How Leading Hospitals Operationalize Evidence-Based Readmission Reduction Strategies: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Study Using Systematic Review and Survey Design

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-537
Author(s):  
Bita A. Kash ◽  
Juha Baek ◽  
Ohbet Cheon ◽  
Joanna-Grace Mayo Manzano ◽  
Stephen L. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Md Anderson

Although various interventions targeted at reducing hospital readmissions have been identified in the literature, little is known about actual operationalization of such evidence-based interventions. This study conducted a systematic review and a survey of key informants in 2 leading hospitals, Houston Methodist (HM) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), to compare and contrast the most cited evidence-based interventions in the current literature with interventions reported by those hospitals. The authors found that both hospitals followed evidence-based practices reported as successful in the literature. Both hospitals have implemented interventions for inpatient settings, and the timing of interventions was very similar. Major implementation differences observed for post-discharge interventions focused on collaboration. It also was found that HM was more likely than MDACC to use medication reconciliation in outpatient ( P = .018) and discharge planning for community/home patients ( P = .032). Results will provide hospital professionals with insights for implementing the most effective interventions to reduce readmissions.

scholarly journals Successful hospital readmission reduction initiatives: Top five strategies to consider implementing today

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bita A. Kash ◽  
Juha Baek ◽  
Ohbet Cheon ◽  
Nana E. Coleman ◽  
Stephen L. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Hospital Readmission Rates ◽  
Weighted Means ◽  
Pubmed Database

Only one quarter of U.S. hospitals demonstrated low enough levels of 30 day readmission rates to avoid penalties imposed by the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2016. Previous work describes interventions for reducing hospital readmission rates; however, without a comprehensive analysis of these interventions, healthcare leaders cannot prioritize strategies for implementation within their healthcare environment. This comparative study identifies the most effective interventions to reduce unplanned 30-day readmissions. The MEDLINE-PubMed database was used to conduct a systematic review of existing literature about interventions for 30-day readmission reduction published from 2006 through 2017. Data were extracted on hospital type, setting, disease type, intervention type, study sample, and impact level. Of 4,886 citations, 508 articles were reviewed in full-text, and 90 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the three analytic methodologies of means, weighted means, and pooled estimated impact level, the most effective interventions to reduce unplanned 30-day admissions were identified as collaboration with clinical teams and/or community providers, post-discharge home visits, telephone follow-up calls, patient/family education, and discharge planning. Commonly, all five interventions identify patient level engagement for success. The findings reveal the need for shared accountability towards desired outcomes among health systems, providers, and patients while providing hospital leaders with actionable strategies that can effectively reduce 30-day readmission rates.

Potentially Preventable Hospital Readmissions After Patients’ First Stroke—A National Population-Based Study In Taiwan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling-Jan Chiou ◽  
Hui-Chu Lang
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Important Indicator

Abstract Readmission is an important indicator of the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to explore the probabilities and predictors of 30-day and 1-year potentially preventable hospital readmission (PPR) after a patient’s first stroke. We used claims data from the National Health Insurance (NHI) from 2010 to 2018. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of 30-day and 1-year PPR. A total of 41,921 discharged stroke patients was identified. We found that hospital readmission rates were 15.48% within 30-days and 47.25% within 1-year. The PPR and non-PPR were 9.84% (4,123) and 5.65% (2,367) within 30-days, and 30.65% (12,849) and 16.60% (6,959) within 1-year, respectively. The factors of older patients, type of stroke, shorter length of stay, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), higher stroke severity index (SSI), hospital level, hospital ownership, and urbanization level were associated significantly with the 30-day PPR. In addition, the factors of gender, hospitalization year, and monthly income were associated significantly with 1-year PPR. The results showed that better discharge planning and post-discharge follow-up programs could reduce PPR substantially. Also, implementing a post-acute care program for stroke patients has helped reduce the long-term PPR in Taiwan.

Nonpharmacological Interventions to Prevent Delirium: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. Rivosecchi ◽  
Pamela L. Smithburger ◽  
Susan Svec ◽  
Shauna Campbell ◽  
Sandra L. Kane-Gill
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Inpatient Settings ◽  
Stay Hospital ◽  
Critical Care Patients

Development of delirium in critical care patients is associated with increased length of stay, hospital costs, and mortality. Delirium occurs across all inpatient settings, although critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at the highest risk. Overall, evidence to support the use of antipsychotics to either prevent or treat delirium is lacking, and these medications can have adverse effects. The pain, agitation, and delirium guidelines of the American College of Critical Care Medicine provide the strongest level of recommendation for the use of nonpharmacological approaches to prevent delirium, but questions remain about which nonpharmacological interventions are beneficial.

scholarly journals Interventions to address medication-related causes of hospital readmissions: A scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Nathan W. Carroll ◽  
Reena Joseph ◽  
Neeraj Puro
Keyword(s):  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Reduction Strategies ◽  
Intervention Patient

Unplanned readmissions pose a tremendous burden on patients, providers, and payers.  A significant proportion of readmissions are medication-related.  Despite the availability of literature regarding hospital-level strategies to reduce readmissions, little has been written about strategies aimed at medication-related readmissions.  We sought to identify successful readmission reduction strategies by performing a scoping literature review of research published between 2000 and 2017.  We identified 21 studies that met our inclusion criteria.  From these studies, we identified 7 components frequently employed as a part of interventions to reduce medication-related readmissions: discharge planning, discharge education, post-discharge telephone calls, the use of a professional coordinator with clinical training to administer the intervention, patient education efforts, provider training efforts, and medication reconciliation.  Thirty-eight percent of all the interventions identified were associated with a statistically significant reduction in readmissions.  Of the 7 common intervention components we identified, none were consistently associated with intervention success in the full sample.  However, interventions implemented by inpatient hospitals, in particular academic medical centers, had a higher success rate than interventions implemented by other providers.   We examined a subsample of larger studies and found that discharge planning and medication reconciliation components were included in most of the successful interventions.  Future research should look beyond simply identifying components included in an intervention and should instead seek to identify contextual factors that enable or inhibit the success of these components.  Research examining discharge planning and medication reconciliation efforts will be particularly important.

scholarly journals Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coffey ◽  
Leahy-Warren ◽  
Savage ◽  
Hegarty ◽  
Cornally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Term Care ◽  
At Home

Increasing pressure on limited healthcare resources has necessitated the development of measures promoting early discharge and avoiding inappropriate hospital (re)admission. This systematic review examines the evidence for interventions in acute hospitals including (i) hospital-patient discharge to home, community services or other settings, (ii) hospital discharge to another care setting, and (iii) reduction or prevention of inappropriate hospital (re)admissions. Academic electronic databases were searched from 2005 to 2018. In total, ninety-four eligible papers were included. Interventions were categorized into: (1) pre-discharge exclusively delivered in the acute care hospital, (2) pre- and post-discharge delivered by acute care hospital, (3) post-discharge delivered at home and (4) delivered only in a post-acute facility. Mixed results were found regarding the effectiveness of many types of interventions. Interventions exclusively delivered in the acute hospital pre-discharge and those involving education were most common but their effectiveness was limited in avoiding (re)admission. Successful pre- and post-discharge interventions focused on multidisciplinary approaches. Post-discharge interventions exclusively delivered at home reduced hospital stay and contributed to patient satisfaction. Existing systematic reviews on tele-health and long-term care interventions suggest insufficient evidence for admission avoidance. The most effective interventions to avoid inappropriate re-admission to hospital and promote early discharge included integrated systems between hospital and the community care, multidisciplinary service provision, individualization of services, discharge planning initiated in hospital and specialist follow-up.

Hospital readmissions in frail older people

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Craven ◽  
Simon Conroy
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Older People ◽  
Discharge Planning ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Nutritional Interventions ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Poor Functional Status ◽  
The Cochrane Library

SummaryThe majority of hospital in-patients are older people, and many of these are at increased risk of readmission, which can be an adverse outcome for the patient. Currently there is poor understanding as to how best to reduce the risk of readmission. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library for high quality review articles about readmissions. Each review was quality assessed by two reviewers. Grouped data and evidence from original papers is cited with 95% confidence intervals when possible. Nine review studies of sufficient quality were included. Two addressed risk factors for readmission, which included: age, poor functional status prior to admission, length of stay during the index admission, depression, cognitive impairment, malnutrition, social support and social networks/support. The seven other reviews addressed interventions to reduce readmission, which included: discharge planning, post-discharge support, post-discharge case management, and nutritional supplementation. It is possible to identify older people at risk of readmission using well-established risk factors; discharge planning, post-discharge support and nutritional interventions appear to be effective in reducing readmission. Combined interventions appear to be more effective than isolated interventions.

scholarly journals Decreasing Readmissions in Medically Complex Children

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Colleen Bartlett
Keyword(s):  
Medication Reconciliation ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Practice Problem ◽  
Telephone Calls

Practice Problem: There was a report of an existing practice problem of increased 30-day readmission rates in medically complex children at an outpatient clinic within an extensive hospital system. Hospital readmissions can cause clinical, social, and financial burdens to the patients and their families and thus reflected a need for interventions to reduce readmissions. PICOT: The PICOT question that guided this change project: In medically complex pediatric patients ages 0-17, what is the effect of a discharge intervention bundle in reducing all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions compared to current practice within an 8-week timeframe? Evidence: The literature revealed 18 pertinent studies that fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria that promoted a discharge intervention bundle. The themes within the evidence included post-discharge telephone calls, follow-up appointments, medication reconciliation, and education with teach-back to reduce overall readmission rates. Intervention: The evidence-based intervention utilized the bundle of post-discharge telephone calls within 72 hours, follow up appointments within 7 days, and medication reconciliation with education and teach-back through in-person and virtual care. The clinic nurses championed the intervention and tracked all the data using a check sheet. Outcome: Evaluation of the outcome measures confirmed a decrease in all-cause 30-day readmissions from 23% to 14.5% within the project timeframe. Implications of the findings support the existing evidence for implementing a multifaceted bundle to decrease readmissions. Conclusion: The evidence-based change project decreased all-cause 30-day readmissions rates. The results of the project proved that implementing consistent discharge standards in medically complex children helped guide medical staff, improved patient outcomes, saved costs to the organization, and reduced 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions.

Systematic review methodology for development: An example from microfinance

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Van Rooyen ◽  
Ruth Stewart ◽  
Thea De Wet
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
International Development ◽  
Health Sector ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Systematic Review Methodology ◽  
Development Interventions ◽  
The Us ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Evidence Based Decision Making

Big international development donors such as the UK’s Department for International Development and USAID have recently started using systematic review as a methodology to assess the effectiveness of various development interventions to help them decide what is the ‘best’ intervention to spend money on. Such an approach to evidence-based decision-making has long been practiced in the health sector in the US, UK, and elsewhere but it is relatively new in the development field. In this article we use the case of a systematic review of the impact of microfinance on the poor in sub-Saharan African to indicate how systematic review as a methodology can be used to assess the impact of specific development interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document