outcomes. Strength of evidence was low, and most studies were not designed adequately to detect improvements in mortality or other patient outcomes, but obvious adverse effects on patient outcomes were not reported.

scholarly journals 105. Fluoroquinolone Stewardship at a Community Health-System: A Decade in Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S167-S167
Author(s):  
Matthew Song ◽  
Ashley Wilde ◽  
Ashley Wilde ◽  
Sarah E Moore ◽  
Brian C Bohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Adult Inpatient ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Adult Hospital

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolone stewardship is a common target for antimicrobial stewardship programs seeking to maintain or improve fluoroquinolone susceptibility rates. Additional benefits include reducing C. difficile infection rates, drug toxicities, and resistance to other antimicrobials as fluoroquinolones can co-select for resistance. The Norton Healthcare antimicrobial stewardship program was founded in 2011 and provides services at 4 adult hospitals with ~1600 beds. Main fluoroquinolone stewardship activities have included provider education, prospective audit and feedback, and guideline and order-set development. The purpose of this study was to describe the resistance and usage rates of fluoroquinolones over time. Methods This was a descriptive study examining individual adult hospital antibiograms from 2010 to 2020. Levofloxacin susceptibility rates to E. coli and P. aeruginosa were collated from annual antibiograms between 2010 and 2020 for outpatients and each adult hospital. Adult hospital resistance rates were aggregated and weighted accordingly to number of isolates per hospital per year. Additionally, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin inpatient days of therapy (DOT) was collected since 2016 when DOT was first readily retrievable and was normalized per 1000 patient days to compare between different time points. Results Outpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against P. aeruginosa improved from 81% to 91%. Outpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against E. coli remained stable between 84 – 86% (Figure 1). Adult inpatient fluoroquinolone usage decreased by approximately 75% from 83.5 to 21.37 DOT/1000 patient days since 2016 (Figure 2). Adult inpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against P. aeruginosa improved from 53% to 83%. Adult inpatient levofloxacin likelihood of activity against E. coli improved from 65% to 75% (Figure 3). Conclusion The Norton Healthcare antimicrobial stewardship program has been effective in reducing unnecessary fluoroquinolone usage and improving inpatient fluoroquinolone susceptibility rates. Future studies should examine opportunities to translate successes to the outpatient phase of care. Disclosures Ashley Wilde, PharmD, BCPS-AQ ID, Nothing to disclose Paul S. Schulz, MD, Gilead (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Consultant, Speaker’s Bureau)

scholarly journals 1141. Implementation of a Pediatric Handshake Antimicrobial Stewardship Program to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S406-S406
Author(s):  
Amanda P Hughes ◽  
Maya Beganovic ◽  
Ronda Oram ◽  
Sarah Wieczorkiewicz ◽  
Anthony Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Antimicrobial Utilization ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acceptance Rates ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs emerged in response to rising rates of resistance and adverse effects associated with inappropriate antimicrobial utilization. Optimal metrics and strategies (e.g., preauthorization, prospective audit and feedback) for AMS remain to be elucidated. This study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary, rounding-based AMS strategy (i.e., Handshake Stewardship) on antimicrobial utilization and prescribing practices at a pediatric hospital. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective quality improvement study at a community, teaching children’s hospital. All pediatric and neonatal inpatients with active antimicrobial orders between July 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study, and endpoints were compared with data from July 2017- March 2018. Antimicrobial courses were prospectively audited by a multidisciplinary AMS team, and feedback was provided to the primary teams during Handshake Stewardship rounds. The primary endpoint was a number of interventions made and the corresponding acceptance rates. The secondary endpoint was days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. Descriptive statistics were performed on all continuous and categorical data as appropriate. Results Of 2238 antimicrobial courses reviewed, 710 (32%) required intervention, and 86% of the interventions made were accepted. The top 3 indications evaluated were respiratory (n = 522, 23%), sepsis/bacteremia (n = 351, 16%), and surgical prophylaxis (n = 266, 12%). Of the respiratory courses reviewed, there were 228 opportunities for antimicrobial optimization. The most common interventions were: bug-drug optimization (n = 208, 29%), discontinuation of anti-infective (n = 136, 19%), and dose optimization (n = 120, 17%). No significant difference was observed for overall, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and vancomycin DOT pre- and post-implementation of Handshake Stewardship. However, a statistically significant reduction in DOTs was observed for piperacillin–tazobactam (15.2 vs. 7.4, P = 0.004) and a nonsignificant reduction in meropenem (9.5 vs. 6.2). Conclusion Rounding-based, Handshake AMS was associated with overall high intervention acceptance rates and a reduction in commonly utilized broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Inpatient Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittin Wagner ◽  
Gregory A. Filice ◽  
Dimitri Drekonja ◽  
Nancy Greer ◽  
Roderick MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
English Language ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Cochrane Library

ObjectiveEvaluate the evidence for effects of inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) on patient, prescribing, and microbial outcomes.DesignSystematic review.MethodsSearch of MEDLINE (2000 through November 2013), Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. We included English language studies with patient populations relevant to the United States (ie, infectious conditions and prescriptions required for antimicrobials) that evaluated ASP interventions and reported outcomes of interest. Study characteristics and outcomes data were extracted and reviewed by investigators and trained research personnel.ResultsFew intervention types (eg, audit and feedback, guideline implementation, and decision support) substantially impacted patient outcomes, including mortality, length of stay, readmission, or incidence ofClostridium difficileinfection. However, most interventions were not powered adequately to demonstrate impacts on patient outcomes. Most interventions were associated with improved prescribing patterns as measured by decreased antimicrobial use or increased appropriate use. Where reported, ASPs were generally associated with improvements in microbial outcomes, including institutional resistance patterns or resistance in the study population. Few data were provided on harms, sustainability, or key intervention components. Studies were typically of short duration, low in methodological quality, and varied in study design, populations enrolled, hospital setting, ASP intent, intervention composition and implementation, comparison group, and outcomes assessed.ConclusionsNumerous studies suggest that ASPs can improve prescribing and microbial outcomes. Strength of evidence was low, and most studies were not designed adequately to detect improvements in mortality or other patient outcomes, but obvious adverse effects on patient outcomes were not reported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document